Creativity, Intelligence, and Personality: A Critical Review of the Scattered Literature

References

• Aguilar-Alonso, A. (1996). Personality and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 959-969.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, R. S., & Runco, M. A. (1999). A history of research on creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 16-34). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W., Vernon, P. E., & Lindzey, G. (1960). A study of values (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. New York: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Andreasen, N., & Powers, P. (1975). Creativity and psychosis: An examination of conceptual style. Archives of General Psychiatry, 32, 70-73.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, E. G. (1930). The development of imagination in the pre-school child. University of Iowa Studies in Character, 3(4), 64.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173-177.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 113-117.
   Google Scholar
• Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1-26.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, F. X. (1955). The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 51, 478-485.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, F. X. (1963). Creativity and psychological health: Origins of personality and creative freedom. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, F. X., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476.
   Google Scholar
• Baruch, I., Hemsley, D. R., & Gray, J. A. (1988a). Differential performance of acute and chronic schizophrenics in a latent inhibition task. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176, 598-606.
   Google Scholar
• Baruch, I., Hemsley, D. R., & Gray, J. A. (1988b). Latent inhibition and "psychotic proneness" in normal subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 777-783.
   Google Scholar
• Basadur, M. (1997). Organizational development interventions for enhancing creativity in the workplace. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 59-72.
   Google Scholar
• Beech, A., Baylis, C., Smithson, P., & Claridge, G. (1989). Individual differences in schizotypy as reflected in measures of cognitive inhibition. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 117-129.
   Google Scholar
• Beech, A., McManus, D., Baylis, G., Tipper, S., & Agar, K. (1991). Individual differences in cognitive processes: Towards an explanation of schizophrenic symptomatology. British Journal of Psychology, 82, 417-426.
   Google Scholar
• Beech, A., Powell, T., McWilliam, J., & Claridge, G. (1989). Evidence of reduced "cognitive inhibition" in schizophrenia. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 109-116.
   Google Scholar
• Bentall, R. P., Claridge, G., & Slade, P. D. (1989). The multidimensional nature of schizotypal traits: A factor analytic study with normal subjects. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 363-375.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boorstin, D. J. (1992). The creators: A history of heroes of the imagination. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). The Big Five as states: How useful is the five-factor model to describe intraindividual variations over time? Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 202-221.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Bullen, J., & Hemsley, D. (1984). Psychoticism and visual recognition threshold. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 633-648.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116-131.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytical studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499-506.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1940). A culture-free intelligence test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 31, 161-179.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1943). The measurement of adult intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 153-193.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B., & Butcher, H. J. (1968). The prediction of achievement and creativity. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B., & Drevdahl, J. E. (1955). A comparison of the personality profile (16 P. F.) of eminent researchers with that of eminent teachers and administrators, and of the general population. British Journal of Psychology, 46, 248-261.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, J. P., Chapman, L. J., & Kwapil, T. R. (1994). Does the Eysenck Psychoticism dimension predict psychosis? A ten-year longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 369-375.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Miller, E. N. (1982). Reliabilities and intercorrelations of eight measures of proneness to psychosis. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 50, 187-195.
   Google Scholar
• Chassel, L. M. (1916). Test for originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 7, 317-329.
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, M. M. (2004). The convergent validity of the Torrance tests of creative thinking and creativity interest inventories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 828-841.
   Google Scholar
• Claridge, G. (1997). Schizotypy: Implications for illness and health. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Colvin, S. S. (1902). Invention versus form in English composition. Pedagogical Seminar, 9, 393-421.
   Google Scholar
• Colvin, S. S., & Meyer, I. F. (1906). Imaginative elements in the written work of school children. Pedagogical Seminar, 13, 91.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). NEO-PI/FFI manual supplement. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653-665.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). Revised NEO personality inventory and NEO five-factor inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, C. M. (1926). Genetic studies of genius II: The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. J. (1968). A note on the Wallach-Kogan test of creativity. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 38, 197-201.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, person: A systems view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 325-339). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (pp. 313-335). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dearborn, G. V. (1898). A study of imagination. American Journal of Psychology, 5, 183-190.
   Google Scholar
• Deary, I. J. (2000). Looking down on human intelligence: From psychometrics to the brain. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dellas, M., & Gaier, E. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: The individual. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 55-73.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, R. A., Smith, S. M., & Ward, T. B. (2002). The use of environmental clues during incubation. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 287-304.
   Google Scholar
• Dollinger, S. J., & Clancy, S. M. (1993). Identity, self, and personality: II. Glimpses through the autophotographic eye. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1064-1071.
   Google Scholar
• Domino, G. (1970). Identification of potentially creative persons from the Adjective Check List. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35, 48-51.
   Google Scholar
• Domino, G. (1974). Assessment of cinematographic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1064-1071.
   Google Scholar
• Drevdahl, J. E. (1956). Factors of importance for creativity. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 12, 21-26.
   Google Scholar
• Dykes, M., & McGhie, A. (1976). A comparative study of attentional strategies of schizophrenic and highly creative normal subjects. British Journal of Psychiatry, 128, 50-56.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot, J. M. (1964). Measuring creative abilities in public relations and in advertising work. In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Widening horizons in creativity (pp. 396-400). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of personality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1960). Maudsley Personality Inventory. London: Maudsley Hospital.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3? Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 773-790.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1992a). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 667-673.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1992b). A reply to Costa and McCrae: P or A and C: The role of theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 67-68.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4, 147-178.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). Psychophysiology and the measurement of intelligence. In C. R. Reynolds & P. C. Willson (Eds.), Methodological and statistical advances in the study of individual differences (pp. 1-49). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1976). Psychoticism as a dimension of personality. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, H. J., & Furnham, A. (1993). Personality and the Barron-Welsh Art Scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 837-838.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, M. W., & Graydon, J. (1989). Susceptibility to distraction as a function of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 681-687.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). Revised version of the Psychoticism Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 21-29.
   Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of the impact of personality on scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 2, 290-309.
   Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J. (1999). Influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J., & Barron, F. X. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 62-88.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, D. H. (1984). A follow-up of subjects scoring above 180 IQ in Terman's "Genetic Studies of Genius." Exceptional Children, 50, 518-523.
   Google Scholar
• Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Folley, B. S., & Park, S. (2005). Schizophrenia, schizotypy and creativity in relation to laterality: A behavioral and near-infrared optical imaging study. Schizophrenia Research, 80(2-3), 271-282.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1959). Creative writers and day-dreaming. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 9, 143-153). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1908)
   Google Scholar
• Frith, C. D. (1979). Consciousness, information processing, and schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 225-235.
   Google Scholar
• Furnham, A. (1999). Personality and creativity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 407-408.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, F. (1962). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London: Macmillan/Fontana. (Original work published 1869)
   Google Scholar
• Gelade, G. (1997). Creativity in conflict: The personality of the commercial creative. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 165, 67-78.
   Google Scholar
• George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513-524.
   Google Scholar
• Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. Oxford, England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gilhooly, K., Wynn, V., & Osman, M. (2004, April). Studies of divergent thinking. In K. Gilhooly (Chair), Recent research on insight and creative thinking (p. 146). Reported in Proceedings of the British Psychological Society 12:2). August 2004. Imperial College: London.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (1989). Handbook of creativity: Perspectives on individual differences. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goertzel, M. G., Goertzel, V., & Goertzel, T. G. (1978). Eminent personalities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, L. S. (1998). The general intelligence factor. Scientific American Presents, 9, 24-29.
   Google Scholar
• Gotz, K. O., & Gotz, K. (1973). Introversion-extraversion and neuroticism in gifted and ungifted art students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 36, 675-678.
   Google Scholar
• Gotz, K. O., & Gotz, K. (1979a). Personality characteristics of professional artists. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 327-334.
   Google Scholar
• Gotz, K. O., & Gotz, K. (1979b). Personality characteristics of successful artists. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 919-924.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G. (1957). Manual for the California psychological inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G. (1961). Techniques for identifying the creative research scientist. In Conference on the creative person. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Personality Assessment and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G. (1976). Studying creativity by means of association tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 348-353.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398-1405.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G., & Heilburn, A. B. (1965). The Adjective Check List manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, H. G., & Heilburn, A. B. (1983). The Adjective Check List manual (1983 ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. J., & Williams, L. M. (1999). Schizotypy and creativity as effects of reduced cognitive inhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(2), 263-276.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence has three facets. Science, 160, 615-620.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1981). Higher-order structure-of-intellect abilities. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 411-435.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1982). Cognitive psychology's ambiguities: Some suggested remedies. Psychological Review, 89, 48-59.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1983). Transformation abilities of functions. Journal of Creative Behavior, 17, 75-83.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P., & Hoepfner, R. (1966). Sixteen divergent thinking abilities at the ninth-grade level. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 43-64.
   Google Scholar
• Hakstian, A. R., & Cattell, R. B. (1976). Comprehensive ability battery. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D. J., & Bolton, H. (1972). Selecting creativity tests for use in research. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 451-462.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, H. L. (1927). The "faculty" of imagination: An enquiry concerning the existence of a general "faculty," or group factor, of imagination. British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplement, 3, 1-74.
   Google Scholar
• Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1967). Manual of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. New York: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2). Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. (1977). Conditions for administering creativity tests. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 1249-1260.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. (1980). Should creativity tests be administered under test-like conditions? An empirical study of three alternative conditions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 87-98.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R. (1989). Cognitive processes in creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 111-132). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemsley, D. (1991). An experimental psychological model of schizophrenia. In A. Hafner, W. Gattaz, & F. Janzarik (Eds.), Search for causes of schizophrenia (pp. 179-188). Hiedelberg, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1988). Story-telling: A method for assessing children's creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 22, 235-246.
   Google Scholar
• Heston, L. L. (1966). Psychiatric disorders in foster home reared children of schizophrenic mothers. British Journal of Psychiatry, 112, 1103-1110.
   Google Scholar
• Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking, and creativity. Intelligence, 4, 25-40.
   Google Scholar
• Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Perspectives on individual differences (pp. 53-75). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L., & Knapp, J. R. (1973). On the subjective character of the empirical base of Guilford's structure-of-intellect model. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 33-43.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, L. (1966). Contrary imaginations. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jamison, K. R. (1989). Mood disorders and patterns of creativity in British writers and artists. Psychiatry, 52, 125-134.
   Google Scholar
• Jamison, K. R. (1993). Touched with fire: Manic depressive illness and the artistic temperament. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jausovec, N. (2000). Differences in cognitive process between gifted, intelligent, creative and average individuals while solving complex problems: An EEG study. Intelligence, 28, 213-237.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. R. (1993). Why is reaction time correlated with psychometric g? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 53-56.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big-Five Inventory: Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kasof, J. (1997). Creativity and breadth of attention. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 303-315.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). Hawking's haiku, Madonna's math: Why it's hard to be creative in every room of the house. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 3-19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, G. (2003). Expanding the mood: Creativity equation. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2-3), 131-135.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, G. H., & Rosanoff, A. J. (1910). A study of association in insanity. American Journal of Insanity, 67, 37-96, 317-390.
   Google Scholar
• Kershner, J. R., & Ledger, G. (1985). Effect of sex, intelligence, and style of thinking on creativity: A comparison of gifted and average IQ children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1033-1040.
   Google Scholar
• King, L., Walker, L., & Broyles, S. (1996). Creativity and the five factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189-203.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, P., & Cooper, C. (1986). Psychoticism and creativity. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 147, 183-188.
   Google Scholar
• Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lauritzen, E. S. (1963). Semantic divergent thinking factors among elementary school children. Dissertation Abstracts, 24, 629.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Evans, R., Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Bipolar disorder and creativity: Investigating a possible link. In A. Columbus (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (Vol. 40, pp. 111-142). New York: Nova Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16, 317-323.
   Google Scholar
• Lowenfeld, V., & Beittel, K. (1959). Interdisciplinary criteria of creativity in the arts and sciences: A progress report. Research Yearbook: National Art Education Association, 19, 35-44.
   Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. I. (1994). Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving. Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 289-332). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. I. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (pp. 339-350). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. I. (2003). In search of creative intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Lautrey (Eds.), Models of intelligence: International perspectives (pp. 279-292). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lubinski, D. (2004). Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman's (1904) "‘General intelligence,’ objectively determined and measured." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 96-111.
   Google Scholar
• Lubow, R. E., Ingberg-Sachs, Y., Zalstein-Orda, N., & Gerwitz, J. C. (1992). Latent inhibition in low and high "psychotic-prone" normal subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 563-572.
   Google Scholar
• Lubow, R. E., & Moore, A. U. (1959). Latent inhibition: The effect of nonreinforced pre- exposure to the conditional stimulus. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 52, 451-419.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, A. M. (1995). The price of greatness: Resolving the creativity and madness controversy. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. W. (1961). Fostering creativity in students of engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 52, 129-142.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484-495.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. W. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20, 273-281.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). In search of human effectiveness. New York: Creative Education Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Mackintosh, N. J. (1998). IQ and human intelligence. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, C. (1981). Cognition and consciousness. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, situation, and creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Perspectives on individual differences (pp. 3-32). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, C. (1999). Biological bases of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (pp. 137-152). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, C., & Dailey, A. (1996). Creativity: Primary process cognition and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 409-414.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, C., Hines, D., Mitchell, L., & Covello, E. (1984). EEG alpha asymmetry and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 77-86.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, O., Claridge, G., & Jackson, M. (1995). New scales for the assessment of schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 7-13.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
   Google Scholar
• McCloy, W., & Meier, N. C. (1931). Re-creative imagination. Psychological Monographs, 51, 108-116.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258-1265.
   Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 3, 220-232.
   Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. A., & Andrews, F. M. (1967). Creative thinking and level of intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1, 428-431.
   Google Scholar
• Mednick, S. A., & Mednick, M. T. (1967). Examiner's manual: Remote Associates Test. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E. (1962). Schizotaxia, schizotypy, schizophrenia. American Psychologist, 17, 827-838.
   Google Scholar
• Merrifield, P. R., Gardner, S. F., & Cox, A. B. (1964). Aptitudes and personality measures related to creativity in seventh-grade children. Report of the Psychological Laboratory (No. 28). Los Angeles: University of Southern California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merten, T. (1993). Word association responses and psychoticism. Personality and Individual Differences. 14, 837-839.
   Google Scholar
• Merten, T. (1995). Factors influencing word-association responses: A reanalysis. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 249-263.
   Google Scholar
• Merten, T., & Fischer, I. (1999). Creativity, personality, and word association responses: Associative behavior in forty supposedly creative persons. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 933-942.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E., & Chapman, L. (1983). Continued word associations in hypothetically psychosis-prone college students. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 468-478.
   Google Scholar
• Moles, A. (1968). Information theory and aesthetic perception (J. E. Cohen, Trans.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, S. A. (2002). The impact of environmental clues in problem solving and incubation: The moderating effect of ability. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 207-211.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107-120.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27-43.
   Google Scholar
• Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., et al. (1996). Intelligence: Knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist, 51, 77-101.
   Google Scholar
• Nettle, D. (2001). Strong imagination: Madness, creativity, and human nature. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nettle, D. (2006). Schizotypy and mental health amongst poets, artists and mathematicians. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 876-890.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1962). The process of creative thinking. In H. E. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 63-119). New York: Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, J. G. (1972). Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original and useful: The concept of creativity as a normally distributed trait. American Psychologist, 27, 717-727.
   Google Scholar
• Nobel Foundation. (2007). Nobel prizes: All Nobel laureates. Retrieved November 30, 2007, from http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/lists/all
   Google Scholar
• Ochse, R. (1990). Before the gates of excellence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkhurst, H. B. (1999). Confusion, lack of consensus, and the definition of creativity as a construct. Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 1-21.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. B., & Carson, S. (2000). Latent inhibition and openness to experience in a high-achieving student population. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 323-332.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., & Carson, S. H. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: Replication and commentary. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1137-1147.
   Google Scholar
• Piers, E. V., Daniels, J. M., & Quakenbush, J. F. (1960). The identification of creativity in adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 346-351.
   Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A. (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for content generality of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 179-182.
   Google Scholar
• Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance's (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103-114.
   Google Scholar
• Plucker, J., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of human creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 35-60). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poincaré, H. (1970). Mathematical creation. In P. E. Vernon (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 77-88). London: Penguin Books. (Original work published 1908)
   Google Scholar
• Prentky, R. A. (1980). Creativity and psychopathology: A neurocognitive perspective. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Prentky, R. A. (1989). Creativity and psychopathology: Gamboling at the seat of madness. In A. J. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Perspectives on individual differences (pp. 3-32). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prentky, R. A. (2001). Mental illness and roots of genius. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 95-104.
   Google Scholar
• Price, D. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J. C. (1956). Standard progressive matrices: Sets A, B, C, D, E. London: Lewis.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J. C. (1963). Standard progressive matrices. London: Lewis.
   Google Scholar
• Rawlings, D. (1985). Psychoticism, creativity, and dichotic shadowing. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 737-742.
   Google Scholar
• Reitan, R. M. (1992). Trail Making Test. Manual for administration and scoring. South Tuscon, AZ: Reitan Neurological Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, M., Panksepp, J., Schnabel, N., Kellerhoff, N., Kempel, P., & Hennig, J. (2005). Personality and biological markers of creativity. European Journal of Personality, 19, 83-95.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. (1987). An analysis of creativity. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics (pp. 216-222). Buffalo, NY: Bearly. (Original work published 1961)
   Google Scholar
• Richards, R. L. (1976). A comparison of selected Guilford and Wallach-Kogan Creative Thinking Tests in conjunction with measures of intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 178-182.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, R. L. (1993). Everyday creativity, eminent creativity, and pscyhopathology. Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 212-217.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, A. (1951a). A psychological study of eminent biologists. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 65, 459-470.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, A. (1951b). A psychological study of physical scientists. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 43, 121-139.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, A. (1953). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd Mead.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, C. R. (1954). Toward a theory of creativity. ETC: Review of General Semantics, 11, 249-260.
   Google Scholar
• Rothenberg, A. (1971). The process of Janusian thinking in creativity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 24(3), 195-205.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657-687.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393-400.
   Google Scholar
• Rushton, J. P. (1990). Creativity, intelligence, and psychoticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 1291-1298.
   Google Scholar
• Salgado, J. F. (1998). Big five personality dimensions and job performance in army and civil occupations: A European perspective. Human Performance, 11, 271-288.
   Google Scholar
• Sass, L. A. (2001). Schizophrenia, modernism, and the "creative imagination": On creativity and psychopathology. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 55-74.
   Google Scholar
• Schoppe, K. J. (1975). Verbaler Kreativitäts-Test (V-K-T). Ein Verfahren zur Erfassung verbal produktiver Kreativitätsmerkmale Handandweisung [A procedure to capture verbally the signs of productive creativity]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K., & Hagtvet, K. A. (1993). Correlations among creativity, intelligence, personality, and academic achievement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 497-498.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1976). Biographical determinants of achieved eminence: A multivariate approach to the Cox data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 218-226.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1977). Creative productivity, age and stress: A biographical time-series analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 791-804.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership: Historiometric inquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of genius. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. M. (1922). Creative imagination. American Journal of Psychology, 33, 234-235.
   Google Scholar
• Snyderman, M., & Rothman, S. (1987). Survey of expert opinion on intelligence and aptitude testing. American Psychologist, 42, 137-144.
   Google Scholar
• Soldz, S., & Vaillant, G. E. (1999). The big five personality traits and the life course: A 45 year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 208-232.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, P. R., Crider, A., Winkelman, J. W., Turi, A., Kamer, R. M., & Kaplan, L. J. (1981). Disrupted latent inhibition in the rat with chronic amphetamine or haloperidolinduced supersensitivity: Relationship to schizophrenic attention disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 16, 519-537.
   Google Scholar
• Spearman, C. (1904). General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201-293.
   Google Scholar
• Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stavridou, A., & Furnham, A. (1996). The relationship between psychoticism, trait-creativity, and the attentional mechanism of cognitive inhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 143-153.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology, 36, 311-322.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Nonentrenchment in the assessment of intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 63-67.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triarchic mind: A theory of human intelligence. New York: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). Guilford's structure of intellect model and model of creativity: Contributions and limitations. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 309-316.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2002). The creativity conundrum: A propulsion model of kinds of creative contributions. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 1-32.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1992). Buy low sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Research, 1, 1-5.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (pp. 1-19). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroop, J. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
   Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence: An explanation of and a complete guide for the use of the Stanford revision and extension of the Binet-Simon Intelligence Scale. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M. (Ed.). (1925-1959). Genetic studies of genius (Vols. 1-5). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M. (1973). Concept Mastery Test manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. (1940). The significance of deviates: III. Correlates of adult achievement in the California gifted group. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 39, 74-89.
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. (1952). The nature of creative thinking. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137-1148.
   Google Scholar
• Tipper, P. (1985). The negative primary effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 571-590.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1963). Explorations in creative thinking in the early school years: A progress report. In C. W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 173-183). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Directions manual and scoring guide. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1967). The Minnesota studies of creative behavior: National and international extensions. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1, 137-154.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Directions guide and scoring manual. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1990). The Torrance tests of creative thinking norms—technical manual figural (streamlined) forms A & B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P., & Ball, O. E. (1998). The Torrance tests of creative thinking streamlined scoring guide figural A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Toynbee, A. (1964). Is America neglecting her creative minority? In C. W. Taylor (Ed.), Widening horizons in creativity: The proceedings of the Fifth Utah Creativity Research Conference (pp. 3-9). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Upmanyu, V. V., Bhardwaj, S., & Singh, S. (1996). Word-association emotional indicators: Associations with anxiety, psychoticism, neuroticism, extraversion, and creativity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 521-529.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, A. S., Decker, B. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163-178.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, S. (1968). Differences between intelligence and creativity: Some speculations on the role of environment. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 97-101.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, H. R. (1961). Creative thinking: A factor in sales productivity. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 9, 223-226.
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, M. A. (1970). Creativity. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1211-1272) New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive negative states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465-490.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children: Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wehner, L., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Magyari-Beck, I. (1991). Current approaches used in studying creativity: An exploratory investigation. Creativity Research Journal, 4(3), 261-271.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, G. S., & Barron, F. (1963). Barron-Welsh art scale. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., & Lewis, D. J. (1954). A factor-analytic study of creative-thinking abilities. Psychometrika, 19, 297-311.
   Google Scholar
• Witelson, S. F., Kigar, D. L., & Harvey, T. (1999). The exceptional brain of Albert Einstein. Lancet, 353, 2149-2153.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfradt, U., & Pretz, J. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 297-310.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, R. W., & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1989). Individual differences in creativity: An interactionist perspective. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Perspectives on individual differences (pp. 3-32). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woody, E., & Claridge, G. (1977). Psychoticism and thinking. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16, 241-248.
   Google Scholar
• Wuthrich, V., & Bates, T. C. (2001). Schizotypy and latent inhibition: Nonlinear linkage between psychometric and cognitive markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 783-798.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, K. (1964). Threshold of intelligence in academic achievement of highly creative students. Journal of Experimental Education, 32, 401-405.
   Google Scholar
• Ziller, R. C. (1990). Photographing the self: Observing self, social environmental orientations. San Francisco, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar