2,027
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Beating the Casino: Conceptualizing an Anchoring-based Third Route to Regional Development

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Balland, P. A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., and Rigby, D. L. 2019. Smart specialization policy in the European Union: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies 53 (9): 1252–68. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900.
  • Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Doloreux, D., Shearmur, R., and Trippl, M. 2022. When history does not matter? The rise of Quebec's wine industry. Geoforum 128 (January): 115–24. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.12.013.
  • Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., and Maskell, P. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28 (1): 31–56. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph469oa.
  • Binz, C., and Anadon, L. D. 2018. Unrelated diversification in latecomer contexts: Emergence of the Chinese solar photovoltaics industry. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 28 (September): 14–34. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2018.03.005.
  • Binz, C., and Gong, H. 2022. Legitimation dynamics in industrial path development: New-to-the-world versus new-to-the-region industries. Regional Studies 56 (4): 605–18. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1861238.
  • Binz, C., Truffer, B., and Coenen, L. 2016. Path creation as a process of resource alignment and anchoring: Industry formation for on-site water recycling in Beijing. Economic Geography 92 (2): 172–200. doi:10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177.
  • Binz, C., and Truffer, B. 2017. Global Innovation Systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts. Research Policy 46 (7): 1284–98. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.012.
  • Boschma, R. 1997. New industries and windows of locational opportunity: A long-term analysis of Belgium (Neue Industrien und das “Windows of Locational Opportunity”-Konzept. Eine Langfrist-Analyse Belgiens). Erdkunde 51 (1): 12–22. doi:10.3112/erdkunde.1997.01.02.
  • Boschma, R. 2017. Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies 51 (3): 351–64. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1254767.
  • Boschma, R. 2021. Designing Smart Specialization Policy: Relatedness, unrelatedness, or what? Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography 21.28. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Utrecht University.
  • Boschma, R. 2022. Global value chains from an evolutionary economic geography perspective: A research agenda. Area Development and Policy 7 (2):123–46. doi:10.1080/23792949.2022.2040371.
  • Boschma, R., Coenen, L., Frenken, K., and Truffer, B. 2017. Towards a theory of regional diversification: Combining insights from evolutionary economic geography and transition studies. Regional Studies 51 (1): 31–45. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1258460.
  • Bradsher, K., and Forstyhe, M. 2021. Why a Chinese company dominates electric car batteries. New York Times, December 22, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/22/business/china-catl-electric-car-batteries.htm.
  • Breul, M., Hulke, C., and Kalvelage, L. 2021. Path formation and reformation: Studying the variegated consequences of path creation for regional development. Economic Geography 97 (3): 213–34. doi:10.1080/00130095.2021.1922277.
  • Carvalho, L., and Vale, M. 2018. Biotech by bricolage? Agency, institutional relatedness and new path development in peripheral regions. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (2): 275–95.
  • CATL. 2018. CATL Initial Public Offering Prospectus. China Securities Regulatory Commission. https://www.catl.com/uploads/1/file/public/202010/20201014141001_911lreeufo.pdf.
  • Coe, N. M., and Yeung, H. W-c. 2015. Global production networks: Theorizing economic development in an interconnected world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Crevoisier, O., and Jeannerat, H. 2009. Territorial knowledge dynamics: From the proximity paradigm to multi-location milieus. European Planning Studies 17 (8): 1223–41. doi:10.1080/09654310902978231.
  • Dawley, S. 2014. Creating new paths? Offshore wind, policy activism, and peripheral region development. Economic Geography 90 (1): 91–112. doi:10.1111/ecge.12028.
  • Dawley, S., MacKinnon, D., and Pollock, R. 2019. Creating strategic couplings in global production networks: Regional institutions and lead firm investment in the Humber region, UK. Journal of Economic Geography 19 (4): 853–72. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbz004.
  • De Propris, L., and Crevoisier, O. 2011. From regional anchors to anchoring. In Handbook of regional innovation and growth, ed. P. Cooke, B. Asheim, R. Boschma, R. Martin, D. Schwartz, and F. Tödtling, 167–77. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Doloreux, D., and Dionne, S. 2008. Is regional innovation system development possible in peripheral regions? Some evidence from the case of La Pocatie`re, Canada. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 20 (3): 259–83. doi:10.1080/08985620701795525.
  • Eder, J. 2019. Innovation in the periphery: A critical survey and research agenda. International Regional Science Review 42 (2): 119–46. doi:10.1177/0160017618764279.
  • Feldman, M. 2003. The locational dynamics of the US biotech industry: Knowledge externalities and the anchor hypothesis. Industry and Innovation 10 (3): 311–29. doi:10.1080/1366271032000141661.
  • Fitjar, R. D., and Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2011. Innovating in the periphery: Firms, values and innovation in Southwest Norway. European Planning Studies 19 (4): 555–74. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.548467.
  • Fredin, S., Miörner, J., and Jogmark, M. 2019. Developing and sustaining new regional industrial paths: Investigating the role of ‘outsiders’ and factors shaping long-term trajectories. Industry and Innovation 26 (7): 795–819. doi:10.1080/13662716.2018.1535429.
  • Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., and Verburg, T. 2007. Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies 41 (5): 685–97. doi:10.1080/00343400601120296.
  • Fu, W., and Lim, K. F. 2022. The constitutive role of state structures in strategic coupling: On the formation and evolution of Sino-German production networks in Jieyang, China. Economic Geography 98 (1): 25–48. doi:10.1080/00130095.2021.1985995.
  • Glückler J, Shearmur, R., and Martinus, K. 2023. Liability or opportunity? Reconceptualizing the periphery and its role in innovation. Journal of Economic Geography 23 (1): 231–49. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbac028.
  • Garud, R., and Karnøe, P. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy 32 (2): 277300. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00100-2.
  • Gong, H., and Andersen, A. D. 2022. The role of natural resources in accelerating net-zero transitions: Insights from EV lithium-ion battery technological innovation system in China. Working Paper 20221001. Oslo, Norway: Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo. https://www.sv.uio.no/tik/InnoWP/tik_working_paper_20221001.pdf.
  • Gong, H., and Binz, C. 2023. Cumulative causation in regional industrial path development—A conceptual framework and case study in the videogame industry of Hamburg and Shanghai. Geoforum 141 (May): art. 103729.
  • Gong, H., and Hansen, T. 2023. The rise of China's new energy vehicle lithium-ion battery industry: The coevolution of battery technological innovation systems and policies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 46 (March): art. 100689. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.100689.
  • Gong, H., Binz, C., Hassink, R., and Trippl, M. 2022a. Emerging industries: Institutions, legitimacy and system building. Regional Studies 56 (4): 523–35. doi:10.1080/00343404.2022.2033199.
  • Gong, H., Hassink, R., Foster, C., Hess, M., and Garretsen, H. 2022b. Globalisation in reverse? Reconfiguring the geographies of value chains and production networks. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 15 (2): 165–81.
  • Grillitsch, M., and Sotarauta, M. 2020. Trinity of change agency, regional development paths and opportunity spaces. Progress in Human Geography 44 (4): 704–23. doi:10.1177/0309132519853870.
  • Hassink, R., Isaksen, A., and Trippl, M. 2019. Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development. Regional Studies 53 (11): 1636–45. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704.
  • Heiberg, J., Binz, C., and Truffer, B. 2020. The geography of technology legitimation: How multiscalar institutional dynamics matter for path creation in emerging industries. Economic Geography 96 (5): 470–98. doi:10.1080/00130095.2020.1842189.
  • Heiberg, J., and Truffer, B. 2022. The emergence of a global innovation system–A case study from the urban water sector. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 43 (June): 270–88. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2022.04.007.
  • Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., and Yeung, H. W.-c. 2002. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy 9 (3): 436–64. doi:10.1080/09692290210150842.
  • Hidalgo, C. A., Klinger, B., Barabási, A. L., and Hausmann, R. 2007. The product space conditions the development of nations. Science 317 (5837): 482–87. doi:10.1126/science.1144581.
  • Huang, P., and Yu, Z. 2021. Aligning industry interests with urban priorities to foster energy transitions: Insights from two Chinese cities. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 14 (2): 341–59.
  • Isaksen, A., and Trippl, M. 2017. Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography 93 (5): 436–57. doi:10.1080/00130095.2016.1154443.
  • Isaksen, A., Jakobsen, S. E., Njøs, R., and Normann, R. 2019. Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 32 (1): 48–65. doi:10.1080/13511610.2018.1496322.
  • Jeannerat, H., and Crevoisier, O. 2016. From ‘territorial innovation models’ to ‘territorial knowledge dynamics’: On the learning value of a new concept in regional studies. Regional Studies 50 (2): 185–88. doi:10.1080/00343404.2015.1105653.
  • Jiaocheng CPCC Committee. 2004. Development and innovation in the new situation—Reflections and suggestions on economic constraints and institutional innovation in Jiaocheng district. Xinhua Jiaocheng Online, September 14, 2004.
  • Laasonen, V. 2023. Building dynamic capabilities in the transition toward a knowledge-based bioeconomy: A case study of three Finnish regions. Regional Studies. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2023.2249499
  • Laasonen, V., and Kolehmainen, J. 2017. Capabilities in knowledge-based regional development—Towards a dynamic framework. European Planning Studies 25 (10): 1673–92. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1337727.
  • Labory, S., and Bianchi, P. 2021. Regional industrial policy in times of big disruption: Building dynamic capabilities in regions. Regional Studies 55 (10-11): 1829-38. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1928043.
  • MacKinnon, D. 2012. Beyond strategic coupling: Reassessing the firm-region nexus in global production networks. Journal of Economic Geography 12 (1): 227–45. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbr009.
  • MacKinnon, D., Dawley, S., Pike, A., and Cumbers, A. 2019. Rethinking path creation: A geographical political economy approach. Economic Geography 95 (2): 113–35. doi:10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294.
  • Martin, R. 2010. Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography—Rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography 86 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x.
  • Morrison, A., Pietrobelli, C., and Rabellotti, R. 2008. Global value chains and technological capabilities: A framework to study learning and innovation in developing countries. Oxford Development Studies 36 (1): 39–58. doi:10.1080/13600810701848144.
  • Neffke, F., Henning, M., and Boschma, R. 2011. How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography 87 (3): 237–65. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x.
  • Nilsen, T. 2017. Firm-driven path creation in arctic peripheries. Local Economy 32 (2): 77–94. doi:10.1177/0269094217691481.
  • Nilsen, T., Grillitsch, M., and Hauge, A. 2022. Varieties of periphery and local agency in regional development. Regional Studies 57 (4): 749–62. doi:10.1080/00343404.2022.2106364.
  • Ningde Government. 2012. Statistical bulletin of national economic and social development of Ningde in 2011. March 5, 2012. http://www.ningde.gov.cn/zwgk/tjxx/tjgb/202201/t20220120_1584383.htm.
  • Ningde Government 2018. Statistical bulletin of national economic and social development of Ningde in 2017. March 22, 2018. http://tjj.ningde.gov.cn/xxgk/tjgb/tjgb_11706/201803/t20180322_758716.htm.
  • Pugh, R., and Dubois, A. 2021. Peripheries within economic geography: Four “problems” and the road ahead of us. Journal of Rural Studies 87 (November): 267–75. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.007.
  • Saxenian, A. 2006. The new argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Saxenian, A., and Sabel, C. 2008. Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography—Venture capital in the “periphery”: The new argonauts, global search, and local institution building. Economic Geography 84 (4): 379–94. doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.00001.x.
  • Shearmur, R. 2015. Far from the madding crowd: Slow innovators, information value, and the geography of innovation. Growth and Change 46 (3): 424–42. doi:10.1111/grow.12097.
  • Shi, X., and Shi, Y. 2022. Unpacking the process of resource allocation within an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Research Policy 51 (9): art. 104378.
  • Sotarauta, M., and Grillitsch, M. 2023. Studying human agency in regional development. Regional Studies 57 (8): 1409–14. doi:10.1080/00343404.2023.2217224.
  • Teece, D. J. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 28 (13): 1319–50. doi:10.1002/smj.640.
  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509–33. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.
  • Ter Wal, A. L., and Boschma, R. 2011. Co-evolution of firms, industries and networks in space. Regional Studies 45 (7): 919–33. doi:10.1080/00343400802662658.
  • Trippl, M., Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., Frangenheim, A., Isaksen, A., and Rypestøl, J. O. 2020. Unravelling green regional industrial path development: Regional preconditions, asset modification and agency. Geoforum 111 (May): 189–97. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.02.016.
  • Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., and Isaksen, A. 2018. Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography 42 (5): 687–705. doi:10.1177/0309132517700982.
  • Vale, M., and Carvalho, L. 2013. Knowledge networks and processes of anchoring in Portuguese biotechnology. Regional Studies 47 (7): 1018–33. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.644237.
  • Wang, E., Klein, G., and Jiang, J. J. 2007. IT support in manufacturing firms for a knowledge management dynamic capability link to performance. International Journal of Production Research 45 (11): 2419–34. doi:10.1080/00207540601020437.
  • Walker, R., and Storper, M. 1989. The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology and industrial growth, vol. 2. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Xi, J. P. 1992. Out of poverty (摆脱贫困). Fuzhou, China: Fujian People's Publishing House.
  • Xiao, J., Boschma, R., and Andersson, M. 2018. Industrial diversification in Europe: The differentiated role of relatedness. Economic Geography 94 (5): 514–49. doi:10.1080/00130095.2018.1444989.
  • Xu, C. 2020. Shanhai Mindong[Mountain and Sea, East Fujian] (山海闽东). Tianjin, China: Baihua Literature and Art Press.
  • Yap, X. S., and Truffer, B. 2019. Shaping selection environments for industrial catch-up and sustainability transitions: A systemic perspective on endogenizing windows of opportunity. Research Policy 48 (4): 1030–47. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.002.
  • Yeung, H. W.-c. 2016. Strategic coupling: East Asian industrial transformation in the new global economy. New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Yeung, H. W.-c. 2021a. The trouble with global production networks. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 53 (2): 428–38. doi:10.1177/0308518X20972720.
  • Yeung, H. W.-c. 2021b. Regional worlds: From related variety in regional diversification to strategic coupling in global production networks. Regional Studies 55 (6): 989–1010. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1857719.
  • Yeung, H. W.-c., and Coe, N. 2015. Toward a dynamic theory of global production networks. Economic Geography 91 (1): 29–58. doi:10.1111/ecge.12063.
  • Yu, Z., and Gibbs, D. 2020. Unravelling the role of green entrepreneurs in urban sustainability transitions: A case study of china's solar city. Urban Studies 57 (14): 2901–17. doi:10.1177/0042098019888144.
  • Zeng. R. 2022. Innovation leads the TWh era (创新引领TWh时代). July 21, 2022. https://www.catl.com/news/6476.html.
  • Zhu, S., He, C., and Zhou, Y. 2017. How to jump further and catch up? Path-breaking in an uneven industry space. Journal of Economic Geography 17 (3): 521–45.
  • Zhu, S., Guo, Q., and He, C. 2021. Strong links and weak links: How do unrelated industries survive in an unfriendly environment? Economic Geography 97 (1): 66–88. doi:10.1080/00130095.2020.1837618.