Implementing Clinical Guidelines for the Treatment of Psychosis: The Frontline Leaders’ Point of View. A Qualitative Study

References

• Khan S, Vandermorris A, Sheperd J, et al. Embracing uncertainty, managing complexity: applying complexity thinking principles to transformation efforts in healthcare systems. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(192). doi:10.1186/s12913-018-2994-0
   Google Scholar
• Thompson DS, Fazio X, Kustra E, Patric L, Stanley D. Scoping review of complexity theory in health services research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(87). doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1343-4
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite J, Churruca K, Long JC, Ellis LA, Herkes J. When complexity science meets implementation science: a theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change. BMC Med. 2018;1663. doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1057-z
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Papoutsi C. Studying complexity in health services research: desperately seeking an overdue paradigm shift. BMC Med. 2018;16(95). doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1089-4
   Google Scholar
• Wensing M, Grol R (2020). Theories on Implementation of Change in Healthcare. In: Wensing M, Grol R Grimshaw JM (editors), Improving Patient Care. The Implementation of Change in Healt Care (3 ed., pp. 21–44, p. 33). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Reed JE, Green S, Howe C. Translating evidence in complex systems: a comparative review of implementation and improvement frameworks. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019;31(3):173–182. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzy158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meza RD, Triplett NS, Woodward GS, et al. The relationship between first-level leadership and inner-context and implementation outcomes in behavioral health: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2021;16(1). doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01104-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birken SA, Clary A, Tabriz AA, et al. Middle managers’ role in implementing evidence-based practices in healthcare: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2018;13(149). doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0843-5
   Google Scholar
• McSherry R, Pearce P. What are the effective ways to translate clinical leadership into health care quality improvement? J Healthc Leadersh. 2016;8:11–17. doi:10.2147/JHL.S46170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uhl-Bien M, Marion R, McKelvey B. Complexity leadership theory: shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadersh Q. 2007;18:298–318. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly J, Jackson D, Mannix J, Davidson PM, Hutchinson M. The importance of clinical leadership in the hospital setting. J Healthc Leadersh. 2014;6:75–83. doi:10.2147/JHL.S46161
   Google Scholar
• Nordin H, Rørtveit K, Mathisen GE, et al. Frontline leadership for implementing clinical guidelines in Norwegian mental health services: a qualitative study. J Health Organiz Manage. 2022;36(5):617–632. doi:10.1108/JHOM-08-2021-0286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plsek P, Wilson T. Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organisations. BMJ. 2001;323(7315):746–749. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7315.746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien M, Arena M. Complexity leadership: enabling people and organizations for adaptability. Org Dyn. 2017;46(1):9–20. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2016.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl-Bien M, Arena M. Leadership for organizational adaptability: a theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. Leadersh Q. 2018;29(1):89–104. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May C, Mair R, Finch F, et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009;4(29). doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flynn R, Rotter T, Hartfeild D, Newton AS, Scott SD. A realist evaluation to identify contexts and mechanisms that enabled and hindered implementation and had an effect on sustainability of a lean intervention in pediatric healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1). doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4744-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May C, Albers B, Bracher M, et al. Translational framework for implementation evaluation and research: a normalisation process theory coding manual for qualitative research and instrument development. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1). doi:10.1186/s13012-022-01191-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira VC, Silva SN, Carvalho VKS, Zanghelini F, Barreto JOM. Strategies for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in public health: an overview of systematic reviews. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022;20(13). doi:10.1186/s12961-022-00815-4
   Google Scholar
• De Leo A, Bloxsome D, Bayes S. Approaches to clinical guideline development in healthcare: a scoping review and document analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(37). doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08975-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kueny A, Shever LL, Mackin ML, Titler MG. Facilitating the implementation of evidence-based practice through contextual support and nursing leadership. J Healthc Leadersh. 2015;29–39. doi:10.2147/JHL.S45077
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Girlanda F, Fiedler I, Becker T, Barbui C, Koesters M. The evidence-practice gap in specialist mental healthcare: systematic review and meta-analysis of guideline implementation studies. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;210(1):24–30. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.115.179093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40(8):795–805. doi:10.1177/1403494812465030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruud T, Drake RE, Benth JS, et al. The effect of intensive implementation support on fidelity for four evidence-based psychosis treatments: a cluster randomized trial. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2021;48:909–920. doi:10.1007/s10488-021-01136-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruud T. Implementation of guidelines for treatment of psychosis (NCT03271242) U.S. National Library of Medicine ClinicalTrials.gov. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760. doi:10.1177/1049732315617444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health. 2019;1–16. doi:10.1080/2159676x.2019.1704846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederansvaret i sykehus (Det Kongelige Helse- og Omsorgsdepartementet) [managerial responsibility in hospitals]; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan SS, King M, Tully MP. How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016;38(3):655–662. doi:10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan MT. A method of phenomenological interviewing. Qual Health Res. 2014;24(1):136–144. doi:10.1177/1049732313519710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeland KM, Heiervang KS, Landers M, Ruud T, Drake RE, Bond GR. Psychometric properties of a fidelity scale for illness management and recovery. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2020;47(6):885–893. doi:10.1007/s10488-019-00992-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joa I, Johannessen JO, Heiervang KS, et al. The family psychoeducation fidelity scale: psychometric properties. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2020;47(6):894–900. doi:10.1007/s10488-020-01040-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruud T, Drivenes K, Drake RE, et al. The antipsychotic medication management fidelity scale: psychometric properties. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2020;47(6):911–919. doi:10.1007/s10488-020-01018-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruud T, Høifødt TS, Hendrick DC, et al. The physical health care fidelity scale: psychometric properties. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2020;47(6):901–910. doi:10.1007/s10488-020-01019-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugo GJ, Drake RE, Whitley R, et al. Fidelity outcomes in the national implementing evidence-based practices project. Psychiatric Serv. 2007;58(10):1279–1284. doi:10.1176/ps.2007.58.10.1279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton RJ, Steven A, Shucksmith J. Using normalization process theory as a practical tool across the life course of a qualitative research project. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(2):217–227. doi:10.1177/1049732319863420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43(3):535–554. doi:10.1177/0038038509103208
   Google Scholar
• Njah J, Hansoti B, Adeyemi A, et al. Measuring for success: evaluating leadership training programs for sustainable impact. Ann Glob Health. 2021;87(1):1–10. doi:10.5334/aogh.3221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen W, Joseph DL. Gender and leadership: a criterion-focused review and research agenda. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2021;31(2). doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J, Flowers A, Larkin P. Planning an IPA research study. In: Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis Theory, Method and Research. Sage Publications Ltd.; 2012:40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson OC. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: a theoretical and practical guide. Qual Res Psychol. 2013;11(1):25–41. doi:10.1080/14780887.2013.801543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG. Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plast Reconst Surg. 2010;126(2):619–625. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar