104
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Teaching vocabulary through invoking conceptually accessible epistemic domains

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 04 Jul 2023, Accepted 06 Mar 2024, Published online: 02 Apr 2024
 

ABSTRACT

While existing research into L2 classroom discourse has highlighted how knowledge and knowledge positions are negotiated, no attention seems to have been paid to what might be called conceptual epistemic domains. Drawing on 22 hours of video-recorded data from Iranian EFL classrooms, our conversation analytic study illustrates how invoking conceptually accessible epistemic domains creates interactional space for teachers to introduce conditionally relevant vocabulary. We define conceptual epistemic domains as areas of world knowledge to which learners have ostensible access. The bottom-up analysis of our data showcases that such practices serve two pivotal pedagogical functions: (1) providing contingent assistance; (2) initiating and maintaining warm-up activities. In the former, the teachers invoke the conceptually accessible epistemic domain facing learners’ claims of insufficient knowledge to elicit relevant further talk. In the latter, the teachers sequentially build up a shared conceptual access to conduct a warm-up activity. Both cases unfold interactional space where relevant vocabulary items emerge as learnables. We argue that by bringing to the fore what is conceptually accessible to the learners, teachers orient to relevant vocabulary items as teachable objects. Our findings thus shine light on an interactional resource through which the need for vocabulary teaching is talked into being.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all those who helped us collect the data for this study, namely Shokouh English Institute, Kish Institute of Science and Technology and Andishkadeh Academy. We would like to also extend our deepest appreciation to all the anonymous reviewers whose invaluable comments helped us develop this paper.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 239.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.