The comprehension of ellipsis in isiXhosa-speaking Grade 1 learners

References

• Brown R. 1973. A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674732469
   Google Scholar
• Cain C, Oakhill J. 2007. Reading comprehension difficulties: Correlates, causes and consequences. In: Cain K, Oakhill J (eds), Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written language. New York: Guilford Press. pp. 41–75.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal D. 2008. A dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (6th edn). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302776
   Google Scholar
• De Beaugrande R, Dressler W. 1981. Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835839
   Google Scholar
• Demuth K, Machobane M, Moloi F. 2000. Learning word-order constraints under condition of object ellipsis. Linguistics 38(3): 545–568. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.38.3.545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK, Hasan R. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks M. 2014. The nuts and bolts of literacy development in English as a second language: Evidence from intermediate phase classrooms. The International Journal of Literacies 20(3): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0136/CGP/v20i03/58978
   Google Scholar
• Fangfang G, Foley C, Yu-Chin C, Chi-Pang C, Lust B. 1996. Operator-variable binding in the initial state: A cross-linguistic study of VP ellipsis structures in Chinese and English. Cahiers de linguistique-Asie orientale 25(1): 3–34. doi: 10.1163/19606028-02501002
   Google Scholar
• Foley C, Núñez del Prado Z, Barbier I, Lust B. 2003. Knowledge of variable binding in VP– Ellipsis: Language acquisition research and theory converge. Syntax 6(1): 52–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9612.00056
   Google Scholar
• Fox D, Lasnik H. 2003. Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34(1): 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438903763255959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goksun T, Roeper T, Hirsh-Pasek K, Golinkoff RM. 2011. From noun phrase ellipsis to verb phrase ellipsis: The acquisition path from context to abstract reconstruction. University of Massachusetts Occasional Working Papers in Linguistics 38: 53–74.
   Google Scholar
• Gray DE. 2004. Doing Research in the Real World. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson K. 2009. Gapping isn’t (VP) ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 40(2): 289–328. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan D. 1989. Demonstratives. In: Almog J, Perry J, Wettstein H (eds), Themes from Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 481–564.
   Google Scholar
• Karmilloff-Smith A. 1979. A Functional Approach to Child Language: A study of Determiners and Reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krämer IM. 2000. Interpreting indefinites: an experimental study of children’s language comprehension. PhD thesis, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson S. 2004. Deixis. In: Horn L, Ward G (eds), The handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell. pp 97–121.
   Google Scholar
• Lindenbergh C, van Hout A, Hollebrandse B. 2015. Extending ellipsis research: The acquisition of sluicing in Dutch. BUCLD 39 Online Proceedings Supplement 39.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney B. 2000. The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk (3rd edn). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuo A. 2007. Differing interpretations of empty categories in English and Japanese VP ellipsis contexts. Language Acquisition 14(1): 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489220701331805
   Google Scholar
• Matsuo A, Duffield N. 2001. VP ellipsis and anaphora in first language acquisition. Language Acquisition 9(4): 301–327. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327817LA0904_02
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy M. 1996. Discourse analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant J. 2001. The Syntax of Silence. Sluicing, Islands and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nel JH. 2014. The comprehension and production of later developing language constructions by Afrikaans-, English and isiXhosa-speaking Grade 1 learners. PHD thesis, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Norris J, Hoffman P. 1993. Whole language intervention for school-age children. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti CA. 1994. Psycholinguistics and reading ability. In: Gernsbacher MA (ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 849–894.
   Google Scholar
• Radford A. 1988. Transformational syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards JC, Schmidt R. 2010. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (4th edn). London: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Roeper T. 2007. The Prism of Grammar. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5569.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Saito M. 2004. Ellipsis and pronominal reference in Japanese clefts. Nanzan Linguistics 1: 21–50.
   Google Scholar
• Santos AL. 2009. Minimal answers: Ellipsis, syntax and discourse in the acquisition of European Portuguese 48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.48
   Google Scholar
• Smith NA. 2001. Ellipsis happens, and deletion is how. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 176–191.
   Google Scholar
• Southwood F, van Dulm O. 2012a. Receptive and expressive activities for language therapy: User manual. Johannesburg: JvR Psychometrics.
   Google Scholar
• Southwood F, van Dulm O. 2012b. Receptive and expressive activities for language therapy: Ellipsis. Johannesburg: JvR Psychometrics.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas O. 1965. Transformational grammar and the teacher of English. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton R. 2010. Verb phrase ellipsis in children’s answers to questions. Language Learning and Development 6(1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475440903328146
   Google Scholar
• Thornton R, Wexler K. 1999. Principle B, VP Ellipsis, and Interpretation in Child Grammar. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5550.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Varhánek T. 2007. English as a means of cohesion. PHD thesis, University of Pardubice, the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Wijnen F, Roeper T, Van der Meulen H. 2004. Discourse binding: Does it begin with nominal ellipsis? In: Van Kampen J, Baauw S (eds), Proceedings of GALA 2003. Utrecht: LOT.
   Google Scholar