78
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Cross-Sectional Quantitative Evaluation of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 45-59 | Received 23 Sep 2023, Accepted 11 Jan 2024, Published online: 15 Feb 2024

References

  • Regmi M, Rehman A. Familial Hyperchylomicronemia. Syndrome: StatPearls; 2022.
  • Pallazola VA, Sajja A, Derenbecker R, et al. Prevalence of familial chylomicronemia syndrome in a quaternary care center. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020;27(19):2276–2278. doi:10.1177/2047487319888054
  • Fox RS, Peipert JD, Vera-Llonch M, et al. PROMIS® and Neuro-QoL TM measures are valid measures of health-related quality of life among patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2020;18(4):231–238. doi:10.1080/14779072.2020.1748011
  • Brahm AJ, Hegele RA. Chylomicronaemia--current diagnosis and future therapies. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11(6):352–362. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2015.26
  • Davidson M, Stevenson M, Hsieh A, et al. The burden of familial chylomicronemia syndrome: interim results from the IN-FOCUS study. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017;15(5):415–423. 20170404. doi:10.1080/14779072.2017.1311786
  • Davidson M, Stevenson M, Hsieh A, et al. The burden of familial chylomicronemia syndrome: results from the global IN-FOCUS study. J Clin Lipidol. 2018;12(4):898–907 e892. 20180426. doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2018.04.009
  • Davidson D, Slota C, Vera-Llonch M, et al. Development of a novel PRO instrument for use in familial chylomicronemia syndrome. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021;5(1):72. 20210811. doi:10.1186/s41687-021-00347-5
  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims; 2009. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceCompliance.RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf. Accessed February 4, 2020.
  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Patient-focused drug development (PFDD) guidance: methods to identify what is important to patients & select, develop or modify fit-for-purpose clinical outcomes assessments. Attachment to guidance 3 discussion document–appendices; 2018. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/116277/download. Accessed August 15, 2021.
  • Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
  • Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):S3–S11. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55
  • Svedlund J, Sjodin I, Dotevall G. GSRS--A clinical rating scale for gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and peptic ulcer disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1988;33(2):129–134. doi:10.1007/BF01535722
  • Revicki DA, Wood M, Wiklund I, et al. Reliability and validity of the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Qual Life Res. 1998;7(1):75–83. doi:10.1023/a:1008841022998
  • Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–159. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Kline P. A Handbook of Test Construction: Introduction to Psychometric Design. New York: Methuen & Co; 1986.
  • Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334. doi:10.1007/bf02310555
  • Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
  • Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988.