Learning Arabic as a second language in Saudi universities: Ajzen’s theory and religious motivations

ABSTRACT

Learning Arabic as a second language (ASL) in Arabic-speaking countries is yet to be investigated thoroughly. The present study examines 61 ASL learners from 25 countries in seven Saudi universities using a quantitative and qualitative questionnaire, with Ajzen's theory of planned behaviour used as a theoretical framework to elicit and analyze the participants' intentions, attitudes, motivations, and challenges. The findings of the quantitative items show that learners hold significant and positive intentions, attitudes, and subjective-norm and perceived-behavioural-control beliefs regarding learning Arabic. These findings show the usefulness of using social psychology to elicit and understand ASL learners' beliefs and predict their intentions to learn Arabic by adapting valid and published questionnaire items. The qualitative results show that religious factors are what motivate ASL learning in Saudi universities. For example, Arabic is the language of sacred texts, the language of the Prophet Muhammad, and the language of Heaven. The most-reported challenges are the instructors' use of local dialects and inadequate training in teaching ASL. When designing curricula, policymakers should consider social factors such as religion, literature, history, and students' backgrounds. It is also recommended that language researchers use theories from other related disciplines to understand fully the perspectives of ASL learners.

KEYWORDS:

• Arabic
• second language
• foreign language
• religion
• language learning
• social psychology

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through General Research Project under grant number (G.R.P- 170 −43).

Authors’ contributions

Both authors designed the questionnaires together and revised them. Both authors participated in the collection of the data Then, MA analyzed the results and wrote the draft of the results section. AA revised the analysis and result section. next, both authors wrote the discussion and conclusion. In addition, both authors participated in the literature review section. MA wrote the abstract and introduction.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Compliance with ethical standards

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by King Khalid University. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by King Khalid University [grant number G.R.P- 170 −43].