Fine-Grained, Nomination Coding in the Support Domain: Promising Teacher Discourse Measures

References

• Archambault, I., Eccles, J. S., & Vida, M. N. (2010). Ability self-concepts and subjective value in literacy: Joint trajectories from grades 1 through 12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 804–816. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aucejo, E., Coate, P., Fruehwirth, J., Kelly, S., & Mozenter, Z. (2022). Teacher effectiveness and classroom composition: Understanding match effects in the classroom. Economic Journal, 132(648), 3047–3064. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueac046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Kim, D., Watson, M., & Schaps, E. (1995). Schools as communities, poverty levels of student populations, and students’ attitudes, motives, and performance. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 627–658. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer, A., Bhanot, S. P., Bronchetti, E. T., & O’Connell, S. A. (2020). Diagnosing the learning environment for diverse students in introductory economics. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 110, 294–298. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20201051
   Google Scholar
• Bell, C. A., Qi, Y., Croft, A. J., Leusner, D., McCaffrey, D. F., Gitomer, D. H., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). Improving observational score quality. In Kane, T., Kerr, K., Pianta, R. (Eds.), Designing Teacher Evaluation Systems: New Guidance from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project (pp. 50–97). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R. Q., III, Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Ottmar, E. M., Walkowiak, T. A., & Merritt, E. (2010). The Mathematics Scan (M-Scan): A Measure of Mathematics Instructional Quality. Unpublished measure, University of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. P. (2021). Responsiveness and intellectual work: Features of mathematics classroom discourse related to student achievement. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(3), 466–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1922413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, L. A., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Theories of intelligence and achievement across the junior high school transition: A longitudinal study and intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozack, A. R., Vega, R., McCaslin, M., & Good, T. L. (2008). Teacher support of student autonomy in comprehensive school reform classrooms. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 110(11), 2389–2407. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810811001110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, R., Brooks, S., & Goldstein, S. (2012). The power of mindsets: Nurturing engagement, motivation, and resilience in students. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 541–562). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J. (1986). Teacher influences on student achievement. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., Song, M., Cook, T. D., & Garet, M. S. (2023). Combining a local comparison group, a pretest measure, and rich covariates: How well do they collectively reduce bias in nonequivalent comparison group designs? American Educational Research Journal, 60(1), 141–182. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312221136565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., & Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 19–32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Caughlan, S., Juzwik, M. M., Borsheim-Black, C., Kelly, S., & Fine, J. G. (2013). English teacher candidates developing dialogically organized instructional practices. Research in the Teaching of English, 47, 212–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. (2015). A classroom-based intervention to help teachers decrease students’ amotivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chetty, R., Friedman, J.N. & Rocko, J. E. (2014). Measuring the impacts of teachers: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. The American Economic Review, 104, 2593–2632.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1997). Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory in practice. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, M. L., Turrou, A. C., Webb, N. M., Ing, M., Wong, J., Shin, N., & Fernandez, C. (2015). Student engagement with others’ mathematical ideas: The role of teacher invitation and support moves. Elementary School Journal, 116(1), 126–148. https://doi.org/10.1086/683174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, R. K., Mitchell, J. O., Walters, K. S., Livingston, B., Lineberger, M. B., Putman, C., Yarborough, R., & Karges-Bone, L. (2018). Using Swivl robotic technology in teacher education preparation: A pilot study. TechTrends, 62(2), 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0246-5
   Google Scholar
• Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A., & Kelly, S. (2003). Tracking, instruction, and unequal literacy in secondary school English. In M. T. Hallinan, A. Gamoran, W. Kubitschek, and T. Loveless (Eds.), Stability and Change in American Education: Structure, Processes and Outcomes (pp. 109–126). Eliot Werner Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A., Nystrand, M., Berends, M., & Lepore, P. C. (1995). An organizational analysis of the effects of ability grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 32(4), 687–715. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032004687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitomer, D. H., Bell, C. A., Qi, Y., McCaffrey, D. F., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). The instructional challenge in improving teaching quality: Lessons from a classroom observation protocol. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 116(6), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411600607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goe, L., Biggers, K., & Croft, A. (2012). Linking teacher evaluation to professional development: Focusing on improving teaching and learning. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Between-and within-domain relations of students’ academic emotions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 715–733. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., Grissom, J. A., Rubin, M., Neumerski, C. M., Cannata, M., Drake, T., & Schuermann, P. (2015). Make room value-added: Principals’ human capital decisions and the emergence of teacher observation data. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15575031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, H. M., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 462–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 282–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first‐grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76(5), 949–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00889.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., DeCoster, J., Mashburn, A. J., Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., Cappella, E., Atkins, M., Rivers, S. E., Brackett, M. A., & Hamagami, A. (2013). Teaching through interactions: Testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 461–487. https://doi.org/10.1086/669616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmeter, M. L., Snyder, P., Kinder, K., & Artman, K. (2011). Impact of performance feedback delivered via electronic mail on preschool teachers’ use of descriptive praise. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(1), 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., Blunk, M. L., Charalambous, C. Y., Lewis, J. M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000802177235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M., & Wheatley, L. (2019). Teacher-student dialogue during classroom teaching: Does it really impact on student outcomes? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 462–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., Kosovich, J. J., Barron, K. E., & Daniel, D. B. (2017). Making connections: Replicating and extending the utility value intervention in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphry, S. M., & Heldsinger, S. A. (2014). Common structural design features of rubrics may represent a threat to validity. Educational Researcher, 43(5), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14542154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunkins, N., Kelly, S., D’Mello, S. (2022). Beautiful work, you’re rock stars!”: Teacher analytics to uncover discourse that supports or undermines student motivation, identity, and belonging in classrooms. 12th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK’22, Online, March 21-25, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., Scornavacco, K., Harty, C., Suresh, A., Lai, V., & Sumner, T. (2022). Promoting rich discussion in mathematics classrooms: Using personalized automated feedback to support reflection and instructional change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, A. R., Pattichis, M. S., Celedón-Pattichis, S., & LópezLeiva, C. (2018, April). Context-sensitive human activity classification in collaborative learning environments. In 2018 IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation (SSIAI) (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, C. B., Mackenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1086/376806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, L. N., Floress, M. T., & Reinke, W. (2015). Rates and types of teacher praise: A review and future directions. Psychology in the Schools, 52(5), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, E., L. Pugh, S., K. D'Mello, S. (2021). A deep transfer learning approach to modeling teacher discourse in the classroom. LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (pp. 302–312.). https://doi.org/10.1145/3448139.3448168
   Google Scholar
• Juzwik, M. M., Borsheim-Black, C., Caughlan, S., & Heintz, A. (2013). Inspiring dialogue: Talking to learn in the English classroom. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, S. (2007). Classroom discourse and the distribution of student engagement. Social Psychology of Education, 10(3), 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-007-9024-0
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, S. (2008). Race, social class, and student engagement in middle school English classrooms. Social Science Research, 37(2), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, S. (2023). Agnosticism in instructional observation systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31(7), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.7493
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, S., Bringe, R., Aucejo, E., & Fruehwirth, J. (2020). Using global observation protocols to inform research on teaching effectiveness and school improvement: Strengths and emerging limitations. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28, 62.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, S., Guner, G., Hunkins, N., & D’Mello, S. (2024). High school English teachers reflect on their talk: A user-study of automated feedback with the Teacher Talk Tool.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, S., Olney, A. M., Donnelly, P., Nystrand, M., & D’Mello, S. K. (2018). Automatically measuring question authenticity in real-world classrooms. Educational Researcher, 47(7), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18785613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, S., Pogodzinski, B., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Teaching quality. In B. Schneider & G. Saw, (Eds.). Handbook of the sociology of education in the 21st century (pp. 275–296). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, S., & Ye, F. (2017). Accounting for the relationship between initial status and growth in regression models. Journal of Experimental Education, 85(3), 353–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1160357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, S., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Teacher support and engagement in math and science: Evidence from HSLS. High School Journal, 99(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2016.0005
   Google Scholar
• Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucan, L. (2009). Engaging teachers in investigating their teaching as a linguistic enterprise: The case of comprehension instruction in the context of discussion. Reading Psychology, 30(1), 51–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710802274770
   Google Scholar
• Langer-Osuna, J. M. (2017). Authority, identity, and collaborative mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(3), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.3.0237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehesvuori, S., Hähkiöniemi, M., Jokiranta, K., Nieminen, P., Hiltunen, J., & Viiri, J. (2017). Enhancing dialogic argumentation in mathematics and science. Studia Paedagogica, 22(4), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2017-4-4
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., Liu, J., & Hunter, C. V. (2020). A meta-analysis of the factor structure of the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS). Journal of Experimental Education, 88(2), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2018.1551184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., Bell, C. A., Jones, N. D., & McCaffrey, D. F. (2019). Classroom observation systems in context: A case for the validation of observation systems. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 31(1), 61–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-018-09291-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., & Cohen, J. (2021). Measuring teaching practices at scale: A novel application of text-as-data methods. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 43(4), 587–614. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737211009267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. S. (2018). When am I ever going to use this in the real world? Cognitive flexibility and urban adolescents’ negotiation of the value of mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(5), 726–746. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, D. F., Yuan, K., Savitsky, T. D., Lockwood, J. R., & Edelen, M. O. (2015). Uncovering multivariate structure in classroom observations in the presence of rater errors. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(2), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, S., Lynam, A., & Kelly, M. (2018). A case for using Swivl for digital observation in an online or blended learning environment. International Journal of Innovations in Online Education, 2. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJInnovOnlineEdu.2018028647
   Google Scholar
• MET Project. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• MET Project. (2014). Measures of effective teaching: 1 – Study information, user guide. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• MET Project. (2014). Measures of effective teaching: 1 – Study information, observation measures report. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Mihaly, K., McCaffrey, D. F., Staiger, D. O., & Lockwood, J. R. (2013). A composite estimator of effective teaching. (Tech. Rep.). Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Measures of Effective Teaching Project.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, P. K., Wilkinson, I. A. G., Soter, A. O., Hennessey, M. N., & Alexander, J. F. (2009). Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 740–764. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Child Health and Human Development and Early Child Care Research Network. (2002). The relation of global first-grade classroom environment to structural classroom features and teacher and student behaviors. Elementary School Journal, 102, 367–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGA and CCSSO. (2010). Appendix A: Research supporting key elements of the standards. In Common core state standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. National Governors Association and Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, T., & Gustafsson, J. E. (2016). Teacher quality, instructional quality, and student outcomes: Relationships across countries, cohorts, and time (Vol. 2). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323–367. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottmar, E. R., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Larsen, R. A., & Berry, R. Q. (2015). Mathematical knowledge for teaching, standards-based mathematics teaching practices, and student achievement in the context of the responsive classroom approach. American Educational Research Journal, 52(4), 787–821. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215579484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents’ perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, K. E., Donohue, K. M., & Weinstein, R. S. (2007). Teaching practices and the promotion of achievement and adjustment in first grade. Journal of School Psychology, 45(3), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, A., McMaken, J., Hwang, J., & Yang, R. (2011). Common core standards: The new U.S. intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11405038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praetorius, A.-K., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2018). Classroom observation frameworks for studying instructional quality: Looking back and looking forward. ZDM, 50(3), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0946-0
   Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan, A., Zylich, B., Ottmar, E., LoCasale-Crouch, J., & Whitehill, J. (2021). Toward automated classroom observation: Multimodal machine learning to estimate class positive climate and negative climate. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 14(1), 664–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. (2012). Its ok—not everyone can be good at math: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya, A., & Wilkinson, I. A. (2021). The argumentation rating tool: Assessing and supporting teacher facilitation and student argumentation during text-based discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakiz, G., Pape, S. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2012). Does perceived teacher affective support matter for middle school students in mathematics classrooms? Journal of School Psychology, 50(2), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J. (2014). School, teaching, and system effectiveness: Some comments on three state-of-the-art reviews. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenke, K., Ruzek, E., Lam, A. C., Karabenick, S. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2018). To the means and beyond: Understanding variation in students’ perceptions of teacher emotional support. Learning and Instruction, 55, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2016). Self-efficacy theory in education. In Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 34–54). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003). Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 158–176.
   Google Scholar
• Sherry, M. B., Messier-Jones, L. M., & Morales, J. (2018). Positioning in prospective secondary English teachers’ annotations of teaching videos. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 17(3), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-11-2017-0154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, M. (2007). Supporting whole-class collaborative inquiry in a secondary mathematics classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 25(2–3), 161–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701301125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanou, C. R., Perencevich, K. C., DiCintio, M., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Y. L., & Reeve, J. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 159–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9142-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suldo, S. M., Friedrich, A. A., White, T., Farmer, J., Minch, D., & Michalowski, J. (2009). Teacher support and adolescents’ subjective well-being: A mixed-methods investigation. School Psychology Review, 38(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2009.12087850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, K. S., Wehby, J. H., & Copeland, S. R. (2000). Effect of varying rates of behavior-specific praise on the on-task behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/106342660000800101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweigart, C. A., Collins, L. W., Evanovich, L. L., & Cook, S. C. (2016). An evaluation of the evidence base for performance feedback to improve teacher praise using CEC’s quality indicators. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(4), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2016.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taxer, J. L., & Frenzel, A. C. (2020). Brief research report: The message behind teacher emotions. Journal of Experimental Education, 88(4), 595–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2019.1588699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. M., Pearson, D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. Elementary School Journal, 104(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1086/499740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant, J. E., Demaray, M. K., Malecki, C. K., Terry, M. N., Clary, M., & Elzinga, N. (2015). Students’ ratings of teacher support and academic and social–emotional well-being. School Psychology Quarterly: The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 30(4), 494–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Anderman, E. M., Midgley, C., Gheen, M., Kang, Y., & Patrick, H. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Cox, K. C., Logan, C., Dicintio, M., & Thomas, C. T. (1998). Creating contexts for involvement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(4), 730–745. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Houtte, M., & Van Maele, D. (2012). Students’ sense of belonging in technical/vocational schools versus academic schools: The mediating role of faculty trust in students. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 114(7), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811211400706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83(3), 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, G., Youngs, P., van Aswegen, R., Singh, S. (2021). Automated classification of elementary instructional objects and activities: Analyzing consistency of manual annotations. The 2021 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (April, Online Pandemic Accommodation).
   Google Scholar
• White, M. C. (2018). Rater performance standards for classroom observation measures. Educational Researcher, 47(8), 492–501. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18785623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M., Luoto, J. M., Klette, K., & Blikstad-Balas, M. (2021). Bringing the theory and measurement of teaching into alignment. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/fnhvw
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Meece, J. L. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.2.210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar