751
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Instrumental Motivation of Teachers: Implications of High-Stakes Accountability for Professional Learning

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

9. References

  • Appova, A. and Arbaugh, F. (2018) Teachers’ motivation to learn: implications for supporting professional growth, Professional Development in Education, 44 (1), 5–21. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2017.1280524.
  • Aristotle. (1994) (translated by W. D. Ross) Nicomachean Ethics. Available at: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.html.
  • Assor, A., et al. (2005) Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: the role of anger and anxiety, Learning and Instruction, 15 (5), 397–413. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.008.
  • Bazeley, P. (2018) Integrative Analyses in Mixed Methods Research (London, Sage).
  • Beck, J. (2008) Government professionalism: re-professionalising or de-professionalising teachers in England? British Journal of Educational Studies, 56 (2), 119–143. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00401.x.
  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998) Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development (London, Sage).
  • Boylan, M., Coldwell, M., Maxwell, B. and Jordan, J. (2018) Rethinking models of professional learning as tools: a conceptual analysis to inform research and practice, Professional Development in Education, 44 (1), 120–139. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2017.1306789.
  • Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Carr, S. (2015) Motivation, Educational Policy and Achievement: A Critical Perspective (Abingdon, Routledge).
  • Coldwell, M. (2017) Exploring the influence of professional development on teacher careers: a path model approach, Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.015.
  • Courtney, S. J. (2015) Mapping school types in England, Oxford Review of Education, 41 (6), 799–818. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2015.1121141.
  • Creswell, J. W. and Plano Clark, V. L. (2018) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd edn) (London, Sage).
  • Eyal, O. and Roth, G. (2011) Principals’ leadership and teachers’ motivation, Journal of Educational Administration, 49 (3), 256–275. doi: 10.1108/09578231111129055.
  • Fereday, J. and Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 (1), 80–92. doi: 10.1177/160940690600500107.
  • Fernet, C., et al. (2008) The work tasks motivation scale for teachers (WTMST), Journal of Career Assessment, 16 (2), 256–279. doi: 10.1177/1069072707305764.
  • Fernet C. (2011) Development and validation of the Work Role Motivation Scale for School Principals (WRMS-SP), Educational Administration Quarterly, 47 (2), 307–331. doi: 10.1177/0013161X10385108.
  • Fernet, C., et al. (2012) Predicting intraindividual changes in teacher burnout: the role of perceived school environment and motivational factors, Teaching and Teacher Education, 28 (4), 514–525. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.11.013.
  • Gadermann, A., Guhn, M. and Zumbo, B. (2012) Estimating ordinal reliability, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17 (3), 1–13.
  • Gagné, M., et al. (2015) The multidimensional work motivation scale: validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24 (2), 178–196. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892.
  • Garner, J. K. and Kaplan, A. (2019) A complex dynamic systems perspective on teacher learning and identity formation: an instrumental case, Teachers & Teaching: Theory & Practice, 25 (1), 7–33. doi: 10.1080/13540602.2018.1533811.
  • Gill, P., et al. (2008) Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups, British Dental Journal, 204 (6), 291–295. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2008.192.
  • Gorozidis, G. and Papaioannou, A. G. (2014) Teachers’ motivation to participate in training and to implement innovations, Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.12.001.
  • Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J. and Blanchard, C. (2000) P1: vendor motivation and emotion [ME] on the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: the situational motivation scale (SIMS) 1, Motivation and Emotion, 24 (3), 175–213. doi: 10.1023/A:1005614228250.
  • Hall, D. and Gunter, H. (2016) The liberal state: Permanent instability in the European Educational NPM Laboratory. In H. Gunter, E. Grimaldi, D. Hall and R. Serpieri (Eds) New Public Management and the Reform of Education: European Lessons for Policy and Practice (London, Routledge), 21–36.
  • Hobson, A. J. and Maxwell, B. (2017) Supporting and inhibiting the well‐being of early career secondary school teachers: extending self‐determination theory, British Educational Research Journal, 43 (1), 168–191. doi: 10.1002/berj.3261.
  • Humes, W. (2022) The ‘iron cage’ of educational bureaucracy, British Journal of Educational Studies, 70 (2), 235–253. doi: 10.1080/00071005.2021.1899129.
  • Jamieson, S. (2004) Likert scales: how to (ab)use them, Medical Education, 38 (12), 1217–1218. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x.
  • Jones, K. (2021) Foreword: non-linear perspectives on teacher development: complexity in professional learning and practice, Professional Development in Education, 47 (2–3), 197–198. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2021.1901004.
  • Kaplan, A. (2013) Theory and research on teachers’ motivation: mapping an emerging conceptual terrain. In P. W. Richardson, S. A. Karabenick and H. M. G. Watt (Eds) Teacher Motivation: Theory and Practice (UK, Routledge), 49–66.
  • Lambert, A. D. and Miller, A.L. (2014) Lower response rates on alumni surveys might not mean lower response representativeness, Educational Research Quarterly, 37 (3), 38–51.
  • Lorenzo-Seva, U. and Ferrando, P. J. (2021) Factor: Manual of the Program. Available at: http://psico.fcep.urv.es/utilitats/factor/.
  • Lundström, U. (2012) Teachers’ perceptions of individual performance-related pay in practice: a picture of a counterproductive pay system, Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 40 (3), 376–391. doi: 10.1177/1741143212436954.
  • McMillan, D., McConnell, B. and O’Sullivan, H. (2016) Continuing professional development – why bother? Perceptions and motivations of teachers in Ireland, Professional Development in Education, 42 (1), 150–167. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2014.952044.
  • Müller, K., Alliata, R. and Benninghoff, F. (2009) Attracting and retaining teachers: a question of motivation, Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 37 (5), 574–599. doi: 10.1177/1741143209339651.
  • Niemiec, P. and Ryan, R. M. (2009) Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: applying self-determination theory to educational practice, Theory & Research in Education, 7 (2), 133–144. doi: 10.1177/1477878509104318.
  • Noonan, J. (2022) ‘Regard me’: a case study of learner engagement and the satisfaction of basic needs in continuing professional development, Professional Development in Education, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2022.2065515.
  • Nowell, L. S., et al. (2017) Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16 (1), 1–13. doi: 10.1177/1609406917733847.
  • O’Brien, J. and Jones, K. (2014) Professional learning or professional development? Or continuing professional learning and development? Changing terminology, policy and practice, Professional Development in Education, 40 (5), 683–687. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2014.960688.
  • O’Connor, C. and Joffe, H. (2020) Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: debates and practical guidelines, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19 (1), 1–13. doi: 10.1177/1609406919899220.
  • Proudfoot, K. (2022) Inductive/deductive hybrid thematic analysis in mixed methods research, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17 (3), 308–326. doi: 10.1177/15586898221126816.
  • Proudfoot, K, and Boyd P. (2022) Teachers’ constitutive motivations for professional learning in England’s context of high-stakes accountability, Professional Development in Education, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2022.2151038.
  • Richter, D., Kleinknecht, M. and Gröschner, A. (2019) What motivates teachers to participate in professional development? An empirical investigation of motivational orientations and the uptake of formal learning opportunities, Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2019.102929.
  • Runhaar, P. R. (2017) How can schools and teachers benefit from human resources management? Conceptualising HRM from content and process perspectives, Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 45 (4), 639–656. doi: 10.1177/1741143215623786.
  • Ryan, R. M. and Brown, K. W. (2005) Legislating competence: the motivational impact of high-stakes testing as an educational reform. In C. Dweck and A. Elliot (Eds) Handbook of Competence (New York, Guilford Press), 354–372.
  • Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25 (1), 54–67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
  • Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2020) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: definitions, theory, practices, and future directions, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.
  • Ryan, R. M. and LaGuardia, J. G. (1999) Achievement motivation within a pressured society: intrinsic and extrinsic motivations to learn and the politics of school reform. In T. Urdan (Ed.) Advances in Motivation and Achievement (Greenwich, CT, JAI Press), 45–85.
  • Ryan, R. M. and Weinstein, N. (2009) Undermining quality teaching and learning: a self-determination theory perspective on high-stakes testing, Theory & Research in Education, 7 (2), 224–233. doi: 10.1177/1477878509104327.
  • Sheldon, K. and Biddle, B. (1998) Standards, accountability and school reform: perils and pitfalls, Teacher College Record, 100 (1), 164–180. doi: 10.1177/016146819810000110.
  • Strom, K., Mills, T. and Abrams, L. (2021) Illuminating a continuum of complex perspectives in teacher development, Professional Development in Education, 47 (2–3), 199–208. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2021.1901005.
  • Tremblay, M. A., Blanchard, C. M., Taylor, S., Pelletier, L. G. and Villeneuve, M. (2009) Work extrinsic and intrinsic motivation scale: its value for organizational psychology research, Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41 (4), 213–226. doi: 10.1037/a0015167.
  • Wilkesmann, U. and Schmid, C. J. (2014) Intrinsic and internalized modes of teaching motivation, Evidence-Based HRM, 2 (1), 6–27. doi: 10.1108/EBHRM-07-2013-0022.
  • Wilkins, A., et al. (2019) Translations of new public management: a decentred approach to school governance in four OECD countries, Globalisation, Societies & Education, 17 (2), 147–160. doi: 10.1080/14767724.2019.1588102.
  • Wilkins, C., Gobby, B. and Keddie, A. (2021) The neo-performative teacher: school reform, entrepreneurialism and the pursuit of educational equity, British Journal of Educational Studies, 69 (1), 27–45. doi: 10.1080/00071005.2020.1739621.