324
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
REVIEW

Therapeutic Approaches to Penile Cancer: Standards of Care and Recent Developments

, , , , , & show all
Pages 165-174 | Received 06 Mar 2023, Accepted 24 May 2023, Published online: 02 Jun 2023

References

  • Fu L, Tian T, Yao K, et al. Global pattern and trends in penile cancer incidence: population-based study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022;8(7):e34874. doi:10.2196/34874
  • Giona S. The epidemiology of penile cancer. In: Barber N, Ali A, editors. Urologic Cancers. Exon Publications; 2022.
  • Chadha J, Chahoud J, Spiess PE. An update on treatment of penile cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022;14:17588359221127254. doi:10.1177/17588359221127254
  • Hakenberg OW, Drager DL, Erbersdobler A, Naumann CM, Junemann KP, Protzel C. The diagnosis and treatment of penile cancer. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;115(39):646–652. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2018.0646
  • Tang Y, Hu X, Wu K, Li X. Immune landscape and immunotherapy for penile cancer. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1055235. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1055235
  • Joshi VB, Chadha J, Chahoud J. Penile cancer: updates in systemic therapy. Asian J Urol. 2022;9(4):374–388. doi:10.1016/j.ajur.2022.03.006
  • Board, PDQ Adult Treatment Editorial. Penile Cancer Treatment (PDQ(R)): health professional version. PDQ Cancer Information Summaries; 2002.
  • Manjunath A, Brenton T, Wylie S, Corbishley CM, Watkin NA. Topical therapy for non-invasive penile cancer (Tis)-updated results and toxicity. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6(5):803–808. doi:10.21037/tau.2017.06.24
  • Tang DH, Yan S, Ottenhof SR, et al. Laser ablation as monotherapy for penile squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-center cohort analysis. Urol Oncol. 2018;36(4):147–152. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.09.028
  • Wikstrom A, Hedblad MA, Johansson B, et al. The acetic acid test in evaluation of subclinical genital papillomavirus infection: a comparative study on penoscopy, histopathology, virology and scanning electron microscopy findings. Genitourin Med. 1992;68(2):90–99. doi:10.1136/sti.68.2.90
  • Larke NL, Thomas SL, Dos Santos Silva I, Weiss HA. Male circumcision and penile cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22(8):1097–1110. doi:10.1007/s10552-011-9785-9
  • Prickett KA, Ramsey ML. Mohs Micrographic Surgery. StatPearls; 2022.
  • Shindel AW, Mann MW, Lev RY, et al. Mohs micrographic surgery for penile cancer: management and long-term followup. J Urol. 2007;178(5):1980–1985. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.039
  • Sosnowski R, Kuligowski M, Kuczkiewicz O, et al. Primary penile cancer organ sparing treatment. Cent European J Urol. 2016;69(4):377–383. doi:10.5173/ceju.2016.890
  • Spiess PE, Necchi A; SpringerLink. Penile Carcinoma: Therapeutic Principles and Advances. 1st ed. Springer International Publishing: Imprint: Springer; 2021.
  • Falcone M, Preto M, Oderda M, et al. Total glans resurfacing for the management of superficial penile cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis in a tertiary referral center. Urology. 2020;145:281–286. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.066
  • Lont AP, Gallee MP, Meinhardt W, van Tinteren H, Horenblas S. Penis conserving treatment for T1 and T2 penile carcinoma: clinical implications of a local recurrence. J Urol. 2006;176(2):575–80; discussion 580. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.063
  • Roussel E, Peeters E, Vanthoor J, et al. Predictors of local recurrence and its impact on survival after glansectomy for penile cancer: time to challenge the dogma? BJU Int. 2021;127(5):606–613. doi:10.1111/bju.15297
  • Hasan S, Francis A, Hagenauer A, et al. The role of brachytherapy in organ preservation for penile cancer: a meta-analysis and review of the literature. Brachytherapy. 2015;14(4):517–524. doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2015.03.008
  • Minhas S, Kayes O, Hegarty P, Kumar P, Freeman A, Ralph D. What surgical resection margins are required to achieve oncological control in men with primary penile cancer? BJU Int. 2005;96(7):1040–1043. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05769.x
  • Brouwer OR, Albersen M, Parnham A, et al. European Association of Urology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Collaborative Guideline on Penile Cancer: 2023 update. Eur Urol. 2023;83(6):548–560. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.027
  • Coddington ND, Redger KD, Higuchi TT. Surgical principles of penile cancer for penectomy and inguinal lymph node dissection: a narrative review. AME Med J. 2021;6:29. doi:10.21037/amj-20-159
  • Kamel MH, Bissada N, Warford R, Farias J, Davis R. Organ sparing surgery for penile cancer: a systematic review. J Urol. 2017;198(4):770–779. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.088
  • Maddineni SB, Lau MM, Sangar VK. Identifying the needs of penile cancer sufferers: a systematic review of the quality of life, psychosexual and psychosocial literature in penile cancer. BMC Urol. 2009;9:8. doi:10.1186/1471-2490-9-8
  • Schover LR, von Eschenbach AC, Smith DB, Gonzalez J. Sexual rehabilitation of urologic cancer patients: a practical approach. CA Cancer J Clin. 1984;34(2):66–74. doi:10.3322/canjclin.34.2.66
  • Hegarty PK, Shabbir M, Hughes B, et al. Penile preserving surgery and surgical strategies to maximize penile form and function in penile cancer: recommendations from the United Kingdom experience. World J Urol. 2009;27(2):179–187. doi:10.1007/s00345-008-0312-x
  • Pizzocaro G, Algaba F, Horenblas S, et al. EAU penile cancer guidelines 2009. Eur Urol. 2010;57(6):1002–1012. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.01.039
  • Stroie FA, Houlihan MD, Kohler TS. Sexual function in the penile cancer survivor: a narrative review. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(6):2544–2553. doi:10.21037/tau-20-1228
  • Bandieramonte G, Colecchia M, Mariani L, et al. Peniscopically controlled CO2 laser excision for conservative treatment of in situ and T1 penile carcinoma: report on 224 patients. Eur Urol. 2008;54(4):875–882. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.019
  • Windahl T, Skeppner E, Andersson SO, Fugl-Meyer KS. Sexual function and satisfaction in men after laser treatment for penile carcinoma. J Urol. 2004;172(2):648–651. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000132891.68094.87
  • Hadway P, Corbishley CM, Watkin NA. Total glans resurfacing for premalignant lesions of the penis: initial outcome data. BJU Int. 2006;98(3):532–536. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06368.x
  • Sedigh O, Falcone M, Ceruti C, et al. Sexual function after surgical treatment for penile cancer: which organ-sparing approach gives the best results? Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9(7–8):E423–E427. doi:10.5489/cuaj.2801
  • Scarberry K, Angermeier KW, Montague D, Campbell S, Wood HM. Outcomes for organ-preserving surgery for penile cancer. Sex Med. 2015;3(2):62–66. doi:10.1002/sm2.56
  • Morelli G, Pagni R, Mariani C, et al. Glansectomy with split-thickness skin graft for the treatment of penile carcinoma. Int J Impot Res. 2009;21(5):311–314. doi:10.1038/ijir.2009.17
  • Perez J, Chavarriaga J, Ortiz A, et al. Oncological and functional outcomes after organ-sparing plastic reconstructive surgery for penile cancer. Urology. 2020;142:161–165 e1. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.03.058
  • Chavarriaga J, Becerra L, Camacho D, et al. Inverted urethral flap reconstruction after partial penectomy: long-term oncological and functional outcomes. Urol Oncol. 2022;40(4):169 e13–169 e20. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.02.006
  • Edward JPFS, Sarah PP, Patricia V, Courtney MPH. Sexual and voiding outcomes in post-penectomy penile cancer patients. JOJ Uro Nephron. 2018;6. doi: 10.19080/JOJUN.2018.06.555678
  • Kieffer JM, Djajadiningrat RS, van Muilekom EA, Graafland NM, Horenblas S, Aaronson NK. Quality of life for patients treated for penile cancer. J Urol. 2014;192(4):1105–1110. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.014
  • Romero FR, Romero KR, Mattos MA, Garcia CR, Fernandes Rde C, Perez MD. Sexual function after partial penectomy for penile cancer. Urology. 2005;66(6):1292–1295. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.081
  • Bhat GS, Nelivigi G, Barude V, Shastry A. Sexuality in Surgically Treated Carcinoma Penis Patients and Their Partners. Indian J Surg. 2018;80(1):19–23. doi:10.1007/s12262-016-1543-5
  • Bickell M, Beilan J, Wallen J, Wiegand L, Carrion R. Advances in surgical reconstructive techniques in the management of penile, urethral, and scrotal cancer. Urol Clin North Am. 2016;43(4):545–559. doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2016.06.015
  • Heyns CF, Fleshner N, Sangar V, Schlenker B, Yuvaraja TB, van Poppel H. Management of the lymph nodes in penile cancer. Urology. 2010;76(2 Suppl 1):S43–S57. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.001
  • McDougal WS. Preemptive lymphadenectomy markedly improves survival in patients with cancer of the penis who harbor occult metastases. J Urol. 2005;173(3):681. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000153484.07200.f6
  • Teh J, Duncan C, Qu L, et al. Inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer: a contemporary review. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(6):3210–3218. doi:10.21037/tau.2019.08.37
  • Pizzocaro G, Piva L, Bandieramonte G, Tana S. Up-to-date management of carcinoma of the penis. Eur Urol. 1997;32(1):5–15. doi:10.1159/000480874
  • Horenblas S. Lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 2: the role and technique of lymph node dissection. BJU Int. 2001;88(5):473–483. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.00379.x
  • Saisorn I, Lawrentschuk N, Leewansangtong S, Bolton DM. Fine-needle aspiration cytology predicts inguinal lymph node metastasis without antibiotic pretreatment in penile carcinoma. BJU Int. 2006;97(6):1225–1228. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06159.x
  • Network NCC. Penile cancer (Version 1.2023). Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/penile.pdf. Accessed January 19, 2023.
  • Gkegkes ID, Minis EE, Iavazzo C. Robotic-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy: a systematic review. J Robot Surg. 2019;13(1):1–8. doi:10.1007/s11701-018-0823-4
  • Ottenhof SR, Leone AR, Horenblas S, Spiess PE, Vegt E. Advancements in staging and imaging for penile cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2017;27(6):612–620. doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000447
  • Hughes B, Leijte J, Shabbir M, Watkin N, Horenblas S. Non-invasive and minimally invasive staging of regional lymph nodes in penile cancer. World J Urol. 2009;27(2):197–203. doi:10.1007/s00345-008-0288-6
  • Mueller-Lisse UG, Scher B, Scherr MK, Seitz M. Functional imaging in penile cancer: PET/computed tomography, MRI, and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18(1):105–110. doi:10.1097/MOU.0b013e3282f151fd
  • Sadeghi R, Gholami H, Zakavi SR, Kakhki VR, Horenblas S. Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing inguinal lymph node involvement in penile squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37(5):436–441. doi:10.1097/RLU.0b013e318238f6ea
  • Hakenberg OW, Comperat EM, Minhas S, Necchi A, Protzel C, Watkin N. EAU guidelines on penile cancer: 2014 update. Eur Urol. 2015;67(1):142–150. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.017
  • Pagliaro LC, Williams DL, Daliani D, et al. Neoadjuvant paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic penile cancer: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(24):3851–3857. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.29.5477
  • Azizi M, Aydin AM, Hajiran A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis-is there a benefit in using neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy for locally advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma? J Urol. 2020;203(6):1147–1155. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000000746
  • Pettaway CA, Nicholson S, Spiess PE, et al. The international penile advanced cancer trial (InPACT): the first phase III trial for squamous carcinoma of the penis with regional lymph node metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(6_suppl):TPS7–TPS7. doi:10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.TPS7
  • Canter DJ, Nicholson S, Watkin N, Hall E, Pettaway C, In PEC. The International Penile Advanced Cancer Trial (InPACT): rationale and current status. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(5):706–709. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2019.05.010
  • Yuan Z, Naghavi AO, Tang D, et al. The relationship between HPV status and chemoradiotherapy in the locoregional control of penile cancer. World J Urol. 2018;36(9):1431–1440. doi:10.1007/s00345-018-2280-0
  • Miralles-Guri C, Bruni L, Cubilla AL, Castellsague X, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S. Human papillomavirus prevalence and type distribution in penile carcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 2009;62(10):870–878. doi:10.1136/jcp.2008.063149
  • Lohneis P, Boral S, Kaufmann AM, et al. Human papilloma virus status of penile squamous cell carcinoma is associated with differences in tumour-infiltrating T lymphocytes. Virchows Arch. 2015;466(3):323–331. doi:10.1007/s00428-014-1713-4
  • Yugawa T, Kiyono T. Molecular mechanisms of cervical carcinogenesis by high-risk human papillomaviruses: novel functions of E6 and E7 oncoproteins. Rev Med Virol. 2009;19(2):97–113. doi:10.1002/rmv.605
  • Trimble CL, Morrow MP, Kraynyak KA, et al. Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of VGX-3100, a therapeutic synthetic DNA vaccine targeting human papillomavirus 16 and 18 E6 and E7 proteins for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2b trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10008):2078–2088. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00239-1
  • Chahoud J, Pham R, Sonpavde G. Innovative systemic therapies for penile cancer. Curr Opin Urol. 2022;32(1):8–16. doi:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000941
  • Necchi A, Giannatempo P, Lo Vullo S, et al. Panitumumab treatment for advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma when surgery and chemotherapy have failed. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016;14(3):231–236. doi:10.1016/j.clgc.2015.08.001
  • Buonerba C, Di Lorenzo G, Pond G, et al. Prognostic and predictive factors in patients with advanced penile cancer receiving salvage (2nd or Later Line) systemic treatment: a retrospective, multi-center study. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:487. doi:10.3389/fphar.2016.00487
  • Chahoud J, Tamil M, Necchi A. Second line salvage systemic therapy for advanced penile cancer. Urol Oncol. 2022;40(6):229–234. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.08.001
  • Jacob JM, Ferry EK, Gay LM, et al. Comparative genomic profiling of refractory and metastatic penile and nonpenile cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: implications for selection of systemic therapy. J Urol. 2019;201(3):541–548. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2018.09.056
  • Baweja A, Mar N. Metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma with dramatic response to combined checkpoint blockade with ipilimumab and nivolumab. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2021;27(1):212–215. doi:10.1177/1078155220922602
  • Hahn AW, Chahoud J, Campbell MT, et al. Pembrolizumab for advanced penile cancer: a case series from a phase II basket trial. Invest New Drugs. 2021;39(5):1405–1410. doi:10.1007/s10637-021-01100-x
  • Chahoud J, Skelton W, Spiess PE, et al. Case report: two cases of chemotherapy refractory metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma with extreme durable response to pembrolizumab. Front Oncol. 2020;10:615298. doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.615298
  • Marabelle A, Le DT, Ascierto PA, et al. Efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with noncolorectal high microsatellite instability/mismatch repair-deficient cancer: results from the Phase II KEYNOTE-158 study. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(1):1–10. doi:10.1200/JCO.19.02105
  • Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, et al. Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(10):1353–1365. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30445-9
  • Group LACO. Pembrolizumab combined with cisplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line systemic therapy in advanced penile cancer; 2022. Available from: https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT04224740. Accessed January 19, 2023.
  • Gassian N, Frontczak A, Mouillet G, et al. Activity and tolerability of maintenance avelumab immunotherapy after first line polychemotherapy including platinum in patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell penile carcinoma: PULSE. Bull Cancer. 2020;107(5S):eS16–eS21. doi:10.1016/S0007-4551(20)30282-4
  • Aydin AM, Hall M, Bunch BL, et al. Expansion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) from penile cancer patients. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;94:107481. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2021.107481
  • Doran SL, Stevanovic S, Adhikary S, et al. T-cell receptor gene therapy for human papillomavirus-associated epithelial cancers: a first-in-human, Phase I/II study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(30):2759–2768. doi:10.1200/JCO.18.02424