299
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Māṇḍavlī: negotiating with digital governance in Mumbai

ORCID Icon
Pages 460-483 | Received 04 Sep 2020, Accepted 29 Mar 2023, Published online: 19 Apr 2023

References

  • Aina, Yusuf A. (2017). Achieving smart sustainable cities with GeoICT support: The Saudi evolving smart cities. Cities, 71(July), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.07.007
  • Alvarez Leon, Luis F., & Rosen, Jovanna. (2020). Technology as ideology in urban governance. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110(2), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1660139
  • Anand, N. (2017). Hydraulic city: Water and the infrastructures of citizenship in Mumbai. Duke University Press.
  • Angelidou, Margarita. (2015). Smart cities: A conjuncture of four forces. Cities, 47, 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.004
  • Appadurai, A. (2001). Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environment and Urbanization, 13(2), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780101300203
  • Bailey, F. G. (1957). Caste and the economic frontier: A village in Highland Orissa. Manchester University Press.
  • Baliga, Linah. (2018). Civic officers’ bid to shame four Vile Parle activists backfires; red-faced BMC calls it an error. Mumbai Mirror. September 25 (pp. 1–2).
  • Benjamin, Solomon. (2008). Occupancy urbanism: Radicalizing politics and economy beyond policy and programs. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(3), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00809.x
  • Benjamin, Solomon, & Raman, Bhuvaneswari. (2001). Democracy, inclusive governance and poverty in Bangalore. University of Birmingham - Urban Governance, Partnerships and Poverty Research (Vol. 26).
  • Benjamin, Solomon, & Raman, Bhuvaneswari. (2011). Illegible claims, legal titles, and the worlding of Bangalore. Revue Tiers Monde, 206(2), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.3917/rtm.206.0037
  • Bhan, Gautam. (2019). Notes on a Southern urban practice. Environment and Urbanization, 31(2), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818815792
  • Bhide, Amita, & Solanki, Durgesh. (2016). Transforming the Slum through creation of Property Market : A Case Study of M-ward in Mumbai. Mumbai.
  • Björkman, Lisa. (2014). “You can’t buy a vote”: Meanings of money in a Mumbai election. American Ethnologist, 41(4), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12101
  • Bjorkman, Lisa. (2015). Pipe politics, contested waters: Embedded infrastructures of Millennial Mumbai. Duke University Press.
  • BMC. (2018). Municipal corporation of greater Mumbai enquiry committee report on fire incident at Kamala Mills Ltd. Author.
  • Carswell, Grace, & De Eneve, Geert. (2020). Paperwork, patronage, andcitizenship: The materiality ofeveryday interactions withbureaucracy in Tamil Nadu, India. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 26(3), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.13311
  • Chakrabarti, Pronita, & Shukla, Shikha. (2008). Performance Improvement Planning: Implementing Robust Consumer Voice Mechanisms. Water and Sanitation Mission: Field Note. New Delhi.
  • Chambers, Thomas. (2020). ‘Lean on me’’: Sifarish, mediation & the digitisation of state bureaucracies in India’. Ethnography. OnlineFirst. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138120940755.
  • Chatterjee, Partha. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. Contemporary political theory (Vol. 7). Columbia University Press.
  • Chaudhuri, Bidisha. (2019). Paradoxes of intermediation in aadhaar: Human making of a digital infrastructure. South Asia: Journal of South Asia Studies, 42(3), 572–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2019.1598671
  • Coelho, Karen, Kamath, Lalitha, & Vijaybaskar, M. (2011). Infrastructures of Consent : Interrogating Citizen Participation Mandates in Indian Urban Governance. IDS WORKING PAPER Volume 2011 Number 362, 2011(362).
  • Cook, Ian M. (2015). Link work: Land and housing brokers in Mangaluru, India. Journal of South Asian Development, 10(3), 292–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973174115602169
  • Cowan, Thomas. (2021). Uncertain grounds: Cartographic negotiation and digitized property on the urban frontier. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 45(3), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.13016
  • Das, Veena. (2007). Life and words: Violence and the descent into the ordinary. University of California Press.
  • Datta, Ayona. (2015). New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‘Entrepreneurial urbanization’ in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820614565748
  • Datta, Ayona. (2019). Postcolonial urban futures: Imagining and governing India’s smart urban age. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 37(3), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775818800721
  • Datta, Ayona. (2022). The digitalising state: Governing digitalisation-as-urbanisation in the global south. Progress in Human Geography, 47(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221141798
  • Doshi, Sapana, & Ranganathan, Malini. (2016). Contesting the Unethical City : Land dispossession and corruption narratives in urban India. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 4452(October), 183–199. http://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1226124
  • Elwood, Sarah. (2021). Digital geographies, feminist relationality, Black and queer code studies: Thriving otherwise. Progress in Human Geography, 45(2), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519899733
  • Express News Service. (2018). Civic in Mumbai body took action in only 6 percent of total complaints against illegal constructions : RTI. The Indian Express. December 13.
  • Geertz, Clifford. (1974). From the native’s point of view”: On the nature of anthropological understanding. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 28(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/3822971
  • Ghertner, D. Asher. (2011). Gentrifying the state, gentrifying participation: Elite governance programs in Delhi. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(3), 504–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01043.x
  • Ghertner, D Asher. (2017). When Is the state? Topology, temporality, and the navigation of everyday state space in Delhi. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107(3), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1261680
  • Gidwani, Vinay, & Upadhya, Carol. (2022). Articulation work: Value chains of land assembly and real estate development on a peri-urban frontier. Environment and Planning A, 55(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221107016
  • Gil-Garcia, J. Ramon, Pardo, Theresa A., & de Tuya, Manuel. (2019). Information sharing as a dimension of smartness: Understanding benefits and challenges in Two megacities. Urban Affairs Review, 57(1), 8–34.
  • Graham, Stephen. (1998). The end of geography or the explosion of place? Conceptualizing space, place and information technology. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913298671334137
  • Guma, Prince K. (2019). Smart urbanism? ICTs for water and electricity supply in Nairobi. Urban Studies, 56(11), 2333–2352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018813041
  • Harvey, David. (2001). Globalization and the “spatial Fix”. Geographische Revue: Zeitschrift für Literatur und Diskussion, 3(2), 23–30.
  • Hollands, Robert G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial? City, 12(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126
  • Hollands, Robert G. (2012). Beyond the corporate smart city? Glimpses of other possibilities of smartness. In Simon Marvin, Andrés Luque-Ayala, & Colin McFarlane (Eds.), SMART URBANISM utopian vision or false Dawn? (Vol. 53) (pp. 1689–1699). Routledge.
  • Hull, Matthew S. (2013). Government of paper: Materiality of bureaucracy in urban Pakistan. University of California Press.
  • Jarzabkowski, Paula, Bednarek, Rebecca, & Lê, Jane K. (2014). Producing persuasive findings: Demystifying ethnographic textwork in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 12(4), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014554575
  • Jazeel, Tariq. (2015). Utopian urbanism and representational city-ness: On the Dholera before Dholera smart city. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820614565866
  • Kaviraj, Sudipta. (2010). The trajectories of the Indian state. Permanent Black.
  • Khera, Reetika. (2017). Impact of Aadhaar on welfare programmes. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(50), 61–70.
  • Kong, Lily, & Woods, Orlando. (2018). The ideological alignment of smart urbanism in Singapore: Critical reflections on a political paradox. Urban Studies, 55(4), 679–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017746528
  • Levien, M. (2018). Dispossession without development: Land grabs in neoliberal India. Oxford University Press.
  • Luque-Ayala, A., & Marvin, S. (2015). Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism? Urban Studies, 52(12), 2105–2116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015577319
  • Martin, Chris J., Evans, James, & Karvonen, Andrew. (2018). Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 133(February), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.005
  • Mattern, S. (2021). A city is not a computer: Other urban intelligences. Princeton University Press.
  • McFarlane, Colin, & Söderström, Ola. (2017). On alternative smart cities: From a technology-intensive to a knowledge-intensive smart urbanism. City, 21(3–4), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1327166
  • Molesworth, J. T. (1857). A dictionary, Marathi and English (2d ed., re). Printed for government at the Bombay Education Society’s press.
  • Mouton, Morgan. (2020). Worlding infrastructure in the global south: Philippine experiments and the art of being ‘smart’. Urban Studies, 58(3), 621–638.
  • Nijman, J. (2000). Mumbai’s real estate market in 1990s: De-regulation, global money and casino capitalism. Economic And Political Weekly, 35(7), 575–582.
  • Odendaal, Nancy. (2015). Getting smart about smart cities in Cape Town: Beyond the rhetoric. In Simon Marvin, Andrés Luque-Ayala, & Colin McFarlane (Eds.), Smart urbanism: Utopian vision or false Dawn? (pp. 1–196). Routledge.
  • Praja. (2012). Mumbai Municipal Councillors Handbook 2012 Vol 2. Mumbai.
  • Praja. (2013). Mumbai Municipal Commissioners Handbook 2013 Vol 3. Mumbai.
  • Ralph, L. (2014). Renegade dreams: Living through injury in Gangland Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
  • Reddy, G. Ram, & Haragopal, G. (1985). The Pyraveekar: “The fixer” in Rural India. Asian Survey, 25(11), 1148–1162. https://doi.org/10.2307/2644252
  • Richter, Christine. (2011). In-Tensions to infrastructure: Developing digital property databases in Urban Karnataka, India. Environment and Urbanization Asia, 2(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/097542531100200205
  • R. M. Savant, J. (2012). Writ petition No.2905 OF 2012. High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction.
  • Roy, Ananya. (2003). City requiem, Calcutta: Gender and the politics of poverty. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Sharma, Aradhana. (2013). State transparency after the neoliberal turn: The politics, limits, and paradoxes of India’s right to information law. Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 36(2), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12031
  • Sheth, Urvashi, & Marpakwar, Chaitanya. (2014). New citizen-unfriendly BMC complaint forms ask for impossible details. The Mumbai Mirror. January 11 (pp. 7–8).
  • Simone, Abdoumaliq, & Pieterse, Edgar. (2017). New urban worlds: Inhabiting dissonant times. Polity Press.
  • Singh, Dipti. (2018). Kamala Mills fire : BMC chief orders crackdown on ‘ nexus ‘ between complainants and officials. The Indian Express.
  • Srivastava, Sanjay. (2012). Duplicity, intimacy, community: An ethnography of ID cards, permits and other fake documents in Delhi. Thesis Eleven, 113(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513612456686
  • Suryawanshi, Sudhir. (2010). 2 months before his suicide, BMC man had signed a tragic plea. The Mumbai Mirror. April 1 (pp. 7–9).
  • Willis, Rebecca. (2019). The use of composite narratives to present interview findings. Qualitative Research, 19(4), 471–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118787711

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.