Clinical Performance of Self-Collected Purified Water Gargle for Detection of Influenza a Virus Infection by Real-Time RT-PCR

References

• To K, Yip C, Lai C, et al. Saliva as a diagnostic specimen for testing respiratory virus by a point-of-care molecular assay: a diagnostic validity study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(3):372–378. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2018.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer S, Thompson MG, Flannery B, Fry A, Kraft CS. Comparison of respiratory specimen collection methods for detection of influenza virus infection by reverse transcription-PCR: a literature review. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57(9). doi:10.1128/JCM.00027-19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To KK, Tsang OT, Yip CC, et al. Consistent detection of 2019 novel coronavirus in saliva. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(15):841–843. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobik ER, Kitfield-Vernon LB, Thomas RJ, et al. Saliva as a sample type for SARS-CoV-2 detection: implementation successes and opportunities around the globe. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2022;22(5):519–535. doi:10.1080/14737159.2022.2094250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poukka E, Mäkelä H, Hagberg L, et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in gargle, spit, and sputum specimens. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9(1):e3521. doi:10.1128/Spectrum.00035-21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee RA, Herigon JC, Benedetti A, Pollock NR, Denkinger CM, Humphries RM. Performance of saliva, oropharyngeal swabs, and nasal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59(5). doi:10.1128/JCM.02881-20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler-Laporte G, Lawandi A, Schiller I, et al. Comparison of saliva and nasopharyngeal swab nucleic acid amplification testing for detection of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(3):353–360. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan J, Yu F, Wang X, et al. Hock-a-loogie saliva as a diagnostic specimen for SARS-CoV-2 by a PCR-based assay: a diagnostic validity study. Clin Chim Acta. 2020;511:177–180. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2020.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen R, Bao J, Huang X, et al. Comparison of “hock-a-loogie” saliva versus nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for detecting common respiratory pathogens. Heliyon. 2023;9(10):e20965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLennan K, Barton E, Lang C, et al. User acceptability of saliva and gargle samples for identifying COVID-19 positive high-risk workers and household contacts. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022;104(1):115732. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai CK, Lui GC, Chen Z, et al. Comparison of self-collected mouth gargle with deep-throat saliva samples for the diagnosis of COVID-19: mouth gargle for diagnosis of COVID-19. J Infect. 2021;83(4):496–522. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2021.07.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olearo F, Nörz D, Hoffman A, et al. Clinical performance and accuracy of a qPCR-based SARS-CoV-2 mass-screening workflow for healthcare-worker surveillance using pooled self-sampled gargling solutions: a cross-sectional study. J Infect. 2021;83(5):589–593. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2021.08.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumaresq J, Coutlée F, Dufresne P, et al. Natural spring water gargle and direct RT-PCR for the diagnosis of COVID-19 (COVID-SPRING study). J Clin Virol. 2021;144:104995. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel CE, Young M, Serbanescu MA, et al. Detection of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in outpatients: a multicenter comparison of self-collected saline gargle, oral swab, and combined oral-anterior nasal swab to a provider collected nasopharyngeal swab. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021;42(11):1340–1344. doi:10.1017/ice.2021.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfarb DM, Tilley P, Al-Rawahi GN, et al. Self-collected saline gargle samples as an alternative to health care worker-collected nasopharyngeal swabs for COVID-19 diagnosis in outpatients. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59(4). doi:10.1128/JCM.02427-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohmer N, Eckermann L, Boddinghaus B, et al. Self-collected samples to detect SARS-CoV-2: direct comparison of saliva, tongue swab, nasal swab, chewed cotton pads and gargle lavage. J Clin Med. 2021;10(24):5751. doi:10.3390/jcm10245751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zander J, Scholtes S, Ottinger M, et al. Self-collected gargle lavage allows reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an outpatient setting. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9(1):e36121. doi:10.1128/Spectrum.00361-21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuris C, Kremer C, Geerinck A, et al. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 After COVID-19 screening and mitigation measures for primary school children attending school in Liege, Belgium. JAMA Network Open. 2021;4(10):e2128757. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaku N, Urabe T, Iida T, et al. Gargle sample is an effective option in a novel fully automated molecular point-of-care test for influenza: a multicenter study. Virol J. 2023;20(1):41. doi:10.1186/s12985-023-01993-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett S, Davidson RS, Gunson RN. Comparison of gargle samples and throat swab samples for the detection of respiratory pathogens. J Virol Methods. 2017;248:83–86. doi:10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petruzzi G, De Virgilio A, Pichi B, et al. COVID-19: nasal and oropharyngeal swab. Head Neck. 2020;42(6):1303–1304. doi:10.1002/hed.26212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammitt LL, Kazungu S, Welch S, et al. Added value of an oropharyngeal swab in detection of viruses in children hospitalized with lower respiratory tract infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(6):2318–2320. doi:10.1128/JCM.02605-10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Mittal A, Dhakad S, et al. Gargle lavage & saliva: feasible & cheaper alternatives to nasal & throat swabs for diagnosis of COVID-19. Indian J Med Res. 2021;153(5&6):665–670. doi:10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_4209_20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genelhoud G, Adamoski D, Spalanzani RN, et al. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection in nasopharyngeal swab, saliva, and gargle samples. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022;103(2):115678. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utama R, Hapsari R, Puspitasari I, Sari D, Hendrianingtyas M, Nurainy N. Self-collected gargle specimen as a patient-friendly sample collection method for COVID-19 diagnosis in a population context. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):3706. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07690-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svec D, Tichopad A, Novosadova V, Pfaffl MW, Kubista M. How good is a PCR efficiency estimate: recommendations for precise and robust qPCR efficiency assessments. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2015;3:9–16. doi:10.1016/j.bdq.2015.01.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu P, Chen J, Qian C, Yu W. Pre-enriched saline gargle samples for detection of SARS-CoV-2. Biosci Trends. 2023;17(1):81–84. doi:10.5582/bst.2022.01530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar