Cystine Stones: Developments in Minimally Invasive Surgery and Their Impact on Morbidity and Stone Clearance

References

• Leusmann DB, Blaschke R, Schmandt W. Results of 5035 stone analyses: a contribution to epidemiology of urinary stone disease. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1999;24(3):205–210. doi:10.3109/00365599009180859
   Google Scholar
• Milliner DS, Murphy ME. Urolithiasis in pediatric patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993;68(3):241–248. doi:10.1016/S0025-6196(12)60043-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermann T, Venghaus A, Zerres K. Cystinuria: an inborn cause of urolithiasis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7:19. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-7-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chillarón J, Font-Llitjós M, Fort J, et al. Pathophysiology and treatment of cystinuria. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010;6:424–434. doi:10.1038/nrneph.2010.69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong KA, Mein R, Wass M, et al. The genetic diversity of cystinuria in a UK population of patients. BJU Int. 2015;116(1):109–116. doi:10.1111/bju.12894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner BH, Goldfarb DS, Baum MA, et al. Evaluation and medical management of patients with cystine nephrolithiasis: a consensus statement. J Endourol. 2020;34(11):1103–1110. doi:10.1089/end.2019.0703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers A, Kalakish S, Desai RA, Assimos DG. Management of cystinuria. Urol Clin North Am. 2007;34(3):347–362. doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2007.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfoungaristos S, Hakim R, Katz R, et al. Cystine stones: a single tertiary center experience. J Endourol. 2015;29(3):362–366. doi:10.1089/end.2014.0478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas K, Wong K, Withington J, Bultitude M, Doherty A. Cystinuria-a urologist’s perspective. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11(5):270–277. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2014.51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore SL, Cook P, de Coninck V, et al. Outcomes and long-term follow-up of patients with cystine stones: a systematic review. Curr Urol Rep. 2019;20:27. doi:10.1007/s11934-019-0891-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeper NM, Wertheim ML, Nakada SY, Penniston KL. Cystine stone formers have impaired health-related quality of life compared with noncystine stone formers: a case-referent study piloting the Wisconsin stone quality of life questionnaire among patients with cystine stones. J Endourol. 2017;31(S1):S48–S53. doi:10.1089/end.2016.0564
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prot-Bertoye C, Lebbah S, Daudon M, et al. CKD and its risk factors among patients with cystinuria. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10(5):842–851. doi:10.2215/CJN.06680714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döven SS, Delibaş A, Taşkınlar H, Naycı A. The impact of surgical intervention on renal function in cystinuria. J Bras Nefrol. 2018;40(3):256–260. doi:10.1590/2175-8239-jbn-2018-0034
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsunami M, Kinoshita K, Tanaka K, et al. Successful pre-emptive kidney transplantation in a cystinuria patient with nephrolithiasis-related end-stage renal disease. Ren Replace Ther. 2019;5:30. doi:10.1186/s41100-019-0226-7
   Google Scholar
• Barbey F, Joly D, Rieu P, Méjean A, Daudon M, Jungers P. Medical treatment of cystinuria: critical reappraisal of long-term results. J Urol. 2000;163(5):1419–1423. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67633-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell A, Denneberg T, Edholm E, Jeppsson JO. The effect of sodium intake on cystinuria with and without tiopronin treatment. Nephron. 1995;71(4):407–415. doi:10.1159/000188760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodman JS, Blackburn P, Williams JJ, Brown A, Pospischil MA, Peterson CM. The effect of dietary protein on cystine excretion in patients with cystinuria. Clin Nephrol. 1984;22(6):273–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Königsberger E, Wang Z, Königsberger LC. Solubility of L-cystine in NaCl and artificial urine solutions. Monatshefte fuer Chemie. 2000;131:39–45. doi:10.1007/s007060050004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, et al. Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, part II. J Urol. 2016;196:1161. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraghty RM, Davis NF, Tzelves L, et al. Best practice in interventional management of urolithiasis: an update from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Urolithiasis 2022. Eur Urol Focus. 2023;9(1):199–208. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reinstatler L, Stern K, Batter H, et al. Conversion from cystine to noncystine stones: incidence and associated factors. J Urol. 2018;200(6):1285–1289. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak CY, Fuller CJ. Assessment of cystine solubility in urine and of heterogeneous nucleation. J Urol. 1983;129(5):1066–1070. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)52543-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Servais A, Thomas K, Dello Strologo L, et al. Cystinuria: clinical practice recommendation. Kidney Int. 2021;99(1):48–58. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2020.06.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore SL, Somani BK, Cook P. Journey of a cystinuric patient with a long-term follow-up from a medical stone clinic: necessity to be SaFER (stone and fragments entirely removed). Urolithiasis. 2019;47(2):165–170. doi:10.1007/s00240-018-1059-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onal B, Dogan C, Citgez S, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children with cystine stone: long-term outcomes from a single institution. J Urol. 2013;190(1):234–237. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinchieri A, Montanari E, Zanetti G, Lizzano R. The impact of new technology in the treatment of cystine stones. Urol Res. 2007;35(3):129–132. doi:10.1007/s00240-007-0089-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hughes T, Ho HC, Pietropaolo A, Somani BK. Guideline of guidelines for kidney and bladder stones. Turk J Urol. 2020;46(Supp. 1):S104–S112. doi:10.5152/tud.2020.20315
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruggera L, Zanin M, Beltrami P, Zattoni F. Retrograde transureteral approach: a safe and efficient treatment for recurrent cystine renal stones. Urol Res. 2011;39(5):411–415. doi:10.1007/s00240-010-0358-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takahashi T, Somiya S, Ito K, Kanno T, Higashi Y, Yamada H. The long-term follow-up of patients with cystine stones: a single-center experience for 13 years. J Clin Med. 2021;10(7):1336. doi:10.3390/jcm10071336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usawachintachit M, Sherer B, Hudnall M, et al. Clinical outcomes for cystinuria patients with unilateral versus bilateral cystine stone disease. J Endourol. 2018;32(2):148–153. doi:10.1089/end.2017.0335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quiroz Madarriaga Y, Badenes Gallardo A, Llorens de Knecht E, et al. Can cystinuria decrease the effectiveness of RIRS with high-power ho:yag laser in children? Outcomes from a tertiary endourology referral center. Urolithiasis. 2022;50(2):229–234. doi:10.1007/s00240-022-01301-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinit N, Khoury A, Lopez P, et al. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for cystine stones in children: an observational, retrospective, single-center analysis. Front Pediatr. 2021;16(9):763317. doi:10.3389/fped.2021.763317
   Google Scholar
• Williams JC, Saw KC, Paterson RF, Hatt EK, McAteer JA, Lingeman JE. Variability of renal stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy. Urology. 2003;61(6):1092–1096. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00349-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatta KM, Prien EL, Dretler SP. Cystine calculi--rough and smooth: a new clinical distinction. J Urol. 1989;142(4):937–940. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38946-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SC, Hatt EK, Lingeman JE, Nadler RB, McAteer JA, Williams JC. Cystine: helical computerized tomography characterization of rough and smooth calculi in vitro. J Urol. 2005;174(4 Pt 1):1468–1470. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000173636.19741.24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren H, Poon D, Srinivasan R, et al. Non-contrast computed tomography characteristics in a large cohort of cystinuria patients. World J Urol. 2021;39(7):2753–2757. doi:10.1007/s00345-020-03509-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachel TA, Vijan SR, Dretler SP. Endourological experience with cystine calculi and a treatment algorithm. J Urol. 1991;145(1):25–28. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38237-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranidis AI, Karayannis AA, Delakas DS, Livadas CE, Anezinis PE. Cystine stones: the efficacy of percutaneous and shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Int. 1996;56(3):180–183. doi:10.1159/000282836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz G, Kovalski N, Landau EH. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of ureterolithiasis in patients with cystinuria. Br J Urol. 1993;72(1):13–16. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.1993.tb06447.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landau EH, Shenfeld OZ, Pode D, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in prepubertal children: 22-year experience at a single institution with a single lithotriptor. J Urol. 2009;182:1835–1839. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.04.084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jour I, Lam A, Turney B. Urological stone disease: a 5-year update of stone management using Hospital Episode Statistics. BJU Int. 2022;130(3):364–369. doi:10.1111/bju.15728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juliebø-Jones P, Keller EX, Haugland JN, et al. Advances in ureteroscopy: new technologies and current innovations in the era of Tailored Endourological Stone Treatment (TEST). J Clin Urol. 2022. doi:10.1177/20514158221115986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraghty R, Abourmarzouk O, Rai B, Biyani CS, Rukin NJ, Somani BK. Evidence for Ureterorenoscopy and Laser Fragmentation (URSL) for large renal stones in the modern era. Curr Urol Rep. 2015;16(8):54. doi:10.1007/s11934-015-0529-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane J, Whitehurst L, Hameed BZ, et al. Correlation of operative time with outcomes of ureteroscopy and stone treatment: a systematic review of literature. Curr Urol Rep. 2020;21(4):17. doi:10.1007/s11934-020-0970-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai BP, Ishii H, Jones P, Chapman RA, Stolzenburg JU, Somani BK. Bilateral simultaneous ureteroscopy for bilateral stone disease: a systematic review. Can J Urol. 2016;23(2):8220–8226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraghty RM, Rai BP, Jones P, Somani BK. Bilateral Simultaneous Ureteroscopic (BS-URS) approach in the management of bilateral urolithiasis is a safe and effective strategy in the contemporary era-evidence from a systematic review. Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18(2):11. doi:10.1007/s11934-017-0660-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake T, Ali A, Somani B. Feasibility and safety of bilateral same-session flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for renal and ureteral stone disease. Cent Eur J Urol. 2015;68:193–196. doi:10.5173/ceju.2015.533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whatley A, Jones P, Aboumarzouk O, Somani BK. Safety and efficacy of ureteroscopy and stone fragmentation for pediatric renal stones: a systematic review. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(Suppl 4):S442–S447. doi:10.21037/tau.2019.08.23
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mazzucchi E, Berto FCG, Denstedt J, et al. Treatment of renal lower pole stones: an update. Int Braz J Urol. 2022;48(1):165–174. doi:10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.1023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talso M, Goumas IK, Kamphuis GM, et al. Reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes are more cost-effective than single-use scopes: results of a systematic review from PETRA Uro-group. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(Suppl 4):S418–S425. doi:10.21037/tau.2019.06.13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ventimiglia E, Smyth N, Doizi S, et al. Can the introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes increase the longevity of reusable flexible ureteroscopes at a high volume centre? World J Urol. 2022;40:251–256. doi:10.1007/s00345-021-03808-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwish AE, Gadelmoula MM, Abdelkawi IF, Abdellatif AM, Abdel-Moneim AM, Hammouda HM. Ureteral stricture after ureteroscopy for stones: a prospective study for the incidence and risk factors. Urol Ann. 2019;11(3):276–281. doi:10.4103/UA.UA_110_18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunaryo PL, May PC, Holt SK, Sorensen MD, Sweet RM, Harper JD. Ureteral strictures following ureteroscopy for kidney stone disease: a population-based assessment. J Urol. 2022;208(6):1268–1275. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000002929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May PC, Hsi RS, Tran H, et al. The morbidity of ureteral strictures in patients with prior ureteroscopic stone surgery: multi-institutional outcomes. J Endourol. 2018;32(4):309–314. doi:10.1089/end.2017.0657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen KH, Pedersen KV, Osther SS, Jung HU, Lildal SK, Osther PJ. How should patients with cystine stone disease be evaluated and treated in the twenty-first century? Urolithiasis. 2016;44(1):65–76. doi:10.1007/s00240-015-0841-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark CS, Gnanappiragasam S, Thomas K, Bultitude M. Cystinuria: an Overview of Challenges and Surgical Management. Front Surg. 2022;16(9):812226. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.812226
   Google Scholar
• Schembri M, Sahu J, Aboumarzouk O, et al. Thulium fiber laser: the new kid on the block. Turk J Urol. 2020;46(Suppl 1):S1–S10. doi:10.5152/tud.2020.20093
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keller EX, De Coninck V, Doizi S, Daudon M, Traxer O. Thulium fiber laser: ready to dust all urinary stone composition types? World J Urol. 2021;39(6):1693–1698. doi:10.1007/s00345-020-03217-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Coninck V, Keller EX, Rodríguez-Monsalve M, Audouin M, Doizi S, Traxer O. Systematic review of ureteral access sheaths: facts and myths. BJU Int. 2018;122:959–969. doi:10.1111/bju.14389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxer O, Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol. 2013;189(2):580–584. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulvik O, Harneshaug JR, Gjengsto P. Ureteral strictures following ureteroscopic stone treatment. J Endourol. 2021;35:985–990. doi:10.1089/end.2020.0421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Coninck V, Somani B, Sener ET. Ureteral access sheaths and its use in the future: a comprehensive update based on a literature review. J Clin Med. 2022;11(17):5128. doi:10.3390/jcm11175128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripa F, Tokas T, Griffin S, et al. Role of pediatric ureteral access sheath and outcomes related to flexible ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation: a systematic review of literature. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022;12(45):90–98. doi:10.1016/j.euros.2022.09.012
   Google Scholar
• Tzelves L, Skolarikos A. Suction use during endourological procedures. Curr Urol Rep. 2020;21:46. doi:10.1007/s11934-020-00998-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Z, Cui Y, Zeng F, Li Y, Chen Z, Hequn C. Comparison of suctioning and traditional ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones. World J Urol. 2019;37(5):921–929. doi:10.1007/s00345-018-2455-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang T, Song R, Meng X, et al. A single center study that evaluates the preclinical use of a newly developed software and moving bed system to facilitate the spontaneous excretion of residual fragments after primary stone treatment (RIRS or PCNL). World J Urol. 2022;40(2):585–591. doi:10.1007/s00345-021-03863-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitz C, Desai M, Häcker A, et al. Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol. 2012;61(1):146–158. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhayel Y, Tepeler A, Dabestani S, et al. Tract sizes in miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review from the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2017;72(2):220–235. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emiliani E, Talso M, Baghdadi M, Traxer O. Renal parenchyma injury after percutaneous nephrolithotomy tract dilatations in pig and cadaveric kidney models. Cent Eur J Urol. 2017;70(1):69–75. doi:10.5173/ceju.2017.930
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reeves T, Pietropaolo A, Gadzhiev N, Seitz C, Somani BK. Role of Endourological Procedures (PCNL and URS) on renal function: a systematic review. Curr Urol Rep. 2020;21(5):21. doi:10.1007/s11934-020-00973-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty NJ, Desai MM. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy requiring multiple tracts: comparison of morbidity with single-tract procedures. J Endourol. 2006;20(10):753–760. doi:10.1089/end.2006.20.753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav R, Agarwal S, Sankhwar S, et al. A prospective study evaluating impact on renal function following percutaneous nephrolithotomy using Tc99m ethylenedicysteine renal scan: does multiplicity of access tracts play a role? Investig Clin Urol. 2019;60(1):21–28. doi:10.4111/icu.2019.60.1.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widyokirono DR, Kloping YP, Hidayatullah F, et al. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery vs percutaneous nephrolithotomy for large and complex renal stone: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2022;36(7):865–876. doi:10.1089/end.2021.0761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue T, Watanabe M, Shimada S, Kinoshita H, Matsuda T. Successful ultra-minimally invasive endoscopic intrarenal surgery for 2-year-old boy with bilateral cystine kidney stones over 2 cm. J Endourol Case Rep. 2018;4(1):101–104. doi:10.1089/cren.2018.0042
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barone B, Crocetto F, Vitale R, et al. Retrograde intra renal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm.A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020;72(4):441–450. doi:10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03721-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakare N, Tanase F, Saeb-Parsy K, et al. Efficacy and safety of the EMS Swiss LithoClast® Trilogy for PCNL: results of the European multicentre prospective study on behalf of European Section of UroTechnology. World J Urol. 2021;39(11):4247–4253. doi:10.1007/s00345-021-03710-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav BK, Basnet RB, Shrestha A, et al. Comparison between shockpulse and pneumatic lithotripsy in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 2021;39(3):915–919. doi:10.1007/s00345-020-03239-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajeev TP, Pratihar SK, Sarma D, et al. A comparative study between holmium laser, pneumatic lithotripsy and shock pulse in terms of efficacy and safety in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective randomized study. JELELU. 2020;3:e1–e8.
   Google Scholar
• Rice P, Somani BK. Percutaneous laser nephrolithotripsy: is it here to stay? Results of a systematic review. Curr Opin Urol. 2022;32(2):185–191. doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enikeev D, Taratkin M, Klimov R, et al. Thulium-fiber laser for lithotripsy: first clinical experience in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 2020;38:3069–3074. doi:10.1007/s00345-020-03134-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YH, Wen YC, Chen KC, Chen C. Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2019;37(5):777–788. doi:10.1007/s00345-018-2443-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assimos DG, Leslie SW, Ng C, Streem SB, Hart LJ. The impact of cystinuria on renal function. J Urol. 2002;168(1):27–30. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64824-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suntharasivam T, Mukherjee A, Luk A, Aboumarzouk O, Somani B, Rai BP. The role of robotic surgery in the management of renal tract calculi. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(Suppl 4):S457–S460. doi:10.21037/tau.2019.04.06
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mantica G, Balzarini F, Chierigo F, et al. The fight between PCNL, laparoscopic and robotic pyelolithotomy: do we have a winner? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022;74(2):169–177. doi:10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04587-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varda BK, Johnson EK, Johnson KL, Rosoklija I, Baum MA, Nelson CP. Imaging and surgical utilization for pediatric cystinuria patients: a single-institution cohort study. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(2):106.e1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.08.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito C, Masieri L, Blanc T, Lendvay T, Escolino M. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for treatment of urinary tract stones in children: report of a multicenter international experience. Urolithiasis. 2021;49(6):575–583. doi:10.1007/s00240-021-01271-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein J, Charalampogiannis N, Fiedler M, Wakileh G, Gözen A, Rassweiler J. Analysis of performance factors in 240 consecutive cases of robot-assisted flexible ureteroscopic stone treatment. J Robot Surg. 2021;15(2):265–274. doi:10.1007/s11701-020-01103-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sio M, Manfredi C, Fusco F, Creta M, Mirone V, Arcaniolo D. Recent advances in percutaneous lithotripsy techniques. Curr Opin Urol. 2021;31(1):24–28. doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Yuan Y, Cai Y, et al. Use 3D printing technology to enhance stone free rate in single tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of staghorn stones. Urolithiasis. 2020;48(6):509–516. doi:10.1007/s00240-019-01164-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameed BMZ, Somani S, Keller EX, et al. Application of virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality in endourology and urolithiasis: an update by YAU Endourology and Urolithiasis Working Group. Front Surg. 2022;1(9):866946. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2022.866946
   Google Scholar
• Cai JL, Zhang Y, Sun GF, Li NC, Yuan XL, Na YQ. Proficiency of virtual reality simulator training in flexible retrograde ureteroscopy renal stone management. Chin Med J. 2013;126(20):3940–3943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmi A, Jones P, Somani BK. current status and role of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in Endourology. Urology. 2021;148:26–31. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones P, Pietropaolo A, Chew BH, et al. Atlas of scoring systems, grading tools, and nomograms in endourology: a comprehensive overview from the TOWER Endourological Society Research Group. J Endourol. 2021;35(12):1863–1882. doi:10.1089/end.2021.0124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar