Vocabulary size and comprehension of academic texts by Tanzanian university students: An exploratory study

References

• Beglar D. 2000. Estimating vocabulary size. JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter 4(1): 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Beglar D. 2010. A Rasch-based validation of the Vocabulary Size Test. Language Testing 27(1): 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209340194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broughton G, Brumfit C, Flavell R, Hill P, Pincas A. 1980. English as a Foreign Language. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bulgurcuoglu AN. 2016. Relationship between critical thinking levels and attitudes towards reading habits among Pre-service physical education teachers. Educational Research and Reviews 11(8): 708–712.
   Google Scholar
• Chachage CS. 2006. The University as a site of knowledge: The role of basic research. Journal of Higher Education in Africa / Revue de l’enseignement supérieur en Afrique 4(2): 47–67
   Google Scholar
• Comrie B. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology (2nd edn). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal D. 2008. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th edn). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302776
   Google Scholar
• Daller H, Milton J, Treffers-Daller J, eds. 2007. Modelling and assessing vocabulary knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667268
   Google Scholar
• Emecheta B. 1975. Second class citizen. New York: George Braziller.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen B. 1999. Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21(2): 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199002089
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh D, Nation P. 1992. What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language 8(2): 689–696.
   Google Scholar
• Hu M, Nation IS. 2000. Vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language 23(1): 403–430.
   Google Scholar
• Huang HF. 2006. Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Which really matters in the academic reading performance of Chinese University students? Masters’ thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Huckin T, Coady J. 1999. Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21(2): 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199002028
   Google Scholar
• Kiondo EY, Matekere Y. 2010. The relevance of Mwalimu Nyerere’s philosophy in educational development: Search for missing links in the development of higher education in Tanzania. UONGOZI Journal of Management and Development Dynamics, Special Issue (2).
   Google Scholar
• Kjekshus H. 1996. Ecology control and economic development in East African history: the case of Tanganyika 1850 – 1950 (2nd edn). Oxford: James Currey.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer B. 1992. How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In: Bejoint H, Arnaud P (eds), Vocabulary and applied linguistics. London: Macmillan. pp. 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-12396-4_12
   Google Scholar
• Laufer B. 2013. Lexical thresholds for reading comprehension: What they are and how they can be used for teaching purposes. TESOL Quarterly 47(4): 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer B. 2021. Lexical thresholds and alleged threats to validity: A storm in a teacup? Reading in a Foreign Language 33(2): 238–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer B, Ravenhorst-Kalvoski GC. 2010. Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text-coverage, learners, vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language 22(1): 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lawshe CH. 1975. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology 28(4): 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masrai A. 2019. Vocabulary and reading comprehension revisited: Evidence for high, mid and low-frequency vocabulary knowledge. Sage Open 9(2): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019845182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean S. 2021. The coverage comprehension model, its importance to pedagogy and research and threats to the validity with which it is operationalized. Reading in a Foreign Language 33(2): 126–140.
   Google Scholar
• McLean S, Hogg N, Kramer B. 2014. Estimations of Japanese university learners’ English vocabulary sizes using the vocabulary size test. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction 3(2): 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Meara P. 2005. LLAMA language aptitude tests: The manual. Swansea: Lognostics.
   Google Scholar
• Milton J, Hopkins N. 2006. Comparing phonological and orthographic vocabulary size: do vocabulary tests underestimate the knowledge of some learners. The Canadian Modern Language Review 63(1): 127–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton J, Treffers-Daller J. 2013. Vocabulary size revisited: The link between vocabulary size and academic achievement. Applied Linguistics Review 4(1): 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton J, Wade J, Hopkins N. 2010. Aural word recognition and oral competence. Swansea: Swansea University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mwantimwa K, Mwabungulu E, Kassim M. 2019. Enhancing reading culture among University learners in Tanzania. Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Conference on Research and Inclusive Development, Bridging the Gap: Connecting Research to Policy, 14–15 November 2019, LAPF Conference Centre, Dodoma, Tanzania.
   Google Scholar
• Nation P. 2001. Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
   Google Scholar
• Nation P. 2006. How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review 63(1): 59–82. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nation P, Beglar D. 2007. A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher 31(7): 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Palani KK. 2012. Promoting reading habits and creating literate society. Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce 2(1): 90–94.
   Google Scholar
• Qian DD. 2002. Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading comprehension: An assessment perspective. Language Learning 52(3): 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian DD. 2005. Demystifying lexical Inferencing: The role of aspects of vocabulary knowledge. TESL Canada Journal 22(2): 34–54. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v22i2.86
   Google Scholar
• Read J. 2004. Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In: Bogaards J, Laufer B (eds), Vocabulary in a Second Language: Selection, acquisition and testing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.10.15rea
   Google Scholar
• Rugemalira J. 2017. Language skills for higher education in Tanzania. Journal of University of Namibia Language Centre 2(2): 2–25.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt N. 2000. Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt N. 2008. Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research 12(3): 329–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt N, Schmitt, D, Clapham C. 2001. Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing 18(1): 55–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800103
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt N, Jiang X, Grabe W. 2011. The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal 95(1): 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stæhr LS. 2008. Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal 36(2): 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730802389975
   Google Scholar
• Tozcu A, Coady J. 2004. Successful learning of frequent vocabulary through CALL also benefits reading comprehension and speed. Computer Assisted Language Learning 17(5): 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/0958822042000319674
   Google Scholar
• University of Dodoma. 2019. Undergraduate studies: Regulations for Undergraduate programmes. Dodoma: The University of Dodoma.
   Google Scholar
• Wema E. 2018. Investigating reading culture among students in higher learning institutions in Tanzania. University of Dar Es Salaam Library Journal 13(1): 4–19.
   Google Scholar