Social workers’ assessment of a child’s need for services as ‘craftwork’ practice

References

• Aarnio, N., & Pösö, T. (2023). Palvelutarpeen arviointi lastensuojelun rajapinnoilla asiakasnäkökulmasta–nuorten ja vanhempien näkemyksiä. Janus, 31(3), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.30668/janus.122791
   Google Scholar
• Adler, K., Salanterä, S., & Zumstein-Shaha, M. (2019). Focus group interviews in child, youth, and parent research: An integrative literature review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919887274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. (2005). Making sense of focus groups. Medical Education, 39(7), 742–750. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02200.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, D., Dalgleish, L., Fluke, J., & Kern, H. (2011). The decision-making ecology. American Humane Association.
   Google Scholar
• Berrick, J., Dickens, J., Pösö, T., & Skivenes, M. (2016). Time, institutional support, and quality of decision making in child protection: A cross-country analysis. Human Service Organizations, Management, Leadership & Governance, 40(5), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2016.1159637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesel, K., & Cottier, M. (2020). Errors and mistakes in child protection: Understandings and responsibilities. In K. Biesel, J. Masson, N. L. Parton, & T. Pösö (Eds.), Errors and mistakes in child protection: International discourses, approaches and strategies (pp. 17–34). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biesel, K., Masson, J., Parton, N., & Pösö, T. (2020). Dealing with errors and mistakes in child protection: Similarities and differences among countries. In K. Biesel, J. Masson, N. Parton, & T. Pösö (Eds.), Errors and mistakes in child protection. International discourses, approaches and strategies (pp. 255–276). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blomberg, H., Kroll, C., & Meeuwisse, A. (2013). Nordic social workers’ assessment of child welfare problems and interventions: A common model in child welfare? European Journal of Social Work, 16(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.685700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
   Google Scholar
• Burns, K., & McCaughren, S. (2021). Adoption of children from state care in Ireland: In whose best interests? In T. Pösö, M. Skivenes, & J. Thoburn (Eds.), Adoption from care international perspectives on children’s rights, family preservation and state intervention (pp. 46–65). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duggleby, W. (2005). What about focus group interaction data? Qualitative Health Research, 15(6), 832–840. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304273916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enroos, R., & Pösö, T. (2021). Family relatedness: A challenge for making decisions in child welfare. Families, Relationships and Societies, 12(2), 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674321X16294377606424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falch-Eriksen, A., & Backe-Hansen, E. (Eds.). (2018). Human rights in child protection. Implications for professional practice and policy. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Fluke, J., López López, M., Benbenishty, R., Knorth, E., & Baumann, D. (2020). Decision-making and judgement in child welfare and protection: Theory, research, and practice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. (2012). Critical thinking in clinical practice: Improving the quality of judgments and decisions. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D., & Spratt, T. (2014). Child welfare as child protection then and now: What social workers did and continue to do. The British Journal of Social Work, 44(3), 615–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, D. (2011). Judgements or assumptions? The role of analysis in assessing children and young people`s needs. British Journal of Social Work, 41(5), 894–911. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, D. (2016). Sense-making in a social work office: An ethnographic study of safeguarding judgements. Child and Family Social Work, 21(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hietamäki, J. (2015). Lastensuojelun alkuarvioinnin vaikutukset vanhempien näkökulmasta. University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, S. (2004). Child and family assessment in social work practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Horwath, J. (2001). The child´s world: Assessing children in need. Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Horwath, J. (2007). The missing assessment domain: Personal, professional and organizational factors influencing professional judgements when identifying and referring child neglect. The British Journal of Social Work, 37(4), 1285–1303. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcl029
   Google Scholar
• Hultman, E., Forkby, T., & Höjer, S. (2018). Professionalised, hybrid, and layperson models in Nordic child protection: Actors in decision-making in out of home placements. Nordic Social Work Research, 10(3), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2018.1538897
   Google Scholar
• Jaakola, A.-M. (2020). Lapsen tilanteen arviointi lastensuojelun sosiaalityössä. Publications of the University of Eastern Finland dissertations in social sciences and business studies No 229. Itä-Suomen yliopisto.
   Google Scholar
• Juhila, K., Saario, S., Günther, K., & Raitakari, S. (2014). Reported client-practitioner conversations as assessment in mental health practitioners`talk. Text & Talk, 34(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2013-0038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Käsikirja, L. (2021). Handbook for child protection. https://thl.fi/julkaisut/kasikirjat/lastensuojelun-kasikirja
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. British Medical Journal, 311(7000), 299–302. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamponen, T. (2022). Kiireellisen sijoituksen päätöksenteko lastensuojelun sosiaalityöntekijän työnä [Decision-making of emergency placement as a social worker´s everyday task]. Tampereen yliopisto.
   Google Scholar
• Masson, J. (2010). Emergency protection: The impact of court control on safeguarding children. Family Law, 40, 1088–1093.
   Google Scholar
• Molander, A., Grimen, H., & Eriksen, E. O. (2012). Professional discretion and accountability in the welfare state. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 29(3), 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2012.00564.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2008). Effective child protection. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E. (2011). The Munro review of child protection: Final report: A child centered system. The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Östberg, F. (2014). Using ‘consensual ideology’: A way to sift reports in child welfare. British Journal of Social Work, 44(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pösö, T. (2010). Havaintoja suomalaisen lastensuojelun institutionaalisesta rajasta. Janus, 18(4), 324–336.
   Google Scholar
• Pösö, T. (2014). Translation as a knowledge transformation practice- The ambiguous case of presenting Finnish child welfare in English. European Journal of Social Work, 17(5), 616–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2014.930815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pösö, T., & Huhtanen, R. (2017). Removals of children in Finland. In K. Burns, T. Pösö, & M. Skivenes (Eds.), Child welfare removals by the state: A cross-country analysis of decision-making systems (pp.18–39). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saastamoinen, K. (2016). Lapsen suojelu viranomaisten ja muiden toimijoiden välisenä yhteistyönä. Edita.
   Google Scholar
• Samsonsen, V., & Willumsen, E. (2014). Assessment in child protection. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 9(1), 59–92. https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v9i1.110
   Google Scholar
• Shlonsky, A., & Benbenishty, R. (2014). From evidence to outcomes in child welfare: An international reader. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2018). The availability bias in social perception and interaction. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 190–200). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whittaker, A. (2018). How do child-protection practitioners make decisions in real-life situations? Lessons from the psychology of decision making. The British Journal of Social Work, 48(7), 1967–1984. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks, T. (2004). The use of vignettes in qualitative research into social work values. Qualitative Social Work, 3(1), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325004041133
   Google Scholar
• Witte, S., López López, M., & Baldwin, H. (2020). The voice of the child in child protection decision- making: A cross-country comparison of policy and practice in England, Germany and the Netherlands. In J. Fluke, M. López, R. Benbenishty, E. J. Knorth, & D. J. Baumann (Eds.), Decision-making and judgement in child welfare and protection: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 263–282). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar