Catheter-Free Urodynamics Testing: Current Insights and Clinical Potential

References

• Milsom I, Gyhagen M. The prevalence of urinary incontinence. Climacteric. 2019;22(3):217–222. doi:10.1080/13697137.2018.1543263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber Pedersen L, Lose G, Høybye MT, Elsner S, Waldmann A, Rudnicki M. Prevalence of urinary incontinence among women and analysis of potential risk factors in Germany and Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(8):939–948. doi:10.1111/aogs.13149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakurah MN, Koo C, Choi W, Joung YH. Implantable Bladder Sensors: a Methodological Review. Int Neurourol J. 2015;19(3):133–141. doi:10.5213/inj.2015.19.3.133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao M, Simoes A. Urodynamic Testing and Interpretation. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Abelson B, Majerus S, Sun D, Gill BC, Versi E, Damaser MS. Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: state of the art and future directions. Nat Rev Urol. 2019;16(5):291–301. doi:10.1038/s41585-019-0175-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourand P, Puers R. The BladderPill: an in-body system logging bladder pressure. Sens Actuators A. 2010;162(2):160–166. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2010.01.035
   Google Scholar
• Radley SC, Rosario DJ, Chapple CR, Farkas AG. Conventional and ambulatory urodynamic findings in women with symptoms suggestive of bladder overactivity. J Urol. 2001;166(6):2253–2258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantu H, Sharaf A, Bevan W, Hassine A, Hashim H. Ambulatory urodynamics in clinical practice: a single centre experience. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(8):2077–2082. doi:10.1002/nau.24153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wille S, Schumacher P, Paas J, et al. Catheterless long-term ambulatory urodynamic measurement using a novel three-device system. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e96280. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pannek J, Pieper P. Clinical usefulness of ambulatory urodynamics in the diagnosis and treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2008;42(5):428–432. doi:10.1080/00365590802299056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart T, Hanna J, Gutruf P. Wearable devices for continuous monitoring of biosignals: challenges and opportunities. APL Bioeng. 2022;6(2):021502. doi:10.1063/5.0086935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazaka K, Jacob MV. Implantable Devices: issues and Challenges. Electronics. 2012;2(4):1–34. doi:10.3390/electronics2010001
   Google Scholar
• Semproni F, Iacovacci V, Menciassi A. Bladder Monitoring Systems: state of the Art and Future Perspectives. IEEE Access. 2022;10:125626–125651. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3221816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majerus SJA, Offutt SJ, Brink TS, et al. Feasibility of Real-Time Conditional Sacral Neuromodulation Using Wireless Bladder Pressure Sensor. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2021;29:2067–2075. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3117518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greco F, Bandodkar AJ, Menciassi A. Emerging technologies in wearable sensors. APL Bioeng. 2023;7(2):020401. doi:10.1063/5.0153940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement KD, Lapitan MC, Omar MI, Glazener CM. Urodynamic studies for management of urinary incontinence in children and adults: a short version Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(5):407–412. doi:10.1002/nau.22584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suskind AM, Clemens JQ, Kaufman SR, et al. Patient perceptions of physical and emotional discomfort related to urodynamic testing: a questionnaire-based study in men and women with and without neurologic conditions. Urology. 2015;85(3):547–551. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim H, Abrams P. Is the bladder a reliable witness for predicting detrusor overactivity? J Urol. 2006;175(1):191–194. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digesu GA, Gargasole C, Hendricken C, et al. ICS teaching module: ambulatory urodynamic monitoring. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(2):364–367. doi:10.1002/nau.22933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frainey BT, Majerus SJA, Derisavifard S, et al. pd66-05 safety, feasibility, and accuracy of the uromonitor: a catheter-free wireless ambulatory cystometry device. J Urol. 2021;206(Supplement 3). doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000002110.05
   Google Scholar
• Bright Uro. Feasibility Assessment of Glean Urodynamics System. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05694793. Accessed December 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues D, Barbosa AI, Rebelo R, Kwon IK, Reis RL, Correlo VM. Skin-Integrated Wearable Systems and Implantable Biosensors: a Comprehensive Review. Biosensors. 2020;10(7):79. doi:10.3390/bios10070079
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koven A, Herschorn S. NIRS: past, Present, and Future in Functional Urology. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2022;17(4):241–249. doi:10.1007/s11884-022-00665-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song P, Ma Z, Ma J, et al. Recent Progress of Miniature MEMS Pressure Sensors. Micromachines. 2020;11(1):56. doi:10.3390/mi11010056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan R, McClure T, Lin CK, et al. Development of a fully implantable wireless pressure monitoring system. Biomed Microdevices. 2009;11:259–264. doi:10.1007/s10544-008-9232-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu AS, Majerus S, Ferry E, Makovey I, Zhu H, Damaser MS. Is submucosal bladder pressure monitoring feasible? Proc Inst Mech Eng. Nanomaterials. 2019;233(1):100–113. doi:10.1177/0954411918754925
   Google Scholar
• Jourand P, Puers R, Autonomous A. Capacitive Sensor Based and Battery Powered Internal Bladder Pressure Monitoring System. Procedia Chem. 2009;1(1):1263–1266. doi:10.1016/j.proche.2009.07.315
   Google Scholar
• Wille S, Tenholte D, Engelmann U. A system for long-term urodynamic studies without catheters. Eur Urol. 2013;63(5):966–968. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakula M, Soebadi A, De Ridder D, Puers R. The Bladder Pill: developments Toward Bladder Pressure Measurement in Wake Mini-pigs. Procedia Eng. 2016;168:193–196. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.215
   Google Scholar
• Soebadi MA, Bakula M, Hakim L, Puers R, De Ridder D. Wireless intravesical device for real-time bladder pressure measurement: study of consecutive voiding in awake minipigs. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0225821. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0225821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HY, Choi B, Kim S, Kim SJ, Bae WJ, Kim SW. Sensitivity-Enhanced LC Pressure Sensor for Wireless Bladder Pressure Monitoring. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2016;16(12):4715–4724. doi:10.1109/JSEN.2016.2533262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li YT, Yang LY, Hsu WT, Peng CW. Designing and Implementing an Implantable Wireless Micromanometer System for Real-Time Bladder Pressure Monitoring: a Preliminary Study. Sensors. 2020;20(16):4610. doi:10.3390/s20164610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alloussi SH, Lang C, Eichel R, Ziegler M, Stenzl A, Alloussi S. Urodynamical benchmarks: a retrospective analyses of 976 combined urodynamics with no pathological findings to evaluate standard values. Eur Urol Suppl. 2010;9(2):227. doi:10.1016/S1569-9056(10)60679-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdams I, Kenyon H, Bourbeau D, Damaser MS, Zorman C. Low-cost, Implantable Wireless Sensor Platform for Neuromodulation Research. IEEE Biomed Circuits Syst Conf. 2018;2018. doi:10.1109/BIOCAS.2018.8584729
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang J, Hou C, Zheng X, Zhang W, Chen A, Xu Z. Design and evaluation of a new bladder volume monitor. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(11):1944–1947. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao H, Tata U, Landge V, Li AL, Peng YB, Chiao JC A wireless bladder volume monitoring system using a flexible capacitance-based sensor. IEEE Topical Conference on Biomedical Wireless Technologies, Networks, and Sensing Systems. 2013;Austin, TX, USA:34–36. doi:10.1109/BioWireleSS.2013.6613666.
   Google Scholar
• Chen SC, Hsieh TH, Fan WJ, et al. Design and evaluation of potentiometric principles for bladder volume monitoring: a preliminary study. Sensors. 2015;15(6):12802–12815. doi:10.3390/s150612802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MK, Lee S, Yoon I, et al. Polypyrrole/Agarose Hydrogel-Based Bladder Volume Sensor with a Resistor Ladder Structure. Sensors. 2018;18(7):2288. doi:10.3390/s18072288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MK, Kim H, Jung YS, et al. Implantable bladder volume sensor based on resistor ladder network composed of conductive hydrogel composite. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017;2017:1732–1735. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037177
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajagopalan S, Sawan M, Ghafar-Zadeh E, Savadogo O, Chodavarapu VP. A Polypyrrole-based Strain Sensor Dedicated to Measure Bladder Volume in Patients with Urinary Dysfunction. Sensors. 2008;8(8):5081–5095. doi:10.3390/s8085081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verathon. BladderScan Prime Plus. Available from: https://www.verathon.com/bladderscan-prime-plus/. Accessed December 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Mandal S, Dehghanzadeh P, Zamani H, Shaik S. A Wireless Implantable Microsystem for Real-Time Bladder Volume Monitoring. TechRxiv. 2022. doi:10.36227/techrxiv.20063783.v1
   Google Scholar
• Stothers L, Macnab A, Mutabazi S, Mukisa R, Molavi B, Shadgan B. Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Screening for Bladder Disease in Africa: training Rural Clinic Staff to Collect Data of Diagnostic Quality. J Spectrosc. 2016;2016:1241862. doi:10.1155/2016/1241862
   Google Scholar
• Gaubert V, Gidik H, Koncar V. Proposal of a Lab Bench for the Unobtrusive Monitoring of the Bladder Fullness with Bioimpedance Measurements. Sensors. 2020;20(14):3980. doi:10.3390/s20143980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Leuteren PG, de Vries BA, de Joode-Smink JCJ, ten Haken B, de Jong TPVM, Dik P. URIKA, continuous ultrasound monitoring for the detection of a full bladder in children with dysfunctional voiding: a feasibility study. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2017;3(1):017005. doi:10.1088/2057-1976/aa589f
   Google Scholar
• Hofstetter S, Zilezinski M, Wolf A, et al. Dfree ultrasonic sensor in supporting quality of life and patient satisfaction with bladder dysfunction. Int J Urol Nurs. 2022;17:62–69. doi:10.1111/ijun.12334
   Google Scholar
• Hafid A, Difallah S, Alves C, et al. State of the Art of Non-Invasive Technologies for Bladder Monitoring: a Scoping Review. Sensors. 2023;23(5):2758. doi:10.3390/s23052758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Leuteren PG, Klijn AJ, de Jong TPVM, Dik P. SENS-U: validation of a wearable ultrasonic bladder monitor in children during urodynamic studies. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(6):569.e1–569.e6. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.07.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournelle M, Grün T, Speicher D, et al. Portable Ultrasound Research System for Use in Automated Bladder Monitoring with Machine-Learning-Based Segmentation. Sensors. 2021;21(19):6481. doi:10.3390/s21196481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo HG, Park BH, Joung DY, et al. Forward-Looking Ultrasound Wearable Scanner System for Estimation of Urinary Bladder Volume. Sensors. 2021;21(16):5445. doi:10.3390/s21165445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang BI, Kim A, Kim S. Advancing Patient Care: innovative Use of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for Monitoring Urine Volume in Neurogenic Bladder. Int Neurourol J. 2023;27(Suppl 1):S27–33. doi:10.5213/inj.2346100.050
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macnab AJ, Shadgan B, Stothers L, Afshar K. Ambulant monitoring of bladder oxygenation and hemodynamics using wireless near-infrared spectroscopy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2013;7(1–2):E98–E104. doi:10.5489/cuaj.271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palla A, Rossi S, Fanucci L. Bioimpedance based monitoring system for people with neurogenic dysfunction of the urinary bladder. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;217:892–896.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shin SC, Moon J, Kye S, Lee K, Lee YS, Kang HG. Continuous bladder volume monitoring system for wearable applications. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Jeju, Korea. 2017;2017:4435–4438. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2017.8037840
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leonhäuser D, Castelar C, Schlebusch T, et al. Evaluation of electrical impedance tomography for determination of urinary bladder volume: comparison with standard ultrasound methods in healthy volunteers. Biomed Eng Online. 2018;17(1):95. doi:10.1186/s12938-018-0526-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park E, Lee JW, Kang M, Cho K, Cho BH, Lee KS. Detecting Bladder Biomarkers for Closed-Loop Neuromodulation: a Technological Review. Int Neurourol J. 2018;22(4):228–236. doi:10.5213/inj.1836246.123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt B, Desgrippes A, Desfemmes FN. Changing the double-pigtail stent by a new suture stent to improve patient’s quality of life: a prospective study. World J Urol. 2015;33:1061–1068. doi:10.1007/s00345-014-1394-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosio A, Alessandria E, Agosti SC, et al. Pigtail suture stents significantly reduce stent-related symptoms compared to conventional double J Stents: a prospective randomized trial. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021;29:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.euros.2021.03.011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karam R, Bourbeau D, Majerus S, et al. Real-Time Classification of Bladder Events for Effective Diagnosis and Treatment of Urinary Incontinence. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016;63(4):721–729. doi:10.1109/TBME.2015.2469604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karam R, Bhunia S, Majerus S, Brose SW, Damaser MS, Bourbeau D. Real-time, autonomous bladder event classification and closed-loop control from single-channel pressure data. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016;2016:5789–5792. doi:10.1109/EMBC.2016.7592043
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu L, Kim BJ, Meng E. Chronically implanted pressure sensors: challenges and state of the field. Sensors. 2014;14(11):20620–20644. doi:10.3390/s141120620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson BD, Karipott SS, Wang Y, Ong KG. Wireless Technologies for Implantable Devices. Sensors. 2020;20(16):4604. doi:10.3390/s20164604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suster MA, Young DJ Wireless recharging of battery over large distance for implantable bladder pressure chronic monitoring. 16th International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference, Beijing, China. 2011;2011:1208–1211. doi:10.1109/TRANSDUCERS.2011.5969398.
   Google Scholar
• Park YG, Lee S, Park JU. Recent Progress in Wireless Sensors for Wearable Electronics. Sensors. 2019;19(20):4353. doi:10.3390/s19204353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Shi Q, Lee C. Advanced Implantable Biomedical Devices Enabled by Triboelectric Nanogenerators. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(8):1366. doi:10.3390/nano12081366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao G, Kang L, Li J, et al. Effective weight control via an implanted self-powered vagus nerve stimulation device. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5349. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07764-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ouyang H, Tian J, Sun G, et al. Self-Powered Pulse Sensor for Antidiastole of Cardiovascular Disease. Adv Mater. 2017;29(40). doi:10.1002/adma.201703456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majerus SJ, Garverick SL, Suster MA, Fletter PC, Damaser MS. Wireless, Ultra-Low-Power Implantable Sensor for Chronic Bladder Pressure Monitoring. ACM J Emerg Technol Comput Syst. 2012;8(2):11. doi:10.1145/2180878.2180883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim A, Powell CR, Ziaie B. An Universal packaging technique for low-drift implantable pressure sensors. Biomed Microdevices. 2016;18(2):32. doi:10.1007/s10544-016-0058-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majerus SJ, Fletter PC, Damaser MS, Garverick SL. Low-power wireless micromanometer system for acute and chronic bladder-pressure monitoring. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011;58(3):763–767. doi:10.1109/TBME.2010.2085002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao J, Qiang W, Wei H, et al. Ultrathin and Robust Micro-Nano Composite Coating for Implantable Pressure Sensor Encapsulation. ACS Omega. 2020;5(36):23129–23139. doi:10.1021/acsomega.0c02897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin A, Gong S, Cheng W. Wearable Smart Bandage-Based Bio-Sensors. Biosensors. 2023;13(4):462. doi:10.3390/bios13040462
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Majerus SJ, Fletter PC, Ferry EK, Zhu H, Gustafson KJ, Damaser MS. Suburothelial Bladder Contraction Detection with Implanted Pressure Sensor. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0168375. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DH, Lu N, Ma R, et al. Epidermal electronics. Science. 2011;333(6044):838–843. doi:10.1126/science.1206157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin YK, Shin Y, Lee JW, Seo MH. Micro-/Nano-Structured Biodegradable Pressure Sensors for Biomedical Applications. Biosensors. 2022;12(11):952. doi:10.3390/bios12110952
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zheng Q, Zou Y, Zhang Y, et al. Biodegradable triboelectric nanogenerator as a life-time designed implantable power source. Sci Adv. 2016;2(3):e1501478. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Y, Xu J, Li L, et al. Boosting the Piezoelectric Sensitivity of Amino Acid Crystals by Mechanical Annealing for the Engineering of Fully Degradable Force Sensors. Adv Sci. 2023;10(11):e2207269. doi:10.1002/advs.202207269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amen MT, Pham TTT, Cheah E, Tran DP, Thierry B. Metal-Oxide FET Biosensor for Point-of-Care Testing: overview and Perspective. Molecules. 2022;27(22):7952. doi:10.3390/molecules27227952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MM, Shabbir B, Wu Y, et al. Ultrasensitive WSe2 field-effect transistor-based biosensor for label-free detection of cancer. 2D Mater. 2021;8(4):045005. doi:10.1088/2053-1583/ac1253
   Google Scholar
• Shak Sadi M, Kumpikaitė E. Advances in the Robustness of Wearable Electronic Textiles: strategies, Stability, Washability and Perspective. Nanomaterials. 2022;12(12):2039. doi:10.3390/nano12122039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du K, Lin R, Yin L, Ho JS, Wang J, Lim CT. Electronic textiles for energy, sensing, and communication. iScience. 2022;25(5):104174. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das R, Zeng W, Asci C, Del-Rio-Ruiz R, Sonkusale S. Recent progress in electrospun nanomaterials for wearables. APL Bioeng. 2022;6(2):021505. doi:10.1063/5.0088136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooqui MF, Shamim A. Low Cost Inkjet Printed Smart Bandage for Wireless Monitoring of Chronic Wounds. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28949. doi:10.1038/srep28949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Kim J, Kim SY, et al. Soft, smart contact lenses with integrations of wireless circuits, glucose sensors, and displays. Sci Adv. 2018;4(1):eaap9841. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aap9841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arab Hassani F, Mogan RP, Gammad GGL, et al. Toward Self-Control Systems for Neurogenic Underactive Bladder: a Triboelectric Nanogenerator Sensor Integrated with a Bistable Micro-Actuator. ACS Nano. 2018;12(4):3487–3501. doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b00303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khurram A, Ross SE, Sperry ZJ, et al. Chronic monitoring of lower urinary tract activity via a sacral dorsal root ganglia interface. J Neural Eng. 2017;14(3):036027. doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aa6801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd W, Motwani K, Small C, et al. Spinal cord injury and neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: what do we know and where are we going? J Mens Health. 2022;18(1):24. doi:10.31083/j.jomh1801024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arab Hassani F, Jin H, Yokota T, Someya T, Thakor NV. Soft sensors for a sensing-actuation system with high bladder voiding efficiency. Sci Adv. 2020;6(18):eaba0412. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba0412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar