The Potential of the SMART Learning Framework to Design and Implement Geospatial Curricula in the Secondary Classroom

References

• Abadal, E. 2021. Ciencia abierta: Un modelo con piezas por encajar [Open science: A model with pieces to fit]. Arbor 197 (799):a588. doi:10.3989/arbor.2021.799003.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T.-R., S. Battersby, S. Bednarz, A.-M. Bodzin, B. Kolvoord, S. Moore, D. Sinton, and D. Uttal. 2015. A research agenda for geospatial technologies and learning. Journal of Geography 114 (3):118–30. doi:10.1080/00221341.2014.950684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman, N., N. Jones, I. André, H.-A. Cachinho, and M. DeMers. 2016. The future role of GIS education in creating critical spatial thinkers. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 40 (3):394–408. doi:10.1080/03098265.2016.1144729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. A., M. Cummins, A. Davis, A. Freeman, C. H. Giesinger, and V. Ananthanarayanan. 2017. NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition. New Media Consortium, Austin, TX. Accessed September 15, 2023. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED582134.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bednarz, S., and J. Van der Schee. 2006. Europe and the United States: The implementation of geographic information systems in secondary education in two contexts. Journal of Technology, Pedagogy and Education 15 (2):191–205. doi:10.1080/14759390600769573.
   Google Scholar
• Berendsen, M.-E., J.-D. Hamerlinck, and G.-R. Webster. 2018. Digital story mapping to advance educational atlas design and enable student engagement. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 7 (3):125. doi:10.3390/ijgi7030125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budhrani, K., Y. Ji, and J.-H. Lim. 2018. Unpacking conceptual elements of smart learning in the Korean scholarly discourse. Smart Learning Environments 5 (1):1–26. doi:10.1186/s40561-018-0069-7.
   Google Scholar
• Buzo Sánchez, I.-J. 2021. Aprendizaje inteligente y pensamiento espacial en Geografía [Intelligent learning and spatial thinking in geography]. PhD diss., Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
   Google Scholar
• Buzo, I. 2015. Posibilidades y límites de las TIC en la enseñanza de la Geografía [Opportunities and limits of ICT in geography education]. Ar@cne. Revista Electrónica en Internet sobre Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, 195. Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona. https://revistes.ub.edu/index.php/aracne/article/view/26719
   Google Scholar
• Buzo, I. 2017. De las TIG a las TAG: Integrando la información en el aprendizaje geográfico [From GeoICT to GeoLearning: Integrating information into geographic learning]. In El aprendizaje de la Geografía para el siglo XXI [Teaching and learning geography for the 21st century], ed. R. Sebastiá and E. Tonda, 175–200. Alicante, Spain: Universidad de Alicante.
   Google Scholar
• Buzo-Sánchez, I.-J., C. Mínguez, and M.-L. De Lázaro-Torres. 2022. Expert perspectives on GIS use in Spanish geographic education. International Journal of Digital Earth 15 (1):1204–18. doi:10.1080/17538947.2022.2096131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonell-Carrera, C., and S. Hess-Medler. 2019. 3D landform modeling to enhance geospatial thinking. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 8 (2):65. doi:10.3390/ijgi8020065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, J.-C. 2019. Introduction to human geography using ArcGIS Online. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ciesielska, M., K.-W. Boström, and M. Öhlander. 2018. Observation methods. In Qualitative methodologies in organization studies, ed. M. Ciesielska and D. Jemielniak, 33–52. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65442-3_2.
   Google Scholar
• Crespo Castellanos, J. M. 2019. El visualizador Iberpix 4 del Instituto Geográfico Nacional: Un recurso didáctico para la interpretación de los componentes físicos del paisaje [The Iberpix 4 Viewer of the Spanish National Geographic Institute: A didactic resource for interpreting the physical components of the landscape]. Enseñanza de Las Ciencias de la Tierra 27 (2):182–91.
   Google Scholar
• De Lázaro Torres, M.-L, and R. De Miguel González. 2022. Sustainable development goals in Europe. A geographical approach. Key Challenges in Geography EUROGEO Book Series. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-21614-5.
   Google Scholar
• De Lázaro Torres, M.-L., R. De Miguel González, and F.-J. Morales Yago. 2017. WebGIS and geospatial technologies for landscape education on personalized learning contexts. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 6 (11):350. doi:10.3390/ijgi6110350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lázaro y Torres, M.-L., S. Álvarez, and M.-J. González. 2016. Geodatos y paisaje: De la nube al aula universitaria [Geodata and landscape: From the cloud to lectures]. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles 70:371–91. doi:10.21138/bage.2175.
   Google Scholar
• De Miguel González, R., M.-L., and De Lázaro Torres. 2020. WebGIS implementation and effectiveness in secondary education using the digital atlas for schools. Journal of Geography 119 (2):74–85. doi:10.1080/00221341.2020.1726991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durán-Sánchez, A., J. Álvarez-García, M.-C. Del Río-Rama, and P.-O. Sarango-Lalangui. 2018. Analysis of the scientific literature published on smart learning. Espacios 39:14–27.
   Google Scholar
• Fargher, M. 2018. WebGIS for geography education: Towards a GeoCapabilities approach. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 7 (3):111. doi:10.3390/ijgi7030111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farran, E.-K., M. Blades, K.-D. Hudson, P. Sockeel, and Y. Courbois. 2022. Spatial exploration strategies in childhood; exploration behaviours are predictive of navigation success. Cognitive Development 61:101153. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favier, T. 2013. Geo-information technologie in het voortgezet aardrijkskundeonderwijs: Een brochure voor docenten [Geo-information technology in secondary geography education: A brochure for teachers]. PhD diss., Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. 2020. Twenty-five years of children’s geographies: A planner’s perspective. Children’s Geographiesi 18 (1):110–21. doi:10.1080/14733285.2019.1598547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Trigueros, I. 2020. Digital teaching competence and space competence with TPACK in social sciences. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET) 15 (19):37–52. doi:10.3991/ijet.v15i19.14923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Blanco García, E. 2016. Un nuevo camino hacia las Humanidades Digitales: El Laboratorio de Innovación en Humanidades Digitales de la UNED (LINHD) [A new way towards digital humanities: The digital humanities innovation lab at UNED (LINHD)]. Signa: Revista de la Asociación Española de Semiótica 25:79–93. doi:10.5944/signa.vol25.2016.16959.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F., and D.-G. Janelle. 2010. Toward critical spatial thinking in the social sciences. GeoJournal 75 (1):3–13. doi:10.1007/s10708-010-9340-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ha, C., and S.-Y. Lee. 2019. Elementary teachers’ beliefs and perspectives related to smart learning in South Korea. Smart Learning Environments 6 (1):1–15. doi:10.1186/s40561-019-0082-5.
   Google Scholar
• Houtsonen, L., S. Mäki, J. Riihelä, T. Toivonen, and J. Tulivuori. 2014. Paikkaoppi: A Web based learning environment for Finnish Schools. In Innovative learning geography in Europe: New challenges for the 21st century, ed. R. De Miguel and K. Donert, 89–100. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Humble, N. 2023. Future paths for GIS in K-12 education: A review of possibilities and constraints. European Journal of Geography 14 (3):79–88. doi:10.48088/ejg.n.hum.14.3.079.088.
   Google Scholar
• Huynh, N. T., and B. Sharpe. 2013. An assessment instrument to measure geospatial thinking expertise. Journal of Geography 112 (1):3–17. doi:10.1080/00221341.2012.682227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janelle, D. G., and M.-F. Goodchild. 2018. Territory, geographic information, and the map. In The map and the territory, ed. S. Wuppuluri and F. Doria, 609–27. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72478-2_33.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, E. 2020. Education reform for the future: A case study of Korea. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT) 16 (3):66–81. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1275645.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kerski, J. J., and T.-R. Baker. 2019. Infusing educational practice with Web-GIS. In Geospatial technologies in geography education, ed. R. De Miguel González, K. Donert, and K. Koutsopoulos, 3–19. EUROGEO Book SeriesKey challenges in Geography. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-17783-6_1.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M., and R. Bednarz. 2013. Development of critical spatial thinking through GIS learning. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 37 (3):350–66. doi:10.1080/03098265.2013.769091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., S.-M. Song, and Y.-I. Yoon. 2011. Smart learning services based on smart cloud computing. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 11 (8):7835–50. doi:10.3390/s110807835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-K., M.-J. Lee, E.-S. Jang, and Y.-E. Lee. 2022. The study on the efficiency of smart learning in the COVID-19. Journal of Multimedia Information System 9 (1):51–60. doi:10.33851/JMIS.2022.9.1.51.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, T., J.-Y. Cho, and B.-G. Lee. 2013. Evolution to smart learning in public education: A case of Korean public education. In Open and social technologies for networked learning. OST 2012. IFIP advances in information and communication technology. Vol. 395, ed. T. Ley, M. Ruohonen, M. Laanpere, M. Study, and A. Tatnall, 170–8. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37285-8_18.
   Google Scholar
• Kolvoord, B., K. Keranen, and S. Rittenhouse. 2019. The geospatial semester: Concurrent enrollment in geospatial technologies. Journal of Geography 118 (1):3–10. doi:10.1080/00221341.2018.1483961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. 2015. Development and use of student-centered active learning strategies in geography classrooms. The Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic and Environmental Education 23 (1):65–82. doi:10.17279/jkagee.2015.23.1.65.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and R. Bednarz. 2009. Effect of GIS learning on spatial thinking. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 33 (2):183–98. doi:10.1080/03098260802276714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and R. Bednarz. 2012. Components of spatial thinking: Evidence from a spatial thinking ability test. Journal of Geography 111 (1):15–26. doi:10.1080/00221341.2011.583262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobben, A., and M. Lawrence. 2015. Synthesized model of geospatial thinking. The Professional Geographer 67 (3):307–18. doi:10.1080/00330124.2014.935155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Fernández, J. A. 2016. De las TIG a las TAG en la formación docente [From GeoICT to GeoLearning in teacher education]. In Proceedings XVII Congreso Nacional de TIG. Universidad de Málaga. https://riuma.uma.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10630/11723/L%C3%B3pezFern%C3%A1ndez.pdf?sequence=3
   Google Scholar
• Lozano, R. 2011. De las TIC a las TAC: Tecnologías del aprendizaje y del conocimiento [From ICT to LKT: Learning and knowledge technologies]. Anuario ThinkEPI 5 (1):45–7. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/ThinkEPI/article/view/30465.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Q., Y. Duan, and Z. Yao. 2023. Meta-analysis of the impact of geospatial technologies on learning outcomes. Education and Information Technologies doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11712-w.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan, B.-S. 2020. Measuring student motivation for participation in GIS data activities. Portal: Libraries and the Academy 20 (3):475–94. doi:10.1353/pla.2020.0026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, A., ed. 2015. Smart learning: Teaching and learning with smartphones and tablets in post compulsory education. Sheffield, UK: Media-Enhanced Learning Special Interest Group and Sheffield Hallam University. https://melsig.shu.ac.uk/melsig/smart-learning-new-book-project/.
   Google Scholar
• Milson, A. J. 2012. GIS in the cloud: Using WebGIS for teaching secondary geography. Didáctica Geográfica 12:151–3. https://didacticageografica.age-geografia.es/index.php/didacticageografica/article/view/66.
   Google Scholar
• Mínguez, C. 2021. Teaching tourism: Urban routes design using GIS story map. Investigaciones Geográficas 75:25–42. doi:10.14198/INGEO2020.M.
   Google Scholar
• Morales Capilla, M., J. M. T. Torres, and F. R. Sánchez. 2015. Percepción del profesorado y alumnado universitario ante las posibilidades que ofrecen las TIC en su integración en el proceso educativo: Reflexiones, experiencias e investigación en la Facultad de Educación de Granada [Perceptions of teachers and students to the university potential of ITC integration in the educational process: Thoughts, experiences and research in the Faculty of Education of Granada]. Edmetic 5 (1):113–42. doi:10.21071/edmetic.v5i1.4019.
   Google Scholar
• Murga-Menoyo, M. A. 2020. El camino hacia los ODS: Conformar una ciudadanía planetaria mediante la educación [Towards the SDGs: Building a planetary citizenship through education]. Comillas Journal of International Relations 19:1–11. doi:10.14422/cir.i19.y2020.001.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, J., C. Kueh, C. Holly, L. Brook, and C. Erickson. 2023. Co-designing a communication app to enhance collaborative communication support for secondary students with autism. Educational Technology Research and Development 71 (2):579–604. doi:10.1007/s11423-022-10170-4.
   Google Scholar
• Olabuénaga, J. I. R. 2012. Metodología de la Investigación Cualitativa [Qualitative research methodology]. Bilbao, Spain: Universidad de Deusto.
   Google Scholar
• Puertas-Aguilar, M.-Á., B. Conway, M.-L. de Lázaro Torres, R. de Miguel González, K. Donert, M. Linder-Fally, A. Parkinson, D. Prodan, S. Wilson, and L. Zwartjes. 2022. A teaching model to raise awareness of sustainability using geoinformation. Espacio Tiempo y Forma. Serie VI, Geografía 15:23–42. doi:10.5944/etfvi.15.2022.33687.
   Google Scholar
• Puertas-Aguilar, M.-Á., J. Álvarez-Otero, and M.-L. de Lázaro-Torres. 2021. The challenge of teacher training in the 2030 agenda framework using geotechnologies. Education Sciences 11 (8):381. doi:10.3390/educsci11080381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redecker, C., and Y. Punie. 2017. European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2760/159770.
   Google Scholar
• Sein-Echaluce, M.-L., A. Fidalgo-Blanco, and F.-J. García-Peñalvo, eds. 2019. Innovative trends in flipped teaching and adaptive learning. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-8142-0.
   Google Scholar
• Sherrington, T. 2019. Rosenshine’s principles in action. London, UK: John Catt Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, E.-E., A.-J. Milson, and T. J. Smith. 2015. Future teachers’ spatial thinking skills and attitudes. Journal of Geography 4:139–46. doi:10.1080/00221341.2015.1100654.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddart, R., and B. Godfrey. 2020. Gathering evidence of learning in library curriculum center spaces with Web GIS. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 15 (3):21–35. doi:10.18438/eblip29721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strachan, C., and J. Mitchell. 2014. Teachers’ perceptions of Esri story maps as effective teaching tools. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 4 (3):195–220. https://dergipark. Org.tr/en/download/article-file/591037.
   Google Scholar
• Sung, M. 2015. A study of adults’ perception and needs for smart learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 191:115–20. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.480.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, J., J.-H.-L. Koh, C. Ren, and Y. Wang. 2022. Understanding higher education students’ developing perceptions of geocapabilities through the creation of story maps with geographical information systems. British Journal of Educational Technology 53 (3):687–705. doi:10.1111/bjet.13176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomás, M.-P., and M.-A. Murga-Menoyo. 2020. El marco curricular de la Educación Secundaria Obligatoria: Posibilidades para la formación de competencias en sostenibilidad [The Curriculum Framework of Compulsory Secondary Education: Possibilites for training skill in sustainability]. Revista Internacional de Comunicación y Desarrollo (RICD) 3 (13):90–109. doi:10.15304/ricd.3.13.7180.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2014. Roadmap for implementing the Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development. Accessed August 16, 2023. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000230514
   Google Scholar
• Vuorikari, R., S. Kluzer, and Y. Punie. 2022. DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens - with new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. doi:10.2760/115376.
   Google Scholar
• Zwartjes, L., and M.-L. de Lázaro Torres. 2019. Geospatial thinking learning lines in secondary education: The GI learner project. In Geospatial technologies in geography education, ed. R. de Miguel González, K. Donert, and K. Koutsopulos, 41–61. Key Challenges in Geography. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-17783-6_3.
   Google Scholar