1,758
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Report

RBD- specific Th1 responses are associated with vaccine-induced protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with hematological malignancies

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2163785 | Received 24 Nov 2022, Accepted 27 Dec 2022, Published online: 04 Jan 2023
 

ABSTRACT

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic still represents a threat for immunosuppressed and hematological malignancy (HM) bearing patients, causing increased morbidity and mortality. Given the low anti-SARSCoV-2 IgG titers post-vaccination, the COVID-19 threat prompted the prophylactic use of engineered anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies. In addition, potential clinical significance of T cell responses has been overlooked during the first waves of the pandemic, calling for additional in-depth studies. We reported that the polarity and the repertoire of T cell immune responses govern the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection in health care workers and solid cancer patients. Here, we longitudinally analyzed humoral and cellular immune responses at each BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine injection in 47 HM patients under therapy. Only one-third of HM, mostly multiple myeloma (MM) bearing patients, could mount S1-RBD-specific IgG responses following BNT162b2 mRNA vaccines. This vaccine elicited a S1-RBD-specific Th1 immune response in about 20% patients, mostly in MM and Hodgkin lymphoma, while exacerbating Th2 responses in the 10% cases that presented this recognition pattern at baseline (mostly rituximab-treated patients). Performing a third booster barely improved the percentage of patients developing an S1-RBD-specific Th1 immunity and failed to seroconvert additional HM patients. Finally, 16 patients were infected with SARS-CoV-2, of whom 6 developed a severe infection. Only S1-RBD-specific Th1 responses were associated with protection against SARS-CoV2 infection, while Th2 responses or anti-S1-RBD IgG titers failed to correlate with protection. These findings herald the paramount relevance of vaccine-induced Th1 immune responses in hematological malignancies.

Acknowledgments

LZ laboratory was supported by MALAKOFF HUMANIS, the French Ministry of Health & Solidarity, Association pour la recherche sur le cancer (ARC); Agnès b., Seerave Foundation, the Germano-French ANR Ileobiome - 19-CE15-0029-01 and H2020 ONCOBIOME N°825410, RHU5 “ANR-21-RHUS-0017” IMMUNOLIFE”; Seerave Foundation; SIRIC Stratified Oncology Cell DNA Repair and Tumor Immune Elimination (SOCRATE), the European Union Horizon 2020 ONCOBIOME: Project Number: 825410, Project Acronym: ONCOBIOME, Institut National du Cancer (INCa); Inserm (HTE); Institut Universitaire de France; LabEx Immuno-Oncology (ANR-18-IDEX-0001), The Organization for Partnerships in Leukemia. AC was supported by MALAKOFF HUMANIS.

Disclosure statement

LZ and CB designed research and wrote the paper. CB, YH, CT, AC, RB, PL, CF, IL, MM performed research, and analyzed the data. EDS and MM provided critical expertise and reagents. AT, CCL, SDB, CF, AB, LD, JL, AM, and VR managed the patient’s information and data. All authors provided critical revision of the manuscript and had final approval of the manuscript for publication.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2022.2163785

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported that there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.