Presence of Breast Cancer Information Recorded in United Kingdom Primary Care Databases: Comparison of CPRD Aurum and CPRD GOLD (Companion Paper 1)

References

• Jick H, Jick SS, Derby LE. Validation of information recorded on general practitioner based computerised data resource in the United Kingdom. BMJ. 1991;302:766–768. doi:10.1136/bmj.302.6779.766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jick SS, Kaye JA, Vasilakis-Scaramozza C, et al. Validity of the general practice research database. Pharmacotherapy. 2003;23:686–689. doi:10.1592/phco.23.5.686.32205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrett E, Thomas SL, Schoonen WM, et al. Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;69:4–14. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03537.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan NF, Harrison SE, Rose PW. Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60:e128–36. doi:10.3399/bjgp10X483562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. Clinical Practice Research Datalink [internet]. Available from: www.CPRD.com. Accessed November 30, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Walley T, Mantgani A. The UK General Practice Research Database. Lancet. 1997;350:1097–1099. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)04248-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPRD bibliography. Available from: https://cprd.com/bibliography. Accessed November 30, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Herrett E, Gallagher AM, Bhaskaran K, et al. Data resource profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:827–836. doi:10.1093/ije/dyv098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf A, Dedman D, Campbell J, et al. Data resource profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum. Int J Epi. 2019;48:1740–1740g. doi:10.1093/ije/dyz034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPRD Aurum May 2022 release notes. Available from: https://cprd.com/sites/default/files/2022-05/2022-05%20CPRD%20Aurum%20Release%20Notes.pdf. Accessed November 30, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Jick S, Hagberg KW, Persson R, et al. Quality and completeness of diagnoses recorded in the new CPRD Aurum database: evaluation of pulmonary embolism. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020;29(9):1134–1140. doi:10.1002/pds.4996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson R, Sponholtz T, Vasilakis-Scaramozza C, et al. Quality and completeness of myocardial infarction recording in Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum. Clin Epidemiol. 2021;13:745–775. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S319245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson R, Vasilakis-Scaramozza C, Hagberg KW, et al. CPRD Aurum database: assessment of data quality and completeness of three important comorbidities. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020;29:1456–1464. doi:10.1002/pds.5135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg KW, Vasilakis-Scaramozza C, Persson R, et al. Quality and completeness of malignant cancer recording in United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum compared to Hospital Episode Statistics. Ann Cancer Epi. 2022;6:6. doi:10.21037/ace-22-4
   Google Scholar
• Williams T, van Staa T, Puri S, et al. Recent advances in the utility and use of the General Practice Research Database as an example of a UK Primary Care Data resource. Ther Adv Drug saf. 2012;3(2):89–99. doi:10.1177/2042098611435911
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NHS Digital. SNOMED CT [internet]. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/terminology-and-classifications/snomed-ct. Accessed November 30, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Digital. Read codes [internet]. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/terminology-and-classifications/read-codes. Accessed November 30, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Business Services Authority. Dictionary of medicines and devices (dm+d) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.nhsbsa.nhs.uk/pharmacies-gp-practices-and-appliance-contractors/dictionary-medicin[es-and-devices-dmd. Accessed November 30, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. National records of Scotland, Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency–population estimates 2018 data. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/mid2020#the-uk-population-at-mid-2020. Accessed November 30, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Din NU, Ukoumunne OC, Rubin G, et al. Age and gender variations in cancer diagnostic intervals in 15 cancers: analysis of data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0127717. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margulis AV, Fortuny J, Kaye JA, et al. Validation of cancer cases using primary care, cancer registry, and hospitalization data in the United Kingdom. Epidemiology. 2018;29(2):308–313. doi:10.1097/EDE.0000000000000786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker S, Hyde C, Hamilton W. Risk of breast cancer in symptomatic women in primary care: a case-control study using electronic records. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(629):e788–93. doi:10.3399/bjgp14X682873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewis R, Gribbin J. Breast Cancer: Diagnosis and Treatment: An Assessment of Need. Cardiff (UK): National Collaborating Centre for Cancer (UK); February, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye JA, Derby LE, Del Mar Melero-Montes M, et al. The incidence of breast cancer in the General Practice Research Database compared with national cancer registration data. Br J Cancer. 2000;83(11):1556–1558. doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagberg KW, Vasilakis-Scaramozza C, Persson R, Neasham D, Kafatos G, Jick S . Correctness and Completeness of Breast Cancer Diagnoses Recorded in UK CPRD Aurum and CPRD GOLD Databases: Comparison to Hospital Episode Statistics and Cancer Registry (Companion Paper 2). Clin Epidemiol. 2023;15:1193–1206. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S434829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jick SS, Vasilakis-Scaramozza C, Persson R, Neasham D, Kafatos G, Hagberg KW . Use of the CPRD Aurum Database: Insights Gained from New Data Quality Assessments. Clin Epidemiol. 2023;15:1219–1222. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S434832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggar JS, Coleman T, Lewis S, et al. The impact of the quality and outcomes framework (qof) on the recording of smoking targets in primary care medical records: cross-sectional analyses from the health improvement network (THIN) database. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:329. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arhi CS, Bottle A, Burns EM, et al. Comparison of cancer diagnosis recording between the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Cancer Registry and Hospital Episodes Statistics. Cancer Epidemiol. 2018;57:148–157. doi:10.1016/j.canep.2018.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strongman H, Williams R, Bhaskaran K. What are the implications of using individual and combined sources of routinely collected data to identify and characterise incident site-specific cancers? A concordance and validation study using linked English electronic health records data. BMJ Open. 2020;10(8):e037719. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafford AM, Parisi R, Rutter MK, et al.; Global psoriasis atlas (gpa). Concordance and timing in recording cancer events in primary care, hospital and mortality records for patients with and without psoriasis: a population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0254661. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0254661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar