176
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Quantitative and Qualitative Correlation of Mandibular Lingual Bone with Risk Factors for Third Molar Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

, ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 267-277 | Received 25 Jul 2023, Accepted 15 Sep 2023, Published online: 30 Oct 2023

References

  • Gbotolorun OM, Arotiba GT, Ladeinde AL. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(10):1977–1983. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.285
  • Tolstunov L, Brickeen M, Kamanin V, Susarla SM, Selvi F. Is the angulation of mandibular third molars associated with the thickness of lingual bone? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54(8):914–919. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.07.004
  • Menziletoglu D, Tassoker M, Kubilay-Isik B, Esen A. The assessment of the relationship between the angulation of impacted mandibular third molar teeth and the thickness of lingual bone: a prospective clinical study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019;24(1):e130–e135. doi:10.4317/medoral.22663
  • Emes Y, Öncu B, Aybar B, et al. Measurement of the lingual position of the lower third molar roots using cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(1):13–17. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2014.09.008
  • Wang D, He X, Wang Y, et al. Topographic relationship between root apex of mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar and lingual plate: cross-sectional analysis using CBCT. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38955. doi:10.1038/srep38955
  • Parada C, Chai Y. Mandible and tongue development. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2015;115:31–58. doi:10.1016/bs.ctdb.2015.07.023
  • Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. The diagnostic efficacy of cone beam computed tomography for impacted teeth and associated features: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(3):208–216. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02141.x
  • Pauwels R, Araki K, Siewerdsen JH, Thongvigitmanee SS. Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140224. doi:10.1259/dmfr.20140224
  • Yilmaz S, Adisen MZ, Misirlioglu M, Yorubulut S. Assessment of third molar impaction pattern and associated clinical symptoms in a Central Anatolian Turkish population. Med Princ Pract. 2016;25(2):169–175. doi:10.1159/000442416
  • Mallick A, Vidya KC, Waran A, Rout SK. Measurement of lingual cortical plate thickness and lingual position of lower third molar roots using cone beam computed tomography. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017;7(7):S8–12. doi:10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_106_17
  • Sathapana S, Forrest A, Monsour P, Naser-Ud-Din S. Age-related changes in maxillary and mandibular cortical bone thickness in relation to temporary anchorage device placement. Aust Dent J. 2013;58(1):67–74. doi:10.1111/adj.12018
  • Ge J, Zheng JW, Yang C, Qian WT. Variations in the buccal-lingual alveolar bone thickness of impacted mandibular third molar: our classification and treatment perspectives. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):16375. doi:10.1038/srep16375
  • Aksoy U, Orhan K. Risk factor in endodontic treatment: Topographic evaluation of mandibular posterior teeth and lingual cortical plate using cone beam computed tomography (CT). Med Sci Monit. 2018;24(11):7508–7516. doi:10.12659/MSM.908869
  • Huang C, Zhou C, Xu M, Zou D. Risk factors for lingual plate fracture during mandibular third molar extraction. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(11):4133–4142. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03286-5
  • Nguyen DP‐A, Le SH, Nguyen CTK, Dien VHA, Nguyen LT‐B, et al. The vulnerability of lingual plate of the mesioangular impacted mandibular third molars: A measurement on CBCT images. Oral Surg. 2020;14(2):106–112. doi:10.1111/ors.12543