ABSTRACT
Extended school non-attendance, commonly named truancy or school refusal, has over the last decade attracted attention among educational researchers. This article points to a need for theoretical perspectives that can account for the complexity and ambiguity of the phenomenon. The article presents a critical analysis of the research field of extended school non-attendance. It is argued that both the school refusal/truancy terminology as well as more environment sensitive approaches support a simplifying and individualising representation of extended school non-attendance. It is further argued that much research focuses on the prevalence of psychopathology in children with extended school non-attendance, and therefore eliminates the voices of these children. Based on the analysis, the article proposes a theoretical framework based on poststructuralism and new materialism as a way to grasp the complex phenomenon of extended school non-attendance.
Disclosure statement
There are no competing interests to be reported.
Notes
1. These examples include research on both school refusal and truancy.
2. See Højgaard & Søndergaard (Citation2011) for an example of how to work with ‘forces’ as a theoretical concept in a complex empirical field.
3. Analyses of this specific topic can already be found in Bodén (Citation2013; Citation2016).
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Frederikke Skaaning Knage
Frederikke Skaaning Knage is a PhD candidate at the Danish School of Education, Aarhus University, Denmark. Frederikke specializes in school (dis)engagement.
Email: [email protected]