Effective Online Instruction Through The Community of Inquiry Framework: An Exploratory Study in Kinesiology

References

• American Kinesiology Association. (2010). Position statement #2, AKA clarifies the definition of kinesiology. http://www.americankinesiology.org/Content/Documents/Position%20Statement_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Annand, D. (2011). Social presence within the community of inquiry framework. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 12(5), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i5.924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B. (2013). Does academic discipline moderate CoI-course outcomes relationships in online MBA courses? The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the community of inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C, & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, G., & Green, F. P. (2001). Student learning in the online environment: No significant difference? Quest, 53(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2001.10491727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biber, D. D. (2021). Teaching psychological theory through video diaries. Journal of Educators Online, 18(2), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2009). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Goad, T. (2018). Predicting student success in online physical education [ Doctoral dissertations]. West Virginia University. https://doi.org/10.33915/etd.5684
   Google Scholar
• Goc Karp, G., & Woods, M. L. (2003). Wellness NutriFit online learning in physical education for high school students. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(2), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Graber, K. C., & Chodzko-Zajko, W. (2014). Online education: Crossing a new educational frontier. Kinesiology Review, 3(4), 173–176. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2014-0070
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. A., & DiLoreto, M. (2016). The effects of student engagement, student satisfaction, and perceived learning in online learning environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1), 20.
   Google Scholar
• Harasim, L. (2006). A history of e-learning: Shift happened. In J. Weiss, J. Nolan, J. Hunsinger, & P. Trifonas. (Eds.), The international handbook of virtual learning environments (pp. 59–94). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hersman, B., & Schroeder, N. (2017). Strategies for designing engaging online kinesiology courses based on the community of inquiry model. Quest, 69(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2017.1295274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, A. H. (1997). Challenges and opportunities of online education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 25(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.2190/DE8W-DA78-FH16-5K89
   Google Scholar
• Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Riecke, B. E., & Hatala, M. (2015). Social presence in online discussions as a process predictor of academic performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 638–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, J, & Gilson, T. A. (2014). Online threaded discussion: Benefits, issues, and strategies. Kinesiology Review, 3(4), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2014-0062
   Google Scholar
• Kim, G., & Gurvitch, R. (2020). Online education research adopting the community of inquiry framework: A systematic review. Quest, 72(4), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2020.1761843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, G., & Gurvitch, R. (2022). Community of inquiry analysis of alignment between instructors’ intentions and students’ perceptions in online courses. Journal of Educators Online, 19(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2022.19.2.7
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman, B. J., Sheehan, D. P., Wesolek, M., & Retegui, E. (2017). Moving online physical education from oxymoron to efficacy. Sport, Education and Society, 22(2), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2015.1015978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, H. A. (2018). Research and development to guide and defend redesign. In H. A. Lawson (Ed.), Redesigning physical education: An equity agenda in which every child matters (pp. 104–120). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C. S., & Irby, B. (2008). An overview of online education: Attractiveness, benefits, challenges, concerns, and recommendations. College Student Journal, 42(2), 449–458.
   Google Scholar
• Mahar, M. T., Hall, T. R., Delp, M. D., & Morrow, J. R. (2014). The state of online education in kinesiology in the United States. Kinesiology Review, 3(4), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2014-0068
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, J. M., & Barnhill, C. R. (2017). Enhancing the student experience in online sport management programs: A review of the community of inquiry framework. Sport Management Education Journal, 11(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1123/smej.2016-0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED505824
   Google Scholar
• Murtagh, E. M., Calderón, A, Scanlon, D., & MacPhail, A. (2023). Online teaching and learning in physical education teacher education: A mixed studies review of literature. European Physical Education Review, 29(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X231155793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onyesolo, M., Nwasor, V., Ositanwosu, O., & Iwegbuna, O. (2013). Pedagogy: Instructivism to socio-constructivism through virtual reality. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 4(9). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2013.040907
   Google Scholar
• Oyarzun, B., Barreto, D., & Conklin, S. (2018). Instructor social presence effects on learner social presence, achievement, and satisfaction. Tech Trends, 62(6), 625–634. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0299-0
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ransdell, L. B., Rice, K., Snelson, C., & Decola, J. (2008). Online health-related fitness courses. The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 79(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2008.10598119
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J., Wadsworth, D., Hastie, P., & Rudisill, M. (2014). Incorporating e-learning to enhance instruction and student experiences in collegiate physical activity courses. Kinesiology Review, 3(4), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2014-0066
   Google Scholar
• Sato, T., Ellison, D. W., & Tsuda, E. (2019). Study habits and learning experiences of undergraduate students in a physical education major online kinesiology course. The Physical Educator, 76(2), 440–466. https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2019-V76-I2-8837
   Google Scholar
• Sato, T., & Haegele, J. A. (2018). Undergraduate kinesiology students’ experiences in online motor development course. Online Learning, 22(2), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i2.1361
   Google Scholar
• Serdyukov, P. (2015). Does online education need a special pedagogy? Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 23(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.2498/cit.1002511
   Google Scholar
• Shackelford, J. L., & Maxwell, M. (2012). Sense of community in graduate online education: Contribution of learner to learner interaction. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 13(4), 228–249. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., Sau Li, C., & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, R. (2011). Enhancing learner-learner interaction using video communications in higher education: Implications from theorizing about a new model: Learner-learner interaction using video communications. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00990.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, P. (1998). Distance learning in physical education teacher education. Quest, 50(4), 344–356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenbom, S. (2018). A systematic review of the community of inquiry survey. The Internet and Higher Education, 39, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, B. S. (2004). A comparison of online and face-to-face instruction in an undergraduate foundations of American education course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(2), 196–213.
   Google Scholar
• Sundgren, M, Jaldemark, J., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2023). Disciplinary differences and emotional presence in communities of inquiry: Teachers’ expressions of digital technology-enabled teaching. Computers and Education Open, 4, 100–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100134
   Google Scholar
• Swan, K., Shea, P., Richardson, J., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-mentor, 2(24), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wiklund, M., & Andersson, A. (2018). Student-initiated use of technology – Friend and foe. E-Learning & Digital Media, 15(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017752767
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (applied social research methods). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D. (2005). Interactive multimedia-based e-learning: A study of effectiveness. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_3
   Google Scholar