Hull-White’s value at risk model: case study of Baltic equities market

References

• Artzner, P.; Delbaen, F.; Eber, J. M.; Heath, D. 1999. Coherent measures of risk, Mathematical Finance 9: 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9965.00068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babalos, V.; Balcilar, M.; Loate B. T.; Chisoro, S.; Gupta, R. 2014. Did Baltic stock markets offer diversification benefits during the recent financial turmoil? Novel evidence from a nonparametric causality in quantiles test. Working paper 2014–71 [online], [cited 12 April 2016]. University of Pretoria, Pretoria. Available from Internet: http://www.up.ac.za/media/shared/61/WP/wp_2014_71.zp39317.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barone-Adesi, G.; Bourgoin, F.; Giannopoulos, K. 1998. Don’t look back, Risk 11(8): 100–104.
   Google Scholar
• Basel Committee of Banking Supervision. 2014. Fundamental Review of the Trading Book: Outstanding Issues. Technical Report. Basle Committee of Banking Supervision, Basel.
   Google Scholar
• Bee, M. 2012. Dynamic value at risk models and the peaks-over-threshold method for market risk measurement: an empirical investigation during a financial crisis, Journal of Risk Model Validation 2(2): 3–45. https://doi.org/10.21314/JRMV.2012.087
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, J.; Christoffersen, P. F.; Pelletier, D. 2011. Evaluating value at risk models with Desk-Level Data, Management Science 57(12): 2213–2227. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1080.0964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudoukh, J.; Richardson, M.; Whitelaw, F. R. 1998. The best of both worlds: a hybrid approach to calculating value at risk, Risk 11(5): 64–67.
   Google Scholar
• Brandolini, D.; Colucci, S. 2013. Backtesting value-at-risk: a comparison between filtered boot-strap and historical simulation, Journal of Risk Model Validation 6(4): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.21314/JRMV.2012.094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännäs, K.; De Gooijer, J. G.; Lönnbark, C.; Soultanaeva, A. 2012. Simultaneity and asymmetry of returns and volatilities: the emerging Baltic States’ stock exchanges, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics 16(1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/1558-3708.1855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoffersen, P. F.; Pelletier, D. 2004. Backtesting value-at-risk: a duration-based approach, Journal of Financial Econometrics 2(1): 84–108. doi: 10.1093/jjfinec/nbh004
   Google Scholar
• Cui, X.; Zhu, S.; Sun, X.; Li, D. 2013. Nonlinear portfolio selection using approximate parametric value-at-risk, Journal of Banking & Finance 37: 2124–2139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.01.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darškuvienė, V.; Keating, C.; Žigiene, G. 2014. Baltic financial markets handbook. Vilnius: Lithuanian Financial Markets Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Del Brio, E. B.; Mora-Valencia, A.; Javier, P. 2014. VaR performance during the subprime and sovereign debt crises: an application to emerging markets, Emerging Markets Review 20: 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2014.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deltuvaitė, V. 2016. Investigation of stock market integration in the Baltic countries, Economics and Business 28: 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1515/eb-2016-0006
   Google Scholar
• Diamandis, F. P.; Anastassios A.; Kouretas, G. P.; Zarangas, L. 2011. Value-at-risk for long and short trading positions: evidence from developed and emerging equity markets, International Review of Financial Analysis 20: 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2011.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufour, J. M. 2006. Monte Carlo tests with nuisance parameters: a general approach to finite-sample inference and nonstandard asymptotics in econometrics, Journal of Econometrics 133: 443–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Еurostat. 2016. Report EBC. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Franses, P.; van Dijk, D. 1996. Forecasting stock market volatility using nonlinear Garch model, Journal of Forecasting 15(3): 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-131X(199604)15:3<229::AID-FOR620>3.0.CO;2-3 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-131X(199604)15:3<229::AID-FOR620>3.0.CO;2-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holton, A. G. 1998. Simulating value at risk, Risk 11(5): 60–63
   Google Scholar
• Goorbergh, R.; Vlaar, P. 1999. Value at risk analysis of stock returns historical simulation, variance techniques or tail index estimation? Working Paper [online], [cited 15 December 2016]. Econometric Research and Special Studies Department. De Nederlandsche Bank. Available from Internet: https://www.dnb.nl/binaries/wo0579_tcm46-145908.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hull, J.; White, A. 1998. Incorporating volatility updating into the historical simulation method for value-at-risk, Journal of Risk 1(1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.21314/JOR.1998.001
   Google Scholar
• Hurlin, C.; Colletaz, G.; Tokpavi, S.; Candelon, B. 2008. Backtesting value at risk: a GMM duration-based test. Working Paper [online], [cited 3 November 2016]. Paris: HAL Ltd. Available from Internet: http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00329495
   Google Scholar
• Jacikevičius, A.; Raos, D. 2014. Fix income, Chapter 6, in V. Darškuvienė; C. Keating; G. Žigienė (Eds.). Baltic financial markets handbook. Vilnius: Lithuanian Financial Markets Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. C. 2001. Value at risk: teoría y aplicaciones, Estudios de Economía 28(2): 217–247.
   Google Scholar
• Jurgilas, D. 2012. Measuring and forecasting value at risk for Nordic and Baltic stock indexes: Master’s thesis. ISM University of Management and Economics. Vilnius.
   Google Scholar
• Kellner R.; Rösch, D. 2016. Quantifying market risk with value-at-risk or expected shortfall? – Consequences for capital requirements and model risk, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 68: 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S. 2015. The most-promising emerging and frontier markets [online], [cited 3 April 2016]. Available from Internet: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-02-11/gulf-nations-defy-oil-rout-to-top-list-of-best-emerging-markets
   Google Scholar
• Kresta, A.; Tichy, T. 2016. Selection of efficient market risk models: backtesting results evaluation with DEA approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering 102: 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuusk, A.; Paas, T.; Viikmaa, K. 2011. Financial contagion of the 2008 crisis: is there any evidence of financial contagion from the US to the Baltic states, Eastern Journal of European Studies 2(2): 61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Louzis, P. D.; Xanthopoulos-Sisinis, S.; Refenes, A. P. 2014. Realized volatility models and alternative value at risk prediction strategies, Economic Modelling 40: 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maneschiöld, P. O. 2006. Integration between the Baltic and International stock markets, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 42(6): 25–45. https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X420602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsson, U. 2007. Interdependence of Nordic and Baltic stock markets, Baltic Journal of Economics 6(2): 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099X.2007.10840434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikkinen, J.; Piljak, V.; Äijö, J. 2012. Baltic stock markets and the financial crisis of 2008–2009, Research in International Business and Finance 26: 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2012.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Perignon, C.; Smith, D. R. 2010. The level and quality of value at risk disclosure by commercial banks, Journal of Banking and Finance 34(2): 362–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritsker, M. 2001. The hidden dangers of historical simulation. Working paper. Washington: Board of Governors of the FRS.
   Google Scholar
• Radivojevic, N.; Cvijetkovic, M.; Stepanov, S. 2016a. The new hybrid VaR approach based on EVT, Estudios de Economia 43(1): 29–52. doi: 10.4067/S0718-52862016000100002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radivojevic, N.; Milojkovic, D.; Curcic, N.; Miletic, V. 2016b. Testing value-at-risk models in emerging markets during crises: a case study on South Eastern European countries, Journal of Risk Model Validation 10(2): 25–52. https://doi.org/10.21314/JRMV.2016.153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radivojevic, N.; Sabot-Matic, Z.; Mirjanic, B. 2017. New historical bootstrap value at risk model, Journal of Risk Model Validation (in printing).
   Google Scholar
• Rossignolo, A.; Fethib, M.; Shaban, M. 2012. Value at risk models and Basel capital charges: evidence from emerging and frontier stock markets, Journal of Financial Stability 8: 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2011.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossignolo, F. A.; Fethib, M.; Shaban, M. 2013. Market crises and Basel capital requirements: could Basel III have beendifferent? Evidence from Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Spain (PIGS), Journal of Banking & Finance 37: 1323–1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şener, E.; Baronyana, S.; Mengütürk, L. 2012. Ranking the predictive performances of value at risk estimation methods, International Journal of Forecasting 28: 849–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stancic, P.; Radivojevic, N.; Stancici, V. 2013. Testing the applicability of the BRW approach in the emerging stock markets, Actual Problems of Economics 6: 480–486.
   Google Scholar
• Zikovic, S. 2007. Testing popular VaR models in EU new member and candidate states, Journal of Economics and Business 25: 325–346.
   Google Scholar
• Zikovic, S. 2010. Market risk in transitions countries: value at risk approach. Rijeka: University of Rijeka.
   Google Scholar
• Zikovic, S.; Prohaska, Z. 2010. Optimization of decay factor in time weighted (BRW) simulation, implications for VaR performance in Mediterranean countries, Ekonomska istraživanja 23(1): 73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zikovic, S.; Filer, R. K. 2013. Ranking of VaR and ES models: performance in developed and emerging markets, Czech Journal of Economics and Finance 63(3): 327–359.
   Google Scholar