Cognitive science teaching strategies and literacy-targeted economics complementarities

References

• Ambrose, S. A., M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, and M. K. Norman. 2010. How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, K. 2004. What the best college students do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, D., A. J. Cohen, and G. Hamilton. 2020. A Pareto-improving way to teach principles of economics: Evidence from the University of Toronto. AEA Papers and Proceedings 110 (May): 299–303. doi: 10.1257/pandp.20201052.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, A., and W. L. Goffe. 2018. Beyond the flipped class: The impact of research-based teaching methods in a macroeconomics principles class. AEA Papers and Proceedings 108 (May): 297–301. doi: 10.1257/pandp.20181052.
   Google Scholar
• Chew, S. L. 2019. How not to fool ourselves: Infusing cognitive science into teaching and learning. Plenary address. Conference on Teaching and Research in Economic Education (CTREE), St. Louis, MO, USA, May 29.
   Google Scholar
• Chew, S. L., and W. J. Cerbin. 2021. The cognitive challenges of effective teaching. Journal of Economic Education 52 (1): 17–40. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2020.1845266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslauriers, L., E. Schelew, and C. Wieman. 2011. Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science 332 (6031): 862–64. doi: 10.1126/science.1201783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J. 2013. Strengthening the student toolbox: Study strategies to boost learning. American Educator 37 (3): 12–21.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlosky, J., K. A. Rawson, E. J. Marsh, M. J. Nathan, and D. T. Willingham. 2013. Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society 14 (1): 4–58. doi: 10.1177/1529100612453266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, A., and R. Pool. 2016. Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, R. H. 1998. Some thoughts on the micro principles course. In Teaching undergraduate economics: A handbook for instructors, ed. W. B. Walstad and P. Saunders, 13–20. New York: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gilleskie, D. B., and M. K. Salemi. 2012. The cost of economic literacy: How well does a literacy-targeted principles of economics course prepare students for intermediate theory courses? Journal of Economic Education 43 (2): 111–32. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2012.659639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffe, W. L., and D. Kauper. 2014. A survey of principles instructors: Why lecture prevails. Journal of Economic Education 45 (4): 360–75. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2014.946547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guertin, L., C. Ormand, G. Novak, A. Gavrin, S. Simkins, M. Clerici-Arias, and R. J. Goodman. n.d. Just in time teaching (JiTT). In Starting point: Teaching and learning economics. Northfield, MN: Carleton College. https://serc.carleton.edu/econ/justintime (accessed May 23, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, W. L., M. K. Salemi, and J. J. Siegfried. 2002. Use it or lose it: Teaching literacy in the economics principles course. American Economic Review 92 (2): 463–72. doi: 10.1257/000282802320191813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartle, R. T., S. Baviskar, and R. Smith. 2012. A field guide to constructivism in the college science classroom: Four essential criteria and a guide to their usage. Bioscene: Journal of College Biology Teaching 38 (2): 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt, W. W., M. J. Bowman, E. E. Hale, B. W. Knight, and S. Peterson. 1950. Elementary courses in economics. In The teaching of undergraduate economics: Report of the Committee on the Undergraduate Teaching of Economics and the Training of Economists, ed. H. Taylor. American Economic Review 40 (5): 52–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, G., and E. Washington. 2024. How LT principles can improve diversity, inclusiveness, and student interest. Journal of Economic Education 55 (2): 178–88.
   Google Scholar
• Hultberg, P. T., and D. S. Calonge. 2017. Effective teaching of economics: A constrained optimization problem? Journal of Economic Education 48 (4): 265–75. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2017.1353458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Learning Scientists. n.d. Six strategies for effective learning. https://www.learningscientists.org/downloadable-materials (accessed May 23, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Lyle, K. B., C. R. Bego, R. F. Hopkins, J. L. Hieb, and P. A. Ralston. 2020. How the amount and spacing of retrieval practice affect the short-and long-term retention of mathematics knowledge. Educational Psychology Review 32 (1): 277–95. doi: 10.1007/s10648-019-09489-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 101 (2): 343–52. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343.
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., III, and A. C. Butler. 2011. The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (1): 20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrer, D., R. F. Dedrick, M. K. Hartwig, and C. N. Cheung. 2020. A randomized controlled trial of interleaved mathematics practice. Journal of Educational Psychology 112 (1): 40–52. doi: 10.1037/edu0000367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. L., J. M. Tsang, and K. P. Blair. 2016. A is for analogy. In The ABCs of how we learn: 26 scientifically proven approaches, how they work, and when to use them. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sheridan, B. J., and B. Smith. 2020. How often does active learning actually occur? Perception versus reality. AEA Papers and Proceedings 110 (May): 304–8. doi: 10.1257/pandp.20201053.
   Google Scholar
• Simkins, S., and M. Maier. 2010. Just-in-time teaching: Across the disciplines, across the academy. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Simkins, S., M. Maier, and P. Ruder. 2021. Team-based learning (TBL): Putting learning sciences research to work in the economics classroom. Journal of Economic Education 52 (3): 231–40. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2021.1925188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. n.d. Team-based learning. In Starting point: Teaching and learning economics. Northfield, MN: Carleton College. https://serc.carleton.edu/econ/tbl-econ (accessed May 22, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. K., W. B. Wood, K. Krauter, and J. K. Knight. 2011. Combining peer discussion with instructor explanation increases student learning from in-class concept questions. CBE Life Sciences Education 10 (1): 55–63. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-08-0101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, A. J., H. M. Sackett-Taylor, J. Forgue, S. B. Brewer, and S. Sarnikar. 2020. A mixed methods approach to uncover common error patterns in student reasoning of supply and demand. Journal of Economic Education 51 (3–4): 271–86. doi: 10.1080/00220485.2020.1804500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. J. 1963. Elementary economics education. The American Economic Review 53 (2): 653–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, Y., C. R. Madan, and M. A. Sumeracki. 2018. Teaching the science of learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 3 (1): 2. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0087-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wieman, C. 2007. The “Curse of Knowledge” or Why intuition about teaching often fails. American Physical Society (APS) News 16 (10): 8.
   Google Scholar
• Wieman, C., K. Perkins, S. Gilbert, F. Benay, S. Kennedy, K. Semsar, J. Knight, et al. 2017. The clicker resource guide. Last modified, July 2017. Vancouver, Canada, and Boulder, CO: University of British Columbia, Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative; University of Colorado, Science Education Initiative. https://cwsei.ubc.ca/sites/default/files/cwsei/resources/instructor/Clicker_guide_CWSEI_CU-SEI.pdf (accessed May 22, 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T. 2021. Why don’t students like school? A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wosilait, K., P. R. Heron, P. S. Shaffer, and L. C. McDermott. 1998. Development and assessment of a research-based tutorial on light and shadow. American Journal of Physics 66 (10): 906–13. doi: 10.1119/1.18988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar