Validity of Major Osteoporotic Fracture Diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry

References

• Compston JE, McClung MR, Leslie WD. Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2019;393(10169):364–376. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32112-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie WD, Schousboe JT, Morin SN, et al. Fracture risk following high-trauma versus low-trauma fracture: a registry-based cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 2020;31(6):1059–1067. doi:10.1007/s00198-019-05274-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briot K, Paternotte S, Kolta S, et al. FRAX®: prediction of major osteoporotic fractures in women from the general population: the OPUS study. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83436. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen A, Möller S, Skjødt MK, Bech BH, Rubin KH. Evaluating the performance of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) in fracture risk prediction and developing a new Charlson Fracture Index (CFI): a register-based cohort study. Osteoporos Int. 2022;33(3):549–561. doi:10.1007/s00198-021-06293-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin KH, Möller S, Holmberg T, Bliddal M, Søndergaard J, Abrahamsen B. A New Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FREM) Based on Public Health Registries. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(11):1967–1979. doi:10.1002/jbmr.3528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjødt MK, Möller S, Hyldig N, et al. Validation of the Fracture Risk Evaluation Model (FREM) in predicting major osteoporotic fractures and Hip fractures using administrative health data. Bone. 2021;147:115934. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2021.115934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry SD, Samelson EJ, Pencina MJ, et al. Repeat bone mineral density screening and prediction of Hip and major osteoporotic fracture. JAMA. 2013;310(12):1256–1262. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.277817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looker AC. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk of major osteoporotic fractures in older U.S. adults. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28(5):997–1006. doi:10.1002/jbmr.1828
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD); 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases. Accessed March 27, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Konstantelos N, Rzepka AM, Burden AM, et al. Fracture definitions in observational osteoporosis drug effects studies that leverage healthcare administrative (claims) data: a scoping review. Osteoporos Int. 2022;33(9):1837–1844. doi:10.1007/s00198-022-06395-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–490. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S91125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen MS, Pedersen JS, Vinholt PJ, Hansen RS, Savarimuthu TR. Benchmark for evaluation of Danish clinical word embeddings. North Eur J Lang Technol. 2023;9(1). doi:10.3384/nejlt.2000-1533.2023.4132
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen JS, Laursen MS, Rajeeth Savarimuthu T, et al. Deep learning detects and visualizes bleeding events in electronic health records. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2021;5(4):e12505. doi:10.1002/rth2.12505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelholt TJ, Edwards NM, Vesterager JD, Kristensen PK, Pedersen AB. The positive predictive value of Hip fracture diagnoses and surgical procedure codes in the Danish multidisciplinary Hip fracture registry and the Danish National Patient Registry. Clin Epidemiol. 2020;12:123–131. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S238722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 18. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi D, Houkjær L, Gundtoft P, Brorson S, Viberg B. Positive predictive value of humeral fractures in the Danish National Patient Registry. Dan Med J. 2023;70(4):A10220612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sing CW, Woo YC, Lee ACH, et al. Validity of major osteoporotic fracture diagnosis codes in the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System in Hong Kong. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26(8):973–976. doi:10.1002/pds.4208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jean S, Candas B, Belzile É, et al. Algorithms can be used to identify fragility fracture cases in physician-claims databases. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(2):483–501. doi:10.1007/s00198-011-1559-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright NC, Daigle SG, Melton ME, Delzell ES, Balasubramanian A, Curtis JR. The Design and Validation of a New Algorithm to Identify Incident Fractures in Administrative Claims Data. J Bone Miner Res. 2019;34(10):1798–1807. doi:10.1002/jbmr.3807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundtoft PH, Danielsson FB, Houlind M, et al. The positive predictive value of ankle fracture diagnosis in the Danish National Patient Registry. Dan Med J. 2022;69(12):A01220032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Laguna D, Soria-Castro A, Carbonell-Abella C, et al. Validation of fragility fractures in primary care electronic medical records: a population-based study. Reumatol Clin. 2019;15(5):e1–e4. doi:10.1016/j.reuma.2017.10.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen DP, Rasmussen L, Hansen MR, Hallas J, Pottegård A, Dalal K. Comparison of the five Danish regions regarding demographic characteristics, healthcare utilization, and medication use--a descriptive cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140197. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar