Understanding the Spatial Narratives of Puzzle Films Using Cognitive Maps

Literature Cited

• Bergmann, L., and N. Lally. 2021. For geographical imagination systems. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111 (1):26–35. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2020.1750941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjornson, R. 1981. Cognitive mapping and the understanding of literature. SubStance 10 (1):51. doi: 10.2307/3684397.
   Google Scholar
• Bordwell, D. 2006. The way Hollywood tells it: Story and style in modern movies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, G. 2018. Atlas of emotion: Journeys in art, architecture, and film. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Buckland, W., ed. 2009. Puzzle film: Complex storytelling in contemporary cinema. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Caquard, S. 2015. Cartography III: A post-representational perspective on cognitive cartography. Progress in Human Geography 39 (2):225–35. doi: 10.1177/0309132514527039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caquard, S., and W. Cartwright. 2014. Narrative cartography: From mapping stories to the narrative of maps and mapping. The Cartographic Journal 51 (2):101–06. doi: 10.1179/0008704114Z.000000000130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caquard, S., and D. R. F. Taylor. 2009. What is cinematic cartography? The Cartographic Journal 46 (1):5–8. doi: 10.1179/000870409X430951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, T. 2007. Cartographic cinema. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danjo, T. 2020. Allocentric representations of space in the hippocampus. Neuroscience Research 153:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2019.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimendberg, E. 2004. Film noir and the spaces of modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elsaesser, T. 2017. Contingency, causality, complexity: Distributed agency in the mind-game film. New Review of Film and Television Studies 16 (1):1–39. doi: 10.1080/17400309.2017.1411870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, R. A., E. Z. Patai, J. B. Julian, and H. J. Spiers. 2017. The cognitive map in humans: Spatial navigation and beyond. Nature Neuroscience 20 (11):1504–13. doi: 10.1038/nn.4656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafting, T., M. Fyhn, S. Molden, M. B. Moser, and E. I. Moser. 2005. Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature 436:801–06. doi: 10.1038/nature03721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallam, J., and L. Roberts, eds. 2013. Locating the moving image: New approaches to film and place. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanks, W. F. 2010. Deixis. In Routledge encyclopedia of narrative theory, ed. D. Herman, M. Jahn, and M.-L. Ryan, 99–100. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, M., and S. Willemsen. 2017. Impossible puzzle films: A cognitive approach to contemporary complex cinema. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, A. K., L. Westerveld, and L. Strom. 2015. Inductive visualization: A humanistic alternative to GIS. GeoHumanities 1 (2):233–65. doi: 10.1080/2373566X.2015.1108831.
   Google Scholar
• Lukinbeal, C. 2018. The mapping of 500 days of summer: A processual approach to cinematic cartography. NECSUS: European Journal of Media Studies 7 (2):97–120.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, J., and J. Dostrovsky. 1971. The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat. Brain Research 34 (1):171–75. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90358-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, G. 1992. Spatial metaphors and speaking positions. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 10 (3):241–44. doi: 10.1068/d100241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, R. E. 2021. Cartographic design as visual storytelling: Synthesis and review of map-based narratives, genres, and tropes. The Cartographic Journal 58 (1):83–114. doi: 10.1080/00087041.2019.1633103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. L. 1991. Possible worlds and accessibility relations: A semantic typology of fiction. Poetics Today 12 (3):553–76. doi: 10.2307/1772651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. L. 2015. Narrative as virtual reality 2: Revisiting immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Secor, A. 2013. 2012 Urban Geography plenary lecture: Topological city. Urban Geography 34 (4):430–44. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2013.778698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shone, T. 2020. The Nolan variations: The movies, mysteries, and marvels of Christopher Nolan. New York: Knopf Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Suwala, L. 2021. Concepts of space, refiguration of spaces, and comparative research: Perspectives from economic geography and regional economics. Forum qualitative sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 22 (3):1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Tolman, E. C. 1948. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review 55 (4):189–208. doi: 10.1037/h0061626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, W. 1969. The role of illusion in North American geography: A note on the geography of North American settlement. Canadian Geographies/Géographies Canadiennes 13 (1):10–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0064.1969.tb00490.x.
   Google Scholar
• Westerveld, L., and A. K. Knowles. 2021. Loosening the grid: Topology as the basis for a more inclusive GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 35 (10):2108–27. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2020.1856854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, B. 2022. Humanistic GIS: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 112 (6):1576–92. doi: 10.1080/24694452.2021.2004875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, B. 2023. Reorienting GIScience for a data-intensive society. Dialogues in Human Geography. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/20438206231179230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar