The Role of Ophthalmology in Tele-Stroke Consults for Triaging Acute Vision Loss

References

• v RJ, Wilcock AD, Schwamm LH, et al. Assessment of telestroke capacity in US hospitals. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77(8):1035–1037. doi:10.1001/JAMANEUROL.2020.1274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler LR, Demaerschalk BM, Schwamm LH, et al. Telemedicine quality and outcomes in stroke: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. 2017;48(1):e3–e25. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Barna P, Schwamm LH, Haberl RL. Telestroke increases use of acute stroke therapy. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012;25(1):5–10. doi:10.1097/WCO.0B013E32834D5FE4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pula JH, Yuen CA. Eyes and stroke: the visual aspects of cerebrovascular disease. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2(4):210–220. doi:10.1136/SVN-2017-000079
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biousse V, Newman NJ. Chapter 29 Eye syndromes and the neuro‐ophthalmology of stroke. Handb Clin Neurol. 2008;93:595–611. doi:10.1016/S0072-9752(08)93029-3
   Google Scholar
• Baltaziak K, Szpringer A, Czarnek-Chudzik A, et al. Quadrantanopia as the only symptom of post-COVID stroke in the occipital pole Case report. Medicine. 2021;100:44. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000027542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yew KS, Cheng E. Acute Stroke Diagnosis; 2009. Available from: http://www.ninds.nih.gov/doctors/NIH_Stroke_Scale.pdf. Accessed September 24, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart-Shor EM, Wellenius GA, Dellolacono DM, Mittleman MA. Gender differences in presenting and prodromal stroke symptoms. Stroke. 2009;40(4):1121–1126. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.543371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe FJ; VIS Group2 3. Accuracy of referrals for visual assessment in a stroke population. Eye. 2011;25(2):161. doi:10.1038/EYE.2010.173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijesundera C, Vingrys AJ, Wijeratne T, Crewther SG. Acquired visual deficits independent of lesion site in acute stroke. Front Neurol. 2020;11:705. doi:10.3389/FNEUR.2020.00705/BIBTEX
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe FJ, Wright D, Brand D, et al. A prospective profile of visual field loss following stroke: prevalence, type, rehabilitation, and outcome. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:1–12. doi:10.1155/2013/719096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson LN, Baloh FG. The accuracy of confrontation visual field test in comparison with automated perimetry. J Natl Med Assoc. 1991;83(10):895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavitt JA, Larson TA, Hodge DO, Gullerud RE. The incidence of central retinal artery occlusion in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(5):820–823.e2. doi:10.1016/J.AJO.2011.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• mac GB, Bao B, Schrag M, et al. Management of central retinal artery occlusion a scientific statement from the American heart association. Stroke. 2021;52:282–294. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayreh SS, Podhajsky PA, Zimmerman MB. Branch retinal artery occlusion: natural history of visual outcome. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(6):1188. doi:10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2009.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petzold A, Islam N, Hu HH, Plant GT. Embolic and nonembolic transient monocular visual field loss: a clinicopathologic review. Surv Ophthalmol. 2013;58(1):42–62. doi:10.1016/J.SURVOPHTHAL.2012.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutts SB. Diagnosis and management of transient ischemic attack. Continuum. 2017;23(1):82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lavin P, Patrylo M, Hollar M, Espaillat KB, Kirshner H, Schrag M. Stroke risk and risk factors in patients with central retinal artery occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;200:271–272. doi:10.1016/J.AJO.2019.01.021
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu CM, McLaughlin K, Lorenzetti DL, Hill MD, Manns BJ, Ghali WA. Early risk of stroke after transient ischemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(22):2417–2422. doi:10.1001/ARCHINTE.167.22.2417
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biousse V, Nahab F, Newman NJ. Management of acute retinal ischemia: follow the guidelines! Ophthalmology. 2018;125(10):1597–1607. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.03.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang LY, Zhang J, Kim RK, et al. Risk of acute ischemic stroke in patients with monocular vision loss of vascular etiology. J Neuroophthalmol. 2018;38(3):328–333. doi:10.1097/WNO.0000000000000613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallico M, Lotery AJ, Longo A, et al. Risk of acute stroke in patients with retinal artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eye. 2019;34(4):683–689. doi:10.1038/s41433-019-0576-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Newman N, Biousse V. Conservative treatments for acute nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion: do they work? Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2021;11(1):16. doi:10.4103/TJO.TJO_61_20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schumacher M, Schmidt D, Jurklies B, et al. Central retinal artery occlusion: local intra-arterial fibrinolysis versus conservative treatment, a multicenter randomized trial. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(7). doi:10.1016/J.OPHTHA.2010.03.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mac Grory B, Nackenoff A, Poli S, et al. Intravenous fibrinolysis for central retinal artery occlusion: a cohort study and updated patient-level meta-analysis. Stroke. 2020;51:2018–2025. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028743/FORMAT/EPUB
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce BB, Lamirel C, Wright DW, et al. Nonmydriatic ocular fundus photography in the emergency department supplementary material refer to web version on PubMed central for supplementary material. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(4):387–389. doi:10.1056/NEJMc1009733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workforce H. National and regional projections of supply and demand for surgical specialty practitioners: 2013-2025 the national center for health workforce analysis (the National Center) informs public and private-sector decision-making on the U national and regional projections of supply and demand for surgical specialty practitioners: 2013–2025 2; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Sorra J, Famolaro T, Naomi Dyer Yount M, Alan Smith S, Wilson S, Helen Liu M. Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture: 2014 User Comparative Database Report Part II: appendix A-Overall Results by Hospital Characteristics Appendix B-Overall Results by Respondent Characteristics Part III: appendix C-Trending Results by Hospital Characteristics Appendix D-Trending Results by Respondent Characteristics; 2014. Available from: www.ahrq.gov. Accessed January 17, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Tauber J, Ayoub S, Shah P, et al. Assessing the demand for teleophthalmology in Florida emergency departments. Telemed E-Health. 2020;26(12):1500–1506. doi:10.1089/TMJ.2019.0260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedekind L, Sainani K, Pershing S. Supply and perceived demand for teleophthalmology in triage and consultations in California emergency departments. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(5):537–543. doi:10.1001/JAMAOPHTHALMOL.2016.0316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady CJ, Eghrari AO and Labrique AB. Smartphone-based visual acuity measurement for screening and clinical assessment. JAMA. 2015;314(24):2682–2683. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam TM, Parry NR, Murray IJ, et al. Development and testing of an automated computer tablet-based method for self-testing of high and low contrast near visual acuity in ophthalmic patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254(5):891–899. doi:10.1007/s00417-016-3293-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claessens J, van Egmond J, Wanten J, Bauer N, Nuijts R, Wisse R. The accuracy of a web-based visual acuity self-assessment tool performed independently by eye care patients at home: method comparison study. JMIR Form Res. 2023;7:.e41045. doi: 10.2196/41045
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Labiris G, Panagiotopoulou, EK, Delibasis, K et al . Validation of a web-based distance visual acuity test. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023;49(7): 666–671. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAnany JJ, Smith BM, Garland A, Kagen SL. iPhone-based pupillometry: a novel approach for assessing the pupillary light reflex. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95(10):953–958. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazziotti R, Carrara F, Viglione A, et al. MEYE: web app for translational and real-time pupillometry. eNeuro. 2021;8(5):ENEURO.0122–21.2021. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0122-21.2021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goseki T, Kunimi K, Shioya N, et al. New device for taking nine-directional ocular photographs: “9Gaze” application. JEMR. 2022;15(1). doi: 10.16910/jemr.15.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar GE, Shen B, Aref A. The Sensimed Triggerfish contact lens sensor: efficacy, safety, and patient perspectives. OPTH. 2017;11:875–882. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S109708
   Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Luttrell I, Feng S, et al. Development and validation of a machine learning, smartphone-based tonometer. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104(10):1394–1398. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo A, Mapham W, Turano R, et al. Comparison of smartphone ophthalmoscopy with Slit-Lamp Biomicroscopy for grading vertical cup-to-disc ratio. J Glaucoma.2016;25(9):e777–e781. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong P, Phan A, Truong B, Suen B, Melles G, Talke F. A smartphone attachment for remote ophthalmic slit lamp examinations. Microsyst Technol. 2020;26(11):3403–3407. doi: 10.1007/s00542-020-04894-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Márquez F, Luque-Romero L, Ruiz-Romero MV, et al. Remote ophthalmology with a smartphone adapter handled by nurses for the diagnosis of eye posterior pole pathologies during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Telemed Telecare. 2023;29(6):474–483. doi: 10.1177/1357633X21994017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo A, Morescalchi F, Costagliola C, Delcassi L, Semeraro F. A novel device to exploit the Smartphone Camera for Fundus Photography. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:1–5. doi: 10.1155/2015/823139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilela MA, Valença FM, Barreto PK, Amaral CE, Pellanda LC. Agreement between retinal images obtained via smartphones and images obtained with retinal cameras or fundoscopic exams – systematic review and meta-analysis. OPTH. 2018. 12:2581–2589. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S182022
   Google Scholar
• Sivaraman A, Nagarajan S, Vadivel S, et al. A novel, smartphone-based, teleophthalmology-enabled, widefield fundus imaging device with an autocapture algorithm. Trans Vis Sci Tech. 2021;10(12):21. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.12.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TN, Myers, F, Reber, C et al . A smartphone-based tool for rapid, portable, and Automated Wide-Field Retinal Imaging. Trans Vis Sci Tech. 2018;7(5):21. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.5.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin D, Munshi H, Savatovsky E, Vanner E, Chang TA, Grajewski AL. Visual Field Testing in a Telehealth Setting: Remote Perimetry Using a Head-Mounted Device in Normal Eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022;63(7):1265 – A0405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones PR, Campbell P, Callaghan T, et al. Glaucoma home monitoring using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (eyecatcher): an assessment of accuracy and adherence over 6 months. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021; 223:42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.08.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapelfeldt J, Kucur ŞS, Huber N, Höhn R, Sznitman R. Virtual reality–based and conventional visual field examination comparison in healthy and glaucoma patients. Trans Vis Sci Tech. 2021;10(12):10. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.12.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsapakis S, Papaconstantinou D, Diagourtas A, et al . Home-based visual field test for glaucoma screening comparison with Humphrey perimeter. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:2597–2606. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S187832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong YX, He M, Crowston JG, Vingrys AJ. A comparison of perimetric results from a tablet perimeter and Humphrey field analyzer in glaucoma patients. Trans Vis Sci Tech. 2016;5(6):2. doi: 10.1167/tvst.5.6.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Liu L, Campbell JP, Huang D, Liu G. Handheld optical coherence tomography angiography. Biomed Opt Express. 2017;8(4):2287. doi: 10.1364/BOE.8.002287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Crose M, Eldridge WJ, Cox B, Brown WJ, Wax A. Design and implementation of a low-cost, portable OCT system. Biomed Opt Express. 2018;9(3):1232. doi: 10.1364/BOE.9.001232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer AC, Blumenthal EZ. Telemedicine in ophthalmology in view of the emerging COVID-19 outbreak. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;258(11):2341–2352. doi:10.1007/S00417-020-04879-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meshkin RS, Armstrong GW, Hall NE, Rossin EJ, Hymowitz MB, Lorch AC. Effectiveness of a telemedicine program for triage and diagnosis of emergent ophthalmic conditions. Eye. 2022;37(2):325–331. doi:10.1038/s41433-022-01940-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh L, Hong SC, Chalakkal RJ, Ogbuehi KC. A systematic review of current teleophthalmology services in New Zealand compared to the four comparable countries of the United Kingdom, Australia, United States of America (USA) and Canada. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:4015. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S294428
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez MA, Bruce BB, Newman NJ, Biousse V. The use of retinal photography in non-ophthalmic settings and its potential for neurology. Neurologist. 2012;18(6):350. doi:10.1097/NRL.0B013E318272F7D7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong LN, Thulasi P, Biousse V, et al. Ocular fundus photography of patients with focal neurologic deficits in an emergency department. Neurology. 2015;85(3):256–262. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachade S, Coronado I, Abdelkhaleq R, et al. Detection of stroke with retinal microvascular density and self-supervised learning using OCT-A and Fundus imaging. J Clin Med. 2022;11(24):7408. doi:10.3390/JCM11247408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kummervold PE, Johnsen JAK, Skrøvseth SO, Wynn R. Using noninferiority tests to evaluate telemedicine and E-health services: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(5):e132. doi:10.2196/JMIR.2169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar