Frequentist, Bayesian Analysis and Complementary Statistical Tools for Geriatric and Rehabilitation Fields: Are Traditional Null-Hypothesis Significance Testing Methods Sufficient?

References

• Mann TN, Lamberts RP, Lambert MI. High responders and low responders: factors associated with individual variation in response to standardized training. Sports Med. 2014;44:1113–1124. doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0197-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonafiglia JT, Preobrazenski N, Gurd BJ. A systematic review examining the approaches used to estimate interindividual differences in trainability and classify individual responses to exercise training. Front Physiol. 2021;12:1–18. doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.665044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserstein RL, Schirm AL, Lazar NA. Moving to a world beyond “p <0.05”. Am Stat. 2019;73(sup1):1–19. doi:10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornacon-Wood I, Mistry H, Johnson-Hart C, Faivre-Finn C, O’Connor JPB, Price GJ. Understanding the differences between bayesian and frequentist statistics. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022;112(5):1076–1082. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salsburg D. The Lady Tasting Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth Century. Macmillan; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Field AP. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. sage; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Berg KE, Latin RW. Essentials of Research Methods in Health, Physical Education, Exercise Science, and Recreation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. ASA Statement on Statistical Significance and p-values. In: The Theory of Statistics in Psychology. Springer International Publishing; 2020:1–10. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48043-1_1
   Google Scholar
• Perezgonzalez JD, Frías-Navarro MD. Retract p <0.005 and propose using JASP, instead. F1000Res. 2017;6:2122. doi:10.12688/f1000research.13389.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goss-Sampson M. Statistical Analysis in JASP - a Guide for Students. JASP; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Quintana DS, Williams DR. Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests in psychiatry: a non-technical guide using JASP. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18(1):178. doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1761-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers EJ, Marsman M, Jamil T, et al. Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018;25(1):35–57. doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goss-Sampson M, van Doorn J, Wagenmakers EJ. Bayesian Inference in JASP: A Guide for Students. Jeffrey’s Amazing Statistics Program; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kelter R. Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1). doi:10.1186/s12874-020-00980-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doorn J, van den Bergh D, Böhm U, et al. The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021;28(3):813–826. doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinton PA, Hemingway BS, Saunders B, Gualano B, Dolan E. A statistical framework to interpret individual response to intervention: paving the way for personalized nutrition and exercise prescription. Front Nutr. 2018;5:1–14. doi:10.3389/fnut.2018.00041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Cunha Nascimento D, Neto de S, Saraiva B, et al. Advancements and critical steps for statistical analyses in blood pressure response to resistance training in hypertensive older women: a methodological approach. Blood Press Monit. 2021;26(2):135–145. doi:10.1097/MBP.0000000000000505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• laerd statistics. Two-way ANOVA using SPSS. Statistical Tutorials Software Guides Statistics; 2017. Available from: https://statistics.laerd.com/. Accessed January 14, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Stang A, Poole C, Kuss O. The ongoing tyranny of statistical significance testing in biomedical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(4):225–230. doi:10.1007/s10654-010-9440-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa S, Cuthill IC. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev. 2007;82(4):591–605. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck TW. The importance of a priori sample size estimation in strength and conditioning research. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27(8):2323–2337. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e318278eea0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer RA, Ellis EM. Moving beyond categorization to understand affective influences on real world health decisions. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2019;13(11):1–16. doi:10.1111/spc3.12502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhea MR. Determining the magnitude of treatment effects in strength training research through the use of the effect size. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(4):918–920. doi:10.1519/14403.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fey CF, Hu T, Delios A. the measurement and communication of effect sizes in management research. Manag Organ Rev. 2023;19(1):176–197. doi:10.1017/mor.2022.2
   Google Scholar
• Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol. 2013;4:1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serdar CC, Cihan M, Yücel D, Serdar MA. Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021;31(1):27–53. doi:10.11613/BM.2021.010502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Routledge; 1988. doi:10.4324/9780203771587
   Google Scholar
• Sainani KL. A closer look at confidence intervals. PM&R. 2011;3(12):1134–1141. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenker N, Gentleman JF. On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. Am Stat. 2001;55(3):182–186. doi:10.1198/000313001317097960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainani KL. Clinical versus statistical significance. PM&R. 2012;4(6):442–445. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW, Schuler TC. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J. 2007;7(5):541–546. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JG. The minimal important difference: who’s to say what is important? J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(11):1221–1222. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00207-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vet De HCW, Ostelo RW, Terwee CB, et al. Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:131–142. doi:10.1007/s11136-006-9109-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawes CMM, Bennett DA, Feigin VL, Rodgers A. Blood pressure and stroke: an overview of published reviews. Stroke. 2004;35(3):776–785. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000116869.64771.5A
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samsa G, Edelman D, Rothman ML, Williams GR, Lipscomb J, Matchar D. Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the health utilities index mark II. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999;15(2):141–155. doi:10.2165/00019053-199915020-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, et al. Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. Lancet. 2015;386:9990):266–273. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62000-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens PJ, Syddall HE, Patel HP, Martin HJ, Cooper C, Aihie Sayer A. Is grip strength a good marker of physical performance among community-dwelling older people? J Nutr Health Aging. 2012;16(9):769–774. doi:10.1007/s12603-012-0388-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins WG, Batterham AM. Error rates, decisive outcomes and publication bias with several inferential methods. Sports Med. 2016;46(10):1563–1573. doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0517-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohse KR, Lohse KR, Sainani KL, et al. Systematic review of the use of “magnitude-based inference” in sports science and medicine. PLoS One. 2020;15(6 June):1–22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainani KL, Lohse KR, Jones PR, Vickers A. Magnitude-based Inference is not Bayesian and is not a valid method of inference. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019;29(9):1428–1436. doi:10.1111/sms.13491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevill AM, Williams AM, Boreham C, et al. Can we trust “Magnitude-based inference”? J Sports Sci. 2018;36(24):2769–2770. doi:10.1080/02640414.2018.1516004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh AH, Knight EJ. “Magnitude-based Inference” A statistical review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(4):874–884. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran-Everett D. Magnitude-based inference: good idea but flawed approach. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(10):2164–2165. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000001646
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruschke JK. Bayesian analysis reporting guidelines. Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5(10):1282–1291. doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01177-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffreys H. Theory of Probability. 3rd ed. Clarendon Press - Oxford; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Blume JD, Greevy RA, Welty VF, Smith JR, Dupont WD. An Introduction to Second-Generation p-values. American Statistician. 2019;73(sup1):157–167. doi:10.1080/00031305.2018.1537893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida da IS, Souza Andrade L, Sousa AMM, et al. The effect of mat pilates training combined with aerobic exercise versus mat pilates training alone on blood pressure in women with hypertension: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2022:1–5. doi:10.1093/ptj/pzab258
   Google Scholar