Evaluation of Commercial Products for Colistin and Polymyxin B Susceptibility Testing for mcr-Positive and Negative Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in China

References

• Ezadi F, Ardebili A, Mirnejad R, Kraft CS. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for polymyxins: challenges, issues, and recommendations. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57(4). doi:10.1128/JCM.01390-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sayed Ahmed MAE, Zhong LL, Shen C, Yang Y, Doi Y, Tian GB. Colistin and its role in the Era of antibiotic resistance: an extended review (2000–2019). Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9(1):868–885. doi:10.1080/22221751.2020.1754133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniuk EM, Tyski S. Colistin resistance in Enterobacterales strains – a current view. Pol J Microbiol. 2019;68(4):417–427. doi:10.33073/pjm-2019-055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialvaei AZ, Samadi Kafil H. Colistin, mechanisms and prevalence of resistance. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015;31(4):707–721. doi:10.1185/03007995.2015.1018989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Recommendations for MIC determination of colistin (polymyxin E) as recommended by the joint CLSI-EUCAST Polymyxin Breakpoints Working Group; 2016. Available from: http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/General_documents/Recommendations_for_MIC_determination_of_colistin_March_2016.pdf. Accessed August 18, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Matuschek E, Åhman J, Webster C, Kahlmeter G. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of colistin – evaluation of seven commercial MIC products against standard broth microdilution for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24(8):865–870. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2017.11.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chew KL, La MV, Lin RTP, Teo JWP, Munson E. Colistin and Polymyxin B susceptibility testing for carbapenem-resistant and mcr-positive Enterobacteriaceae: comparison of sensititre, MicroScan, Vitek 2, and Etest with Broth Microdilution. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(9):2609–2616. doi:10.1128/JCM.00268-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maalej SM, Meziou MR, Rhimi FM, Hammami A. Comparison of disc diffusion, Etest and agar dilution for susceptibility testing of colistin against Enterobacteriaceae. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2011;53(5):546–551. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03145.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dafopoulou K, Zarkotou O, Dimitroulia E, et al. Comparative evaluation of colistin susceptibility testing methods among carbapenem-nonsusceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae and Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(8):4625–4630. doi:10.1128/AAC.00868-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfennigwerth N, Kaminski A, Korte-Berwanger M, et al. Evaluation of six commercial products for colistin susceptibility testing in Enterobacterales. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(11):1385–1389. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2019.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries RM, Green DA, Schuetz AN, et al. Multicenter evaluation of colistin broth disk elution and colistin agar test: a report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57(11). doi:10.1128/JCM.01269-19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Jia P, Zhou M, et al. Evaluation of the clinical systems for polymyxin susceptibility testing of clinical Gram-negative bacteria in China. Front Microbiol. 2021;11:610604. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.610604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically M07-A10. 10th ed. Wayne (PA): Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• García-Fernández S, García-Castillo M, Ruiz-Garbajosa P, et al. Performance of CHROMID(R) Colistin R agar, a new chromogenic medium for screening of colistin-resistant Enterobacterales. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;93(1):1–4. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters, version 12.0; 2022. Available from: http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_12.0_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf. Accessed August 18, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Verification of Commercial Microbial Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Systems M52. 1st ed. Wayne (PA): Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Vourli S, Dafopoulou K, Vrioni G, Tsakris A, Pournaras S. Evaluation of two automated systems for colistin susceptibility testing of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(9):2528–2530. doi:10.1093/jac/dkx186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anantharajah A, Glupczynski Y, Hoebeke M, et al. Multicenter study of automated systems for colistin susceptibility testing. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;40(3):575–579. doi:10.1007/s10096-020-04059-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telke AA, Olaitan AO, Morand S, Rolain JM. soxRS induces colistin hetero-resistance in Enterobacter asburiae and Enterobacter cloacae by regulating the acrAB-tolC efflux pump. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(10):2715–2721. doi:10.1093/jac/dkx215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farzana R, Jones LS, Barratt A, et al. Emergence of mobile colistin resistance (mcr-8) in a highly successful Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 15 clone from clinical infections in Bangladesh. mSphere. 2020;5(2). doi:10.1128/mSphere.00023-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulengowski B, Ribes JA, Burgess DS. Polymyxin B Etest® compared with gold-standard broth microdilution in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae exhibiting a wide range of polymyxin B MICs. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(1):92–95. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2018.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lat A, Clock SA, Wu F, et al. Comparison of polymyxin B, tigecycline, cefepime, and meropenem MICs for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae by broth microdilution, Vitek 2, and Etest. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(5):1795–1798. doi:10.1128/JCM.02534-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Berglund B, Zhu Y, Luo Q, Xiao Y. Performance of different methods for testing polymyxin B: comparison of broth microdilution, agar dilution and MIC test strip in mcr-1 positive and negative Escherichia coli. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2021;73(2):197–205. doi:10.1111/lam.13492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar