Establishing a research territory in economics: Implications for academic writing instruction

References

• Adams KA, Lawrence EK. 2019. Research methods, statistics, and applications (2nd edn). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bardi M. 2015. Learning the practice of scholarly publication in English – A Romanian perspective. English for Specific Purposes 37: 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett P. 1994. A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes 13(1): 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90024-8
   Google Scholar
• Bryman A. 2012. Social research methods (4th edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan SH, Ebrahimi SF. 2012. Marked themes as context frames in research article abstracts. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 12: 1147–1164. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288788654_Marked_themes_as_context_frames_in_research_article_abstracts
   Google Scholar
• Corder GW, Foreman DI. 2014. Nonparametric statistics: A step-by-step approach (2nd edn). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cortes V. 2013. The purpose of this study is to: connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(1): 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl T. 2009. The linguistic representation of rhetorical function: A study of how economists present their knowledge claims. Written Communication 26(4): 370–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309341241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis RH. 2020. Moves and steps in the IMRD sections of medical research articles. Taiwan International ESP Journal 11(1): 23–39. https://doi.org/10.6706/TIESPJ.202008_11(1).0002
   Google Scholar
• Fudulu P. 2019. The natural economic science: Re-writing economic fundamentals. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781789732191
   Google Scholar
• Halleck GB, Connor UM. 2006. Rhetorical moves in TESOL conference proposals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5(1): 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Harwood N. 2005. ‘Nowhere has anyone attempted … In this article I aim to do just that’: A corpusbased study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics 37(8): 1207–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin B. 2018. A multidimensional analysis of research article discussion sections in the field of Chemical Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 61(3): 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2018.2817002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph R, Lim JMH. 2018. Background information in the Discussion sections of Forestry journals: A case study. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 18(1): 198–216. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2018-1801-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanoksilapatham B. 2005. Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes 24(3): 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan BSC. 2006. The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes 25(1): 30–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Ge G. 2009. Genre analysis: Structural and linguistic evolution of the English-medium medical research article (1985–2004). English for Specific Purposes 28(2): 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim JMH. 2010. Commenting on research results in applied linguistics and education: A comparative genre-based investigation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(4): 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim JMH. 2012. How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based investigation into management researchers’ rhetorical steps and linguistic mechanisms. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11(3): 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim JMH. 2014. Expert writers’ descriptions and justifications of research instruments and materials: Using communicative resources to generate promotional effects. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 11(2): 154–176. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.34704
   Google Scholar
• Lim JMH. 2017. Writing descriptions of experimental procedures in language education: Implications for the teaching of English for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes 47: 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim JMH. 2019. Explicit and implicit justifications of experimental procedures in language education: Pedagogical implications of studying expert writers’ communicative resources. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 37: 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim JMH, Chung VL. 2021. Arousing readers’ interest: An inquiry into Chinese argumentative essays. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 21(1): 204–220. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2101-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim JMH, Loi CK, Hashim A. 2014. Postulating hypotheses in experimental doctoral dissertations on applied linguistics: A qualitative investigation into rhetorical shifts and linguistic mechanisms, Ibérica 27: 121–142. http://www.revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/265
   Google Scholar
• Lim JMH, Loi CK, Hashim A, Liu MSM. 2015. Purpose statements in experimental doctoral dissertations submitted to U.S. universities: An inquiry into doctoral students’ communicative resources in language education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20: 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim JMH, Luo X. 2020. Writing research questions and hypotheses: A genre-based investigation into writers’ linguistic resources in social sciences. ESP Today: Journal of English for Specific Purposes at Tertiary Level 8(2): 206–226. https://doi.org/10.18485/esptoday.2020.8.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu MSM, Lim JMH. 2014. How do writers evaluate their own empirical research? A genre-based inquiry into economics journal papers. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 134: 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.219
   Google Scholar
• Liu MSM, Lim JMH. 2021. Expert writers’ recommendations in Economics research articles: Implications for the teaching of English for academic purposes. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature 27(3): 22–37. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2021-2703-02
   Google Scholar
• Lorés R. 2004. On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organisation. English for Specific Purposes 23(3): 280–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo X, Lim JMH. 2021. Expert writers’ structural outlines in research papers: An inquiry into social sciences. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39(3): 306–318. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2021.1942099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lung J. 2011. Discursive hierarchical patterning in Economics cases. English for Specific Purposes 30(2): 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey DN. 2000. Economical writing (2nd edn). Prospect Heights: Waveland.
   Google Scholar
• Moghaddasi S, Graves HAB. 2017. ‘Since Hadwiger’s conjection … is still open’: Establishing a niche for research in discrete mathematics research article introductions. English for Specific Purposes 45: 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno AI, Swales JM. 2017. Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the functionform gap. English for Specific Purposes 50: 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwogu KN. 1997. The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes 16(2): 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4
   Google Scholar
• Omidian T, Siyanova-Chanturia A, Biber D. 2021. A new multidimensional model of writing for research publication: An analysis of disciplinarity, intra-textual variation, and L1 versus LX expert writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 53: 101020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk I. 2007. The textual organisation of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for Specific Purposes 26(1): 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson J. 2017. The student laboratory report genre: A genre analysis. English for Specific Purposes 45: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock M. 2002. Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System 30(4): 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7
   Google Scholar
• Posteguillo S. 1999. The schematic structure of computer science research articles. English for Specific Purposes 18(2): 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00001-5
   Google Scholar
• Samraj B. 2002. Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 21(1): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00023-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehzad W. 2008. Move two: establishing a niche. Iberica 15: 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon E. 2019. Knowledge construction of discussion/conclusion sections of research articles written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 37: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler-Monreal C, Carbonell-Olivares M, Gil-Salom L. 2011. A contrastive study of the rhetorical organisation of English and Spanish PhD thesis introductions. English for Specific Purposes 30(1): 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki ST. 2012. Utilising genre analysis: From theory to application in teaching the research article Methods section. Bulletin of the University of Electro-Communications 24: 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Swales JM. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swales JM. 2004. Research genres. Explorations and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tessuto G. 2015. Generic structure and rhetorical moves in English-language empirical law research articles: Sites of interdisciplinary and interdiscursive cross-over. English for Specific Purposes 37(1): 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, Yang C. 2015. Claiming centrality as promotion in applied linguistics research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20: 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar