Forensic Dentistry as an Analysis Tool for Sex Estimation: A Review of Current Techniques

References

• Heidari S, Babor TF, De Castro P, Tort S, Curno M. Sex and gender equity in research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016;1:2. doi:10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Makiyan Z. Studies of gonadal sex differentiation. Organogenesis. 2016;12(1):42–51. doi:10.1080/15476278.2016.1145318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karkanaki A, Praras N, Katsikis I, Kita M, Panidis D. Is the Y chromosome all that is required for sex determination? Hippokratia. 2007;11(3):120–123.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesalo L, Tammisalo E, Townsend G. Upper central incisor and canine tooth crown size in 47, XXY males. J Dent Res. 1991;70(7):1057–1060. doi:10.1177/00220345910700070801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesalo L. Sex chromosomes and human growth. A dental approach. Hum Genet. 1997;101(1):1–5. doi:10.1007/s004390050575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey PJ, Townsend GC, Richards LC. Increased tooth crown size in females with twin brothers: evidence for hormonal diffusion between human twins in utero. Am J Hum Biol. 1999;11(5):577–586. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(199909/10)11:5<577::AID-AJHB1>3.0.CO;2-Y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilberman U, Smith P. Sex- and age-related differences in primary and secondary dentin formation. Adv Dent Res. 2001;15:42–45. doi:10.1177/08959374010150011101
   Google Scholar
• Kuiri-Hänninen T, Sankilampi U, Dunkel L. Activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in infancy: minipuberty. Horm Res Paediatr. 2014;82(2):73–80. doi:10.1159/000362414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capitaneanu C, Willems G, Thevissen P. A systematic review of odontological sex estimation methods. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2017;35(2):1–19. doi:10.1007/s00784-011-0537-8
   Google Scholar
• Guatelli-Steinberg D, Sciulli PW, Betsinger TK. Dental crown size and sex hormone concentrations: another look at the development of sexual dimorphism. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2008;137(3):324–333. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeyemi TA, Isiekwe MC. Comparing permanent tooth sizes (mesio-distal) of males and females in a Nigerian population. West Afr J Med. 2003;22(3):219–221. doi:10.4314/wajm.v22i3.27953
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz GT, Dean MC. Sexual dimorphism in modern human permanent teeth. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005;128(2):312–317. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoub F, Shamseddine L, Rifai M, et al. Mandibular canine dimorphism in establishing sex identity in the Lebanese population. Int J Dent. 2014;2014:235204. doi:10.1155/2014/235204
   Google Scholar
• Bakkannavar SM, Monteiro FN, Arun M, Pradeep Kumar G. Mesiodistal width of canines: a tool for sex determination. Med Sci Law. 2012;52(1):22–26. doi:10.1258/msl.2011.010152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya AB, Mainali S. Sex discrimination potential of buccolingual and mesiodistal tooth dimensions. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53(4):790–792. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00778.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garn SM, Lewis AB, Swindler DR, Kerewsky RS. Genetic control of sexual dimorphism in tooth size. J Dent Res. 1967;46(5):963–972. doi:10.1177/00220345670460055801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garn SM, Cole PE, Van Alstine WL. Sex discriminatory effectiveness using combinations of root lengths and crown diameters. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1978;50(1):115–118. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330500111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt EE Jr, Gleiser I. The estimation of age and sex of preadolescent children from bones and teeth. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1955;13(3):479–487. doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330130308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manchanda AS, Narang RS, Kahlon SS, Singh B. Diagonal tooth measurements in sex assessment: a study on North Indian population. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015;7(2):126–131. doi:10.4103/0975-1475.146371
   Google Scholar
• Soundarya N, Jain VK, Shetty S, Akshatha BK. Sexual dimorphism using permanent maxillary and mandibular incisors, canines and molars: an odontometric analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2021;25(1):183–188. doi:10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_400_20
   Google Scholar
• Prabhu S, Acharya AB. Odontometric sex assessment in Indians [published correction appears in Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Mar 20; 206 (1–3): 218.e1–2]. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;192(1–3):129.e1–129.e1295. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorba E, Moraitis K, Manolis SK. Sexual dimorphism in permanent teeth of modern Greeks. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;210(1–3):74–81. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angadi PV, Hemani S, Prabhu S, Acharya AB. Analyses of odontometric sexual dimorphism and sex assessment accuracy on a large sample. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20(6):673–677. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2013.03.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash KC, Panda A, Behura SS, Ramachandra S, Bhuyan L, Bandopadhyay A. Employing dimensional disparity of teeth to establish the gender in Odisha population: a dimorphic study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018;8(2):174–178. doi:10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_42_18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaid S, Zafar S, Kruger E, Tennant M. Mesiodistal dimensions and sexual dimorphism of teeth of contemporary Western Australian adolescents. J Oral Sci. 2021;63(3):247–251. doi:10.2334/josnusd.20-0596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Campos C, Martinón-Torres M, Martínez de Pinillos M, et al. Modern humans sex estimation through dental tissue patterns of maxillary canines. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2018;167(4):914–923. doi:10.1002/ajpa.23715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders SR, Chan AH, Kahlon B, Kluge HF, FitzGerald CM. Sexual dimorphism of the dental tissues in human permanent mandibular canines and third premolars. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2007;133(1):735–740. doi:10.1002/ajpa.20553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorenti M, Martinón-Torres M, Martín-Francés L, Perea-Pérez B. Sexual dimorphism of dental tissues in modern human mandibular molars. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2019;169(2):332–340. doi:10.1002/ajpa.23822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesalo L. Human sex chromosomes in oral and craniofacial growth. Arch Oral Biol. 2009;54(Suppl 1):S18–S24. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2008.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Campos C, Martinón-Torres M, Martín-Francés L, et al. Contribution of dental tissues to sex determination in modern human populations. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2018;166(2):459–472. doi:10.1002/ajpa.23447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anna J, Harish K. How reliable is sex differentiation from teeth measurements. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2013;4:289–292.
   Google Scholar
• Zorba E, Vanna V, Moraitis K. Sexual dimorphism of root length on a Greek population sample. Homo. 2014;65(2):143–154. doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2013.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindaram D, Bharanidharan R, Ramya R, Rameshkumar A, Priyadharsini N, Rajkumar K. Root length: as a determinant tool of sexual dimorphism in an ethnic tamil population. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2018;10(2):96–100. doi:10.4103/jfo.jfds_10_18
   Google Scholar
• Aitchison J. Sex differences in teeth, jaws and skulls. Dent Pract. 1964;14:52–57.
   Google Scholar
• Rani ST. Applicability of odontometric dimensions and indices in sexual dimorphism among Nalgonda population. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2017;9(3):175. doi:10.4103/jfo.jfds_42_16
   Google Scholar
• Prasanna S, Makesh Raj LS, Sai Krishna P, Jai Santhosh Manikandan V, Srikant N. Evaluation of incisor index as a forensic tool in gendural dimorphism – a study in south Indian population. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2021;15(4):2319–2323. doi:10.37506/ijfmt.v15i4.17053
   Google Scholar
• Rao NG, Rao NN, Pai ML, Kotian MS. Mandibular canine index--a clue for establishing sex identity. Forensic Sci Int. 1989;42(3):249–254. doi:10.1016/0379-0738(89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel RA, Chaudhary AR, Dudhia BB, Macwan ZS, Patel PS, Jani YV. Mandibular canine index: a study for gender determination in Gandhinagar population. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2017;9(3):135–143. doi:10.4103/jfo.jfds_64_16
   Google Scholar
• Sreedhar G, Sumalatha MN, Ramesh G, Nagarajappa R, Murari A, Agrawal A. Dimorphic mandibular canines in gender determination in Moradabad population of Western Uttar Pradesh. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015;7(1):32–36. doi:10.4103/0975-1475.150302
   Google Scholar
• Singh SK, Gupta A, Padmavathi BN, Kumar S, Roy S, Kumar A. Mandibular canine index: a reliable predictor for gender identification using study cast in Indian population. Indian J Dent Res. 2015;26(4):396–399. doi:10.4103/0970-9290.167632
   Google Scholar
• Silva AM, Pereira ML, Gouveia S, Tavares JN, Azevedo Á, Caldas IM. A new approach to sex estimation using the mandibular canine index. Med Sci Law. 2016;56(1):7–12. doi:10.1177/0025802415575415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atreya A, Shrestha R, Tuladhar LR, Nepal S, Shrestha R, Sah SK. Sex predictability by using mandibular canine index. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020;17(4):501–505. doi:10.33314/jnhrc.v17i4.2187
   Google Scholar
• Acharya AB, Mainali S. Limitations of the mandibular canine index in sex assessment. J Forensic Leg Med. 2009;16(2):67–69. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2008.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dony E, Reddy M, Kakodkar P. Mandibular Canine Index (MCI) not an accurate tool for gender identification: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2018;9(7):61–69. doi:10.5958/0976-5506.2018.00614.9
   Google Scholar
• Rocha MFN, Pinto PHV, Franco A, da Silva RHA. Applicability of the mandibular canine index for sex estimation: a systematic review. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2022;12(14):1–18. doi:10.1186/s41935-022-00270-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo Á, Pereira ML, Gouveia S, Tavares JN, Caldas IM. Sex estimation using the mandibular canine index components. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2019;15(2):191–197. doi:10.1007/s12024-018-0051-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz AG, Soares GH, da Rosa GC, Biazevic MGH, Michel-Crosato E. A pilot study of an automated personal identification process: applying machine learning to panoramic radiographs. Imaging Sci Dent. 2021;51(2):187–193. doi:10.5624/isd.20200324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmaeilyfard R, Paknahad M, Dokohaki S. Sex classification of first molar teeth in cone beam computed tomography images using data mining. Forensic Sci Int. 2021;318:110633. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Issrani R, Prabhu N, Sghaireen MG, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography: a new tool on the horizon for forensic dentistry. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(9):5352. doi:10.3390/ijerph19095352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott G, Maier C, Heim K. Identifying and recording key morphological (nonmetric) crown and root traits. In: Irish JD, Scott GR, editors. A Companion to Dental Anthropology. Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell; 2015:247–264. doi:10.1002/9781118845486.ch17
   Google Scholar
• Scott GR. Classification, sex dimorphism, association, and population variation of the canine distal accessory ridge. Hum Biol. 1977;49(3):453–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toneva D, Nikolova S, Agre G, Zlatareva D, Hadjidekov V, Lazarov N. Machine learning approaches for sex estimation using cranial measurements. Int J Legal Med. 2021;135(3):951–966. doi:10.1007/s00414-020-02460-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirthiga M, Manju M, Praveen R, Umesh W. Ethnic association of cusp of Carabelli trait and shoveling trait in an Indian population. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(3):ZC78–ZC81. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/17463.7504
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puri P, Shukla SK, Haque I. Developmental dental anomalies and their potential role in establishing identity in post-mortem cases: a review. Med Leg J. 2019;87(1):13–18. doi:10.1177/0025817218808714
   Google Scholar
• Sella tunis T, Sarne O, Hershkovitz I, et al. Dental anomalies’ characteristics. Diagnostics. 2021;11(7):1161. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11071161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh R, David MP. Cheiloscopy: an aid for personal identification. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2011;3(2):67–70. doi:10.4103/0975-1475.92147
   Google Scholar
• Franco A, Lima LKG, de Oliveira MN, et al. The weak evidence of lip print analysis for sexual dimorphism in forensic dentistry: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):24192. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03680-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan P, Bahirwani S, Valambath S. Assessment of cheiloscopy in sex determination using lysochrome - a preliminary study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015;7(3):195–200. doi:10.4103/0975-1475.172434
   Google Scholar
• Malik R, Goel S, Kailasam S. Cheiloscopy: a deterministic aid for forensic sex determination. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2011;23:17–19. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10011-1082
   Google Scholar
• Sharma V, Ingle NA, Kaur N, Yadav P. Identification of sex using lip prints: a clinical study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2014;4(Suppl 3):S173–S177. doi:10.4103/2231-0762.149030
   Google Scholar
• Nagalaxmi V, Ugrappa S, Ch L, Maloth KN, Kodangal S. Cheiloscopy, palatoscopy and odontometrics in sex prediction and dis-crimination - a comparative study. Open Dent J. 2015;8:269–279. doi:10.2174/1874210601408010269
   Google Scholar
• Smitha T, Vaswani V, Deepak V, Sheethal HS, Hema KN, Jain VK. Reliability of palatal rugae patterns in individual identification. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2021;25(3):555. doi:10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_269_21
   Google Scholar
• Poojya R, Shruthi CS, Rajashekar VM, Kaimal A. Palatal rugae patterns in edentulous cases, are they a reliable forensic marker? Int J Biomed Sci. 2015;11(3):109–112.
   Google Scholar
• de Castro-Espicalsky TL, Freitas P, Ribeiro Tinoco RL, Calmon M, Júnior ED, Rossi AC. Human identification by the analysis of palatal rugae printed in complete dentures. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2020;38(2):57–62.
   Google Scholar
• Smriti K, Gupta R, Pentapati KC, et al. Sex assessment by morphological analysis of palatal rugae patterns in a South Indian adult population. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2021;13:77–81. doi:10.2147/CCIDE.S304599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadicherla P, Saini D, Bhaskar M. Palatal rugae pattern: an aid for sex identification. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2017;9(1):48. doi:10.4103/jfo.jfds_108_15
   Google Scholar
• Gautam N, Patil SG, Krishna RG, Agastya H, Mushtaq L, Kumar KV. Association of palatal rugae pattern in gender identification: an exploratory study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017;18(6):470–473. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2067
   Google Scholar
• Andrade RNM, Vieira WA, Bernardino ÍM, Franco A, Paranhos LR. Reliability of palatal rugoscopy for sexual dimorphism in forensic dentistry: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Arch Oral Biol. 2019;97:25–34. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamba Tde O, Alves MC, Haiter-Neto F. Mandibular sexual dimorphism analysis in CBCT scans. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016;38:106–110. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2015.11.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunis TS, Sarig R, Cohen H, Medlej B, Peled N, May H. Sex estimation using computed tomography of the mandible. Int J Legal Med. 2017;131(6):1691–1700. doi:10.1007/s00414-017-1554-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinay G, Mangala Gowri SR, Anbalagan J. Sex determination of human mandible using metrical parameters. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(12):2671–2673. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2013/7621.3728
   Google Scholar
• Alias A, Ibrahim A, Abu Bakar SN, et al. Anthropometric analysis of mandible: an important step for sex determination. Clin Ter. 2018;169(5):e217–e223. doi:10.7417/CT.2018.2082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Akhtar MJ, Kumar B, Sinha RR, Kumar A, Kumar S. Sex determination of human mandible in population of bihar by using metrical parameters. Int J Med Res Prof. 2018;4(6):173–177. doi:10.21276/ijmrp.2018.4.6.036
   Google Scholar
• Kujur B, Wakode NS, Gaikwad MR, Wakode S. Most reliable parameter of the mandible used for sex determination. Int J Anat Res. 2017;5:4611–4615. doi:10.16965/ijar.2017.419
   Google Scholar
• Ongkana N, Sudwan P. Gender difference in Thai mandibles using metric analysis. Chiang Mai Med J. 2009;48(2):43–48.
   Google Scholar
• Khan HS, Sharieff JH. Observation on morphological features of human mandibles in 200 South Indian subjects. Anatomica Karnataka Int J. 2011;5:44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Nagaraj T, Veerabasvaiah BT, James L, Goswami RD, Narayanan S, Keerthi I. Use of non-metric characteristics of mandible in sex determination. J Med Radiol Pathol Surg. 2016;2(4):1–4. doi:10.15713/ins.jmrps.60
   Google Scholar
• Nirmale VK, Mane UW, Sukre SB, Diwan CV. Morphological features of human mandible. Int J Recent Trends Sci Technol. 2012;3(2):38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Tambawala SS, Karjodkar FR, Sansare K, Prakash N, Dora AC. Sexual dimorphism of foramen magnum using cone beam computed tomography. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016;44:29–34. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2016.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paknahad M, Shahidi S, Zarei Z. Sexual dimorphism of maxillary sinus dimensions using cone-beam computed tomography. J Forensic Sci. 2017;62(2):395–398. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.13272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farias Gomes A, de Oliveira Gamba T, Yamasaki MC, Groppo FC, Haiter Neto F, Possobon RF. Development and validation of a formula based on maxillary sinus measurements as a tool for sex estimation: a cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Legal Med. 2019;133(4):1241–1249. doi:10.1007/s00414-018-1869-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leao de Queiroz C, Terada AS, Dezem TU, et al. Sex determination of adult human maxillary sinuses on panoramic radiographs. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2016;50(3):215–221. doi:10.15644/asc50/3/3
   Google Scholar
• Nunes Rocha MF, Dietrichkeit Pereira JG, Alves da Silva RH. Sex estimation by maxillary sinus using computed tomography: a systematic review. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2021;1(39):35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Veeraraghavan G, Lingappa A, Shankara SP, Mamatha GP, Sebastian BT, Mujib A. Determination of sex from tooth pulp tissue. Libyan J Med. 2010;5. doi:10.3402/ljm.v5i0.5084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maulani C, Auerkari EI. Molecular analysis for sex determination in forensic dentistry: a systematic review. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2020;10(1):36. doi:10.1186/s41935-020-00210-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priyadharscini RA, Sabarinath T. Barr bodies in sex determination. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2013;5(1):64–67.
   Google Scholar
• Khorate MM, Dhupar A, Ahmed J, Dinkar AD. Gender determination from pulpal tissue. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2014;6(2):107–112. doi:10.4103/0975-1475.132540
   Google Scholar
• Reddy AVS, Prakash AR, Killampalli LK, Rajinikanth M, Sreenath G, Sabiha PB. Gender determination using barr bodies from teeth exposed to high temperatures. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2017;9(1):44. doi:10.4103/0975-1475.206494
   Google Scholar
• Haas-Rochholz H, Weiler G. Additional primer sets for an amelogenin gene PCR-based DNA-sex test. Int J Legal Med. 1997;110(6):312–315. doi:10.1007/s004140050094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy VS, Sriram G, Saraswathi T, Sivapathasundharam B. Isolation of epithelial cells from tooth brush and gender identification by amplification of SRY gene. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2011;3(1):27–32. doi:10.4103/0975-1475.85293
   Google Scholar
• Tozzo P, Giuliodori A, Corato S, Ponzano E, Rodriguez D, Caenazzo L. Deletion of amelogenin Y-locus in forensics: literature revision and description of a novel method for sex confirmation. J Forensic Leg Med. 2013;20(5):387–391. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2013.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashyap VK, Sahoo S, Sitalaximi T, Trivedi R. Deletions in the Y-derived amelogenin gene fragment in the Indian population. BMC Med Genet. 2006;7:37. doi:10.1186/1471-2350-7-37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thangaraj K, Reddy AG, Singh L. Is the amelogenin gene reliable for gender identification in forensic casework and prenatal diagnosis? Int J Legal Med. 2002;116(2):121–123. doi:10.1007/s00414-001-0262-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dash HR, Rawat N, Das S. Alternatives to amelogenin markers for sex determination in humans and their forensic relevance. Mol Biol Rep. 2020;47(3):2347–2360. doi:10.1007/s11033-020-05268-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastelic V, Budowle B, Drobnic K. Validation of SRY marker for forensic casework analysis. J Forensic Sci. 2009;54(3):551–555. doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01007.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George R, Sriram G, Saraswathi T, Sivapathasundharam B. Isolation of epithelial cells from acrylic removable dentures and gender identification by amplification of SRY gene using real time PCR. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2010;2(1):32–36. doi:10.4103/0974-2948.71055
   Google Scholar
• Khan R, Tejasvi MLA, Paramkusam G. Comparison of Gender determination from dental pulp and dentin after exposure to various environmental conditions: a polymerase chain reaction-based SRY gene study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2019;10(2):256–262. doi:10.4103/ccd.ccd_472_18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toy S, Secgin Y, Oner Z, Turan MK, Oner S, Senol D. A study on sex estimation by using machine learning algorithms with parameters obtained from computerized tomography images of the cranium. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):4278. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07415-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz AG, Costa C, Silva RHA, Biazevic MGH, Michel-Crosato E. Sex estimation: anatomical references on panoramic radiographs using machine learning. Forensic Imaging. 2020;20:200356. doi:10.1016/j.fri.2020.200356
   Google Scholar