22
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The complex relationship between automation and work intensity: evidence from selected EU countries

ORCID Icon
Received 06 Feb 2024, Accepted 07 Apr 2024, Published online: 26 Apr 2024

References

  • Acemoglu, D. 1999. “Changes in Unemployment and Wage Inequality: An Alternative Theory and Some Evidence.” American Economic Review 89 (5): 1259–1278. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.5.1259.
  • Anton, J. I., E. Fernández- MacíMacíAs, and R. Winter-Ebmer. 2021. “Does Robotization Affect Job Quality? Evidence from European Regional Labour Markets.” Iza Dp, no. (13975). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3755392.
  • Arntz, M., T. Gregory, and U. Zierahn. 2016. “The Risk ofAutomation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis.” OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 189, Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Autor, D. H. 2015. “Why Are There Still so Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3): 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3.
  • Autor, D., and D. Dorn. 2013. “The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market.” American Economic Review 103 (5): 1553–1597. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.5.1553.
  • Awano, G., N. Bloom, T. Dolby, P. Mizen, R. Riley, T. Senga, J. Vyas, and P. Wales. 2018. Management Practices and Productivity in British Production and Services Industries – Initial Results from the Management and Expectations Survey: 2016. Newport, UK: Office for National Statistics.
  • Baiocco, S., E. Fernández- MacíMacíAs, U. Rani, and A. Pesole. 2022. “The Algorithmic Management of Work and Its Implications in Different Contexts.” No. 2022/02. JRC Working Papers Series on Labour, Education and Technology.
  • Bell, A., M. Fairbrother, and K. Jones. 2018. “Fixed and Random Effects Models: Making an Informed Choice.” Quality & Quantity 53 (2): 1051–1074. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0802-x.
  • Boiral, O., M. C. Brotherton, L. Rivaud, and L. Guillaumie. 2021. “Organizations’ Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review of Business Articles.” Sustainability 13 (7): 3993. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073993.
  • Carter, B., A. Danford, D. Howcroft, H. Richardson, A. Smith, and P. Taylor. 2013. “Taxing Times: Lean Working and the Creation of (In)efficiencies in HM Revenue and Customs.” Public Administration 91 (1): 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02073.x.
  • Eurofound. 2020. Working Conditions: Employee Monitoring and Surveillance: The Challenges of Digitalisation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • European Parliament, E. 2024. “Artificial Intelligence Act: MEPs Adopt Landmark Law [Press Release].” Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20240308IPR19015/artificial-intelligence-act-meps-adopt-landmark-law.
  • Frey, C. B., and M. A. Osborne. 2017. “The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation?” Technological Forecasting 114:254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019.
  • Frey, C., and M. Osborne. 2013. “The Future of Employment. How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerization?” Working Paper, Oxford: Oxford Martin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019.
  • Goos, M., A. Manning, and A. Salomons. 2014. “Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring.” American Economic Review 104 (8): 2509–2526. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.8.2509.
  • Green, F., A. Felstead, D. Gallie, and G. Henseke. 2021. “Working Still Harder.” ILR Review 75 (2): 458–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793920977850.
  • Ibrahim, J. G. 1990. “Incomplete data in generalized linear models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 765–769. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290013.
  • Ivanov, S., M. Kuyumdzhiev, and C. Webster. 2020. “Automation Fears: Drivers and Solutions.” Technology in Society 63:101431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101431.
  • Kellogg, K. C., M. A. Valentine, and A. Christin. 2020. “Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control.” Academy of Management Annals 14 (1): 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174.
  • Kelly, E. L., and P. Moen. 2020. Overload: How Good Jobs Went Bad and What We Can Do About It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Kim, T. W., and K. Werbach. 2016. “More Than Just a Game: Ethical Issues in Gamification.” Ethics and Information Technology 18 (2): 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9401-5.
  • Moore, P. V. 2019. “OSH and the Future of Work: Benefits and Risks of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Workplaces.” In Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management. Human Body and Motion. HCII 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by V. Duffy, 11581. Cham: Springer.
  • Oliveira, R. C. 2021. “GAMIFICATION AND UBERIZED WORK IN APPLICATION COMPANIES.” RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas (Journal of Business Management) 61 (4): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020210407x.
  • Sampson, S. E. 2021. “A Strategic Framework for Task Automation in Professional Services.” Journal of Service Research 24 (1): 122–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520940407.
  • Unruh, C. F., C. Haid, F. Johannes, and T. Büthe. 2022. “Human Autonomy in Algorithmic Management”. Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514094.3534168.
  • Youssef, M. A., E. M. Youssef, and J. G. Motwani. 2015. “A Structural Equation Model for Measuring the JIT Intensity and Its Impact on Manufacturing Flexibility.” International Journal of Business Excellence 8 (3): 324. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2015.069148.
  • Zel, S., and E. Kongar. 2020. “Transforming Digital Employee Experience with Artificial Intelligence.” In 2020 IEEE/ITU International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Good (AI4G), 21-25 September 2020. Geneva, Switzerland, 176–179.
  • Zilian, L. S., S. S. Zilian, and G. Jäger. 2021. “Labour Market Polarisation Revisited: Evidence from Austrian Vacancy Data.” Journal for Labour Market Research 55 (7). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-021-00290-4.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.