128
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
REVIEW

Is It Possible for Light-Based Hair Removal Home Devices to Induce Ocular Damage? Systematic Review

, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 3731-3742 | Received 03 Oct 2023, Accepted 17 Dec 2023, Published online: 22 Dec 2023

References

  • Town G, Ash C, Dierickx C, Fritz K, Bjerring P, Haedersdal M. Guidelines on the safety of light-based home-use hair removal devices from the European society for laser dermatology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(7):799–811. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04406.x
  • Juhász MLW, Levin MK, Marmur ES. A review of available laser and intense light source home devices: a dermatologist’s perspective. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017;16(4):438–443. doi:10.1111/jocd.12371
  • Lyngå C, Urban D. Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: Summary of Research and Policy Options. First. (Wood AW, Karipidis K, Eds). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2017.
  • Town G, V. BN, Uzunbajakava NE, et al. Light-based home-use devices for hair removal: why do they work and how effective they are? Lasers Surg Med. 2019;51(6):481–490. doi:10.1002/lsm.23061
  • Cohen M, Austin E, Masub N, Kurtti A, George C, Jagdeo J. Home-based devices in dermatology: a systematic review of safety and efficacy. Arch Dermatol Res. 2022;314(3):239–246. doi:10.1007/s00403-021-02231-0
  • Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, et al. Explanation of the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels of evidence (background document). Available from: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/explanation-of-The-2011-ocebm-levels-of-evidence/. Accessed December 21, 2023.
  • Thaysen-Petersen D, Bjerring P, Dierickx C, Nash JF, Town G, Haedersdal M. A systematic review of light-based home-use devices for hair removal and considerations on human safety. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(5):545–553. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04353.x
  • FDA. Laser products and instruments. radiation-emitting products; 2023. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/home-business-and-entertainment-products/laser-products-and-instruments. Accessed July 24, 2023.
  • IEC. Safety of laser products - part 1: equipment classification and requirements. IEC 60825-1, international standard; 2014. Available from: https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/3587. Accessed July 24, 2023.
  • Kelechava B. Laser safety: class 1, 1C, 1M, 2, 2M, 3R, 3B, and 4. Available from: https://blog.ansi.org/2018/09/laser-class-safety-1-1c-1m-2-2m-3r-3b-4/#gref. Accessed December 21, 2023.
  • Malayanur D, Mysore VN. Laser safety eyewear. CosmoDerma. 2022;2:24. doi:10.25259/CSDM_15_2022
  • JBI. JBI’s critical appraisal tools, checklist for case reports. Available from: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools. Accessed December 21, 2023.
  • Brilakis HS, Holland EJ. Diode-laser–induced cataract and iris atrophy as a complication of eyelid hair removal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137(4):762–763. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2003.09.043
  • Carrancho García A, Garrote Llordén A, Cordero Coma M. Ocular complications secondary to diode laser-assisted eyebrow epilation. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2022;97(3):172–175. doi:10.1016/j.oftal.2020.09.006
  • Chang CY, Sheu SJ. Choroidal neovascularization secondary to intense pulsed light injury. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;34(4):e129–e131. doi:10.1097/IOP.0000000000001142
  • Crabb M, Chan WO, Taranath D, Huilgol SC. Intense pulsed light therapy (IPL) induced iritis following treatment for a medial canthal capillary malformation. Australas J Dermatol. 2014;55(4):289–291. doi:10.1111/ajd.12137
  • Pang ALY, Wells K. Bilateral anterior uveitis after intense pulsed light therapy for pigmented eyelid lesions. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(9):1276–1279. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2008.34274.x
  • Javey G, Schwartz SG, Albini TA. Ocular complication of intense pulsed light therapy: Iris photoablation. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(9):1466–1468. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01661.x
  • Halkiadakis I, Skouriotis S, Stefanaki C, et al. Iris atrophy and posterior synechiae as a complication of eyebrow laser epilation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(2):S4–S5. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2006.07.024
  • Herbold TM, Busse H, Uhlig CE. Bilateral cataract and corectopia after laser eyelid epilation. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(9):1634–1635. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.03.032
  • Jewsbury H, Morgan F. Uveitis and iris photoablation secondary to intense pulsed light therapy. Can J Ophthalmol. 2012;47(4):e13–e14. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.01.019
  • Hong S, Lee JR, Lim T. Pigment deposition of cosmetic contact lenses on the cornea after intense pulsed-light treatment. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2010;24(6):367. doi:10.3341/kjo.2010.24.6.367
  • Lee WW, Murdock J, Albini TA, O’Brien TP, Levine ML. Ocular damage secondary to intense pulse light therapy to the face. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;27(4):263–265. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e31820c6e23
  • Maganti N, Kalbag NS, Gill MK. Macular hole formation associated with intense pulsed light therapy. Retin Cases Brief Rep. 2022;16(2):161–164. doi:10.1097/ICB.0000000000000947
  • Rho NK, Sa HS. Bilateral acute anterior uveitis after intense pulsed light treatment. Med Lasers. 2016;5(2):101–103. doi:10.25289/ML.2016.5.2.101
  • Nordqvist C, Fracheboud S, Guex-Crosier Y. Intense pulsed light eyebrow epilation and Iris lesion. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2018;235(04):450–452. doi:10.1055/s-0043-124468
  • Durmus Ece BS. Macular burn secondary to diode laser epilation. Can J Ophthalmol. 2023;58(2):e95–e97. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2022.07.011
  • Passos ÂF, Borges DF. Iris atrophy after aesthetic treatment with intense pulsed light. Rev Bras Oftalmol. 2012;71(3):191–193. doi:10.1590/S0034-72802012000300010
  • Wessely D, Lieb W. Okuläre Komplikationen bei Diodenlaserepilation im Gesichtsbereich [Ocular complications of diode laser epilation in the area of the face. Loss of pupillary symmetry and pigment layer defect as well as coagulation of the ciliary body with intraocular inflammation caused by laser treatment]. Der Ophthalmologe. 2002;99(1):60–61. doi:10.1007/PL00007119
  • Sheikh A, Hodge W, Coupland S. Diode laser-induced uveitis and visual field defect. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;23(4):321–323. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e3180a6f296
  • Jalian HR, Jalian CA, Avram MM. Common causes of injury and legal action in laser surgery. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(2):188. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.1384
  • Town G, Ash C, Eadie E, Moseley H. Measuring key parameters of intense pulsed light (IPL) devices. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2007;9(3):148–160. doi:10.1080/14764170701435297
  • Eadie E, Miller P, Goodman T, Moseley H. Assessment of the optical radiation hazard from a home-use intense pulsed light (IPL) source. Lasers Surg Med. 2009;41(7):534–539. doi:10.1002/lsm.20801
  • Birtel J, Harmening WM, Krohne TU, Holz FG, Charbel Issa P, Herrmann P. Retinal injury following laser pointer exposure. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;114(49):831–837. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2003.09.043
  • Hattersley AM, Kiernan M, Goldberg D, et al. Assessment of adverse events for a home‐use intense pulsed light hair removal device using postmarketing surveillance. Lasers Surg Med. 2023;55(4):414–422. doi:10.1002/lsm.23650
  • FDA. 510(k) premarket notification; 2023. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPMN/pmn.cfm. Accessed August 22, 2023.
  • Juhasz M, Zachary C, Cohen JL. Ocular complications after laser or light-based therapy—dangers dermatologists should know. Dermatologic Surg. 2021;47(5):624–629. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000002974