Cross-organism toxicogenomics with group factor analysis

References

• Hartwell LH, Szankasi P, Roberts CJ, Murray AW, Friend SH. Integrating genetic approaches into the discovery of anticancer drugs. Science 1997; 278:1064-8; PMID:9353181; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.278.5340.1064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaletta T, Hengartner MO. Finding function in novel targets: C. elegans as a model organism. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2006; 5:387-98; PMID:16672925; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd2031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zon LI, Peterson RT. In vivo drug discovery in the zebrafish. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2005; 4:35-44; PMID:15688071; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd1606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpless NE, Depinho RA. The mighty mouse: genetically engineered mouse models in cancer drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2006; 5:741-54; PMID:16915232; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd2110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins FS, Gray GM, Bucher JR. Toxicology. Transforming environmental health protection. Science 2008; 319:906-7; PMID:18276874; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1154619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy B, Apic G, Carthew P, Clark D, Cook D, Dix I, Escher S, Hastings J, Heard DJ, Jeliazkova N, et al. Toxicology ontology perspectives. ALTEX 2012; 29:139-56; PMID:22562487; http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex.2012.2.139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willighagen EL, Wehrens R, Buydens LMC. Molecular chemometrics. Crit Rev Anal Chem 2006; 36:189-98; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408340600969601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krewski D, Westphal M, Al-Zoughool M, Croteau MC, Andersen ME. New directions in toxicity testing. Annu Rev Public Health 2011; 32:161-78; PMID:21219154; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Zhang M, Borlak J, Tong W. A decade of toxicogenomic research and its contribution to toxicological science. Toxicol Sci 2012; 130:217-28; PMID:22790972; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfs223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou T, Chou J, Watkins PB, Kaufmann WK. Toxicogenomics: transcription profiling for toxicology assessment. In: Luch A, editor. Vol. 1, Molecular, Clinical and Environmental Toxicology; Basel (Switzerland): Birkhäuser; 2009. p. 325-366. (Experientia Supplementum; vol. 99)
   Google Scholar
• Hartung T, van Vliet E, Jaworska J, Bonilla L, Skinner N, Thomas R. Systems toxicology. ALTEX 2012; 29:119-28; PMID:22562485; http://dx.doi.org/10.14573/altex.2012.2.119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas RS, Black MB, Li L, Healy E, Chu T-M, Bao W, Andersen ME, Wolfinger RD. A comprehensive statistical analysis of predicting in vivo hazard using high-throughput in vitro screening. Toxicol Sci 2012; 128:398-417; PMID:22543276; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfs159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uehara T, Ono A, Maruyama T, Kato I, Yamada H, Ohno Y, Urushidani T. The Japanese toxicogenomics project: application of toxicogenomics. Mol Nutr Food Res 2010; 54:218-27; PMID:20041446; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200900169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Vijay V, Shi Q, Liu Z, Fang H, Tong W. FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury. Drug Discov Today 2011; 16:697-703; PMID:21624500; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2011.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le H-S, Bar-Joseph Z. Cross species expression analysis using a Dirichlet process mixture model with latent matchings. In: Lafferty JD, Williams CKI, Shawe-Taylor J, Zemel RS, Culotta A, editors. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 23. 24th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2010 Dec 6–9; Vancouver, BC, Canada. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates; 2011. p. 1270-1278
   Google Scholar
• Suvitaival T, Huopaniemi I, Oresic M, Kaski S. Cross-species translation of multi-way biomarkers. Honkela T, Duch W, Girolami M, Kaski S, editors. Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2011. 21st International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks; 2011 June 14–17; Espoo, Finland. Berlin/Heidelberg (Germany): Springer; 2011. Part I: p. 209-216. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; vol 6791)
   Google Scholar
• The CAMDA Organizing Committee. The CAMDA challenges [Internet]. [cited 2013 Sep 23]. Available from: http://dokuwiki.bioinf.jku.at/doku.php/contest_dataset
   Google Scholar
• Virtanen S, Klami A, Khan SA, Kaski S. Bayesian group factor analysis. In: Lawrence N, Girolami M, editors. JMLR W&CP 22. 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics; 2012 Apr 21–23; La Palma, Canary Islands. JMLR; 2012. p. 1269-1277
   Google Scholar
• Lamb J, Crawford ED, Peck D, Modell JW, Blat IC, Wrobel MJ, Lerner J, Brunet J-P, Subramanian A, Ross KN, et al. The Connectivity Map: using gene-expression signatures to connect small molecules, genes, and disease. Science 2006; 313:1929-35; PMID:17008526; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1132939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iorio F, Rittman T, Ge H, Menden M, Saez-Rodriguez J. Transcriptional data: a new gateway to drug repositioning? Drug Discov Today 2013; 18:350-7; PMID:22897878; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2012.07.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu XA, Rajpal DK. Applications of Connectivity Map in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today 2012; 17:1289-98; PMID:22889966; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2012.07.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiment F, Tsamou M, Jennen D, Kleinjans J. Assessing compound carcinogenicity in vitro using connectivity mapping. Carcinogenesis 2014; 35:201-7; PMID:23940306; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgt278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smalley JL, Gant TW, Zhang S-DD. Application of connectivity mapping in predictive toxicology based on gene-expression similarity. Toxicology 2010; 268:143-6; PMID:19788908; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2009.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing L, Wu L, Liu Y, Ai N, Lu X, Fan X. LTMap: a web server for assessing the potential liver toxicity by genome-wide transcriptional expression data. J Appl Toxicol 2013; (Forthcoming); PMID:24022982; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jat.2923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102:15545-50; PMID:16199517; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506580102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ATC classification index with DDDs 2013. Oslo: WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. 2012 [cited 2013 Sep 23]. Available from: http://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/
   Google Scholar
• The CAMDA Organizing Committee. Preprocessed TGP data [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2013 Mar 1]. Available from: http://dokuwiki.bioinf.jku.at/doku.php/tgp_prepro/
   Google Scholar
• Hochreiter S, Clevert D-A, Obermayer K. A new summarization method for Affymetrix probe level data. Bioinformatics 2006; 22:943-9; PMID:16473874; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochreiter S, Bodenhofer U, Heusel M, Mayr A, Mitterecker A, Kasim A, Khamiakova T, Van Sanden S, Lin D, Talloen W, et al. FABIA: factor analysis for bicluster acquisition. Bioinformatics 2010; 26:1520-7; PMID:20418340; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinfor-matics/btq227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldas J, Kaski S. Bayesian biclustering with the plaid model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP); 2008 Oct 16–19; Cancun, Mexico. IEEE 2008; p. 291-6
   Google Scholar
• Ishwaran H, Rao JS. Spike and slab variable selection: Frequentist and Bayesian strategies. Ann Stat 2005; 33:730-73; http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/009053604000001147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell T, Beauchamp JJ. Bayesian variable selection in linear regression. J Am Stat Assoc 1988; 83:1023-32; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc, B 1995; 57:289-300
   Google Scholar