51
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Spatial Autocorrelation and Political Redistricting: A Task for the Uniform Distribution

Received 27 Jun 2023, Accepted 25 Jan 2024, Published online: 22 Apr 2024

Literature Cited

  • Abonazel, M., Z. Algamal, F. Awwad, and I. Taha. 2022. A new two-parameter estimator for beta regression model: Method, simulation, and application. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics 7:780322. doi: 10.3389/fams.2021.780322.
  • Bartlett, M. 1975. The statistical analysis of spatial pattern. London: Chapman and Hall.
  • Besag, J. 1974. Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 36 (2):192–225. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00999.x.
  • Besag, J., J. York, and A. Mollié. 1991. Bayesian image restoration with two applications in spatial statistics. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 43 (1):1–20. doi: 10.1007/BF00116466.
  • Bivand, R., J. Hauke, and T. Kossowski. 2013. Computing the Jacobian in Gaussian spatial autoregressive models: An illustrated comparison of available methods. Geographical Analysis 45 (2):150–79. doi: 10.1111/gean.12008.
  • Blom, G. 1954. Transformations of the binomial, negative binomial, Poisson and χ2 distributions. Biometrika 41 (3–4):302–16. doi: 10.2307/2332711.
  • Burden, S., and D. Steel. 2016. Empirical zoning distributions for small area data. Geographical Analysis 48 (4):373–90. doi: 10.1111/gean.12104.
  • Cliff, A., and J. Ord. 1973. Spatial autocorrelation. London: Pion.
  • Cliff, A., and J. Ord. 1981. Spatial processes. London: Pion.
  • Cover, B., and D. Niven. 2021. Geographic gerrymandering. Harvard Law & Policy Review 16 (1):159–215.
  • Danilevicz, I., and R. Ehlers. 2017. BDSAR: A new package on Bregman divergence for Bayesian simultaneous autoregressive models. arXiv:1704.07414. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.07414.pdf.
  • De Oliveira, V., and J. Song. 2008. Bayesian analysis of simultaneous autoregressive models. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics Series B 70 (2):323–50.
  • Ferrari, S., and F. Cribari-Neto. 2004. Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics 31 (7):799–815. doi: 10.1080/0266476042000214501.
  • Gelman, A., and J. Hill. 2007. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goodchild, M. 1986. Spatial autocorrelation. Norwich, UK: GeoBooks.
  • Griffith, D. 2000. Eigenfunction properties and approximations of selected incidence matrices employed in spatial analyses. Linear Algebra and Its Applications 321 (1–3):95–112. doi: 10.1016/S0024-3795(00)00031-8.
  • Griffith, D. 2003. Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering: Gaining understanding through theory and scientific visualization. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Griffith, D. 2022. Spatial autocorrelation and unorthodox random variables: The uniform distribution. Chilean Journal of Statistics 13 (2):135–55.
  • Griffith, D., and J. Paelinck. 2011. Non-standard spatial statistics and spatial econometrics. Berlin: Springer.
  • Griffith, D., and P. Peres-Neto. 2006. Spatial modeling in ecology: The flexibility of eigenfunction spatial analyses. Ecology 87 (10):2603–13. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2603:Smietf.[PMC]2.0.co;2]
  • Gronau, Q., H. Singmann, and E.-J. Wagenmakers. 2020. bridgesampling: An R package for estimating normalizing constants. Journal of Statistical Software 92 (10):1–29. doi: 10.18637/jss.v092.i10.
  • G’Sell, M. G., S. Wager, A. Chouldechova, and R. Tibshirani. 2016. Sequential selection procedures and false discovery rate control. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 78 (2):423–44. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12122.
  • Hodges, J., and B. Reich. 2010. Adding spatially-correlated errors can mess up the fixed effect you love. The American Statistician 64 (4):325–34. doi: 10.1198/tast.2010.10052.
  • Hughes, J., and M. Haran. 2013. Dimension reduction and alleviation of confounding for spatial generalized linear mixed models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 75 (1):139–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2012.01041.x.
  • Jagerman, D. 1963. The autocorrelation function of a sequence uniformly distributed modulo 1. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 34 (4):1243–52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2238334. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177703859.
  • Johnson, N., S. Kotz, and N. Balakrishnan. 1994/1995. Continuous univariate distributions. Vols. 1 & 2, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
  • Johnson, N., S. Kotz, and N. Balakrishnan. 2005. Univariate discrete distributions. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.
  • Kaiser, M., and N. Cressie. 1997. Modeling Poisson variables with positive spatial dependence. Statistics & Probability Letters 35 (4):423–32. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7152(97)00041-2.
  • Leemis, L., and J. McQueston. 2008. Univariate distribution relationships. The American Statistician 62 (1):45–53. doi: 10.1198/000313008X270448.
  • Maškarinec, P. 2020. Spatial dimensions of female political participation: Regional perspective of women’s descriptive representation in Czech local councils, 1994–2018. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9 (12):729–16. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9120729.
  • McCullagh, P., and J. Nelder. 1989. Generalized linear models. 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • McGhee, E. 2020. Partisan gerrymandering and political science. Annual Review of Political Science 23 (1):171–85. doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-060118-045351.
  • Mészáros, J., N. Solymosi, and F. Speiser. 2007. Spatial distribution of political parties in Hungary 1990–2006. Political Geography 26 (7):804–23. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2007.06.002.
  • Meulman, J., A. Van Der Kooij, and W. Heiser. 2004. Principal components analysis with nonlinear optimal scaling transformations for ordinal and nominal data. In Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences, ed. D. Kaplan, 49–70. London: Sage.
  • Orcutt, M. 2023. How math has changed the shape of gerrymandering. Quanta Magazine, June 1. https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-math-has-changed-the-shape-of-gerrymandering-20230601/.
  • Peizer, D., and J. Pratt. 1968. A normal approximation for binomial, F, beta, and other common, related tail probabilities, I. Journal of the American Statistical Association 63 (324):1416–56. doi: 10.2307/2285895.
  • Plešivčák, M., J. Buček, V. Bačík, and D. Kusendová. 2016. Theoretical and methodological notes on current options related to examination of voting behaviour—The geographical approach. Acta Geographica Universitatis Comenianae 60 (2):151–70.
  • Pratt, J. 1968. A normal approximation for binomial, F, beta, and other common, related tail probabilities, II. Journal of the American Statistical Association 63 (324):1457–83.
  • Stephens, M. 1986. Tests for the uniform distribution. In Goodness-of-fit-techniques, ed. R. D’Agostino, 331–66. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Tiefelsdorf, M., and D. Griffith. 2007. Semi-parametric filtering of spatial autocorrelation: The eigenvector approach. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 39 (5):1193–1221. doi: 10.1068/a37378.
  • Van Hala, M., S. Bandyopadhyay, S. Lahiri, and D. Nordman. 2017. On the non-standard distribution of empirical likelihood estimators with spatial data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 187:109–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2017.02.007.
  • Willemain, R., and A. Desautels. 1993. A method to generate autocorrelated uniform random numbers. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 45 (1–2):23–31. doi: 10.1080/00949659308811469.
  • Wimmer, G., and G. Altmann. 1999. Thesaurus of univariate discrete probability distributions. Essen, Germany: STAMM Verlag GmbH.
  • Wong, D. 2009. In The Sage handbook of spatial analysis, ed. A. Fotheringham and P. Rogerson, 105–24. London: Sage.
  • Wu, P., and A. Combs. 2019. Geographic information system for and against gerrymandering. In Proceedings of the 2019 conference on information systems applied research (CONISAR), ed. B. Ghosh and L. Mew, vol. 21, 5218. Wrightsville Beach, NC: ISCAP. https://iscap.us/proceedings/conisar/2019/pdf/5218.pdf.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.