“Conversation is everything”: How teachers and students create environments where open discussion can thrive

References

• Ahlquist, R. (1990). Critical pedagogy for social studies teachers. Social Studies Review, 29(3), 53–57.
   Google Scholar
• Alivernini, F., & Manganelli, S. (2011). Is there a relationship between openness in classroom discussion and students’ knowledge in civic and citizenship education? Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3441–3445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.315
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M., Berkowitz, S., Hunt, S., & Louden, A. (1999). A meta-analysis of the impact of forensics and communication education on critical thinking. Communication Education, 48(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., & Lovett, M. C. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Boulay, B., Selman, R. L., McCormick, R., Lowenstein, E., Gamse, B., Fine, M., & Leonard, M. B. (2015). A randomized controlled trial of professional development for interdisciplinary civic education: Impacts on humanities teachers and their students. Teachers College Record, 117(2), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511700202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, K. C., & Avery, P. (2016). Research on social studies education: Diverse students, settings, and methods. In D. Gitomer & C. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 985–1038). American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, K. C., & Ho, L.-C. (2023). Collaborative deliberation in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 104(5), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217231156229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573
   Google Scholar
• Beck, T. A. (2005). Tools of deliberation: Exploring the complexity of learning to lead elementary civics discussions. Theory & Research in Social Education, 33(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2005.10473273
   Google Scholar
• Beck, T. A. (2019). Managing an unpopular opinion in a controversial political issue discussion. Theory & Research in Social Education, 47(2), 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2018.1551165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2011). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bohan, C. H., & Feinberg, J. (2008). The authors of the harvard social studies project: A retrospective analysis of Donald Oliver, Fred Neumann, and James Shaver. Social Studies Research & Practice, 3(2), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-02-2008-B0005
   Google Scholar
• Bolinger, K., & Warren, W. J. (2007). Methods practiced in social studies instruction: A review of public school teachers’ strategies. International Journal of Social Education, 22(1), 68–84.
   Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (1999). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Burridge, P. (2018). Teacher pedagogical choice. In O. B. Cavero & N. Llevot-Calvet (Eds.), New pedagogical challenges in the 21st century (pp. 141–158). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.73201
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. E. (2007). Sticking together: Classroom diversity and civic education. American Politics Research, 35(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X06294503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. E. (2008). Voice in the classroom: How an open classroom climate fosters political engagement among adolescents. Political Behavior, 30(4), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9063-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claes, E., Maurissen, L., & Havermans, N. (2017). Let’s talk politics: Which individual and classroom compositional characteristics matter in classroom discussions? YOUNG, 25(4_suppl), 18S–35S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308816673264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocco, M., Segall, A., Halvorsen, A.-L., & Jacobsen, R. (2018). Deliberating public policy issues with adolescents: Classroom dynamics and sociocultural considerations. Democracy & Education, 26(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (1986). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Educational Review, 56(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.56.1.b327234461607787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Favero, L., Boscolo, P., Vidotto, G., & Vicentini, M. (2007). Classroom discussion and individual problem-solving in the teaching of history: Do different instructional approaches affect interest in different ways? Learning & Instruction, 17(6), 635–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 28(3), 280–298. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.58.3.c43481778r528qw4
   Google Scholar
• Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, N. K. (2009). Toward democratic discourse: Scaffolding student-led discussions in the social studies. Teachers College Record, 111(8), 2021–2054. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friere, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Academic. ( Original work published 1970)
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, H. J. (2017). Learning to be in the world with others. Peter Lang US. https://www.peterlang.com/document/1113228, https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4331-3966-6
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, H. J. (2020). Containing classroom discussions of current social and political issues. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(3), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1727020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, H. J., & Alvey, E. (2021). Exploring the emotional dynamics of a political discussion. Theory & Research in Social Education, 49(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2020.1808550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geller, R. C. (2020). Teacher political disclosure in contentious times: A “responsibility to speak up” or “fair and balanced”? Theory & Research in Social Education, 48(2), 182–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2020.1740125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hadjioannou, X. (2007). Bringing the background to the foreground: What do classroom environments that support authentic discussions look like? American Educational Research Journal, 44(2), 370–399. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207302173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayat, N., & Kawashima-Ginsberg, K. (2020). Building for better democracy: Final report on the lllinois #CivicsIsBack civic education initiative. Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. https://circle.tufts.edu/sites/default/files/2020-12/illinois_ciivcs_report_full_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, A. (2000). High school democratic dialogues: Possibilities for praxis. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning, J. E. (2008). The art of discussion-based teaching: Opening up conversation in the classroom. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203878880
   Google Scholar
• Hess, D. E., & Posselt, J. (2002). How high school students experience and learn from the discussion of controversial public issues. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 17(4), 283–314.
   Google Scholar
• Hlavacik, M., & Krutka, D. G. (2021). Deliberation can wait: How civic litigation makes inquiry critical. Theory & Research in Social Education, 49(3), 418–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2021.1933665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (2016). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, L.-C., McAvoy, P., Hess, D. E., & Gibbs, B. (2017). Teaching and learning about controversial issues and topics in the social studies: A review of the research. In M. M. Manfra & C. M. Bolick (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of social studies research (pp. 321–335). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, R., Halvorsen, A.-L., Frasier, A. S., Schmitt, A., Crocco, M., & Segall, A. (2018). Thinking deeply, thinking emotionally: How high school students make sense of evidence. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 232–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2018.1425170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Journell, W. (2011). The disclosure dilemma in action: A qualitative look at the effect of teacher disclosure on classroom instruction. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 35(2), 217–244.
   Google Scholar
• Journell, W. (2012). Ideological homogeneity, school leadership, and political intolerance in secondary education: A study of three high schools during the 2008 Presidential election. Journal of School Leadership, 22(3), 269–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461202200306
   Google Scholar
• Journell, W. (2017). Framing controversial identity issues in schools: The case of HB2, bathroom equity, and transgender students. Equity & Excellence in Education, 50(4), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2017.1393640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Journell, W. (2022). Classroom controversy in the midst of political polarization: The essential role of school administrators. NASSP Bulletin, 106(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/01926365221100589
   Google Scholar
• Kawashima-Ginsberg, K. (2013). Do discussion, debate, and simulations boost NAEP civics performance? The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, S. (2008). Race, social class, and student engagement in middle school English classrooms. Social Science Research, 37(2), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, R. T., & McCafferty-Wright, J. (2015). Connecting an open classroom climate to social movement citizenship: A study of 8th graders in Europe using IEA ICCS data. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 39(4), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2015.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, C. S., Lester, A. J., & Wilcox, K. C. (2021). College, career, and civic readiness: Building school communities that prepare youth to thrive as 21st century citizens. Theory & Research in Social Education, 49(4), 602–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2021.1968984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krutka, D. G., & Hlavacik, M. (2022). How do we discuss controversial issues that confront injustices? Three approaches to framing critical inquiries. Social Education, 86(3), 197–203.
   Google Scholar
• Kuang, X., Kennedy, K. J., & Mok, M. M. C. (2018). Creating democratic class rooms in Asian contexts: The influences of individual and school level factors on open classroom climate. Journal of Social Science Education, 17(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.4119/UNIBI/jsse-v17-i1-1678
   Google Scholar
• Larson, B. E. (2000). Classroom discussion: A method of instruction and a curriculum outcome. Teaching & Teacher Education, 16(5), 661–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00013-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, B. E. (2022). Guiding principles for using classroom discussion. In J. C. Lo (Ed.), Making classroom discussions work: Methods for quality dialogue in the social studies (pp. 11–26). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, B. E., & Parker, W. C. (1996). What is classroom discussion? A look at teachers’ conceptions. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 11(2), 110–126.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, P., & Kawashima-Ginsberg, K. (2017). The republic is (still) at risk– and civics is part of the solution. Johnathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life. https://civxnow.org/sites/default/files/resources/SummitWhitePaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, M. (2012). No citizen left behind. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674065291
   Google Scholar
• Levy, B. L. M., Busey, C. L., Cuenca, A., Evans, R. W., Halvorsen, A.-L., Ho, L.-C., Kahne, J., Kissling, M. T., Lo, J. C., McAvoy, P., & McGrew, S. (2023). Social studies education research for sustainable democratic societies: Addressing persistent civic challenges. Theory & Research in Social Education, 51(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2158149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, J. C. (2017). Empowering young people through conflict and conciliation: Attending to the political and agonism in democratic education. Democracy & Education, 25(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, J. C. (Ed.). (2022). Making classroom discussions work: Methods for quality dialogue in the social studies. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lozano Parra, S., Wansink, B. G. J., Bakker, C., & van Liere, L. M. (2023). Teachers stepping up their game in the face of extreme statements: A qualitative analysis of educational friction when teaching sensitive topics. Theory & Research in Social Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2145923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacQueen, K. M., McLellan-Lemal, E., Bartholow, K., & Milstein, B. (2008). Team-based codebook development: Structure, process, and agreement. In G. Guest & K. M. MacQueen (Eds.), Handbook for team-based qualitative research (pp. 119–135). AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magill, K. R., & Salinas, C. (2019). The primacy of relation: Social studies teachers and the praxis of critical pedagogy. Theory & Research in Social Education, 47(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2018.1519476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiello, C., Oser, F., & Biedermann, H. (2003). Civic knowledge, civic skills and civic engagement. European Educational Research Journal, 2(3), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2003.2.3.5
   Google Scholar
• Maurissen, L., Claes, E., & Barber, C. (2018). Deliberation in citizenship education: How the school context contributes to the development of an open classroom climate. Social Psychology of Education, 21(4), 951–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9449-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, D. A. (2001). Student resistance: How the formal and informal organization of classrooms facilitate everyday forms of student defiance. The American Journal of Sociology, 107(3), 612–678. https://doi.org/10.1086/338779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mirra, N., Honoroff, B., Elgendy, S., & Pietrzak, G. (2016). Reading and writing with a public purpose: Fostering middle school students’ academic and critical community literacies through debate. Journal of Language & Literacy Education, 12(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion–our social skin. University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, W. C. (2010). Listening to strangers: Classroom discussion in democratic education. Teachers College Record, 112(11), 2815–2832. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011201104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, W. C., & Hess, D. (2001). Teaching with and for discussion. Teaching & Teacher Education, 17(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00057-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, K. A., & Journell, W. (2019). “We have those kinds of conversations here … ”: Addressing contentious politics with elementary students. Teaching & Teacher Education, 79, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029001004
   Google Scholar
• Quintelier, E., & Hooghe, M. (2013). The relationship between political participation intentions of adolescents and a participatory democratic climate at school in 35 countries. Oxford Review of Education, 39(5), 567–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.830097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichert, F., Chen, J., & Torney-Purta, J. (2018). Profiles of adolescents’ perceptions of democratic classroom climate and students’ influence: The effect of school and community contexts. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 47(6), 1279–1298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0831-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reidel, M., & Salinas, C. (2011). The role of emotion in democratic dialogue: A self study. Social Studies Research & Practice, 6(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-01-2011-B0001
   Google Scholar
• Ross, E. W. (2017). Rethinking social studies: Critical pedagogy in pursuit of dangerous citizenship. Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2009). Coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, K., Buck, P., & Niesz, T. (2000). Democratizing conversations: Racialized talk in a post-desegregated middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 33–65. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, W., & Sibberns, H. (Eds.). (2004). IEA civic education study technical report. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, M., Katz, D., & Grosland, T. (2015). Conceptualizing emotions in social studies education. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43(2), 147–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2015.1034391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel-Stechler, K. (2021). Teaching for citizenship: Instructional practices and open classroom climate. Theory & Research in Social Education, 49(4), 570–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2021.1966560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Fallmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H., & Schulz, W. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. http://works.bepress.com/wolfram_schulz/8
   Google Scholar
• van Kessel, C., den Heyer, K., & Schimel, J. (2020). Terror management theory and the educational situation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(3), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1659416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.; Revised ed.). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. A., & Sattes, B. D. (2015). Questioning for classroom discussion: Purposeful speaking, engaged listening, deep thinking. ACSD. https://adams.marmot.org/Record/.b4950860x
   Google Scholar
• Washington, E. Y., & Humphries, E. K. (2011). A social studies teacher’s sense making of controversial issues discussions of race in a predominantly white, rural high school classroom. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(1), 92–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2011.10473448
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Youniss, J., McLellan, J. A., & Yates, M. (1997). What we know about engendering civic identity. The American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 620–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764297040005008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2014). Theorizing “difficult knowledge” in the aftermath of the “affective turn”: Implications for curriculum and pedagogy in handling traumatic representations. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(3), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/curi.12051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2020). Hannah Arendt’s political thinking on emotions and education: Implications for democratic education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 41(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1508423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M. (2023). Democratic education in the post-democratic turn: Disenchantment with democracy and the pedagogical potential of ugly and negative feelings. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979211061806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., Torney-Purta, J., & Barber, C. (2012). Students’ conceptual knowledge and process skills in civic education: Identifying cognitive profiles and classroom correlates. Theory & Research in Social Education, 40(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2012.649467
   Google Scholar