A Validated Register-Based Algorithm to Identify Patients Diagnosed with Recurrence of Surgically Treated Stage I Lung Cancer in Denmark

References

• Rubin G, Berendsen A, Crawford SM, et al. The expanding role of primary care in cancer control. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1474–5488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Danish National Board of Health [Homepage on the internet]. Cancer incidence in Denmark 2019 (in Danish); 2021. Available from: https://sundhedsdatastyrelsen.dk/da/find-tal-og-analyser/tal-og-analyser/sygdomme-og-behandlinger/kraeft/kraeft_nyetilfaelde_aarsrapport. Accessed October 17, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Leduc C, Antoni D, Charloux A, Falcoz PE, Quoix E. Comorbidities in the management of patients with lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(3):1601721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Danish Lung Cancer group, The Danish Lung Cancer Register [Homepage on the internet]. Danish lung cancer register - annual national report 2019–2020 (in Danish); 2021. Available from: https://www.lungecancer.dk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/%C3%85rsrapport-20192020_netudgave.pdf. Accessed October 17, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Subotic D, Van Schil P, Grigoriu B. Optimising treatment for post-operative lung cancer recurrence. Eur Respir J. 2016;47(2):374–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassett MJ, Uno H, Cronin AM, Carroll NM, Hornbrook MC, Ritzwoller D. Detecting lung and colorectal cancer recurrence using structured clinical/administrative data to enable outcomes research and population health management. Med Care. 2017;55(12):e88–e98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassett MJ, Ritzwoller DP, Taback N, et al. Validating billing/encounter codes as indicators of lung, colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer recurrence using 2 large contemporary cohorts. Med Care. 2014;52(10):e65–e73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takenaka T, Tagawa T, Kohno M, et al. Consideration of the optimal surgical procedure based on the risk of recurrence in clinical stage 0 or IA lung adenocarcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2022;42(2):1137–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren JL, Yabroff KR. Challenges and opportunities in measuring cancer recurrence in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(8):djv134–djv134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Izci H, Tambuyzer T, Tuand K, et al. A systematic review of estimating breast cancer recurrence at the population level with administrative data. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020;112(10):djaa050.
   Google Scholar
• Uno H, Ritzwoller DP, Cronin AM, Carroll NM, Hornbrook MC, Hassett MJ. Determining the time of cancer recurrence using claims or electronic medical record data. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018;2(2):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lash TL, Riis AH, Ostenfeld EB, Erichsen R, Vyberg M, Thorlacius-Ussing O. A validated algorithm to ascertain colorectal cancer recurrence using registry resources in Denmark. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(9):2210–2215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen LA, Jensen H, Virgilsen LF, Jensen JB, Vedsted P. A validated algorithm to identify recurrence of bladder cancer: a register-based study in Denmark. Clin Epidemiol. 2018;10:1755–1763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen LA, Jensen H, Flytkjær Virgilsen L, Jellesmark Thorsen LB, Vrou Offersen B, Vedsted P. A validated algorithm for register-based identification of patients with recurrence of breast cancer—based on Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) data. Cancer Epidemiol. 2019;59:129–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen LA, Jensen H, Virgilsen LF, et al. Identification of endometrial cancer recurrence – a validated algorithm based on nationwide Danish registries. Acta Oncol. 2021;60(4):1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen LA, Jensen H, Virgilsen LF, Hölmich LR, Vedsted P. A validated register-based algorithm to identify patients diagnosed with recurrence of malignant melanoma in Denmark. Clin Epidemiol. 2021;13:207–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen RN, Öztürk B, Mellemkjær L, et al. Validation of an algorithm to ascertain late breast cancer recurrence using Danish medical registries. Clin Epidemiol. 2020;12:1083–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin-Fenton D, Kjærsgaard A, Nørgaard M, et al. Breast cancer recurrence, bone metastases, and visceral metastases in women with stage II and III breast cancer in Denmark. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018;167(2):517–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen CB. The Danish civil registration system. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl):22–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjerstorff ML. The Danish cancer registry. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7_suppl):42–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandegaard JL, Schmidt SAJ, Sørensen HT, et al. The Danish national patient registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erichsen R, Lash TL, Hamilton-Dutoit SJ, Bjerregaard B, Vyberg M, Pedersen L. Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: the Danish national pathology registry and data bank. Clin Epidemiol. 2010;2:51–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SNOMED international [Homepage on the internet]. SNOMED international. Available from: https://www.snomed.org/. Accessed October 17, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen NL, Dalton SO, Mellemgaard A, Christensen J, Kejs AMT, Rasmussen TR. Assessing the pattern of recurrence in Danish stage I lung cancer patients in relation to the follow-up program: are we failing to identify patients with cerebral recurrence? Acta Oncol. 2018;57(11):1556–1560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen NL, Jekunen A, Heinonen S, Dalton DO, Rasmussen TR. Lung cancer guidelines in Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland: a comparison. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(7):943–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Union for International Cancer Control [Homepage on the internet]. TNM classification of malignant tumours; 2018. Available from: https://www.uicc.org/resources/tnm. Accessed October 17, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• McBride GB. A Proposal for Strength of Agreement Criteria for Lin’s Concordance Correlation Coefficient. Hamilton, New Zealand: National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Reseach; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Winther-Larsen A, Hoffmann L, Moeller DS, Khalil AA, Knap MM. Evaluation of factors associated with loco-regional failure and survival in limited disease small cell lung cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(9):1574–1581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Schmidt SAJ, Adelborg K, et al. The Danish health care system and epidemiological research: from health care contacts to database records. Clin Epidemiol. 2019;11:563–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travis LB. The epidemiology of second primary cancers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(11):2020–2026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothmann KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern Epidemiology. Third ed. Wolters Kluwer: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt ME, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. (Press NA, ed.). The National Academies Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Interior and Health of Denmark. Law information (In Danish: retsinformation). Available from: https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2020/1338. Accessed February 10, 2023.
   Google Scholar