300
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Investigating the interplay of epistemological and positional framing during collaborative uncertainty management

&
Pages 80-124 | Received 07 Oct 2022, Accepted 25 Jan 2024, Published online: 07 Mar 2024
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Dealing with uncertainties is inherent in the engineering design process and often poses challenges for young learners. This necessitates providing learners with adequate support to navigate their uncertainties effectively. However, achieving this requires a deeper understanding of the factors influencing learners’ uncertainty management processes.

Method

In this paper, we analyze learners’ framing of uncertain situations in collaborative engineering design tasks. Using the case study method, we explore two framing dimensions—epistemological and positional—to understand their impact on collaborative uncertainty management processes. Specifically, we examine how learners’ framing dynamically shifts during uncertainty management activities by analyzing two contrasting cases from a sixth-grade classroom where groups tackled an engineering design problem, employing interaction analysis.

Findings

Learners’ epistemological and positional framings are intertwined, collectively influencing their own and their team members’ uncertainty management actions. Additionally, contextual factors such as mentor intervention, early success, affect induced by prolonged failure, and time constraints can prompt shifts in learners’ framing, both in productive and unproductive manners.

Contribution

The paper provides nuanced insights into how learners’ evolving epistemological orientations and positioning influence uncertainty management, offering practical insights into supporting learners’ uncertainty management processes in problem-solving contexts such as engineering design.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Ethics approval

The required ethics approval for this study was obtained from the Institute Ethics Board (IEC) of Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, under the proposal no. IITB-IEC/2018/033 on May 22, 2019.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2024.2312163

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.