Comparison of selected methods for performance evaluation of Czech and Slovak commercial banks

References

• Altan, M.; Yusufazari, H.; Bedűk, A. 2014. Performance analysis of banks in Turkey using CAMEL approach, in 14th International Academic Conference, 28 October 2014, Malta, 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, E. I. 2000. Predicting financial distress of companies: revisiting the Z-score and ZETA models. Stern School of Business, New York University, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Andries, A. M.; Capraru, B. 2011. Bank performance in Central and Eastern Europe: the role of financial liberalization, in European Financial Management Association, Annual Meetings, 22–25 June 2011, Braga, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Behzadian, M.; Kazemzadeh, R. B.; Albadvi, A.; Aghdasi, M. 2010. PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications, European Journal of Operational Research 200(1): 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bičo, A.; Ganić, M. 2012. The efficiency of banking sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina in comparison to Slovenia: comparative analysis, Journal of Economic and Social Studies 2: 125–149. https://doi.org/10.14706/JECOSS11226
   Google Scholar
• Brans, J. P.; Mareschal, B. 2005. PROMETHEE methods, in J. Figueira; S. Greco; M. Ehrgott (Eds.). Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer Science + Business Media, Inc., 163–196.
   Google Scholar
• Brauers, W. K. M.; Ginevičius, R.; Podviezko, A. 2014. Development of a methodology of evaluation of financial stability of commercial banks, Panoeconomicus 61(3): 349–367. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN1403349B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauers, W. K. M.; Zavadskas, E. K. 2011. MULTIMOORA optimization used to decide on a bank loan to buy property, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 17(1): 174–188. https://doi.org/10.3846/13928619.2011.560632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burianová, L.; Paulík, J. 2014. Corporate social responsibility in commercial banking – a case study from the Czech Republic, Journal of Competitiveness 6(1): 50–70. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2014.01.04
   Google Scholar
• Cheang, N.; Choy, I. 2009. Aggregate financial stability index for an early warning system. Macao Monetary Research Bulletin No. 21. Macao: Monetary Authority of Macao.
   Google Scholar
• Čihák, M. 2007. Systemic loss: a measure of financial stability, Czech Journal of Economics and Finance 57(1–2): 5–26.
   Google Scholar
• Diaconu, I. R.; Oanea, D. C. 2015. Determinants of bank’s stability. Evidence from CreditCoop, Procedia Economics and Finance 32: 488–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01422-7
   Google Scholar
• Diaconu, R. I.; Oanea, D. C. 2014. The main determinants of bank’s stability. Evidence from Romanian banking sector, Procedia Economics and Finance 16: 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00810-7
   Google Scholar
• Doumpos, M.; Zopounidis, C. 2010. A multicriteria decision support system for bank rating, Decision Support Systems 50: 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiala, P.; Jablonský, J.; Maňas, M. 1994. Vícekriterální rozhodování [Multi-criteria decision making]. Praha: Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze.
   Google Scholar
• Fiala, P.; Jablonský, J.; Maňas, M. 2008. Modely a metody rozhodování [Models and methods of decision making]. Praha: Nakladatelství Oeconomica.
   Google Scholar
• Gersl, A.; Hermanek, J. 2008. Indicators of financial system stability: towards an aggregate financial stability indicators?, Prague Economic Papers 17(2): 127–142. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginevicius, R.; Podvezko, V. 2008. Multicriteria evaluation of Lithuanian banks from the perspective of their reliability for clients, Journal of Business Economics and Management 9(4): 257–267. https://doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.257-267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Podvezko, V.; Novotny, M. 2010. Evaluating Lithuanian banks from the perspective of their reliability to customers by PROMETHEE method, in 6th International Scientific Conference “Business and Management 2010”, 13–14 May 2010, Vilnius, Lithuania, 993–999.
   Google Scholar
• Ginevičius, R.; Podviezko, A. 2013. The evaluation of financial stability and soundness of Lithuanian banks, Ekonomska istraživanja 26(2): 191–208. doi:10.1080/1331677X.2013.11517616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groeneveld, J. M.; de Vries, B. 2009. European cooperative banks: first lessons from the subprime crisis, International Journal of Cooperative Management 4: 8–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hunjak, T.; Jakovcevic, D. 2001. AHP based model for bank performance evaluation and rating, in Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Analytic Hierarchy Process (ISAHP 2001), 2–4 August 2001, Berne, Switzerland, 149–158.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, C. L.; Yoon, K. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making-methods and applications, a state of the art survey. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, Y. T. 2001. CAMELS analysis in Turkish banking sector. BRSA MSPD Working Report, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Konovalova, N.; Kristovska, I.; Kudinska, M. 2016. Credit risk management in commercial banks, Polish Journal of Management Studies 13(2): 90–100. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2016.13.2.09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosmidou, K.; Zopounidis, C. 2008. Measurement of bank performance in Greece, South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics 6: 79–95.
   Google Scholar
• Kubiszewska, K. 2017. Banking concentration in the Baltic and Western Balkan states – selected issues, Oeconomia Copernicana 8(1): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.v8i1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumbirai, M.; Webb, R. 2010. A financial ratio analysis of commercial bank performance in South Africa, African Review of Economics and Finance 1: 30–53.
   Google Scholar
• Laznia, M. 2013. Kde nájdeme najstabilnejšie banky? [Where can we find the most stable banks?] [online], [cited 30 November 2016]. Slovak Banking Association. Available from Internet: http://www.sbaonline.sk/sk/presscentrum/aktuality/tema-kde-najdeme-najstabilnejsie-banky.html
   Google Scholar
• Matarazzo, B. 1986. Multicriterion analysis of preferences by means of pairwise actions and criterion comparisons, Applied Mathematics and Computation 18: 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0096-3003(86)90020-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matarazzo, B. 1988. Preference ranking global frequencies in multicriterion analysis (PRAGMA), EJOR 36: 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(88)90005-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maudos, J. 2012. Financial soundness indicators for the Spanish banking sector: an international comparison, SEFO-Spanish Economic and Financial Outlook 1(4): 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, R. N.; Majumdar, S.; Bhandia, D. 2013. Banking stability – a precursor to financial stability. Reserve Bank of India Working Paper Series no. WPS (DEPR): 01/2013
   Google Scholar
• Olszak, M.; Pipień, M.; Roszkowska, S. 2016. The impact of capital ratio on lending of EU banks – the role of bank specialization and capitalization, Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy 11(1): 43–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G. H. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research 156(2): 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulík, J.; Sobeková Majková, M.; Tykva, T.; Červinka, M. 2015. Application of the CSR measuring model in commercial bank in relation to their financial performance, Economics and Sociology 8(4): 65–81. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2015/8-4/5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrovska, M.; Mihajlovska, E. M. 2013. Measures of financial stability in Macedonia, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice 2(3): 85–110.
   Google Scholar
• Podvezko, V. 2011. The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS, Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics 22(2): 134–146. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.22.2.310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman, A.; Şargu, A. C. 2013. Analysing the financial soundness of the commercial banks in Romania: an approach based on the camels framework, Procedia Economics and Finance (6): 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00192-5
   Google Scholar
• Sahajwala, R.; Van den Bergh, P. 2000. Supervisory risk assessment and early warning systems. Technical Report 4, Bank of International Settlements. Basel, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Said, R. M.; Tumin, M. H. 2011. Performance and financial ratios of commercial banks in Malaysia and China, International Review of Business Research Papers 2: 157–169.
   Google Scholar
• Simionescu, M.; Gavurova, B.; Smrčka, L. 2017. Combined forecasts to improve survey of profession forecasters predictions for quarterly inflation in the USA, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 30(1): 789–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1314826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinicakova, M.; Sulikova, V.; Gavurova, B. 2017. Twin deficits threat in the European Union, E + M Economics and Management 20(1): 144–156.
   Google Scholar
• Stehell, V.; Vrbka, J.; Rowland, Z. 2016. Using neural networks for determining creditworthiness for the purpose of providing bank loan on the example of construction companies in south region of Czech Republic, Ekonomicko-Manazerske Spektrum 10(2): 62–75.
   Google Scholar
• Svitálková, Z. 2014. Comparison and evaluation of bank efficiency in Austria and the Czech Republic, Journal of Competitiveness 6(2): 15–29. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2014.02.02
   Google Scholar
• Trautmann, P. Y. 2011. CAMELS Ratings/USAID-Funded Economic Governance II Project. Retrieved May. BearingPoint, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K.; Turskis, Z.; Tamosaitiene, J.; Marina, V. 2008. Multicriteria selection of project managers by applying grey criteria, Technological and Economic Development of Economy 14(4): 462–477. https://doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.462-477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar