147
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
CASE REPORT

“Compression Necrosis” – A Cause of Concern for Early Implant Failure? Case Report and Review of Literature

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 43-52 | Received 08 Dec 2023, Accepted 28 Feb 2024, Published online: 06 Mar 2024

References

  • Zupancic Cepic L, Frank M, Reisinger A, Pahr D, Zechner W, Schedle A. Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible. Int J Implant Dent. 2022;8(1):8. doi:10.1186/s40729-022-00404-8
  • Horita S, Sugiura T, Yamamoto K, Murakami K, Imai Y, Kirita T. Biomechanical analysis of immediately loaded implants according to the all-on-four. Concept J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61(2):123–132. doi:10.1016/j.jpor.2016.08.002
  • Lung H, Hsu J-T, Wu AY-J, Huang H-L. Biomechanical effects of diameters of implant body and implant platform in bone strain around an immediately loaded dental implant with platform switching concept. Applied Sciences. 2019;9(10):1998.
  • Azcarate-Velázquez F, Castillo-Oyagüe R, Oliveros-López LG, et al. Influence of bone quality on the mechanical interaction between implant and bone: a finite element analysis. J Dent. 2019;88:103161. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2019.06.008
  • Fernández-Olavarria A, Gutiérrez-Corrales A, González-Martín M, Torres-Lagares D, Torres-Carranza E, Serrera-Figallo M. Influence of different drilling protocols and bone density on the insertion torque of dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023;28(4):e385–e394. doi:10.4317/medoral.25804
  • Fanali S, Tumedei M, Pignatelli P, et al. Implant primary stability with an osteocondensation drilling protocol in different density polyurethane blocks. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2021;24(1):14–20. doi:10.1080/10255842.2020.1806251
  • Palaskar JN, Joshi N, Shah PM, Gullapalli P, Vinay V. Influence of different implant placement techniques to improve primary implant stability in low-density bone: a systematic review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020;20(1):11–16. doi:10.4103/jips.jips_244_18
  • Olmedo-Gaya MV, Romero-Olid MN, Ocaña-Peinado FM, et al. Influence of different surgical techniques on primary implant stability in the posterior maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest. 2023;27(7):3499–3508. doi:10.1007/s00784-023-04962-y
  • Tomasi C, Derks J. Etiology, occurrence, and consequences of implant loss. Periodontol. 2000;88(1):13–35. doi:10.1111/prd.12408
  • Ga K, Ge R. Biological mechanisms underlying complications related to implant site preparation. Periodontol. 2022;88(1):52–63. doi:10.1111/prd.12410
  • Stocchero M, Toia M, Cecchinato D, Becktor JP, Coelho PG, Biomechanical JR. Biologic, and clinical outcomes of undersized implant surgical preparation: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(6):1247–1263. doi:10.11607/jomi.5340
  • Huang HM, Chee TJ, Lew WZ, Feng SW. Modified surgical drilling protocols influence osseointegration performance and predict value of implant stability parameters during implant healing process. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(10):3445–3455. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03215-6
  • Antonacci D, Del Fabbro M, Bollero P, Stocchero M, Jinno Y, Canullo L. Clinical effects of conventional and underprepared drilling preparation of the implant site based on bone density: a systematic review and meta-regression. J Prosthodont Res. 2023;67(1):23–34. doi:10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00275
  • Zucchelli G, Wang HL, Chambrone L. Complications and treatment errors in periodontal and implant therapy. Periodontol. 2000;92(1):9–12. doi:10.1111/prd.12442
  • Lekholm U, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Patient Selection and Preparation. Tissue Integrated Prostheses. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc; 1985:199–209.
  • Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Bone quality and quantity and dental implant failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30(3):219–237. doi:10.11607/ijp.5142
  • Romanos G, Damouras M, Veis AA, Hess P, Schwarz F, Brandt S. Comparison of histomorphometry and microradiography of different implant designs to assess primary implant stability. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22(3):373–379. doi:10.1111/cid.12915
  • Silva GAF, Faot F, Possebon APDR, da Silva WJ, Del Bel Cury AA. Effect of macrogeometry and bone type on insertion torque, primary stability, surface topography damage and titanium release of dental implants during surgical insertion into artificial bone. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;119:104515. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104515
  • Abrahamsson I, Carcuac O, Berglund T. Influence of implant geometry and osteotomy design on early bone healing: a pre-clinical in vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(10):1190–1199. doi:10.1111/clr.13816
  • Antonelli A, Barone S, Attanasio F, et al. Effect of implant macro-design and magnetodynamic surgical preparation on primary implant stability: an in vitro investigation. Dentistry J. 2023;11(10):227. doi:10.3390/dj11100227
  • Dayan C, Geckili O, Bural C. The influence of implant shape on primary stability of implants with a thread cutting and forming design: an ex vivo study. J Oral Implantol. 2019;45(3):181–185. doi:10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00158
  • Falco A, Berardini M, Trisi P. Correlation between implant geometry, implant surface, insertion torque, and primary stability: in vitro biomechanical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(4):824–830. doi:10.11607/jomi.6285
  • Gehrke SA, Cortellari GC, de Oliveira Fernandes GV, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing insertion torque and implant stability of two different implant macrogeometries in the initial periods of osseointegration. Medicina. 2023;59(1):168. doi:10.3390/medicina59010168
  • Rajendra K, Manual L, Kochhar AS, Haseeb SA, Dubey D, Dang GS. Comparative evaluation of implant stability, insertion torque, and implant macrogeometry in different bone densities using resonance frequency analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22(6):665–668. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3118
  • Gandhi Y, Padhye N. Comparison of insertion torque, implant stability quotient and removal torque, in two different implant designs with and without osseodensification. - An ex vivo bench top study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2023;13(2):249–252. doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2023.02.004
  • Cehreli MC, Karasoy D, Akea K, Eckert SE. Meta-analysis of methods used to assess implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24:1015–1032.
  • Rea M, Botticelli D, Ricci S, Soldini C, González GG, Lang NP. Influence of immediate loading on healing of implants installed with different insertion torques – an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(1):90–95. doi:10.1111/clr.12305
  • Do Vale Souza JP, de Moraes Melo Neto CL, Piacenza LT, et al. Relation between insertion torque and implant stability quotient: a clinical study. Eur J Dent. 2021;15(4):618–623. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1725575
  • Ottoni JM, Oliveira ZF, Mansini R, Cabral AM. Correlation between placement torque and survival of single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20(5):769–776.
  • Trisi P, Perfetti G, Baldoni E, Berardi D, Colagiovanni M, Scogna G. Implant micromotion is related to peak insertion torque and bone density. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(5):467–471. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01679.x
  • Consolo U, Travaglini D, Todisco M, Trisi P, Galli S. Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of the effects of implant insertion torque on peri-implant bone healing. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(3):860–865. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e31827ca3cf
  • Khayat PG, Arnal HM, Tourbah BI, Sennerby L. Clinical outcome of dental implants placed with high insertion torques (up to 176 Ncm). Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15(2):227–233. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00351.x
  • Winwood K, Zioupos P, Currey JD, Cotton JR, Taylor M. The importance of the elastic and plastic components of strain in tensile and compressive fatigue of human cortical bone in relation to orthopaedic biomechanics. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2006;6(2):134–141.
  • Haider R, Watzek G, Plenk H. Histomorphometric analysis of bone healing after insertion of IMZ-1 implants independent of bone structure and drilling method (in German). Z Stomatol. 1991;88:507–521.
  • Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(Suppl 20):S286–S291. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12957
  • Schwarz F, John G, Schmucker A, Sahm N, Becker J. Combined surgical therapy of advanced peri-implantitis evaluating two methods of surface decontamination: a 7-year follow-up observation. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(3):337–342. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12648
  • Bashutski JD, Nj D, Wang HL. Implant compression necrosis: current understanding and case report. J Periodontol. 2009;80(4):700–704. doi:10.1902/jop.2009.080581
  • Staedt H, Rossa M, Lehmann KM, Al-Nawas B, Kämmerer PW, Heimes D. Potential risk factors for early and late dental implant failure: a retrospective clinical study on 9080 implants. Int J Implant Dent. 2020;6(1):81. doi:10.1186/s40729-020-00276-w
  • Raj R, Manju V, Kumar-Gopal V, Eswar M. Analysis of factors determining thermal changes at osteotomy site in dental implant placement - An in-vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(3):e234–e239. doi:10.4317/jced.57346
  • Dhok K, Adhikari M, Palange A, Dhatrak P. Heat generation during implant site preparation and its effects on osseointegration: a review. Mater Today. 2023;72(3):1035–1040.
  • Duyck J, Corpas L, Vermeiren S, et al. Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(8):877–884. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01895.x
  • Cha JY, Pereira MD, Smith AA, et al. Multiscale analyses of the bone-implant interface. J Dent Res. 2015;94(3):482–490. doi:10.1177/0022034514566029
  • Toia M, Stocchero M, Cecchinato F, Corrà E, Jimbo R, Cecchinato D. Clinical considerations of adapted drilling protocol by bone quality perception. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017;32(6):1288–1295. doi:10.11607/jomi.5881
  • Misch CE. Density of bone: effect on surgical approach and healing. In: Misch CE, editor. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St Louis: C,V.: Mosby; 1999:372–383.
  • Piatelli A, Scarano A, Balleri P, Favero GA. Clinical and histological evaluation of an active “implant periapical lesion”: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:713–716.
  • Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T, Albrektsson B. Heat caused by drilling cortical bone. Temperature measured in vivo in patients and animals. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984;55(6):629–631. doi:10.3109/17453678408992410
  • Chacon GE, Bower DL, Larsen PE, McGlumphy EA, Beck FM. Heat production by 3 implant drill systems after repeated drilling and sterilization. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64(2):265–269. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2005.10.011
  • Sanz-Sanchez I, Sanz-Martin I, Ortiz-Vigon A, Molina A, Sanz M. Complications in bone grafting procedures: classification and management. Periodontol. 2000;88:86–102. doi:10.1111/prd.12413