The Toxicology of Mercury

References

• WHO Environmental Health Criteria 101: Methylmercury. World Health Organization, Geneva 1990
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald W F, Clarkson T W. Mercury and monomethyl mercury: present and future concerns. Environ Health Perspect 1991; 96: 159–166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen S, Jernelov A. Biological methylation of mercury in aquatic organisms. Nature (London) 1969; 223: 1534
   Google Scholar
• Wood J M, Kennedy F S, Rosen C G. Synthesis of methyl-mercury compounds by extracts of a methanogenic bacterium. Nature 1968; 220(163)1734
   Google Scholar
• Airey D. Total mercury concentration in human hair from three countries in relation to fish consumption and location. Sci. Total Ettviron 1983; 31: 157–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arenholt-Bindslev D. Dental amalgam — environmental hygiene aspects. Potential biological consequences of mercury released from dental amalgam, B Bergman, Z H Boström, K S Larsson, H Löe. Swedish Medical Research Council, Stockholm 1992; 17–32
   Google Scholar
• WHO Conference on intoxication due to alkylmercury treated seed, Baghdad, Iraq. September 9 to 13, 1974. Bull World Health Organz 1976a; 53: 105–12, (Suppl.)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrar W, Williams A R. A history of mercury. The chemistry of mercury, C A McAuliffe. The MacMillan Press Ltd., London 1977; 3–45
   Google Scholar
• Goldwater L. Mercury: a history of quichilver. York Press, Baltimore 1972
   Google Scholar
• Koch R. Mittheiiungen aus dem Kaiserlichen Gesundheitsamt. 1881
   Google Scholar
• Bakir F, Damluji S F, Amin-Zaki L, et al. Methylmercury poisoning in Iraq. Science 1973; 181: 230–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood M R. Methylmercury poisoning in Iraq: an epidemiological study of the 1971–72 outbreak. J Appl Toxicol 1985; 5: 148–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsubaki T, Hkayama K. Minamata disease. Kodansha Ltd, Tokyo 1977
   Google Scholar
• Lam C -W, Wong K L. Toxicological hazard assessment on batteries used in space shuttle missions, Toxicology Group, Biomedical Operations and Research Branch, Medical Sciences Division, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas 1991
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin J F, Telzrow R W, Scott C M. Neonatal mercury vapor exposure in an infant incubator. Pediatrics 1980; 66(6)988–90
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sallsten G, Thoren J, Barregard L, et al. (1996) Long-term use of nicotine chewing gum and mercury exposure from dental amalgam fillings. J Dent Res 1996; 75(1)1–5
   Google Scholar
• Cleary D. Anatomy of the amazon gold rush. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City 1990
   Google Scholar
• Akagi H, Malm O, Branches F J, et al. Human exposure to mercury due to goldmining in the Tapajos river basin, Amazon, Brazil: speciation of mercury in human hair, blood and urine. Mercury as a global pollutant, D B Porcella, J W Huckabee, B Wheatley. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1995; 85–94
   Google Scholar
• Wendroff A P. Magico-religious mercury use and cultural sensitivity. Am J Public Health 1995; 85(3)409–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matheson D S, Clarkson T W, Gelfand E W. Mercury toxicity (Acrodynia) induced by long-term injection of gamma globulin. Pediatrics 1980; 97(1)153–5
   Google Scholar
• McAuliffe C A. The chemistry of mercury. The Macmillan Press Ltd., London 1977
   Google Scholar
• Hughes W L. A physiochemical rationale for the biological activity of mercury and its compounds. Ann NY Acad Sci 1956–7; 65: 454
   Google Scholar
• Ballatori N. Mechanism of metal transport across the liver cell plasma membranes. Drug Metab Rev 1991; 23: 83–132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa M, Christie N T, Cantoni O, et al. DNA damage by mercury compounds. Advances in mercury toxicology, T Suzuki, N Imura, T W Clarkson. Plenum Press, New York 1991; 255–73
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson T W. The uptake and disposition of inhaled mercury vapor. Potential biological consequencers of mercury released from dental amalgam, B Bergman, Z H Boström, K S Larsson, H Loe. Swedish Medical Research Council, Stockholm 1992; 59–91
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson T W, Rothstein A. The excretion of volatile mercury by rats injected with mercuric salts. Health Phys 1964; 10: 1115–21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cherian M G, Hursh J B, Clarkson T W, et al. Radioactive mercury distribution in biological fluids and excretion in human subjects after inhalation of mercury vapor. Arch Environ Health 1978; 33(3)109–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jernelov A. A new biochemical pathway for the methylation of mercury and some ecological implications. Mercury, mercurials and mercaptans, M W Miller, T W Clarkson. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL 1973; 315–24
   Google Scholar
• Carty A J, Malone S F. The chemistry of mercury in biological systems. The biogeochemistry of mercury in the environment, J O Nriagu. Elsevier, AmsterdamHolland 1979; 433–79
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson T W, Magos L, Cox C, et al. Tests of the efficacy of antidotes for removal of methylmercury in human poisonings during the Iraq outbreak. J Pharniacol Exp Ther 1981; 218: 74–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magos L, Webb M, Hudson A R. Complex formation between selenium and methylmercury. Chem Biol lnreracr 1979; 28: 210–207
   Google Scholar
• Suda I, Takahashi H. Effect of reticuloendothelial system blockade on the biotransformation of methyl mercury in the rat. Bull Etiviron Contam Toxicol 1990; 14: 609–15
   Google Scholar
• Rowland I R, Mallett A K, Wise A. The effect of diet on the mammalian gut flora and its metabolic activities. Crit Rev Toxicol 1987; 16: 31–103
   Google Scholar
• Dunn J D, Clarkson T W. Does mercury exhalation signal demethylation of mercury. Health Phys 1980; 38: 411–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis L E, Kornfield M, Mooney E S, et al. Methylmercury poisoning: long-term clinical, radiological, toxicological and pathological studies of an affected family. Ann Neurol 1994; 35(6)680–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walshe C T, Distefano M D, Moore M J, et al. Molecular basis of bacterial resistance to organomercurial and inorganic salts. FASEB J 1988; 2: 124–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rowland I R, Robinson R D, Doherty R A, et al. Are developmental changes in methylmercury metabolism and excretion mediated by the intestinal microflora?. Reproductive and developmental toxicity of metals, T W Clarkson, G F Nordberg, P R Sager. Plenum Press, New York 1983; 754–758
   Google Scholar
• Barregkird L, Horva M, Schutz A. No indication of in vivo methylation of inorganic mercury in chloralkali workers. Environ Res 1994; 67: 160–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramazzini B. Disease of workers. Hafner Publishing Co., New York 1964
   Google Scholar
• Hursh J B, Clarkson T W, Nowak T V, et al. Prediction of the kidney burden content by isotope techniques. Kidney Int 1985; 27: 898–907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballatori N, Clarkson T W. Dependence of biliary secretion of inorganic mercury on the biliary transport of glutathione. Biochem Phamcol 1984; 33(7)1093–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahola T, Hattaula T, Korolainen A, et al. Elimination of free and protein-bound ionic mercury (203Hg++) in man. Ann Clira Res 1973; 5: 214–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hursh J B, Cherian M G, Clarkson T W, et al. Clearance of mercury (Hg-197, Hg-203) vapor inhaled by human subjects. Arch Environ Health 1976; 31: 302–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Environmental Health Criteria 118 Inorganic mercury. World Health Organization, Geneva 1991
   Google Scholar
• Barregard L, Quelquejeu G, Sallsten G, et al. Dose-dependent elimination kinetics for mercury in urine: observations on subjects with brief but high-level exposure. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1996; 68: 345–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borjesson J, Barregard L, Sallsten G, et al. Measurement of mercury in vivo using X-ray fluorescense. Phys Med Biol 1995; 40(3)413–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suzuki T. Hair and nails: advantages and pitfalls when used in biological monitoring. Biological monitoring of toxic metals, T W Clarkson, L Friberg, G F Nordberg, P R Sager. Plenum Press, New York 1988; 623–40
   Google Scholar
• Cernichiari E, Brewer R, Myers G J, et al. Monitoring methylmercury during pregnancy: maternal hair predicts fetal brain exposure. Neurotoxicology 1995; 16(4)705–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith J C, Allen P, Turner M D, et al. The kinetics of intravenously administered methylmercury in man. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1994; 128: 251–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson T W. The toxicology of mercury and its compounds. Mercury pollution. integration and synthesis, C J Watras, J W Huckabee. Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor 1994; 631–41
   Google Scholar
• Miura K, Clarkson T W, Ideda K, et al. Establishment and characterization of methylmercury resistant PC 12–cell line. Environ Health Perspect 1994; 102(Suppl. 3)313–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ballatori N, Clarkson T W. Biliary transport of glutathione and methylmercury. Am J Physiol 1983; 244: G435–G41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutczak W J, Clarkson T W, Ballatori N. Biliary-hepatic recycling of a xenobiotic: gall bladder absorption of methylmercury. Am J Physiof 1991; 260: G873480
   Google Scholar
• Warkany J, Hubbard D M. Adverse mercurial reactions in the form of Acrodynia and related condition. Am J Dis Child 1951; 81: 335–73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gotelli C A, Astolfi E, Cox C, et al. Early biochemical effects of an organo-mercury fungicide on infants: Dose makes the poison. Science 1985; 227: 638–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese R G. Mercury. Minerals yearbook. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Washington, D.C. 1990
   Google Scholar
• Troen P, Kaufman S A, Katz K H. Mercuric bichloride poisoning. N Engl J Med 1951; 244: 459–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardenas A, Roels H, Bernard A M, et al. Markers of early renal changes induced by industrial pollutants. I. Applications to workers exposed to mercury vapour. Br J Ind Med 1993; 50: 17–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woods J S, Martin M D, Naleway C, et al. Urinary porphyrin profiles as a biomarker of mercury exposure: studies in dentists with occupational exposure to mercury vapor. J Toxicof Environ Health 1993; 40: 239–50
   Google Scholar
• CCEHFW. Dental amalgam: a public health service strategy for research, education and regulation. Subcommittee on Risk Management. Committee to Coordinate Environmental Health and related Programs. U.S. Public Health Service, Washington, D.C. 1992
   Google Scholar
• Hunter D, Russell D S. Focal cerebral and cerebellar atrophy in a human subject due to organic mercury compounds. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1954; 17: 235–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spyker J M, Sparber S B, Goldberg A M. Subtle consequences of methylmercury exposure: behavioral deviations in offspring of treated mothers. Science 1972; 177: 621–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapham L W, Cernichiari E, Cox C, et al. An analysis of autopsy brain tissue from infants prenatally exposed to methylmercury. Neuroroxicology 1995; 16(4)689–704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miura K, Imura N. Mechanism of methyl mercury cytotoxicity. Crit Rev Toxicol 1987; 18(3)161–88
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marsh D O, Myers G J, Clarkson T W, et al. Fetal methylmercury poisoning: clinical and toxicological data on 29 cases. Arch Neurol 1980; 348–53
   Google Scholar
• Cox C, Clarkson T W, Marsh D O, et al. Dose-response analysis of infants prenatally exposed to methylmercury. An application of a single compartment model to single strand hair analysis. Environ Res 1989; 31: 640–9
   Google Scholar
• Grandjean P, Weihe P, White R F. Milestone Development in infants exposed to methylmercury from human milk. Neurotoxicology 1995; 16(1)27–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranmer J S. Methylmercury and Human Health: Special issue. Neurotoxicology 1995; 16(4)583–730
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WHO. Environmental Health Criteria 1: Mercury. World Health Organization, Geneva 1976b
   Google Scholar
• Cox C, Marsh D, Myers G, et al. Analysis of data on delayed development from the 1971–72 outbreak of methylmercury poisoning in Iraq. Assessment of influential points. Neurotoxicology 1995; 16(4)727–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump K S, Viren J, Silvers A, et al. Reanalysis of dose response data from the Iraqi methylmercury poisoning episode. Risk Anal 1995; 15: 523–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock A. Die mikroanalytische Bestimmung des Quecksilbers und ihre Anwendung auf hygienische und medizinische Fragen. Svensk Kemisk T 1938; 50: 242–50
   Google Scholar
• Analytical Methods Committee. The determination of small amounts of mercury in organic matter. Analyst 1965; 90: 515–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrom O. Rapid microdetermination of mercury by spectrophotometric flame combustion. Anal Chem 1959; 31: 461–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs M B, Yamaguchi S, Goldwater W, et al. Determination of mercury in blood. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1960; 21: 475–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatch W R, Ott W L. Determination of sub-microgram quantities of mercury at atomic absorption specrrophotometry. Anal Chem 1968; 40: 2085–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magos L. Selective atomic absorption determination of inorganic mercury and methylmercury in undigested biological samples. Analyst 1971; 96: 847–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovanoli-Jakubczak T, Greenwood M R, Smith J C, et al. Determination of total and inorganic mercury in hair by flameless atomic absorption and of methylmercury by gas chromatography. Clin Chem 1974; 20(2)222–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Fitzgerald W F. Determination of volatile mercury species at the picogram level by low-temperature gas chromatography with cold vapor atomic fluorescence detection. Anal Chim Acta 1988; 208: 151–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom N. Determination of picogram levels of methylmercury by aqueous phase ethylation. followed by cryogenic gas chromatography with cold vapor atomic fluorescence detection. Can J Fisheries Aquatic Species 1989; 46: 1131–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar