Combining Register and Radiological Visits Data Allows to Reliably Identify Incident Wrist Fractures

References

• Kanis JA, Norton N, Harvey NC, et al. SCOPE 2021: a new scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe. Arch Osteoporos. 2021;16(1). doi:10.1007/s11657-020-00871-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flinkkilä T, Sirniö K, Hippi M, et al. Epidemiology and seasonal variation of distal radius fractures in Oulu, Finland. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(8):2307–2312. doi:10.1007/s00198-010-1463-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(12):1726–1733. doi:10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691–697. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koski AM, Patala A, Patala E, Sund R. Incidence of osteoporotic fractures in elderly women and men in Finland during 2005–2006: a population-based study. Scand J Surg. 2014;103(3):215–221. doi:10.1177/1457496914525554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häkkinen P, Mölläri K, Saukkonen SM, Väyrynen R, Mielikäinen L, Järvelin J. Care register for health care - definitions and guidelines; 2019. Available from: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-346-5. Accessed March 10, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Sievänen H. Continuously declining incidence of hip fracture in Finland: analysis of nationwide database in 1970–2016. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018;77(April):64–67. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2018.04.008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raudasoja L, Aspinen S, Vastamäki H, Ryhänen J, Hulkkonen S. Epidemiology and treatment of distal radius fractures in Finland—a nationwide register study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(10):2851. doi:10.3390/jcm11102851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekonen SR, Kopra J, Kröger H, Rikkonen T, Sund R. Regional and gender-specific analyses give new perspectives for secular trend in Hip fracture incidence. Osteoporos Int. 2021;32(9):1725–1733. doi:10.1007/s00198-021-05906-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mölläri K, Saukkonen SM. Register of primary health care visits - definitions and guidelines; 2014. Available from: https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-302-273-7. Accessed March 10, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtovuori T, Kauppila T, Kallio J, et al. Improving the recording of diagnoses in primary care with team incentives: a controlled longitudinal follow-up study. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–7. doi:10.1155/2018/4606710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL). THL report: reasons for visits and their recording rates on a monthly basis; 2022. Available from: https://sampo.thl.fi/pivot/prod/fi/avopika/pikarap02/summary_kayntisyyt. Accessed March 10, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• IHE. Integrating the healthcare enterprise® international initiative; 2022. Available from: https://www.ihe.net/. Accessed March 10, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Distal radius fracture. Current Care Guidelines. Working group set up by the Finnish medical society duodecim, Finnish society of physical and rehabilitation medicine, the Finnish society for surgery of the hand, and Finnish orthopaedic association. Available from: https://www.kaypahoito.fi/hoi50109. Accessed February 1, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Slutsky DJ, Herman M. Rehabilitation of distal radius fractures: a biomechanical guide. Hand Clin. 2005;21(3):455–468. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2005.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright NC, Daigle SG, Melton ME, Delzell ES, Balasubramanian A, Curtis JR. The design and validation of a new algorithm to identify incident fractures in administrative claims data. J Bone Miner Res. 2019;34(10):1798–1807. doi:10.1002/jbmr.3807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YK, Park C, Won S, et al. Validation of an operational definition to identify distal radius fractures in a national health insurance database. J Hand Surg Am. 2021;46(11):1026.e1–1026.e7. doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konstantelos N, Rzepka AM, Burden AM, et al. Fracture definitions in observational osteoporosis drug effects studies that leverage healthcare administrative (claims) data: a scoping review. Osteoporos Int. 2022;33(9):1837–1844. doi:10.1007/s00198-022-06395-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sund R. Utilization of routinely collected administrative data in monitoring the incidence of aging dependent Hip fracture. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2007;4:4. doi:10.1186/1742-5573-4-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Honkanen K, Honkanen R, Heikkinen L, Kröger H, Saarikoski S. Validity of self-reports of fractures in perimenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150(5):511–516. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sund R, Nurmi-Lüthje I, Lüthje P, Tanninen S, Narinen A, Keskimäki I. Comparing properties of audit data and routinely collected register data in case of performance assessment of Hip fracture treatment in Finland. Methods Inf Med. 2007;46(5):558–566. doi:10.1160/ME0382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuppurainen M, Honkanen R, Kröger H, Saarikoski S, Alhava E. Osteoporosis risk factors, gynaecological history and fractures in perimenopausal women — the results of the baseline postal enquiry of the Kuopio osteoporosis risk factor and prevention study. Maturitas. 1993;17(2):89–100. doi:10.1016/0378-5122(93)90004-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warriner AH, Patkar NM, Curtis JR, et al. Which fractures are most attributable to osteoporosis? J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(1):46–53. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moilanen A, Kopra J, Kröger H, Sund R, Rikkonen T, Sirola J. Characteristics of long-term femoral neck bone loss in postmenopausal women: a 25-year follow-up. J Bone Miner Res. 2022;37(2):173–178. doi:10.1002/jbmr.4444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of Finnish Municipalities. Radiological examination and procedure classification; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICD-10: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems: Tenth Revision. 2nd. World Health Organization; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kvist M, Savolainen T. ICPC-2 international classification of primary care. Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Patient data repository; 2023. Available from: https://www.kanta.fi/en/professionals/patient-data-repository. Accessed April 21, 2023.
   Google Scholar