Standardization of dual time point [18F] 2-Deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography performed with different positron emission tomography scanners using partial volume correction

References

• Poeppel TD, Krause BJ, Heusner TA, Boy C, Bockisch A, Antoch G. PET/CT for staging and follow-up of patients with malignancies. Eur J Radiol. 2009;70(3):382–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng G, Torigian DA, Zhung H, Alavi A. When should we recommend use of dual time-point and delayed time-point imaging techniques in FDG PET? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(5):779–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillaci O. Use of dual-point fluorodeoxyglucose imaging to enhance sensitivity and specificity. Semin Nucl Med. 2012;42(4):267–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demura Y, Tsuchida T, Ishizaki T, et al. 18F-FDG accumulation with PET for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in the thorax. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(4):540–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthies A, Hickeson M, Cuchiara A, Alavi A. Dual time point 18F-FDG PET for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(7):871–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zytoon AA, Murakami K, El-Kholy MR, El-Shorbagy E. Dual point FDG-PET/CT imaging… Potential tool for diagnosis of breast cancer. Clin Radiol. 2008;63(11):1213–1227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Loving VA, Chauhan A, Zhuang H, Mitchell S, Alavi A. Potential of dual-time-point imaging to improve breast cancer diagnosis with 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 2005;46(11):1819–1824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavi A, Urhan M, Yu JQ, et al. Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging detects breast cancer with high sensitivity and correlates well with histologic subtypes. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(9):1440–1446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zytoon AA, Murakami K, El-Kholy MR, El-Shorbagy E, Ebied O. Breast cancer with low FDG uptake: characterization by means of dual-time point FDG-PET/CT. Eur J Radiol. 2009;70(3):530–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn S, Hecktor J, Grabellus F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients. Acta Radiol. 2012;53(5):518–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprio MG, Cangiano A, Imbriaco M, et al. Dual-time-point [18F]-FDG PET/CT in the diagnostic evaluation of suspicious breast lesions. Radiol Med. 2010;115(2):215–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med. 2009;50 Suppl 1:11S–20S.
   Google Scholar
• Boellaard R. Need for standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for treatment response assessments. J Nucl Med. 2011;52 Suppl 2:93S–100S.
   Google Scholar
• Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I. Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(6):932–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousset OG, Ma Y, Evans AC. Correction for partial volume effects in PET: principle and validation. J Nucl Med. 1998;39(5):904–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousset OG, Collins DL, Rahmim A, Wong DF. Design and implementation of an automated partial volume correction in PET: application to dopamine receptor quantification in the normal human striatum. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(7):1097–1106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CH, Muzic RF Jr, Nelson AD, Adler LP. Simultaneous recovery of size and radioactivity concentration of small spheroids with PET data. J Nucl Med. 1999;40(1):118–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler LP, Crowe JP, Al-Kaisi NK, Sunshine JL. Evaluation of breast masses and axillary lymph nodes with [F-18] 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose PET. Radiology. 1993;187(3):743–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakaguchi Y, Mizoguchi N, Mitsumoto T, et al. A simple table lookup method for PET/CT partial volume correction using a point-spread function in diagnosing lymph node metastasis. Ann Nucl Med. 2010;24(8):585–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruoka Y, Abe K, Baba S, et al. Usefulness of partial volume effect-corrected F-18 FDG PET/CT for predicting I-131 accumulation in the metastatic lymph nodes of patients with thyroid carcinoma. Ann Nucl Med. 2013;27(10):873–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler RM, Ellis JR Jr, Eden M. Analysis of emission tomographic scan data: limitations imposed by resolution and background. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984;8(3):514–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesselle H, Turcotte E, Wiens L, et al. Relationship between non-small cell lung cancer fluorodeoxyglucose uptake at positron emission tomography and surgical stage with relevance to patient prognosis. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(14):4709–4716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks RJ, Kalff V, MacManus MP, et al. 18F-FDG PET provides high-impact and powerful prognostic stratification in staging newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(11):1596–1604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boellaard R, Krak NC, Hoekstra OS, Lammertsma AA. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(9):1519–1527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar