CBCT Analysis of Edentulous Mandibular Symphysis in Iraqi Patients for Treatment with Implant-Supported Overdentures. Cross-Sectional Single-Center Study

References

• Guljé F, Raghoebar GM, Ter Meulen JW, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Mandibular overdentures supported by 6-mm dental implants: a 1-year prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(Suppl 1):59–66. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00358.x
   Google Scholar
• Thomason JM, Lund JP, Chehade A, Feine JS. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16(5):467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, et al. Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients-the York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J. 2009;207(4):185–186. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imre MM, Marin M, Preoteasa E, Tancu A, Preoteasa C. Two implant overdenture–The first alternative treatment for patients with complete edentulous mandible. J Med Life. 2011;4(2):207.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP. A systematic review of post‐extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 5):1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02375.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrot O, Vacher C, Merrot S, Godlewski G, Frigard B, Goudot P. Changes in the edentate mandible in the elderly. Surg Radiol Anat. 2005;27(4):265–270. doi:10.1007/s00276-005-0323-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossell J, Puigdollers A, Girabent-Farrés M. A simple method for measuring thickness of gingiva and labial bone of mandibular incisors. Quintessence Int. 2015;46(3):265–271. doi:10.3290/j.qi.a32919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira RC, Leles CR, Normanha LM, Lindh C, Ribeiro-Rotta RF. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;105(2):231–238. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozé J, Babu S, Saffarzadeh A, Gayet-Delacroix M, Hoornaert A, Layrolle P. Correlating implant stability to bone structure. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(10):1140–1145. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01745.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim SW, Rafeeq AK, Ahmedhamdi MS. Histomorphometric assessment of implant coated with mixture of nano-alumina and fluorapatite in rabbits. Saudi Dent J. 2021;33(8):1142–1148. doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets R, Stadlinger B, Schwarz F, et al. Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6285620. doi:10.1155/2016/6285620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the international congress of oral implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent. 2012;21(2):78–86. doi:10.1097/ID.0b013e31824885b5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ghurabi ZH, Mohammed HB, Hassan TAL. Presurgical Assessment of Anatomical Landmark Position Using Two Views of Cone Beam Computed Tomography: a Comparative Radiological Study. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(2):165–168. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000008182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan NA, Al-Jaboori ASK, Al-Radha ASD. Evaluation of Cortical Bone Thickness of Posterior Implant Sites Using CBCT in Iraqi Population. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:5723397. doi:10.1155/2022/5723397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Saedi A, Al-Bakhakh B, Al-Taee RG. Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography to Determine the Prevalence of the Second Mesiobuccal Canal in Maxillary First Molar Teeth in a Sample of an Iraqi Population. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020;12:505–514. doi:10.2147/CCIDE.S281159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mense C, Saliba-Serre B, Ferrandez AM, Hüe O, Ruquet M, Lalys L. Cone beam computed tomography analysis of the edentulous mandibular symphysis. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(1):115–122. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanai M, Yamaguchi T, Maki K. Cone-beam Computed Tomography evaluation of mandibular symphysis. Dental Med Res. 2011;31(1):16–23. doi:10.7881/dentalmedres.31.16
   Google Scholar
• Abdul-Qadir MY. Assessment of anterior alveolar bone dimensions in adolescents and adults with class I normal occlusion. Al–Rafidain Dent J. 2014;14(2):161–172. doi:10.33899/rden.2014.160887
   Google Scholar
• Uysal T, Yagci A, Ozer T, Veli I, Ozturk A. Mandibular anterior bony support and incisor crowding: is there a relationship? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142(5):645–653. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marghalani HYA, Guan G, Hyun P, Tabbaa S, Linjawi AI, Al-Jewair T. Relationship between mandibular symphysis dimensions and skeletal pattern in adults. Folia Morphol. 2022;81(2):464–471. doi:10.5603/FM.a2021.0045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Khateeb SN, Al Maaitah EF, Abu Alhaija ES, Badran SA. Mandibular symphysis morphology and dimensions in different anteroposterior jaw relationships. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(2):304–309. doi:10.2319/030513-185.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez Y, García-Sanz V, Zamora N, et al. Associations between mandibular symphysis form and craniofacial structures. Oral Radiol. 2018;34(2):161–171. doi:10.1007/s11282-017-0292-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arruda KEM, Valladares Neto J, Almeida GA. Assessment of the mandibular symphysis of Caucasian Brazilian adults with well-balanced faces and normal occlusion: the influence of gender and facial type. Dental Press J Orthod. 2012;17(3):40–50. doi:10.1590/S2176-94512012000300012
   Google Scholar
• Ghalib ZA, Agha NF. Evaluation of mandibular symphysis area among Iraqi adolescent. Int J Enhanced Res Sci Tech Eng. 2016;5(10):52–57.
   Google Scholar
• Linjawi AI, Afify AR, Baeshen HA, Birkhed D, Zawawi KH. Mandibular symphysis dimensions in different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(1):280–285. doi:10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.09.062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koç A, Erdem R. Evaluating posterior edentulous mandible alveolar crest dimensions by cone beam computed tomography. Eastern J Med. 2020;25(3):345–349. doi:10.5505/ejm.2020.24471
   Google Scholar
• Fayed MM, Pazera P, Katsaros C. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(5):939–951. doi:10.2319/121009-709.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swasty D, Lee JS, Huang JC, et al. Anthropometric analysis of the human mandibular cortical bone as assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:491–500. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srebrzyńska-Witek A, Koszowski R, Różyło-Kalinowska I. Relationship between anterior mandibular bone thickness and the angulation of incisors and canines-a CBCT study. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(3):1567–1578. doi:10.1007/s00784-017-2255-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunder U. Crestal ridge width changes when placing implants at the time of tooth extraction with and without soft tissue augmentation after a healing period of 6 months: report of 24 consecutive cases. Int J Periodontics& Restorative Dent. 2011;31(1):9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Ekrish AA, Widmann G, Alfadda SA. Revised, computed tomography-based Lekholm and Zarb jawbone quality classification. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31(4):342–345. doi:10.11607/ijp.5714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park HS, Lee YJ, Jeong SH, Kwon TG. Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(1):30–37. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae JM, Gousman J, Seo JW, Bay RC, Jue SS, Park JH. A retrospective CBCT study of the relationship between mandibular symphysis bone density and mandibular growth direction. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;44(5):356–365. doi:10.17796/1053-4625-44.5.11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alnoori DNM, Al-Adili DSS, Alnuaimi DAS. Evaluation of related factors affecting stability and survival rate of dental implants (meta-analysis of retrospective study). MDJ. 2018;15(1):105–121.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner UH. Bone remodeling in post-menopausal osteoporosis. J Dent Res. 2006;85(7):584–595. doi:10.1177/154405910608500703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Weijden F, Dell’Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(12):1048–1058. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01482.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 5):1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar