A predictive nomogram developed and validated for gastric cancer patients with triple-negative tumor markers

References

• Sung H , FerlayJ , SiegelRLet al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin.71(3), 209–249 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekiguchi M , OdaI , MatsudaTet al. Epidemiological trends and future perspectives of gastric cancer in eastern Asia. Digestion103(1), 22–28 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JL , YangYB , GengYXet al. Trend analysis of the morbidity, prevalence and mortality of stomach cancer in China from 1990 to 2017. Chin. J. Prevent. Control Chronic Dis.28(5), 321–325 (2020).
   Google Scholar
• Yang L , KartsonakiC , YaoPet al. The relative and attributable risks of cardia and non-cardia gastric cancer associated with Helicobacter pylori infection in China: a case–cohort study. Lancet Public Health6(12), e888–e896 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Y , ZhangZ , DongXet al. Pangenomic analysis of Chinese gastric cancer. Nat. Commun.13(1), 5412 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin G , LvJ , YangMet al. Genetic risk, incident gastric cancer, and healthy lifestyle: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies and prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol.21(10), 1378–1386 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López MJ , CarbajalJ , AlfaroALet al. Characteristics of gastric cancer around the world. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol.181, 103841 (2023).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olefson S , MossSF. Obesity and related risk factors in gastric cardia adenocarcinoma. Gastric Cancer18(1), 23–32 (2015).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Japanese Gastric Cancer Association . Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer24(1), 1–21 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang FH , ZhangXT , LiYFet al. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2021. Cancer Commun. (Lond.)41(8), 747–795 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lordick F , CarneiroF , CascinuSet al. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol.33(10), 1005–1020 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y , DochertySL , PorterLSet al. Common and co-occurring symptoms experienced by patients with gastric cancer. Oncol. Nurs. Forum47(2), 187–202 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie Y , WuK , YuJet al. A global burden of gastric cancer: the major impact of China. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.11(7), 651–661 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt N , PeitzU , LippertHet al. Missing gastric cancer in dyspepsia. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther.21(7), 813–820 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kono Y , KanzakiH , IwamuroMet al. Reality of gastric cancer in young patients: the importance and difficulty of the early diagnosis, prevention and treatment. Acta Med. Okayama74(6), 461–466 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu J , HanY , NiWet al. Nomogram-based survival predictions and treatment recommendations for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with upfront surgery. Cancers (Basel)14(22), 5567 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J , GongY , LamVKet al. Deep sequencing of circulating tumor DNA detects molecular residual disease and predicts recurrence in gastric cancer. Cell Death Dis.11(5), 346 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi SS , BadgwellBD. Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer. CA Cancer J. Clin.71(3), 264–279 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z , WuH , ChongWet al. Liquid biopsy in gastric cancer: predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Cell Death Dis.13(10), 903 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang XH , GuoT , GaoXYet al. Exosome-derived noncoding RNAs in gastric cancer: functions and clinical applications. Mol. Cancer20(1), 99 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada H , NoieT , OhashiMet al. Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Gastric Cancer17(1), 26–33 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J , ChenS , LiSet al. A novel classifier based on three preoperative tumor markers predicting the cancer-specific survival of gastric cancer (CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4). Oncotarget9(4), 4814–4822 (2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu X , CaiH , WangY. Prognostic significance of tumour markers in Chinese patients with gastric cancer. ANZ J. Surg.84(6), 448–453 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng F , TianY , XuGet al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of CEA, CA19-9, AFP and CA125 for early gastric cancer. BMC Cancer17(1), 737 (2017).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guo X , LvX , RuYet al. Circulating exosomal gastric cancer-associated long noncoding RNA1 as a biomarker for early detection and monitoring progression of gastric cancer: a multiphase study. JAMA Surg.155(7), 572–579 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C , ChenQ , ZhaoQet al. Value of combined detection of serum CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9, CA15-3 and CA12-5 in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci.47(3), 260–263 (2017).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H . Reference intervals for gastrointestinal tumor markers (AFP, CEA, CA199 and CA724) in healthy adults of Han nationality in Chongqing by Roche ECLIA system. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest.79(7), 484–490 (2019).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong SL , KattanMW , McMastersKMet al. A nomogram that predicts the presence of sentinel node metastasis in melanoma with better discrimination than the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Ann. Surg. Oncol.12(4), 282–288 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camp RL , Dolled-FilhartM , RimmDL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin. Cancer Res.10(21), 7252–7259 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iasonos A , SchragD , RajGVet al. How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis. J. Clin. Oncol.26(8), 1364–1370 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark TG , BradburnMJ , LoveSBet al. Survival analysis part I: basic concepts and first analyses. Br. J. Cancer89(2), 232–238 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y , WuJ , HuangWet al. Development and validation of a hypoxia-immune-based microenvironment gene signature for risk stratification in gastric cancer. J. Transl. Med.18(1), 201 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baqar AR , WilkinsS , WangWet al. Log odds of positive lymph nodes is prognostically equivalent to lymph node ratio in non-metastatic colon cancer. BMC Cancer20(1), 762 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou YC , ZhaoHJ , ShenLZ. Preoperative serum CEA and CA19-9 in gastric cancer – a single tertiary hospital study of 1,075 cases. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev.16(7), 2685–2691 (2015).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gong X , ZhangH. Diagnostic and prognostic values of anti-Helicobacter pylori antibody combined with serum CA724, CA19-9, and CEA for young patients with early gastric cancer. J. Clin. Lab. Anal.34(7), e23268 (2020).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Z , ZhangN. Clinical evaluation of CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4 and CA125 in gastric cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. World J. Surg. Oncol.12, 397 (2014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao C , KongN , ZhangFet al. Risk stratification of lung adenocarcinoma using a nomogram combined with ferroptosis-related LncRNAs and subgroup analysis with immune and N6-methyladenosine modification. BMC Med. Genomics15(1), 15 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S , XieX , SunYet al. Development of a nomogram that predicts the risk for coronary atherosclerotic heart disease. Aging (Albany NY)12(10), 9427–9439 (2020).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slagter AE , VolleberghMA , CaspersIAet al. Prognostic value of tumor markers and ctDNA in patients with resectable gastric cancer receiving perioperative treatment: results from the CRITICS trial. Gastric Cancer25(2), 401–410 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y , ZhangP , ZhangKet al. The application of CA72-4 in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of gastric cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer1876(2), 188634 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka T , YashiroM. Biomarkers of gastric cancer: current topics and future perspective. World J. Gastroenterol.24(26), 2818–2832 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L , JiangR , ChenWet al. Novel prognostic indicator combining inflammatory indicators and tumor markers for gastric cancer. World J. Surg. Oncol.21(1), 50 (2023).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan J , ShaoY , LuHet al. Hsa_circ_0001020 serves as a potential biomarker for gastric cancer screening and prognosis. Dig. Dis. Sci.67(8), 3753–3762 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian W , PangX , LuanF. Diagnosis value of miR-181, miR-652, and CA72-4 for gastric cancer. J. Clin. Lab. Anal.36(6), e24411 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu X , ShenC , ZhaoWet al. Prognostic value of the combination of HB (hemoglobin) and CEA in resectable gastric cancer. J. Cancer13(7), 2246–2257 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J , HassettJM , DaytonMTet al. The prognostic superiority of log odds of positive lymph nodes in stage III colon cancer. J. Gastrointest. Surg.12, 1790–1796 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinh-Hung V , VerschraegenC , PromishDIet al. Ratios of involved nodes in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res.6, R680–R688 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Z , FuZ , LiTet al. Development and validation of the individualized prognostic nomograms in patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer. Front. Oncol.11, 709835 (2021).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun Z , XuY , LiDMet al. Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection. Cancer116(11), 2571–2580 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu P , DengJ , SunZet al. Superiority of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) for prognostic prediction after gastric cancer surgery: a multi-institutional analysis of 7620 patients in China. Surg. Today51(1), 101–110 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H , DengJ , ZhangRet al. The RML of lymph node metastasis was superior to the LODDS for evaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer. Int. J. Surg.11(5), 419–424 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylman JL , MitrugnoA , AtallahMet al. The predictive value of inflammation-related peripheral blood measurements in cancer staging and prognosis. Front. Oncol.8, 78 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fankhauser CD , SanderS , RothLet al. Systemic inflammatory markers have independent prognostic value in patients with metastatic testicular germ cell tumours undergoing first-line chemotherapy. Br. J. Cancer118(6), 825–830 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JX , WangZK , HuangYQet al. Dynamic changes in pre- and postoperative levels of inflammatory markers and their effects on the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. J. Gastrointest. Surg.25(2), 387–396 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato S , KunisakiC , TakahashiMet al. High postoperative neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio and low preoperative lymphocyte–monocyte ratio predict poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients receiving gastrectomy with positive lavage cytology: a retrospective cohort study. Langenbecks Arch. Surg.406(7), 2295–2303 (2021).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma JY , LiuQ. Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Int. J. Surg.50, 67–71 (2018).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H , JinW , WanCet al. Diagnostic value of combined detection of CA72-4, CA19-9, and carcinoembryonic antigen comparing to CA72-4 alone in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl. Cancer Res.11(4), 848–856 (2022).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen XZ , ZhangWK , YangKet al. Correlation between serum CA724 and gastric cancer: multiple analyses based on Chinese population. Mol. Biol. Rep.39(9), 9031–9039 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar