25
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Contrasting the awareness and attitude of French university teachers towards open educational resources sharing across academic fields

Received 28 Jun 2023, Accepted 23 Jan 2024, Published online: 01 May 2024

References

  • Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Opening the curriculum: Open educational resources in U.S. higher education, 2014. Babson Survey Research Group. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED572730
  • Arendt, A. M., & Shelton, B. E. (2009). Incentives and disincentives for the use of OpenCourseWare. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i5.746
  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books.
  • Baas, M., Van der Rijst, R., Huizinga, T., Van den Berg, E., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Would you use them? A qualitative study on teachers’ assessments of open educational resources in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 54, 100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100857
  • Baltà-Salvador, R., Olmedo-Torre, N., Peña, M., & Renta-Davids, A. I. (2021). Academic and emotional effects of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic on engineering students. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7407–7434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10593-1
  • Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Open University Press.
  • Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331382007
  • Belikov, O., & Bodily, R. (2016). Incentives and barriers to OER adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions. Open Praxis, 8(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308
  • Bethlehem, J. (2010). Selection bias in web surveys. International Statistical Review, 78(2), 161–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00112.x
  • Biglan, A. (1973). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034699
  • Chow, C. W., Deng, F. J., & Ho, J. L. (2000). The openness of knowledge sharing within organizations: A comparative study of the United States and the people’s Republic of China. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 12(1), 65–95. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2000.12.1.65
  • Cisel, M. T. (2019). The structure of the MOOC ecosystem as revealed by course aggregators. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(3), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1610285
  • Cisel, M. T., & Pontalier, D. (2021). Knowledge marketplaces: An analysis of the influence of business models on instructors’ motivations and strategies. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 22(3), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i3.5459
  • Clements, K. I., & Pawlowski, J. M. (2012). User-oriented quality for OER: Understanding teachers’ views on re-use, quality, and trust. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00450.x
  • Coughlan, T., & Perryman, L. A. (2011). Something for everyone? The different approaches of academic disciplines to open educational resources and the effect on widening participation. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 15(2), 11–27. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1079986.pdf
  • Cox, G. (2013). Researching resistance to open education resource contribution: An activity theory approach. E-Learning & Digital Media, 10(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2013.10.2.148
  • Creaser, C., Fry, J., Greenwood, H., Oppenheim, C., Probets, S., Spezi, V., & White, S. (2010). Authors’ awareness and attitudes toward open access repositories. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(sup1), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2010.518851
  • Donaldson, M. L., & Firestone, W. (2021). Rethinking teacher evaluation using human, social, and material capital. Journal of Educational Change, 22(4), 501–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09405-z
  • Eger, T., Scheufen, M., & Meierrieks, D. (2015). The determinants of open access publishing: Survey evidence from Germany. European Journal of Law and Economics, 39(3), 475–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-015-9488-x
  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit.
  • Fadehan, O., & Okiki, O. (2023). Awareness, attitude and ethical concerns among faculty members in Nigerian universities on open educational resources (OERs). Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 38(4), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2023.2169122
  • Ferrin, D. L., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The use of rewards to increase and decrease trust: Mediating processes and differential effects. Organization Science, 14(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.18.12809
  • Goldstein, J. (2007). Easy to dance to: Solving the problems of teacher evaluation with peer assistance and review. American Journal of Education, 113(3), 479–508. https://doi.org/10.1086/512741
  • Haavind, S., & Sistek-Chandler, C. (2015). The emergent role of the MOOC instructor: A qualitative study of trends toward improving future practice. International Journal on E-Learning, 14(3), 331–350. http://www.learntechlib.org/p/150663/
  • Hilton, J., III, Bliss, T. J., Robinson, T. J., & Wiley, D. A. (2013). An OER COUP: College teacher and student perceptions of open educational resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-04
  • Hilton, J. L., III, Gaudet, D., Clark, P., Robinson, J., & Wiley, D. (2013). The adoption of open educational resources by one community college math department. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i4.1523
  • Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
  • Hylén, J. (2006). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. OECD’s Center for Educational Research and Innovation. http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/37351085.pdf
  • Impey, C., & Formanek, M. (2021). MOOCS and 100 days of COVID: Enrollment surges in massive open online astronomy classes during the coronavirus pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100177
  • Jacqmin, J. (2018). Why are some online courses more open than others? Social Science Research Network, 3289602. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3289602
  • Kalaycıoğlu, D. B., Toprak, A. Ö., Eyerci, C., Uğur, Z. B., Güç, A., Yıldız, S., Toprak, M., Demir, Z., Demir, Ö., Yildiz, Ö. F., & Çelikkaya, R. (2022). Academics’ perception and practices of online education during the covid-19 pandemic: The case of Turkey. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning (JETOL), 5(1), 32–46. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1330605.pdf
  • Kemp, B., & Jones, C. (2007). Academic use of digital resources: Disciplinary differences and the issue of progression revisited. Educational Technology & Society, 10(1), 52–60. http://oro.open.ac.uk/15356/
  • Kolowich, S. (2013). The professors who make the MOOCs. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 18, 1–12. https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-professors-behind-the-mooc-hype/
  • Kulik, J. A., & McKeachie, W. J. (1975, 7). 7: The evaluation of teachers in higher education. Review of Research in Education, 3(1), 210–240. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X003001210
  • Leval, P. N. (1990). Toward a fair use standard. Harvard Law Review, 103(5), 1105–1136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1341457
  • Liao, C., To, P. L., & Hsu, F. C. (2013). Exploring knowledge sharing in virtual communities. Online Information Review, 37(6), 891–909. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-11-2012-0196
  • Lin, Y. H., Ko, T. M., Chuang, T. R., & Lin, K. J. (2006). Open source licenses and the creative commons framework: License selection and comparison. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 22(1), 1–17.
  • Lockee, B. B. (2021). Online education in the post-COVID era. Nature Electronics, 4(1), 5–6. Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-00534-0
  • Look, H., & Pinter, F. (2010). Open access and humanities and social science monograph publishing. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16(sup1), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2010.512244
  • Marín, V. I., Zawacki-Richter, O., Aydin, C. H., Bedenlier, S., Bond, M., Bozkurt, A., Conrad, D., Jung, I., Kondakci, Y., Prinsloo, P., Roberts, J., Veletsianos, G., Xiao, J., & Zhang, J. (2022). Faculty perceptions, awareness and use of open educational resources for teaching and learning in higher education: A cross-comparative analysis. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00185-z
  • Miao, F., Mishra, S., Orr, D., & Janssen, B. (2019). Guidelines on the development of open educational resources policies. UNESCO Publishing. http://hdl.handle.net/11599/3455
  • Mullens, A. M., & Hoffman, B. (2023). The affordability solution: A systematic review of open educational resources. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), 72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09793-7
  • Papay, J. P., & Johnson, S. M. (2012). Is PAR a good investment? Understanding the costs and benefits of teacher peer assistance and review programs. Educational Policy, 26(5), 696–729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904811417584
  • Peimani, N., & Kamalipour, H. (2021). Online education in the post COVID-19 era: Students’ perception and learning experience. Education Sciences, 11(10), 633. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100633
  • Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2022). The landscape of MOOC platforms worldwide. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 23(3), 104–133. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i3.6294
  • Picard, E. (2012). Les enseignants-chercheurs : une évaluation centralisée (1873-1992). Du comité consultatif de l’enseignement supérieur (CNU) (1873–1992). Spirale Revue de recherches en éducation, 49(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.3406/spira.2012.1109
  • Reed, P. (2012). Awareness, attitudes and participation of teaching staff towards the open content movement in one university. Research in Learning Technology, 20. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.18520
  • Roach, M., & Sauermann, H. (2010). A taste for science? PhD scientists’ academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. Research Policy, 39(3), 422–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.004
  • Rolfe, V. (2012). Open educational resources: Staff attitudes and awareness. Research in Learning Technology, 20(8), 20. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.14395
  • Rosenberg, M. J., Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. (1969). The conditions and consequences of evaluation apprehension. Artifacts in Behavioral Research, 211–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195385540.003.0007
  • Shams, S., Haq, M. A. U., & Waqar, Y. (2020). Open educational resources (OER) usage trends among university students of Pakistan. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5637–5654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10195-3
  • Shigeta, K., Koizumi, M., Sakai, H., Tsuji, Y., Inaba, R., & Hiraoka, N. (2017). A survey of the awareness, offering, and adoption of OERs and MOOCs in Japan. Open Praxis, 9(2), 195. Art. 2. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.2.568
  • Siripipatthanakul, S., Kaewpuang, P., Sitthipon, T., & Sriboonruang, P. (2023). A review of educational adaptation during the COVID-19 pandemic via online learning. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 7, 1514–1530. https://doi.org/10.25147/ijcsr.2017.001.1.114
  • Tejedor, S., Cervi, L., Pérez-Escoda, A., Tusa, F., & Parola, A. (2021). Higher education response in the time of coronavirus: Perceptions of teachers and students, and open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010043
  • Usoro, A., Sharratt, M. W., Tsui, E., & Shekhar, S. (2007). Trust as an antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 5(3), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500143
  • Van Acker, F., Van Buuren, H., Kreijns, K., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Why teachers share educational resources: A social exchange perspective. In R. McGreal, W. Kinuta, & S. Marshall (Eds.), Open educational resources: Innovation, research and practice (pp. 177–191). Commonwealth of Learning and Athabasca University.
  • Van Acker, F., Vermeulen, M., Kreijns, K., Lutgerink, J., & van Buuren, H. (2014). The role of knowledge sharing self-efficacy in sharing open educational resources. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.006
  • Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001
  • Wang, J., Tigelaar, D. E. H., & Admiraal, W. (2021). Rural teachers’ sharing of digital educational resources: From motivation to behavior. Computers & Education, 161, 104055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104055
  • Weber, S. (2004). The success of open source. Harvard University Press.
  • Weller, M. (2013). The battle for open—a perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2013(3), 15. https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-15
  • Wiley, D. (2006). Open source, openness, and higher education. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(1). Retrieved 29 April 2024 https://www.learntechlib.org/p/104321/
  • Wiley, D., & Hilton, J. L., III. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601
  • Yilmaz, R. (2016). Knowledge sharing behaviors in e-learning community: Exploring the role of academic self-efficacy and sense of community. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.055
  • Zhang, L., Wang, G., Li, Y., Hao, Q., Chai, H., & Wu, J. (2021). The copyright risk of MOOC and the countermeasures of university libraries. International Journal of Library and Information Services (IJLIS), 10(2), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJLIS.20210701.oa3

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.