Stress Distribution of Endodontically Treated Tooth MOD Cavity Restored with Ribbon Fiber-Reinforced Composite (Wallpapering Technique) Using Finite Element Method

References

• Afrashtehfar KI, Ahmadi M, Emami E, Abi-Nader S, Tamimi F. Failure of single-unit restorations on root filled posterior teeth: a systematic review. Int Endod J. 2017;50(10):951–966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannocci F, Bhuva B, Roig M, et al. European Society of Endodontology position statement: the restoration of root filled teeth. Int Endod J. 2021;54(11):1974–1981. doi:10.1111/iej.13607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atlas A, Grandini S, Martignoni M. Evidence-based treatment planning for the restoration of endodontically treated single teeth: importance of coronal seal, post vs no post, and indirect vs direct restoration. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(10):772–781. doi:10.3290/j.qi.a43235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belli S, Eraslan O, Eskitascioglu G. Direct Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: a Brief Summary of Materials and Techniques. Curr Oral Heal Reports. 2015;2(4):182–189. doi:10.1007/s40496-015-0068-5
   Google Scholar
• Daher R, Feilzer AJ, Krejci I. Novel non-invasive reinforcement of MOD cavities on endodontically treated teeth. J Dent. 2016;54:77–85. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2016.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengun A, Cobankara FK, Orucoglu H. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2008;24(2):214–219. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.2007.00538.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekla S, Vincze-bandi E, Braunitzer G, Alleman D. Mechanical Performance of Direct Restorative Techniques Utilizing Long Fibers for “ Horizontal Splinting ” to Reinforce Deep MOD Cavities — an Updated Literature Review; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Tekriwal S, Rajkumar B, Gupta V, Rastogi R. A Review on Fibre Reinforced Composite Resins. Ann Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2016;2(1):11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Deliperi S, Alleman D, Rudo D. Stress-reduced direct composites for the restoration of structurally compromised teeth: fiber design according to the “wallpapering” technique. Oper Dent. 2017;42(3):233–243. doi:10.2341/15-289-T
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelic K, Vukicevic A, Jovicic G, Aleksandrovic S, Filipovic N, Djuric M. Mechanical weakening of devitalized teeth: three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis and prediction of tooth fracture. Int Endodontic J. 2014;48(9):850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenberger R, Zeilinger I, Krech M, et al. Stability of endodontically treated teeth with differently invasive restorations: adhesive vs. non-adhesive cusp stabilization. Dent Mater. 2015;31(11):1312–1320. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daher E, Rahme AZ, Wehbe T, El Khoury CK, Badr C, Daou M. Study by finite elements of stress distribution by comparing behaviour of 2 types of composite. Int J Dent Oral Sci. 2021;8(2):1431–1436.
   Google Scholar
• Wicaksono S, Prasetia W, Muryani A, Dirgantara T, Mahyuddin AI. Finite element stress analysis of dental cement application on endocrown and onlay restoration. Aust Endod J. 2023;November 2022:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Camanho PP, Davila CG. Mixed-Mode Decohesion Finite Elements for the Simulation of Delamination in Composite Materials. NASA Tech Pap. 2002;211737(June):42.
   Google Scholar
• Barcelos LM, Bicalho AA, Veríssimo C, Rodrigues MP, Soares CJ. Stress distribution, tooth remaining strain, and fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored without or with one or two fiberglass posts and direct composite resin. Oper Dent. 2017;42(6):646–657. doi:10.2341/16-224-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheron RA, Marshall SJ, Goodis HE, Peters OA. Nanomechanical Properties of Endodontically Treated Teeth. J Endod. 2011;37(11):1562–1565. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2011.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkholy MMA, Nawar NN, Ha WN, Saber SM, Kim HC. Impact of Canal Taper and Access Cavity Design on the Life Span of an Endodontically Treated Mandibular Molar: a Finite Element Analysis. J Endod. 2021;47(9):1472–1480. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2021.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navimipour EJ, Firouzmandi M, Mirhashemi FS. Finite Element Analysis of the Endodontically-treated Maxillary Premolars restored with Composite Resin along with Glass Fiber Insertion in Various Positions. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16(4):284–290. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1677
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asopa S, Mandava J, Chalasani U, Anwarullah A, Ravi R. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with resin composites. Indian J Conserv Endod. 2017;2(3):89–97.
   Google Scholar
• Lukarcanin J, Sadikoǧlu İS, Yaşa B, Türkün LŞ, Türkün M, Galli C. Comparison of Different Restoration Techniques for Endodontically Treated Teeth. Int J Biomater. 2022;2022:1–7. doi:10.1155/2022/6643825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halaçoglu DM, Yamanel K. The effects of different base materials on the stress distribution of the endodontically treated teeth: 3D FEA. Cumhur Dent J. 2019;22(1):56–65. doi:10.7126/cumudj.453467
   Google Scholar
• Prabhakar A, Shrikant L, Nadig B. Stress analysis in maxillary incisor following fragment reattachment: a finite element analysis. J Dent Allied Sci. 2016;5(1):7. doi:10.4103/2277-4696.185188
   Google Scholar
• Ilday N, Seven N. The influence of different fiber-reinforced composites on shear bond strengths when bonded to enamel and dentin structures. J Dent Sci. 2011;6(2):107–115. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2011.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landys Borén D, Jonasson P, Kvist T. Long-term survival of endodontically treated teeth at a public dental specialist clinic. J Endod. 2015;41(2):176–181. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Landuyt KL, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. J Dent. 2006;34(1):77–85. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2005.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair M, Paul J, Kumar S, Chakravarthy Y, Krishna V. Comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of sixth and seventh generation bonding agents: an In-Vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(1):27–30. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.124119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadr A, Bakhtiari B, Hayashi J, et al. Effects of fiber reinforcement on adaptation and bond strength of a bulk-fill composite in deep preparations. Dent Mater. 2020;36(4):527–534. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Microtensile bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite with semi-interpenetrating polymer matrix to dentin using various bonding systems. Dent Mater J. 2008;27(6):821–826. doi:10.4012/dmj.27.821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaladevi M, Balasubramaniam R. Biomechanics in restorative dentistry. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2020;6(2):251–256.
   Google Scholar
• Hajira NSWN, Mehta D, Hl U. Biomechanics in Restorative Dentistry. Saarbrucken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing; 2015:7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Eapen AM, Amirtharaj LV, Sanjeev K, Mahalaxmi S. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with 2 Different Fiber-reinforced Composite and 2 Conventional Composite Resin Core Buildup Materials: an In Vitro Study. J Endod. 2017;43(9):1499–1504. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulamir SW, Majeed MA, Paolone G. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolar Teeth Restored with Wallpapering Technique: a Comparative in Vitro Study. Int J Dent. 2023;2023:1–8. doi:10.1155/2023/6159338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atiyah AH, Baban L. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars with extensive MOD cavities restored with different composite restorations (An In vitro study). J Baghdad Coll Dent. 2014;26:7–15. doi:10.12816/0015139
   Google Scholar
• Maravić T, Comba A, Mazzitelli C, et al. Finite element and in vitro study on biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars restored with direct or indirect composite restorations. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1–11. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-16480-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares PV, Santos-Filho PCF, Queiroz EC, et al. Fracture resistance and stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin. J Prosthodont. 2008;17(2):114–119. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00258.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eliguzeloglu Dalkiliç E, Kazak M, Hisarbeyli D, Fildisi MA, Donmez N, Deniz Arisu H. Can fiber application affect the fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth restored with a low viscosity bulk-fill composite? Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:1–7. doi:10.1155/2019/3126931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roma M, Miglani S, Sureshchandra B. Fracture resistance of class ii (mod) restorations: influence of restorative technique and bevel preparation” – an in vitro study. Int J Adv Res. 2016;65(1):805–818.
   Google Scholar
• Belli S, Dönmez N, Eskitaşcioğlu G. The effect of c-factor and flowable resin or fiber use at the interface on microtensile bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8(4):247–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torabinejad M, Fouad AF, Shabahang S. Endodontics Principles and Practice. Sixth ed. missouri: Elsevier; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran N, Ramachandran AK, Vincent JC. Bond Strength in Adhesive Dentistry- A Narrative Review Abstract. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2022;21(11):58–62.
   Google Scholar
• El-Mowafy O, El-Badrawy W, Eltanty A, Abbasi K, Habib N. Gingival microleakage of class II resin composite restorations with fiber inserts. Oper Dent. 2007;32(3):298–305. doi:10.2341/06-86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar