The Classification and Selection of Adhesive Agents; an Overview for the General Dentist

References

• Cardoso J, Almeida P, Negrao R, et al. Clinical guidelines for posterior restorations based on coverage, adhesion, resistance, esthetics, and subgingival management the CARES concept: part I – partial adhesive restorations. Int J Esthet Dent. 2023;18(3):244–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O´Connor C, Gavriil D. Predictable bonding of adhesive indirect restorations: factors for success. Br Dent J. 2021;231(5):287–293. doi:10.1038/s41415-021-3336-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso MV, De Almeida Neves A, Mine A, et al. Current aspects on bonding effectiveness and stability in adhesive dentistry. Aust Dent J. 2011;56(1 Suppl):31–44. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01294.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perdigão J. Current perspectives on dental adhesion: (1) Dentin adhesion – not there yet. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2020;56(1):190–207. doi:10.1016/j.jdsr.2020.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frencken JE, Peters MC, Manton DJ, Leal SC, Gordan VV, Eden E. Minimal intervention dentistry for managing dental caries – a review Report of a FDI task group *. Int Dent J. 2012;62(5):223–243. doi:10.1111/idj.12007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Wang Q, Zhao J, Zhao B, Ma Z, Zhang C. Adhesion of Teeth. Front Mater. 2021;7:1–11. doi:10.3389/fmats.2020.615225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol. 2017;8(1):1–17. doi:10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebold M, André CB, Sahadi BO, Breschi L, Giannini M. Chronological history and current advancements of dental adhesive systems development: a narrative review. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2021;35(18):1941–1967. doi:10.1080/01694243.2020.1865611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers JM, Farah J. Technique sensitivity in bonding to enamel and dentin. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010;31:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kazak M, Donmez N. Development of dentin bonding systems from past to present. Bezmialem Sci. 2019;7(4):322–330. doi:10.14235/bas.galenos.2019.3102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28(3):215–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashley DH, Tay FR, Breschi L, et al. State of the art etch-and-rinse adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):1–34. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.016.State
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):17–28. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigão J. Universal dental adhesives: current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2019;107(6):2121–2131. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.34305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Tjäderhane L, Breschi L, et al. Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. J Dent Res. 2011;90(8):953–968. doi:10.1177/0022034510391799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz-Ruiz AJ, de Dios Teruel-Fernández J, Alcolea-Rubio LA, Hernández-Fernández A, Martínez-Beneyto Y, Gispert-Guirado F. Structural differences in enamel and dentin in human, bovine, porcine, and ovine teeth. Ann Anat. 2018;218:7–17. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2017.12.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater. 2008;24(1):90–101. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2007.02.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J. Recent advances in the theory and mechanism of adhesive resin bonding to dentin: a critical review. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2009;88(2):558–578. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.31253
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scotti N, Cavalli G, Gagliani M, Breschi L. New adhesives and bonding techniques. Why and when? Int J Esthet Dent. 2017;12(4):524–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto M, Nagano F, Endo K, Ohno H. A review: biodegradation of resin-dentin bonds. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2011;47(1):5–12. doi:10.1016/j.jdsr.2010.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Cerci BB, Roman LS, Guariza-Filho O, Camargo ES, Tanaka OM. Dental enamel roughness with different acid etching times: atomic force microscopy study. Eur J Gen Dent. 2012;1(03):187–191. doi:10.4103/2278-9626.105385
   Google Scholar
• Perdigão J, Araujo E, Ramos RQ, Gomes G, Pizzolotto L. Adhesive dentistry: current concepts and clinical considerations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(1):51–68. doi:10.1111/jerd.12692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho RM, Manso AP, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):72–86. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdigão J, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Dentin adhesion and MMPs: a comprehensive review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25(4):219–241. doi:10.1111/jerd.12016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanca J. Improving bond strength through acid etching of dentin and bonding to wet dentin surfaces. J Am Dent Assoc. 1992;123(9):35–43. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1992.0248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwinnett A. Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent. 1992;5(3):127–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pereira GDDS, Alexandre L, Paulillo MS, De Goes MF, Dias CTDS. How wet should dentin be? Comparison of methods to remove excess water during moist bonding. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3(3):257–264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ekambaram M, Yiu CKY, Matinlinna JP. An overview of solvents in resin-dentin bonding. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2015;57:22–33. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007;28(26):3757–3785. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashley DH, Tay FR, Carvalho RM, et al. From dry bonding to water-wet bonding to ethanol-wet bonding. A review of the interactions between dentin matrix and solvated resins using a macromodel of the hybrid layer. Am J Dent. 2007;20(1):7–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SHY. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free, acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater. 1996;12(4):236–244. doi:10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80029-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SHY. Relation between water content in acetone/alcohol-based primer and interfacial ultrastructure. J Dent. 1998;26(2):147–156. doi:10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00090-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalheiro A, Cruz J, Sousa B, et al. Dentin adhesives application deviations: effects on permeability and nanoleakage. Dent Mater J. 2021;40(5):1160–1168. doi:10.4012/dmj.2020-404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreafico D, Semeraro S, Mezzanzanica D, et al. The effect of the air-blowing step on the technique sensitivity of four different adhesive systems. J Dent. 2006;34(3):237–244. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2005.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Prosperi GD, et al. The influence of adhesive thickness on the microtensile bond strength of three adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent. 2009;11(2):109–115. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a15322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loguercio AD, Luque-Martinez I, Muñoz MA, Szesz AL, Cuadros-Sánchez J, Reis A. A comprehensive laboratory screening of three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives. Oper Dent. 2014;39(6):652–662. doi:10.2341/13-236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005;21(9):864–881. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannini M, Makishi P, Ayres APA, et al. Self-Etch adhesive systems: a literature review. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(1):3–10. doi:10.1590/0103-6440201302442
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sato T, Takagaki T, Hatayama T, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Update on Enamel Bonding Strategies. Front Dent Med. 2021;2:1–10. doi:10.3389/fdmed.2021.666379
   Google Scholar
• Szesz A, Parreiras S, Reis A, Loguercio A. Selective enamel etching in cervical lesions for self-etch adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;53:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2016.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshiro K, Sidhu SK, Inoue S, Ikeda T, Sano H. New concept of resin-dentin interfacial adhesion: the nanointeraction zone. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2006;77(2):401–408. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.30450
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scholz KJ, Bittner A, Cieplik F, et al. Micromorphology of the adhesive interface of self-adhesive resin cements to enamel and dentin. Materials. 2021;14(3):1–15. doi:10.3390/ma14030492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salz U, Zimmermann J, Zeuner F, Moszner N. Hydrolytic stability of self-etching adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7(2):107–116. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a10282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peumans M, De Munck J, Mine A, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review. Dent Mater. 2014;30(10):1089–1103. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arandi NZ, Thabet M. The clinical effectiveness of adhesive agents in posterior restorations: which adhesive strategy performs better? J Oral Res Rev. 2021;13(1):65–70. doi:10.4103/jorr.jorr_25_20
   Google Scholar
• Perdigão J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Anauate-Netto C, et al. Two-year clinical evaluation of self-etching adhesives in posterior restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2009;11(2):149–159. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a15327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis A, Leite TM, Matte K, et al. Improving clinical retention of one-step self-etching adhesive systems with an additional hydrophobic adhesive layer. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140(7):877–885. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Landuyt KV, Mine A, de Munck J, et al. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2009;11(3):175–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadek FT, Goracci C, Cardoso P, Tay F, Ferarri M. Microtensile bond strength of current dentin adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7(4):297–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanares AME, Itthagarun A, King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater. 2001;17(6):542–556. doi:10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00016-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2005;21(10):895–910. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, et al. Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2005;84(2):183–188. doi:10.1177/154405910508400214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanajasan P, Dhakshinamoorthy M, Subba Rao C. Factors affecting the bond strength of self-etch adhesives: a meta-analysis of literature. J Conserv Dent. 2011;14(1):62. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.80746
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arandi NZ, Thabet M. Knowledge and Attitudes of Dentists toward Adhesive System Selection: a Cross-sectional Study from Palestine. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020;10(1):107–115. doi:10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_385_19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay FR, Frankenberger R, Krejci I, et al. Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. I. In vivo evidence. J Dent. 2004;32(8):611–621. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2004.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva TSP, de Castro RF, Magno MB, Maia LC, Silva e Souza MHD. Do HEMA-free adhesive systems have better clinical performance than HEMA-containing systems in noncarious cervical lesions? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2018;74:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2018.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay FR, Suh BI, Pashley DH, Prati C, Chuang S-F, Li F. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual-cured composites. Part II. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5(2):91–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh B, Feng L, Pashley D, Tay F. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5(4):267–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay F, Pashley D, Yiu C, Sanares AME, Wei SHY. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5(1):27–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozmen B, Koyuturk AE, Tokay U, Cortcu M, Sari ME. Evaluation of bond strength of self-etching adhesives having different pH on primary and permanent teeth dentin. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2015;13(3):e274–e279. doi:10.5301/jabfm.5000234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zecin-Deren A, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Szczesio-Wlodarczyk A, Piwonski I, Sokolowski J, Lapinska B. The influence of application protocol of simplified and universal adhesives on the dentin bonding performance. Appl Sci. 2020;10(1):1–17. doi:10.3390/app10010124
   Google Scholar
• Pinna R, Usai P, Arrica M, Milia E. Effectiveness of two self-etchings bonded clinically in caries affected dentin with homogeneous smear layer. J Nanomater. 2015;2015:1–7. doi:10.1155/2015/489183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoroushi M, Mansoori M. Marginal sealing durability of two contemporary self-etch adhesives. ISRN Dent. 2012;2012:1–8. doi:10.5402/2012/204813
   Google Scholar
• Yavuz HF, Eyüboğlu GB. The effect of blood contamination on shear bond strength of calcium silicate-based pulp capping materials. Cumhur Dent J. 2021;24(4):371–385. doi:10.7126/cumudj.1007704
   Google Scholar
• Salvio LA, Di Hipólito V, Martins AL, de Goes MF. Hybridization quality and bond strength of adhesive systems according to interaction with dentin. Eur J Dent. 2013;7(3):315–326. doi:10.4103/1305-7456.115416
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicolas-Silvente AI, Nicolas-Silvente AI, Chiva-Garcia F, Sanchez-Perez A. The effect of dental enamel pre-etching for self-etching adhesives according to their primer pH: an in vitro bond strength, etching pattern and adhesive failure evaluation. J Dent Open Access. 2020;2(1):1–7. doi:10.31487/j.jdoa.2020.01.05
   Google Scholar
• Huang YH, Wang YL, Lin PY, Lai YJ, Cheng CW, Chiang YC. Dentists’ performance in dentin-composite resin bonding before and after hands-on course learning. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020;119(1):260–267. doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2019.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Francescantonio M, de Oliveira MT, Shinohara MS, Ambrosano GMB, Giannini M. Bond strength evaluation of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems on intact and ground human enamel. Brazilian J Oral Sci. 2007;6(23):1462–1466.
   Google Scholar
• Asande Adebayo O, Francis Burrow M, John Tyas M. Bonding of one-step and two-step self-etching primer adhesives to dentin with different tubule orientations. Acta Odontol Scand. 2008;66(3):159–168. doi:10.1080/00016350802123118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amend S, Frankenberger R, Oschmann T, Lucker S, Winter J, Kramer N. Long- term microtensile bond strength of self- etch adhesives and influence of 7- s phosphoric acid etching on adhesion of a 3- step etch- and- rinse adhesive to the dentine of primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2021;32(5):649–659. doi:10.1111/ipd.12943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamadar A, Vanti A, Uppin V, Pujar M, Ghivari S, Vagarali H. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of sixth- And seventh-generation bonding agents with varying pH - An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2020;23(2):169–173. doi:10.4103/JCD.JCD_543_19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ulker M, Ulker HE, Karabekiroglu S, Botsali MS, Cetin AR. Effect of alternative modes of application on microleakage of one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Sci. 2013;8(4):425–431. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2012.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y-H, Shin D-H. Effect of chlorhexidine application on the bond strength of resin core to axial dentin in endodontic cavity. Restor Dent Endod. 2012;37(4):207. doi:10.5395/rde.2012.37.4.207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Poggio C, Beltrami R, Scribante A, Colombo M, Chiesa M. Shear bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives: pH influence. Dent Res J. 2015;12(3):209–214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sabatini C. Effect of phosphoric acid etching on the shear bond strength of two self-etch adhesives. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21(1):56–62. doi:10.1590/1678-7757201302370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa DM, Somacal DC, Borges GA, Spohr AM. Bond capability of universal adhesive systems to dentin in self-etch mode after short-term storage and cyclic loading. Open Dent J. 2017;11(1):276–283. doi:10.2174/1874210601711010276
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siqueira FSF, Cardenas AM, Ocampo JB, et al. Bonding performance of universal adhesives to eroded dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(2):121–132. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a40300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaquias P, Gutiérrez MF, Sutil E, et al. Universal adhesives and dual-cured core buildup composite material: adhesive properties. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020;28:1–15. doi:10.1590/1678-7757-2020-0121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadogiannis D, Dimitriadi M, Zafiropoulou M, Gaintantzopoulou MD, Eliades G. Universal adhesives: setting characteristics and reactivity with dentin. Materials. 2019;12(10):1720. doi:10.3390/MA12101720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shioya Y, Tichy A, Yonekura K, et al. Sodium p-toluenesulfinate enhances the bonding durability of universal adhesives on deproteinized eroded dentin. Polymers. 2021;13(22):1–11. doi:10.3390/polym13223901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuevas-Suárez CE, da Rosa WLO, Lund RG, da Silva AF, Piva E. Bonding performance of universal adhesives: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(1):7–26. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a41975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardan L, Bourgi R, Cuevas-Suárez CE, et al. The bond strength and antibacterial activity of the universal dentin bonding system: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microorganisms. 2021;9(6):1230. doi:10.3390/microorganisms9061230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalheiro A, Cruz J, Sousa B, et al. Effect of application deviations on dentin sealing of a universal adhesive: permeability and nanoleakage. Eur J Dent. 2023;17(1):242–249. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1745767
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takamizawa T, Yokoyama M, Sai K, et al. Effect of adhesive application method on the enamel bond durability of a two-step adhesive system utilizing a universal adhesive-derived primer. Appl Sci. 2021;11(16):1–18. doi:10.3390/app11167675
   Google Scholar
• Kamel M, Mehena M, Soliman Z. The impact of application mode of three universal adhesives with different chemical compositions and curing techniques on their micro shear bond strength to dentin. Egypt Dent J. 2022;68(4):3783–3791. doi:10.21608/edj.2022.161374.2249
   Google Scholar
• Staxrud F, Valen H. Potential of «universal» bonding agents for composite repair. Biomater Investig Dent. 2022;9(1):41–46. doi:10.1080/26415275.2022.2073234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stape THS, Tulkki O, Salim IA, Jamal KN, Mutluay MM, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. Composite repair: on the fatigue strength of universal adhesives. Dent Mater. 2022;38(2):231–241. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2021.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirel G, Kaya Demirsoy FF, Irmak Ö. Cytotoxicity evaluation of eluates from universal adhesives by real-time cell analysis. Dent Mater J. 2020;39(5):815–824. doi:10.4012/dmj.2019-221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ugurlu M. Effect of the double application of universal adhesives on the dentine bond strength after radiotherapy. Aust Dent J. 2020;65(3):181–188. doi:10.1111/adj.12744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Intajak P, Islam R, et al. Effect of sodium hypochlorite on bonding performance of universal adhesives to pulp chamber dentin. J Dent Sci. 2023;18(3):1116–1124. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2022.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia RN, de Araújo Neto VG, Silva CR, Miguel LCM, Giannini M. Microshear bond strength of universal adhesives to enamel and dentin: an eighteen-month in vitro study. Brazilian Dent Sci. 2021;24(4):1–9. doi:10.4322/BDS.2021.E2791
   Google Scholar
• Alex G. Universal adhesives: the next evolution in adhesive dentistry? Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015;36(1):15–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004;83(6):454–458. doi:10.1177/154405910408300604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Okihara T, et al. Functional monomer impurity affects adhesive performance. Dent Mater. 2015;31(12):1493–1501. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima RBW, Silva AF, da Rosa WL, Piva E, Duarte RM, De Souza GM. Bonding efficacy of universal resin adhesives to zirconia substrates: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2023;25(1):51–62. doi:10.3290/J.JAD.B3868649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos RA, de Lima EA, Mendonça LS, et al. Can universal adhesive systems bond to zirconia? J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(6):589–594. doi:10.1111/jerd.12521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira LL, Campos F, Dal Piva AMO, Gondim LD, Souza ROA, Özcan M. Can application of universal primers alone be a substitute for airborne-particle abrasion to improve adhesion of resin cement to zirconia? J Adhes Dent. 2015;17(2). doi:10.3290/J.JAD.A33974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral M, Belli R, Cesar PF, Valandro LF, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U. The potential of novel primers and universal adhesives to bond to zirconia. J Dent. 2014;42(1):90–98. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makishi P, André CB, Silva JPLE, Bacelar-Sá R, Correr-Sobrinho L, Giannini M. Effect of storage time on bond strength performance of multimode adhesives to indirect resin composite and lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Oper Dent. 2016;41(5):541–551. doi:10.2341/15-187-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima RBW, de Muniz IAF, Campos DES, et al. Effect of universal adhesives and self-etch ceramic primers on bond strength to glass ceramics: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2022. doi:10.1016/J.PROSDENT.2022.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YR, Kim JH, Son SA, Park JK. Effect of silane-containing universal adhesives on the bonding strength of lithium disilicate. Materials. 2021;14(14):1–11. doi:10.3390/ma14143976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalavacharla VK, Lawson NC, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. Influence of etching protocol and silane treatment with a universal adhesive on lithium disilicate bond strength. Oper Dent. 2015;40(4):372–378. doi:10.2341/14-116-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez MF, Sutil E, Malaquias P, et al. Effect of self-curing activators and curing protocols on adhesive properties of universal adhesives bonded to dual-cured composites. Dent Mater. 2017;33(7):775–787. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tichý A, Hosaka K, Tagami J. Universal adhesives - A new direction in the development of adhesive systems. Czech Dent J. 2020;1:4–12.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriadi M, Panagiotopoulou A, Pelecanou M, Yannakopoulou K, Eliades G. Stability and reactivity of γ-ΜPTMS silane in some commercial primer and adhesive formulations. Dent Mater. 2018;34(8):1089–1101. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao C, Yu J, Wang Y, Tang C, Huang C. Acidic pH weakens the bonding effectiveness of silane contained in universal adhesives. Dent Mater. 2018;34(5):809–818. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2018.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moro AFV, Ramos AB, Rocha GM, Perez CDR. Effect of prior silane application on the bond strength of a universal adhesive to a lithium disilicate ceramic. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(5):666–671. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Sonoda A, et al. Effectiveness and stability of silane coupling agent incorporated in “universal” adhesives. Dent Mater. 2016;32(10):1218–1225. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2016.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliev G, Hardan L, Kassis C, et al. Shelf life and storage conditions of universal adhesives: a literature review. Polymers. 2021;13(16):2708. doi:10.3390/polym13162708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münchow EA, Zanchi CH, Ogliari FA, Silva MG, de Oliveira IR, Piva E. Replacing HEMA with alternative dimethacrylates in dental adhesive systems: evaluation of polymerization kinetics and physicochemical properties. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(3):221–228. doi:10.3290/j.jad.a31811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtado A, Fuentes V, Cura M, Tamayo A, Ceballos L. Long-Term In Vitro Adhesive Properties of Two Universal Adhesives to Dentin. Materials. 2023;16(9):1–12. doi:10.3390/ma16093458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, et al. Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater. 2016;32(2):e9–e21. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--Old wine in new bottles? J Dent. 2015;43(5):525–536. doi:10.1016/J.JDENT.2015.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salem AA, Nassif MS, El-Korashy DI. Durability of bond strength to dentin using two universal adhesives in different etching modes. Brazilian J Oral Sci. 2021;20:1–15. doi:10.20396/bjos.v20i00.8660445
   Google Scholar
• Triani F, Pereira da Silva L, Ferreira Lemos B, Domingues J, Teixeira L, Manarte-Monteiro P. Universal adhesives: evaluation of the relationship between bond strength and application strategies—a systematic review and meta-analyses. Coatings. 2022;12(10):1–16. doi:10.3390/coatings12101501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Rosa WLDO, Piva E, Da Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43(7):765–776. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu JJ, Tang ATH, Matinlinna JP, Hägg U. Acid etching of human enamel in clinical applications: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(2):122–135. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallahzadeh F, Atai M, Ghasemi S, Mahdkhah A. Effect of rinsing time and surface contamination on the bond strength of silorane-based and dimethacrylate-based composites to enamel. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10(11):e1115. doi:10.4317/jced.55148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carvalho CN, Lanza MDS, Dourado LG, Carvalho EM, Bauer J. Impact of solvent evaporation and curing protocol on degree of conversion of Etch-and-Rinse and multimode adhesives systems. Int J Dent. 2019;2019:1–6. doi:10.1155/2019/5496784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awad MM, Alrahlah A, Matinlinna JP, Hamama HH. Effect of adhesive air-drying time on bond strength to dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2019;90:154–162. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardan L, Bourgi R, Cuevas-Suárez CE, et al. Effect of different application modalities on the bonding performance of adhesive systems to dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cells. 2023;12(1):1–22. doi:10.3390/cells12010190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara S, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, et al. Effect of double-layer application on bond quality of adhesive systems. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;77:501–509. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi C-K, Son S-A, J-H H, et al. Influence of application methods of one-step self-etching adhesives on microtensile bond strength. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 2011;36(3):203. doi:10.5395/jkacd.2011.36.3.203
   Google Scholar