Urban policy mobilities in Urban Geography: in retrospect and in prospect

References

• Baker, T., & McCann, E. (2020). Beyond failure: The generative effects of unsuccessful proposals for Supervised Drug Consumption Sites (SCS) in Melbourne, Australia. Urban Geography, 41(9), 1179–1197. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2018.1500254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, T., & Temenos, C. (2015). Urban policy mobilities research: Introduction to a debate. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 824–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2011). What have we learnt from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited. Political Studies Review, 9(3), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00240.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bok, R. (2020). The relational co-production of “success” and “failure,” or the politics of anxiety of exporting urban “models” elsewhere. Urban Geography, 41(9), 1218–1239. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1802932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borén, T., & Young, C. (2021). Policy mobilities as informal processes: Evidence from “creative city” policy-making in Gdańsk and Stockholm. Urban Geography, 42(4), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1735197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunnell, T., & Das, D. (2010). Urban pulse – A geography of serial seduction: Urban policy transfer from Kuala Lumpur to Hyderabad. Urban Geography, 31(3), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.31.3.277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, I.-C. (2017). Failure matters: Reassembling eco-urbanism in a globalizing China. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(8), 1719–1742. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16685092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleave, E., Arku, G., Sadler, R., & Gilliland, J. (2017). Is it sound policy or fast policy? Practitioners’ perspectives on the role of place branding in local economic development. Urban Geography, 38(8), 1133–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1191793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, I., & Ward, K. (2012). Relational comparisons: The assembling of Cleveland’s waterfront plan. Urban Geography, 33(6), 774–795. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.33.6.774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2010). Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1068/d11407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2011). Mobilities I: Catching up. Progress in Human Geography, 35(4), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510383348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crivello, S. (2015). Urban policy mobilities: The case of Turin as a smart city. European Planning Studies, 23(5), 909–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.891568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, W., & Hanson, S. (2005). Getting globalized: Urban policy and industrial displacement in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. Urban Geography, 26(6), 461–482. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.26.6.461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, M. (2020). Going bust two ways? Epistemic communities and the study of urban policy failure. Urban Geography, 41(9), 1119–1138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1621122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(3), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2012). The future of policy transfer research. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00274.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorling, D., & Shaw, M. (2002). Geographies of the agenda: Public policy, the discipline and its (re)‘turns’. Progress in Human Geography, 26(5), 629–641. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132502ph390oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, S. (2011). Bilbao and Barcelona “in motion”. How urban regeneration “models” travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism. Urban Studies, 48(7), 1397–1418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010374510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, K. F. (2014). Mechanisms of mutation: Policy mobilities and the Gulf Opportunity (GO) Zone. Urban Geography, 35(8), 1171–1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2014.960166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guironnet, A. (2019). Cities on the global real estate marketplace: Urban development policy and the circulation of financial standards in two French localities. Urban Geography, 40(10), 1527–1547. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1627807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A., & Moore, S. (2013). Planning histories and practices of circulating urban knowledge. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1499–1509. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. (1974). What kind of geography for what kind of public policy? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 63, 18–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P., & Upton, R. (Eds.). (2010). Crossing borders: International exchange and planning practices. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, J-y., & Hsu, Y-h. (2013). State transformation, policy learning, and exclusive displacement in the process of urban redevelopment in Taiwan. Urban Geography, 34(5), 677–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.778581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. M. (2012). Urban geographies I: Still thinking cities relationally. Progress in Human Geography, 36(3), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511421715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S. (2016). Urban policy mobilities, argumentation and the case of the model city. Urban Geography, 37(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1055932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X. (2017). “Contested policy mobility”: The creative transformation and temporary use of brownfields in Redtory, Guangzhou. Urban Geography, 38(6), 884–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1178882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E. (2008). Expertise, truth, and urban policy mobilities: Global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada’s “four pillar” drug strategy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40(4), 885–904. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E. (2013). Policy boosterism, policy mobilities, and the extrospective city. Urban Geography, 34(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.778627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012). Policy assemblages, mobilities and mutations: Toward a multidisciplinary conversation. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00276.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2013). A multi-disciplinary approach to policy transfer research: Geographies, assemblages, mobilities and mutations. Policy Studies, 34(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2012.748563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2015). Thinking through dualisms in urban policy mobilities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 828–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, M. (2017). Affect theory and policy mobility: Challenges and possibilities for critical policy research. Critical Studies in Education, 58(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1308875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, B. (2013). A global solution to local urban crises? Comparing discourses on business improvement districts in Cape Town and Hamburg. Urban Geography, 34(7), 1011–1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.799337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, S., Raco, M., & Clifford, B. (2018). The 2012 Olympic Learning Legacy Agenda – The intentionalities of mobility for a new London model. Urban Geography, 39(2), 214–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1300754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore-Cherry, N., & Bonnin, C. (2020). Playing with time in Moore Street, Dublin: Urban redevelopment, temporal politics and the governance of space-time. Urban Geography, 41(9), 1198–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2018.1429767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, S., Côté-Roy, L., & Issahaku Korah, P. (2022). The uncharted foreign actors, investments, and urban models in African new city building. Urban Geography, 43(8), 1252–1259. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2021.1916698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nciri, A., & Levenda, A. (2020). Urban policy (im)mobilities and refractory policy lessons: Experimenting with the sustainability fix. Urban Geography, 41(9), 1158–1178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1575154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2001). Workfare states. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. (2011). Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 35(6), 773–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510394010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigler, T. (2013). Relational cities: Doha, Panama City, and Dubai as 21st century entrepôts. Urban Geography, 34(5), 612–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.778572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (1999). Learning lessons and transferring policy across time, space and disciplines. Politics, 19(2), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00086
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, K. (2013). Zero tolerance in Latin America: Punitive paradox in urban policy mobilities. Urban Geography, 34(7), 972–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.799369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temenos, C., & Lauermann, J. (2020). The urban politics of policy failure. Urban Geography, 41(9), 1109–1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1827194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temenos, C., & McCann, E. (2013). Geographies of policy mobilities. Geography Compass, 7(5), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12063
   Google Scholar
• Theodore, N., & Peck, J. (1999). Welfare-to-work: National problems, local solutions? Critical Social Policy, 19(4), 485–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/026101839901900404
   Google Scholar
• Tulumello, S., & Iapaolo, F. (2022). Policing the future, disrupting urban policy today. Predictive policing, smart city, and urban policy in Memphis (TN). Urban Geography, 43(3), 448–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2021.1887634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, K. (2006). “Policies in motion”, urban management and state restructuring: The trans-local expansion of Business Improvement Districts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00643.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedel, J. R., Shore, C., Feldman, G., & Lathrop, S. (2005). Toward an anthropology of public policy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 600(1), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205276734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, K. (2020). Policy-failing: A repealed right to shelter. Urban Geography, 41(9), 1139–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1598733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, A. (2014). Moving policy: Global and local characters circulating bus rapid transit through South African cities. Urban Geography, 35(8), 1238–1254. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2014.954459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar