Retzius-Sparing Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy: Technical Challenges for Surgeons and Key Prospective Refinements

References

• Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2021;79(2):243–262. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC, et al. Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena consensus panel. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):368–381. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autorino R, Porpiglia F, Dasgupta P, et al. Precision surgery and genitourinary cancers. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(5):893–908. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2017.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma X, Tang K, Yang C, et al. Bladder neck preservation improves time to continence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2016;7(41):67463–67475. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.11997
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martini A, Falagario UG, Villers A, et al. Contemporary techniques of prostate dissection for robot-assisted prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2020;78:583–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sridhar AN, Abozaid M, Rajan P, et al. Surgical techniques to optimize early urinary continence recovery post robot assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18(9):71. doi:10.1007/s11934-017-0717-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, Petralia G, Strada E, Bocciardi AM. A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol. 2010;58(3):457–461. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walz J, Epstein JI, Ganzer R, et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy of the prostate related to optimisation of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy: an update. Eur Urol. 2016;70(2):301–311. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.01.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou YC, Yang CK, Wang J, et al. The trifecta outcome in 300 consecutive cases of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy according to D’Amico risk criteria. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(1):107–113. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2012.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borregales LD, Berg WT, Tal O, et al. Trifecta’ after radical prostatectomy: is there a standard definition? BJU Int. 2013;112(1):60–67. doi:10.1111/bju.12002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F, et al. Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥ 1 year of follow-up. Eur Urol. 2013;64(6):974–980. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim SK, Kim KH, Shin T-Y, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: combining the best of retropubic and perineal approaches. BJU Int. 2014;114(2):236–244. doi:10.1111/bju.12705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalela D, Jeong W, Prasad M-A, et al. A pragmatic randomized controlled trial examining the impact of the retzius-sparing approach on early urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2017;72(5):677–685. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Dalela D, Jamil M, et al. Functional recovery, oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis comparing the retzius sparing and standard approaches. J Urol. 2018;199(5):1210–1217. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu X, Li Y, Chen M, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy improves early recovery of urinary continence: a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial with a 1-year follow-up. BJU Int. 2020;126(5):633–640. doi:10.1111/bju.15195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asimakopoulos AD, Topazio L, De Angelis M, et al. Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(7):2187–2196. doi:10.1007/s00464-018-6499-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel Raheem A, Chang KD, Alenzi MJ, et al. Predictors of biochemical recurrence after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 359 cases with a median follow-up period of 26 months. Int J Urol. 2018;25(12):1006–1014. doi:10.1111/iju.13808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyarangi-Dix JN, Görtz M, Gradinarov G, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and early oncologic results in aggressive and locally advanced prostate cancer. BMC Urol. 2019;19(1):113. doi:10.1186/s12894-019-0550-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galfano A, Tappero S, Eden C, et al. Multicentric experience in Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy performed by expert surgeons for high-risk prostate cancer. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022;74(5):607–614. doi:10.23736/S2724-6051.22.04857-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dell’Oglio P, Tappero S, Longoni M, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients: results from a large single-institution series. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022;38:69–78. doi:10.1016/j.euros.2022.02.007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abdollah F, Dalela D, Sood A, et al. Functional outcomes of clinically high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017;20(4):395–400. doi:10.1038/pcan.2017.26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checcucci E, Veccia A, Fiori C, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs the standard approach: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes. BJU Int. 2020;125(1):8–16. doi:10.1111/bju.14887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phukan C, Mclean A, Nambiar A, et al. Retzius sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy vs. conventional robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2020;38(5):1123–1134. doi:10.1007/s00345-019-02798-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albisinni S, Dasnoy C, Diamand R, et al. Anterior vs. Retzius-sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: can the approach really make a difference? Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022;74(2):137–145. doi:10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04623-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barakat B, Othman H, Gauger U, Wolff I, Hadaschik B, Rehme C. Retzius sparing radical prostatectomy versus robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which technique is more beneficial for prostate cancer patients (MASTER Study)? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(4):1060–1071. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenberg JE, Jung JH, Edgerton Z, et al. Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;8(8):CD013641. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD013641.pub2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tai T-E, Wu -C-C, Kang Y-N, Wu J-C. Effects of Retzius sparing on robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(9):4020–4029. doi:10.1007/s00464-019-07190-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J-N, Xu Z-Y, Yin H-M. Comparison of retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs. conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an up-to-date meta-analysis. Front Surg. 2021;8:738421. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2021.738421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung DY, Jung HD, Kim DK, et al. Outcomes of Retzius-sparing versus conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a KSER update series systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0268182. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0268182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Samavedi S, Bates AS, et al. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Robot Surg. 2017;11(2):129–138. doi:10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abdollah F, Sood A, Sammon JD, et al. Long-term cancer control outcomes in patients with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a multi-institutional study of 1100 patients. Eur Urol. 2015;68(3):497–505. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdollah F, Dalela D, Sood A, et al. Intermediate-term cancer control outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis. World J Urol. 2016;34:1357–1366. doi:10.1007/s00345-016-1781-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzone E, Dell’Oglio P, Rosiello G, et al. Technical refinements in superextended robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer patients at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Urol. 2021;80(1):104–112. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohler JL, Antonarakis ES, Armstrong AJ, et al. Prostate cancer, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(5):479–505. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2019.0023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta NP, Singh P, Nayyar R. Outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with previous transurethral resection of prostate. BJU Int. 2011;108(9):1501–1505. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10113.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zugor V, Labanaris AP, Porres D, Witt JH. Surgical, oncologic, and short-term functional outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate. J Endourol. 2012;26(5):515–519. doi:10.1089/end.2011.0205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung C-F, Yang C-K, Ou Y-C. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy following transurethral resection of the prostate: perioperative, oncologic and functional outcomes. Prostate Int. 2014;2(2):82–89. doi:10.12954/PI.14046
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pompe RS, Leyh-Bannurah S-R, Preisser F, et al. Radical prostatectomy after previous TUR-P: oncological, surgical, and functional outcomes. Urol Oncol. 2018;36(12):527.e21–527.e28. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tappero S, Vecchio E, Palagonia E, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy after previous trans-urethral resection of the prostate: assessment of functional and oncological outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023;49(8):1524–1535. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2023.03.218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahal BA, Butler S, Franco I, et al. Use of active surveillance or watchful waiting for low-risk prostate cancer and management trends across risk groups in the United States, 2010–2015. JAMA. 2019;321(7):704–706. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.19941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zietman AL, Coen JJ, Dallow KC, Shipley WU. The treatment of prostate cancer by conventional radiation therapy: an analysis of long-term outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;32(2):287–292. doi:10.1016/0360-3016(95)00123-G
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco FJ, Scardino PT, Stephenson AJ, Diblasio CJ, Fearn PA, Eastham JA. Long-term oncologic results of salvage radical prostatectomy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62(2):448–453. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.09.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eandi JA, Link BA, Nelson RA, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic salvage prostatectomy for radiation resistant prostate cancer. J Urol. 2010;183(1):133–137. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason JB, Hatch L, Dall C, Kowalczyk KJ. Salvage retzius-sparing radical prostatectomy: a review of complications, functional outcomes, and oncologic outcomes. Curr Oncol. 2022;29(12):9733–9743. doi:10.3390/curroncol29120764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuetz V, Reimold P, Goertz M, et al. Evolution of salvage radical prostatectomy from open to robotic and further to retzius sparing surgery. J Clin Med. 2021;11(1):202. doi:10.3390/jcm11010202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madi R, Sayyid RK, Hiffa A, Thomas E, Terris MK, Klaassen Z. Early experience with salvage retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional outcomes. Urology. 2021;149:117–121. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.12.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalczyk KJ, Madi RH, Eden CG, et al. Comparative outcomes of salvage retzius-sparing versus standard robotic prostatectomy: an international, multi-surgeon series. J Urol. 2021;206(5):1184–1191. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000001939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galfano A, Secco S, Dell’Oglio P, et al. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: early learning curve experience in three continents. BJU Int. 2021;127(4):412–417. doi:10.1111/bju.15196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anceschi U, Galfano A, Luciani L, et al. Analysis of predictors of early trifecta achievement after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for trainers and expert surgeons: the learning curve never ends. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022;74(2):133–136. doi:10.23736/S2724-6051.22.04805-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olivero A, Galfano A, Piccinelli M, et al. Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy for surgeons in the learning curve: a propensity score-matching analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;7(4):772–778. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2020.03.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elliott N, Pahouja G, Felice M, et al. Transition from standard robotic prostatectomy to Retzius-sparing prostatectomy: feasibility and early outcomes. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(5):2035–2040. doi:10.1007/s11701-023-01596-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbs RW, Halgrimson WR, Talamini S, Vigneswaran HT, Wilson JO, Crivellaro S. Single-port robotic surgery: the next generation of minimally invasive urology. World J Urol. 2020;38(4):897–905. doi:10.1007/s00345-019-02898-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C-F N, Chan ESY, Teoh JYC. The use of the da Vinci sp system for retzius-sparing radical prostatectomy in cadaveric model. Urology. 2019;125:260. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal DK, Sharma V, Toussi A, et al. initial experience with da Vinci single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. Eur Urol. 2020;77(3):373–379. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar